logo
Moment migrant 'taxi boat' stops to collect crowd of waist-deep UK-bound asylum seekers off Calais - with French cops watching on and banned from intervening

Moment migrant 'taxi boat' stops to collect crowd of waist-deep UK-bound asylum seekers off Calais - with French cops watching on and banned from intervening

Daily Mail​18-06-2025
This is the moment dry-footed French police officers declined to intervene as UK-bound migrants boarded 'taxi boats' off the coast of Calais.
Footage shows dozens of migrants waiting waist-deep in the sea for the smuggling gangs who are tasked with ferrying them across the Channel.
But in an unexpected twist, members of the Gendarme are seen helplessly standing on the sand as they watch asylum seekers board the small boats bound for England in a calm and orderly fashion.
French authorities say they have been working tirelessly to halt a surge of asylum seekers from reaching Britain on small boats, but as the video shows, cops are finding it harder to intercept migrants.
This is because people smugglers have been upgrading their tactics to throw-off police.
Instead of inflating their boats on beaches which are closely patrolled by cops, smuggling gangs are now launching their vessels from hidden locations along the coast.
They then sail close to the shore, where they pick up migrants, as if they were a taxi service.
The new tactic means migrants, who now wait in the sea and several metres from the shore, are harder to reach by the Gendarme.
This is because rules for police forces suggest that it is too risky for them to try to reach boats once they are already in the water, the BBC reports.
The only instance in which authorities can intervene inside the water is if they are trying to rescue someone from drowning.
Speaking to BBC, Colonel Olivier Alary said: 'The police will be able to do more… if the rules governing our actions at sea are changed'.
His remarks come after the French government declared intention to revise those rules in the coming weeks in order to give the police more leeway.
French authorities are reportedly set to introduce a new maritime doctrine from the beginning of next month which would allow police to intercept dinghies up to 300 metres from the shore.
It comes after extraordinary scenes on Tuesday showed dozens of French police and coastguards looking on as men and women crammed onto an overloaded boat off Gravelines beach, near Calais.
More than 50 police tried to stop as many as 200 migrants reaching the sea - and with the aid of teargas grenades stopped more than half.
But those who dodged police simply waited for the so called 'taxi boat' to ferry them across the Channel while police remained under strict rules to not apprehend anyone in the sea.
Rules for police forces suggest that it is too risky for them to try to reach boats once they are already in the water
French authorities are reportedly set to introduce a new maritime doctrine from the beginning of next month
More than 900 migrants crossed the Channel in small boats on Friday, new government figures have shown.
The Home Office said 919 people made the perilous journey in 14 boats, which pushed the total of arrivals for the year to just over 16,000.
This shows a 42 per cent increase year-on-year and is up 79 per cent from the same date in 2023.
But Friday's total number of migrant crossings was not the highest daily number so far this year. On May 31, 1,195 people arrived into Britain via the Channel in small boats.
Last year, almost 37,000 people left the northern French coastline and arrived in the UK.
Keir Starmer this week was ridiculed for boasting that Britain is leading the world in tackling illegal migration, despite record numbers continuing to cross the Channel this month.
The Prime Minister highlighted UK plans to slap travel bans and asset freezes on people-smuggling kingpins in talks with fellow world leaders at the G7 summit in Canada.
He held one-on-one talks with his Italian counterpart Giorgia Meloni and Downing Street said afterwards that he 'raised the UK's world-leading work on people-smuggling sanctions'.
Meanwhile, a Downing Street spokesman said Keir Starmer and Emmanuel Macron agreed during a meeting at the G7 in Canada that the Channel situation was 'deteriorating'.
The pair both believe that 'migration should be a key focus' and they should 'continue to work closely with other partners to find innovative ways to drive forward progress', according to a No10 readout.
This week, however, there was little sign of any deterrent in action as gangs who organise the crossings continued to outwit French police.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

DAN HODGES: This is why I think Farage and Rayner are right - Britain is now a nation on the brink
DAN HODGES: This is why I think Farage and Rayner are right - Britain is now a nation on the brink

Daily Mail​

time28 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

DAN HODGES: This is why I think Farage and Rayner are right - Britain is now a nation on the brink

Becky lives about ten minutes from The Bell Hotel in Epping. She used to pass by it when she went for a stroll with her daughter on nearby Bell Common. But that stopped when the asylum seekers arrived. 'I drive her past here now,' she tells me. 'It doesn't feel safe.' It's why she's joined the small group of protesters standing by steel railings, and surrounded by a polite, but large, group of police officers.

We need substance, not gestures in pursuit of the two-state solution
We need substance, not gestures in pursuit of the two-state solution

