Brazil's former President Bolsonaro ordered to wear an electronic ankle monitor, prohibited from leaving the house
Brazil's former President Jair Bolsonaro has been ordered to wear an ankle monitor, authorities said on Friday, in a move he described as "a supreme humiliation." The development came as federal police conducted searches at his home and his party's headquarters in Brasília, in compliance with a Supreme Court order.
The order prohibits Bolsonaro from leaving the house at night, communicate with foreign ambassadors and diplomats or approach embassies. The former president is also barred from using social media or contacting other individuals under investigation by the Supreme Court, including his son, Eduardo Bolsonaro, a Brazilian lawmaker who currently lives in the United States and is known for his close ties to U.S. President Donald Trump.
Bolsonaro is currently on trial at the Supreme Court accused of leading an alleged attempt to stage a coup to overturn the 2022 election in which he was defeated by left-wing president Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva.'It is a supreme humiliation,' Bolsonaro told journalists in Brasilia after putting on the ankle monitoring. 'I never thought about leaving Brazil, I never thought about going to an embassy, but the precautionary measures are because of that.'On Thursday, Trump wrote to Bolsonaro describing his ally's treatment by the Brazilian legal system as terrible and unjust. 'This trial should end immediately!,' the U.S. President said, adding that he 'strongly voiced' his disapproval through his tariff policy.
On Friday, the U.S. State Department announced visa restrictions on Brazilian judicial officials.'President Trump made clear that his administration will hold accountable foreign nationals who are responsible for censorship of protected expression in the United States,' Secretary of State Marco Rubio said in a statement. "Brazilian Supreme Federal Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes's political witch hunt against Jair Bolsonaro created a persecution and censorship complex so sweeping that it not only violates basic rights of Brazilians, but also extends beyond Brazil's shores to target Americans.'I have therefore ordered visa revocations for Moraes and his allies on the court, as well as their immediate family members effective immediately,' Rubio said.The Supreme Court's restrictions on Bolsonaro are part of a second investigation against Eduardo for allegedly working with U.S. authorities to impose sanctions against Brazilian officials.Moraes, who is also the rapporteur of the case, said that the former president and his son's recent actions were 'blatant confessions of criminal conduct,' such as coercion during legal proceedings, obstruction of investigations and attacks on national sovereignty.'Alexandre de Moraes doubled down,' Eduardo said on X, mentioning the order to the Supreme Court justice ahead of the criminal cases against his father. His elder brother, Sen. Flávio Bolsonaro, said on X: 'Prohibiting a father from speaking to his own son is the greatest symbol of the hatred that has consumed Alexandre de Moraes.'Live aerial footage from local broadcasters showed federal police vehicles outside Bolsonaro's residence in Brasília.Congressman Sóstenes Cavalcante, the leader of Bolsonaro's party in the lower house, told The Associated Press that officers also searched Bolsonaro's office at the party's headquarters. He described the operation as 'another chapter in the persecution of conservatives and right-wing figures' in Brazil.A lawyer for Bolsonaro did not immediately respond to a request for comment.On Tuesday, Brazil's Prosecutor-General Paulo Gonet said in a report to the Supreme Court that the 'evidence is clear: the defendant acted systematically, throughout his mandate and after his defeat at the polls, to incite insurrection and the destabilization of the democratic rule of law.'Bolsonaro has described the trial on X as a 'witch hunt,' echoing a term used by Trump when he came to his South American ally's defense last week.Last week, Trump imposed a 50% import tax on Brazil, directly tying the tariffs to Bolsonaro's trial. The U.S. president has hosted the former Brazilian president at his Mar-a-Lago resort when both were in power in 2020. Trump compared the Brazilian's situation to his own. On Tuesday, speaking to reporters at the White House, Trump repeated the claim that the trial is a 'witch hunt.'A source at Brazil's Supreme Court said some justices have already made it clear among themselves that U.S. tariffs will have no effect on Bolsonaro's trial, which is expected to resume between August and September. The staffer spoke under condition of anonymity as they were not authorized to discuss the matter publicly.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
26 minutes ago
- India Today
Justice Rajesh Bindal flags use of AI search models, leading to 'fake judgements'
"In India and in the USA, the use of AI search models by young lawyers has led to 'fake judgments,' being placed before courts," said Justice Rajesh Bindal on at an event organised by the All India Senior Lawyers Association, Justice Rajesh Bindal, a sitting Judge of the Supreme Court (SC) of India, said that Senior lawyers have a "responsibility to mentor" young young lawyers against over reliance on technology, Justice Bindal gave examples of incorrect information being cited by AI (Artificial Intelligence) search models. "Sometimes lawyers search on AI using one or two keywords and they cite judgments... it may be incorrect, it may have been the minority they don't know have been instances of the AI created it's own fake judgments and opinions which get presented before Court," said Justice Bindal."This is the danger mark of AI that it generates fake judgments and information. Senior lawyers need to groom the Young Bar about these dangers," said the SC judge."It was said we judges do a lot of work, but the core behind it is the research done by the young lawyers and the arguments made by the Senior counsels," said Bindal was speaking at the felicitation ceremony organised by the All India Senior Advocates Association for the four new Judges elevated to the Supreme Court in the last month- Justice Joymalya Bagchi, Justice Nilay V Anjaria, Justice Vijay Boshnoi and Justice Atul S Chandurkar. Justices Bindal and PB Varale were the "senior" members of the Bench attending the Advocate and MP P Wilson, Senior Advocate Adish Aggarwala and Senior advocate Pitambari Acharya shared the dais with the at the event, Senior Advocate and Parliamentarian P Wilson told the gathering that he had introduced a Private Members Bill to increase the retirement age of Judges before the Parliament.- EndsTune InMust Watch
