logo
Jeffrey Epstein survivor says it's time for the truth to finally be told

Jeffrey Epstein survivor says it's time for the truth to finally be told

Danielle Bensky was waiting for the bathroom at a New York nightclub when a woman asked if she'd be interested in massaging her client — a wealthy financier named Jeffrey Epstein.
The then 17-year-old was an aspiring ballerina working odd jobs to get herself through ballet school and hoping to earn some extra cash.
"He's lovely, he has a big mansion, he's very wealthy," Ms Bensky recalled being told.
With the impression there was nothing untoward about the opportunity, the teenager and a friend headed to Epstein's Upper East Side mansion.
What began as a "casual meeting" within a couple months spiralled into Ms Bensky being sexually abused multiple times a week for more than a year by the notorious paedophile.
Now 38, Ms Bensky, one of hundreds of women to have suffered abuse by the convicted sex offender, is speaking out as the Epstein scandal dogs the White House and grips the nation.
At the time of the abuse in 2004, Ms Bensky's mother had been diagnosed with a brain tumour and "the survival rate was not great", Ms Bensky said.
Under the impression that Epstein had an understanding of neuroscience, she showed him her mother's brain scans, hoping he could help.
Instead, he gave her an ultimatum.
"He sat me down and said, 'OK, so what will you do for this?' And my heart sank and I asked him what he meant.
"He's like, 'You have two choices, basically you can recruit and bring me more girls or … you're going to have to do something for this,' and that's when the sexual abuse started."
Ms Bensky says Epstein used her mother's diagnosis as leverage to repeatedly sexually abuse her and threatened to withhold treatment if she told anyone.
She said he also pressured her to recruit other girls for him, something she said she refused to do.
"He had made a comment about, 'Well I know all the top surgeons, I know the anaesthesiologists, I know all these people and I can do something wonderful, and I can make sure she gets the best care, or I can make sure that that doesn't happen for her and I can actually take the care away.'"
Epstein never followed through with helping her mum receive treatment.
In 2005, her mother had a 19-hour brain operation. Once she was recovering at home, Ms Bensky stopped going to Epstein's New York mansion.
The disgraced financier died in a prison cell in 2019 while awaiting trial charged with sex trafficking minors.
His death has been the subject of myriad conspiracy theories and has caused a furore among many of Donald Trump's most loyal supporters, who have long demanded answers surrounding Epstein's death and criminal operation.
Mr Trump, who committed to releasing the Epstein files during his presidential campaign, has lashed out at some of his supporters, accusing them of falling for the "Epstein hoax".
Survivors like Ms Bensky find those comments, and the ensuing politicisation of the case, offensive.
"It's a circus, it's become this show on the world stage."
Ms Bensky wants to see more information made public.
"The files are a representation of the trial … and we didn't get that. But we do have the files," she said.
"So that feels like the piece of closure that we're lacking right now.
"He had a full staff, and you just knew that there were people watching you at all times.
"I'd love to know what this whole structure was, and how he got away with it for so long."
For years, supporters and allies of the president have amplified scepticism and claims of a government cover-up to protect those associated with Epstein.
Factions of the president's MAGA base, as well as some of his Republican colleagues, have maintained calls for classified documents and a rumoured "client list" to be released to the public.
US Attorney-General Pam Bondi invited a group of conservative influencers to the White House in February where they were handed binders labelled "The Epstein Files Phase I".
But much of what was inside the binders was already on the public record.
One of those influencers who visited Washington DC was conservative podcaster Liz Wheeler.
"I was one of the 'new media' figures … who have been put through the ringer for Attorney-General Pam Bondi's gross incompetence and her severe lack of judgement in the way that she rolled that out," Ms Wheeler said.
The Department of Justice and FBI later released a memo that said their investigation had concluded there was "no incriminating "client list" and that "further disclosure would not be appropriate or warranted".
Now Ms Wheeler wants to see the president sack the attorney-general for her "botched rollout" of the Epstein files.
"It's time to rectify this issue, which is why I said [the president] should not tolerate Pam Bondi's behaviour anymore," she said.
"The base feels stung because we have not been told the truth and we associate the Epstein files now with the question of, are we going to get the justice we voted for?
"The American people feel that this is injustice. They feel that they are being played. They feel there is dishonesty afoot. And of course that triggers us because we have been harmed by politicians doing this before.
"What we do as President Trump's base is, a true friend tells you the truth, even when that truth is uncomfortable, even when that truth might have consequences."
Author and Washington Post reporter Sarah Ellison described the current Epstein controversy as "an own goal by the Trump administration".
"To say there's nothing to see here and you're not going to see anything else … That created an absolute sense of betrayal and that people had been lied to," Ms Ellison said.
The president has faced growing political backlash with mounting calls for greater transparency coming from some Republican colleagues, and his own daughter-in-law, Lara Trump.
With Democrats animated on the issue, the president reversed course — directing Ms Bondi to seek the release of grand jury testimony stemming from the prosecution of Epstein.
But the move was blocked by a federal judge in Florida, citing legal guidelines governing grand jury secrecy.
The Justice Department is continuing a push for grand jury transcripts to be released in the state of New York.
Officials have also reached out to the lawyers for Epstein's co-conspirator and enabler Ghislaine Maxwell to see if she would speak with prosecutors.
In a move that has split Republicans and outraged Democrats, the Republican leadership also moved to close Congress early to prevent a vote on releasing more files relating to Epstein.
Ms Wheeler said only "radical transparency" will satisfy the president's base.
"They owe it to the American people to give us every bit of Epstein file information that they have, period," she said.
"There should not be any more gatekeeping on this.
"I don't care about the political implications of anything else in those files, release them all."
Mr Trump has escalated his legal attacks on the news media and recently settled lawsuits with CBS and America's ABC for tens-of-millions of dollars.
The president also turned on Rupert Murdoch, suing the media mogul and his newspaper The Wall Street Journal for $US10 billion ($15 billion) after it published a story scrutinising his years-long friendship with Epstein.
The Wall Street Journal reported Maxwell had collated a series of letters for Epstein's 50th birthday in 2003 which included one bearing Mr Trump's name.
The article also stated the letter included a lewd drawing of a naked woman which was signed "may every day be a wonderful secret".
Mr Trump, who only in February called Mr Murdoch a "legend", denies ever writing the letter and claims it is a fake.
Ms Ellison, who previously worked as a reporter for the Wall Street Journal before publishing a book that detailed the inside politics at the Murdoch-owned paper, said the legal action sends a message.
"It's the most significant media lawsuit that he brought because Rupert Murdoch is the most significant media mogul in this era," she said.
"This is a sometimes ally, this is someone who has essentially, from a media perspective, delivered Donald Trump to us, and now for this to be the person and the institution that Trump is suing, it means that no-one's really safe."
Despite being hit with a multi-million-dollar lawsuit, Ms Ellison said the paper was showing no signs of backing away from its coverage of Mr Trump and Epstein.
"I think Rupert is one of these people who loves nothing more than talking about the news with his editors … but I don't think that he dictates the coverage to them at the Journal."
The WSJ has since published another exclusive story reporting that Ms Bondi and her deputy, Todd Blanche, told the president his name was among many mentioned in files about Epstein.
The White House has labelled it another fake news story.
Away from the dizzying pace of news developments surrounding the case, survivors at the centre of it, like Ms Bensky, persist.
She returned to dancing as a choreographer after taking a hiatus to cope with the trauma of her abuse.
"It was really a struggle for me to come back to the leotard for a while," she said.
"This is a human story. It's not about politics, it's not divisive, it's just to be seen and heard and finding accountability."
Watch 7.30, Mondays to Thursdays 7:30pm on ABC iview and ABC TV
Do you know more about this story? Get in touch with 7.30 here.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Strange bedfellows
Strange bedfellows