The Hindu
26 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Colombian former President found guilty of witness tampering
A Colombian court on Monday (July 28, 2025) found Alvaro Uribe guilty of witness tampering, making him the South American country's first former President to be convicted of a crime. The 73-year-old, who was President from 2002 to 2010, was found guilty of trying to persuade witnesses to lie for him in a separate investigation. He risks 12 years in prison in the highly politicized case, but the sentence has not yet been pronounced. Uribe was also the first Colombian ex-president to go on trial. As the judge started reading out her verdict, Uribe — who attended the trial virtually — sat shaking his head. The matter dates to 2012, when Uribe accused leftist senator Ivan Cepeda before the Supreme Court of hatching a plot to falsely link him to right-wing paramilitary groups involved in Colombia's long-standing armed conflict. The court decided against prosecuting Cepeda and turned its sights on the senator's claims against Uribe instead. Paramilitary groups emerged in the 1980s in Colombia to fight Marxist guerrillas that had taken up arms against the state two decades earlier with the stated goal of combating poverty and political marginalization, especially in rural areas. A plethora of armed groups that emerged in the standoff adopted cocaine as their main source of income -- the genesis of a deadly rivalry for resources and trafficking routes that continues to this day. Uribe was a politician on the right of the political spectrum. He led a relentless military campaign against drug cartels and the FARC guerrilla army that signed a peace deal with his successor Juan Manuel Santos in 2016, much to Uribe's chagrin. After Cepeda accused him of ties with paramilitary groups responsible for human rights violations, Uribe is alleged to have contacted jailed ex-fighters to lie for him. He claimed he only wanted to convince them to tell the truth. Popular politician Uribe remains popular in Colombia for his anti-FARC campaigns, and a prominent voice on the right. Recent polls revealed him to be the South American country's most trusted politician. In 2019, thousands protested in Bogota and Medellin when he was indicted in the case. The investigation against Uribe began in 2018 and has had numerous twists and turns, with several attorneys-general seeking to close the case. It gained new impetus under Attorney General Luz Camargo, picked by current leftist President Gustavo Petro -- himself a former guerrilla and a political arch-foe of Uribe. More than 90 witnesses testified in the trial, which opened in May 2024. Prosecutors produced evidence during the trial of least one paramilitary ex-fighter who said he was contacted by Uribe to change his story. 'Vengeance' The former President is also under investigation in other matters. He has testified before prosecutors in a preliminary probe into a 1997 paramilitary massacre of subsistence farmers when he was governor of the western Antioquia department. A complaint has also been filed against him in Argentina, where universal jurisdiction allows for the prosecution of crimes committed anywhere in the world. That complaint stems from Uribe's alleged involvement in the more than 6,000 executions and forced disappearances of civilians by the military when he was President. Uribe insists his trial is a product of "political vengeance." On Sunday, he gave an hourlong speech in his native Medellin in which he criticized the administration of Petro, who in 2022 became Colombia's first leftist President. "We need an enormous victory in the coming year," Uribe said, in reference to presidential elections set for 2026.
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Kerala opposes presidential reference on Governors' assent deadlines
The Kerala Government has opposed the Presidential reference filed before the Supreme Court regarding deadlines for Governors in granting assent to state its application submitted to the Court, the state contended that the reference is 'not maintainable' and suffers from 'serious legal lacunae.'Kerala argued that 11 out of the 14 questions raised in the reference have already been addressed by the Supreme Court in its judgment in the Tamil Nadu Government vs Governor case. Since the Union Government has not filed any review or curative petition against that verdict, Kerala maintained that the Centre has effectively accepted the Stating that the judgment has neither been assailed nor set aside in any validly constituted proceeding, Kerala submitted that it has attained finality and is binding under Article 141 of the Constitution. Therefore, it cannot be challenged indirectly through the current state alleged that the Union Government is using the reference as a device to reopen and contest settled constitutional issues, without disclosing that the apex court has already ruled on Article 144, Kerala asserted that the President and the Council of Ministers are constitutionally bound to act in aid of the Supreme Court, not seek to overturn its judgments by indirect also objected to the claim made in the reference that Article 200 does not prescribe a timeline for Governors to act on bills. The state said the Supreme Court has already interpreted the provision clearly, and the reference attempts to mislead the Court into reconsidering its settled suppression of judicial precedent, misinterpretation of constitutional provisions, and lack of transparency in the reference, Kerala urged the Court to return the reference unanswered.'This Court cannot sit in appeal over its own judgments—nor can that power be vested in it by the President under Article 143,' the state further contended that if the foundation of the reference is flawed and the majority of questions aim to overturn existing judgments, the presence of two or three additional questions does not obligate the Court to address any of them.- EndsMust Watch