ABC News

time7 hours ago

  • ABC News

Strange bedfellows

MYLEE HOGAN: Today the president filing a libel lawsuit against Rupert Murdoch, his company News Corp and the reporters behind this article that claims Trump sent Epstein a 'bawdy' 50th birthday letter in 2003 … - Seven News 6pm (Sydney), 19 July 2025 Hello, welcome to Media Watch, I'm Linton Besser. And first tonight, the vortex of intrigues and deceptions now threatening to engulf the White House as Donald Trump tries and fails to douse the flames of the Jeffrey Epstein conspiracy theory he helped to set alight. And not for the first time, marshalling a brigade of lawyers to his cause. MYLEE HOGAN: Seeking $15 billion in damages, the president called it a 'FAKE NEWS 'article' … - Seven News 6pm (Sydney), 19 July 2025 Ten days ago the US president filed a lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal, a Rupert Murdoch-controlled newspaper, after its team reported evidence of just how pally Donald Trump was with the financier and convicted sex trafficker—a letter to Epstein bearing Trump's name in a 2003 album of warm felicitations: It contains several lines of typewritten text framed by the outline of a naked woman, which appears to be hand-drawn with a heavy marker. A pair of small arcs denotes the woman's breasts, and the future president's signature is a squiggly 'Donald' below her waist, mimicking pubic hair. - The Wall Street Journal, 18 July 2025 And what did those typewritten words say? Donald: We have certain things in common, Jeffrey. Jeffrey: Yes, we do, come to think of it… Donald: A pal is a wonderful thing. Happy Birthday — and may every day be another wonderful secret. - The Wall Street Journal, 18 July 2025 Cue apoplexy from Camp Trump with his usual purple denials, before pulling the trigger on a lawsuit that very same day and yanking the newspaper's White House access to his trip to Scotland. Murdoch's Journal was undeterred however, and soon after took another swing at the President. Donald Trump rode to power on the back of a MAGA obsession with deep-state secrecy, whose flames he's happily fanned: DONALD TRUMP: … her friend, or boyfriend … JONATHAN SWAN: Epstein. DONALD TRUMP: … was either killed or committed suicide in jail … DONALD TRUMP: … he died in jail. Was he killed? Was it suicide? - AXIOS on HBO, Youtube, 4 August 2020 Now the crows have come home to roost, because, despite the efforts of his administration, and some right-wing media, to distance Trump from Epstein it's obvious to everyone with half a brain that Donald Trump was indeed an Epstein familiar, with The New York Times also reporting the album story late last week. Trump is now seeking 15 billion dollars in damages from the Murdoch empire, marking a new twist in the on-and-off-again affair between the two men. After years of boosting by Murdoch's Fox News, in February the 'Dirty Digger' was invited to play a bit part during yet another piece of Oval Office theatre: DONALD TRUMP: … Rupert is in a class by himself, he's an amazing guy … - C-SPAN, 4 February 2025 But along the way Murdoch's occasional distaste for Trump has surfaced in his other outlets: TRUMPTY DUMPTY - The New York Post, 10 November 2022 Trump Is the Republican Party's Biggest Loser - The Wall Street Journal, The Editorial Board, 9 November 2022 Donald Trump's litigation against The Wall Street Journal is far from his first foray against the press. Trump has become accustomed to handing out libel lawsuits like confetti. The writs have returned meanwhile, a handsome $100 million windfall in settlements paid by media companies cowed perhaps by the prospect of presidential retaliation including ABC America, social media giant Meta, and most infamous of all, CBS owner Paramount which settled a Trump complaint over a 60 Minutes interview with Kamala Harris as CBS talk show star Stephen Colbert explained earlier this month: STEPHEN COLBERT: This settlement is for a nuisance lawsuit Trump filed claiming that 60 Minutes deceptively edited their interview with then candidate Kamala Harris last fall. Paramount knows they could have easily fought it because in their own words 'the lawsuit was completely without merit'. - The Late Show with Stephen Colbert, CBS/YouTube, 15 July 2025 Three days later Colbert was opening his show like this: STEPHEN COLBERT: I want to let you know something that I found out just last night. Next year will be our last season. The network will be ending The Late Show in May. And… AUDIENCE: Boo! Nooo! - The Late Show with Stephen Colbert, CBS/YouTube, 18 July 2025 Speculation ran rife this was yet another capitulation, with Paramount doing anything in its power to grease the way for a multibillion-dollar merger needing US Government approval. Paramount claimed its decision to axe the show was 'purely financial', which means of course whatever warmth the decision brought to the breast of the president was but mere serendipity. Then last week, lo and behold, it emerged that Paramount's betrayal of its 60 Minutes team, its pay-off to Trump and its cancellation of America's number one late night show franchise had done little harm to its interests, the mega-merger getting the rubber-stamp. So, does the latest Wall Street Journal investigation mean Rupert Murdoch is making a stand for America's free press? Not everyone is convinced: If Rupert Murdoch becomes a white knight standing up to a rampantly bullying US president, the world has moved into the upside-down. - The Conversation, 22 July 2025 Which could mean Americans have to look elsewhere for a white knight: DONALD TRUMP: Why is my dick so small? ARTIST: But that's the size it is in the photo. DONALD TRUMP: Get that guy outta here. I'm gonna sue you. I'm gonna sue both of you. Hahahah. - South Park, Network Ten, 24 July 2024 The creators of comedy cult-hit South Park launching a scathing take-down of both Donald Trump and Paramount's 60 Minutes settlement less than 24 hours after signing a multi-billion dollar deal with, yes, Paramount which bothered Donald Trump not one little bit. South Park and Rupert Murdoch linking arms in defiance of an increasingly authoritarian White House, what a bizarre footnote in the unravelling of the great American experiment.

Closing arguments heard in Janelle Fletcher child abuse trial
Closing arguments heard in Janelle Fletcher child abuse trial

The Australian

time9 hours ago

  • The Australian

Closing arguments heard in Janelle Fletcher child abuse trial

The final arguments in the trial of a music teacher accused of sexually abusing a teen girl have circled around a movie night kiss captured in a photo booth and a series of emotionally charged emails. Janelle Colville Fletcher, 40, is contesting allegations that she groomed and sexually abused the underage girl some years ago and appeared again on Monday at the South Australian District Court before Judge Joanne Fuller. The prosecution, led by Chris Allen, allege Ms Fletcher abused the girl in various locations and also that she communicated with her and another teenage girl to make them amenable to sexual activity. Some of the alleged offending happened when the two girls and Ms Fletcher were alone together in a room, the prosecution said, with the teacher allegedly performing a lap dance on a chair. She then allegedly 'dared' the two girls to kiss each other and asked if they would 'date' each other. That same night, Mr Allen said, Ms Fletcher then spent time alone with one of the girls and touched her genital area. The alleged grooming and abuse of the girl then went on for months at various locations, the prosecution said, including the home of Ms Fletcher and in Ms Fletcher's car. Janelle Fletcher is contesting the allegation that she sexually abused a teen girl. Picture: NewsWire Alongside oral evidence from the alleged victims, the prosecution presented a series of texts, emails and photographs to support its case, including a photo of Ms Fletcher and the girl kissing at a cinema photo booth. In his closing address, Mr Allen said the 'objective evidence' of the photo booth kiss showed an 'unlawful sexual act'. He argued further that the 'sheer volume' of photos of Ms Fletcher and the girl together suggested a sexual relationship. 'They look like girlfriends (in the photographs) … in a relationship between girlfriends,' Mr Allen said. In her testimony from last week, Ms Fletcher said the photo booth kiss was a 'pretend kiss' she did not want or mean to happen. 'It was meant to be a pretend kiss like we had done previously where our lips don't actually touch, and in that particular photo we got close and she did sort of pull me in and the photo went off, yeah,' Ms Fletcher said. There is dispute between the defence and prosecution about the correct sequence order of photos from the booth. The prosecution says the correct sequence runs from top to bottom in the order of one, two, three and then four. In 'photo 4', Ms Fletcher appears happy and the prosecution argues this shows she was happy to kiss the girl and not shocked or upset by it. Ms Fletcher and her defence team, led by Andrew Culshaw, claim that photo was taken before the kiss and should not be seen as approval of the act, with the correct sequence of photos running one, two, four and then three. Mr Culshaw also argued the photo did not show child sexual abuse because the girl had turned 17 at the time of the photo, and so she was therefore not a child when the kiss happened. Further, Ms Fletcher was also no longer in a position of authority at the time of the kiss, the defence said. 'What Your Honour has, in my submission, is evidence of a kiss at a time when it was legal,' Mr Culshaw said. The prosecution argued that a series of emotionally expressive emails from Ms Fletcher to the girl revealed the 'true nature' of the relationship between them. In one email, Ms Fletcher told the girl 'I want something serious not something short term'. In others, she said 'my feelings for you are not lust but love' and 'right now, we can't be open. Right now we will have to continue as we are in secret …' Ms Fletcher holds a PhD in music education. Picture: NewsWire Ms Fletcher had earlier argued the emails showed non-sexual 'love' for the girl, but Mr Allen dismissed that argument on Monday as 'absurd'. 'This is not 'I love you' in some sort of Catholic way,' Mr Allen said. Mr Culshaw, in his closing address, acknowledged under questioning from Judge Fuller that the emails appeared 'terrible' on a first or literal reading in that they seemed to suggest the pair had been in a sexual relationship. But he argued a deeper reading of the emails fit with Ms Fletcher's testimony. She claimed last week that they were written to keep the girl happy and guide her away to a more age-appropriate relationship. 'These emails are consistent with a relatively young teacher, in her early 30s, who had got herself in too deep … and so was trying to deal with the situation and extricate herself from it,' Mr Culshaw said. Mr Culshaw said the only part of the emails that might be read as 'overtly' sexual was the line on 'lust', but he argued her denial of lust reaffirmed her evidence. 'Denial can't be then tortured into an admission,' he said. Further, he stressed Ms Fletcher was not being 'charged' with the content of the emails. In his afternoon address, Mr Culshaw invited Judge Fuller to look with scepticism on the credibility of the oral evidence presented at trial, drilling into what he called 'catastrophic inconsistencies' in the claims against Ms Fletcher. In one instance, he cast doubt on witness testimony to the 'truth or dare' game. The two girls spoke together about the alleged event after it had happened, he claimed, and there was a risk their evidence had been 'contaminated'. 'There is a risk here that these two witnesses have contaminated one another ... and the recollection, to the extent that it was consistent between the two of them, there is a risk that what Your Honour is getting is a single collective version of history rather than two separate and independent versions of history. 'They have both given evidence that there was a game of truth or dare, but neither of them could really say what the truths were, what the dares were, beyond the big headline matters.' Ms Fletcher holds a PhD in music education. She told the court that she was heterosexual and believed in the Catholic faith. She was still legally married to a man, though the pair had separated, she told the court. Judge Fuller will deliver her verdict on August 20. Duncan Evans Reporter Duncan Evans is a reporter for News Corp's NewsWire service, based in Adelaide. Before NewsWire, he worked as a resources and politics reporter for The Daily Mercury in Mackay, Queensland and as a reporter at CQ Today, an independent newspaper based in Rockhampton. He was raised in Emerald and Brisbane and studied English Literature and American Studies at the University of Sydney. He began his career in journalism working for the Jakarta Post in Indonesia for over two years as an editor, translator and writer. He is fluent in Indonesian. @Duncanevans01 Duncan Evans

Defence and prosecution deliver closing arguments in Janelle Fletcher child sexual abuse trial
Defence and prosecution deliver closing arguments in Janelle Fletcher child sexual abuse trial

News.com.au

time12 hours ago

  • News.com.au

Defence and prosecution deliver closing arguments in Janelle Fletcher child sexual abuse trial

The final arguments in the trial of a music teacher accused of sexually abusing a teen girl have circled around a movie night kiss captured in a photo booth and a series of emotionally charged emails. Janelle Colville Fletcher, 40, is contesting allegations that she groomed and sexually abused the underage girl some years ago and appeared again on Monday at the South Australian District Court before Judge Joanne Fuller. The prosecution, led by Chris Allen, allege Ms Fletcher abused the girl in various locations and also that she communicated with her and another teenage girl to make them amenable to sexual activity. Some of the alleged offending happened when the two girls and Ms Fletcher were alone together in a room, the prosecution said, with the teacher allegedly performing a lap dance on a chair. She then allegedly 'dared' the two girls to kiss each other and asked if they would 'date' each other. That same night, Mr Allen said, Ms Fletcher then spent time alone with one of the girls and touched her genital area. The alleged grooming and abuse of the girl then went on for months at various locations, the prosecution said, including the home of Ms Fletcher and in Ms Fletcher's car. Alongside oral evidence from the alleged victims, the prosecution presented a series of texts, emails and photographs to support its case, including a photo of Ms Fletcher and the girl kissing at a cinema photo booth. In his closing address, Mr Allen said the 'objective evidence' of the photo booth kiss showed an 'unlawful sexual act'. He argued further that the 'sheer volume' of photos of Ms Fletcher and the girl together suggested a sexual relationship. 'They look like girlfriends (in the photographs) … in a relationship between girlfriends,' Mr Allen said. In her testimony from last week, Ms Fletcher said the photo booth kiss was a 'pretend kiss' she did not want or mean to happen. 'It was meant to be a pretend kiss like we had done previously where our lips don't actually touch, and in that particular photo we got close and she did sort of pull me in and the photo went off, yeah,' Ms Fletcher said. There is dispute between the defence and prosecution about the correct sequence order of photos from the booth. The prosecution says the correct sequence runs from top to bottom in the order of one, two, three and then four. In 'photo 4', Ms Fletcher appears happy and the prosecution argues this shows she was happy to kiss the girl and not shocked or upset by it. Ms Fletcher and her defence team, led by Andrew Culshaw, claim that photo was taken before the kiss and should not be seen as approval of the act, with the correct sequence of photos running one, two, four and then three. Mr Culshaw also argued the photo did not show child sexual abuse because the girl had turned 17 at the time of the photo, and so she was therefore not a child when the kiss happened. The defence argued Ms Fletcher was also no longer in a position of authority at the time. 'What Your Honour has, in my submission, is evidence of a kiss at a time when it was legal,' Mr Culshaw said. The prosecution also argued that a series of emotionally expressive emails from Ms Fletcher to the girl revealed the 'true nature' of the relationship between them. In one email, Ms Fletcher told the girl 'I want something serious not something short term'. In others, she said 'my feelings for you are not lust but love' and 'right now, we can't be open. Right now we will have to continue as we are in secret …' Ms Fletcher had earlier argued the emails showed non-sexual 'love' for the girl, but Mr Allen dismissed that argument on Monday as 'absurd'. 'This is not 'I love you' in some sort of Catholic way,' Mr Allen said. Mr Culshaw, in his closing address, acknowledged under questioning from Judge Fuller that the emails appeared 'terrible' on a first or literal reading in that they seemed to suggest the pair had been in a sexual relationship. But he argued a deeper reading of the emails fit with Ms Fletcher's testimony. She claimed last week that they were written to keep the girl happy and guide her away to a more age-appropriate relationship. 'These emails are consistent with a relatively young teacher, in her early 30s, who had got herself in too deep … and so was trying to deal with the situation and extricate herself from it,' Mr Culshaw said. Ms Fletcher holds a PhD in music education. She told the court that she was heterosexual and believed in the Catholic faith. She was still legally married to a man, though the pair had separated, she told the court. The judge-alone trial continues.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store