Telegraph

timean hour ago

  • Telegraph

We need substance, not gestures in pursuit of the two-state solution

The suffering we are witnessing in the Gaza Strip demands a response. All parties must do what they can to ensure every civilian has safe access to adequate food and medicine, along with the immediate return of the remaining hostages. This moment of crisis requires practical solutions, not gesture politics. The push for the unilateral declaration of a Palestinian state by some politicians in this country, and by President Macron of France, cannot improve the situation. The UK Jewish community and its major communal organisations have long supported a two-state solution, leading to a secure Israel alongside a viable Palestinian state. But recognising Palestine now will not help achieve that goal. Hamas, having started this war with the brutal terrorism of October 7, are desperate for a propaganda victory to justify the immense suffering they have created. They will claim recognition of Palestine as a vindication of their murderous rampages and hostage-taking. Further, unilateral recognition cannot substitute for the difficult negotiations and concessions needed to realise an enduring peace. Palestinian leaders have been offered two-state proposals in 1947, 2000, 2008, 2014 and 2020, rejecting them each time. This intransigence, and the incitement and corruption of the Palestinian Authority, must be abandoned. Israelis cannot be expected to sacrifice their security for a Palestinian state which could be the base for another October 7. After decades of statements and declarations, it should be clear to all parties that declaring something does not make it the case. Any Palestinian state will need to be created to thrive in reality, not only in the minds of policy-makers. As UK ministers have rightly argued, recognition should be used when it can contribute materially to the endgame of a diplomatic process. In our meetings with the Israeli government, and partners across the Jewish Diaspora, we have been clear that the need for consensual diplomacy, rather than unilateralism, also applies to Israel. The alarming rhetoric of some within the Israeli government, extremist settler violence in the West Bank, and the lack of a clear vision to end the conflict, has left many of Israel's friends unsure of how a sustainable 'day after' can be achieved. In this complex and challenging moment, steps to advance a two-state solution should still be focussed on substance, not gestures. The immediate priority must be to ensure a massive expansion of aid to Gaza, the return of hostages and a lasting ceasefire. This aid must be delivered, whether by the GHF or other humanitarian agencies, in a way which ensures that the beleaguered population receives it but does not allow Hamas to continue to weaponise the aid to fund this war. Beyond this immediate crisis, the ongoing need for peace building has never been more important. This includes both international diplomacy, such as the expansion of the Abraham Accords through normalisation with Saudi Arabia, and bottom-up initiatives both in the Middle East and at home. We need to export peace, not import this conflict. We have told the UK Government that we stand ready to engage with them, the British Muslim community, Israelis, Palestinians, and other key actors, in support of a comprehensive plan that will make a Palestinian state beside a secure Israel a reality. After the horrors of the last 21 months, lasting peace and security for Israelis, Palestinians and the wider Middle East must now be our urgent mission.

The Macrons v Candace Owens: lawsuit marks new phase in battle against conspiracy theories
The Macrons v Candace Owens: lawsuit marks new phase in battle against conspiracy theories

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

The Macrons v Candace Owens: lawsuit marks new phase in battle against conspiracy theories

When the French president, Emmanuel Macron, and his wife, Brigitte, took the rare step this week of filing a US defamation lawsuit against the rightwing podcaster Candace Owens, it marked a new phase in a legal battle on both sides of the Atlantic against the false claim that Brigitte Macron is a man named Jean-Michel Trogneux. The Macrons' US lawsuit attacked what it called the 'verifiably false and devastating lies' being repeated online by Owens that Brigitte Macron, 72, was born a man. The lawsuit said evidence clearly disproved this 'grotesque narrative', which had become 'a campaign of global humiliation' and 'relentless bullying on a worldwide scale'. The case prompted broader questions this week about how conspiracy theories spread worldwide, whether they can be stopped in the courts and what this false narrative, which began in France after the Covid pandemic, says about French society's distrust in politicians. 'This is now one of the biggest fake news stories worldwide in terms of popularity – a billion people have seen it,' said Emmanuelle Anizon, a senior journalist for the French weekly Nouvel Obs, who last year published a book, L'Affaire Madame, investigating the origins of the rumour in France. 'What's new is that for the first time, Emmanuel Macron has joined his wife in taking legal action.' The Macrons' US lawsuit states the accusation that Brigitte Macron was born a man named Jean-Michel Trogneux is completely false and Trogneux is in fact is her older brother. Trogneux, 80, lives in the northern French town of Amiens, where he grew up with Brigitte and four other siblings in a family famous for its local chocolate business. He was present in public alongside his Brigitte at Emmanuel Macron's two presidential inaugurations in 2017 and 2022. Owens, whose podcast and social media channels have an audience of millions, said this week she stood by her narrative. The false claim that Brigitte was a man first went viral in France in 2021, at a moment when distrust of politicians in was at a high, after the gilets jaunes (yellow vests) anti-government protest movement and the Covid pandemic that killed more than 130,000 people in France. In December 2021, a woman who used the name Amandine Roy and called herself a 'spiritual medium', broadcast a four-hour YouTube interview with Natacha Rey, 51, who had worked previously for a small essential oils business and described herself as 'an independent investigative journalist, self-taught, and not from the inner circle of mainstream media'. Rey said she had spent three years investigating Brigitte Macron, after questioning the first lady's body-shape in photos. Rey said she believed Brigitte Macron was actually a man called Jean-Michel Trogneux. Within hours, the interview had 500,000 views and the hashtag #Jean-MichelTrogneux was trending on social media in France, promoted by, among others, some far-right and anti-vaccine accounts. A small far-right newsletter had already published Rey's theories but it was the video interview that sent the claim viral. 'There was a deeper societal problem at that time in France: the mistrust of political, media and economic institutions,' Anizon said. 'There had been years of political health scandals worldwide and in France – from a contaminated blood scandal to the Mediator weight-loss drug. Many people had gradually reached a point of distrust, switching off traditional mainstream media and turning instead to online accounts – Covid and vaccine mistrust increased that.' The rumour spread in part because the Macrons' relationship had long been a topic of comment online. Brigitte Macron, who is 24 years older, first met Emmanuel Macron when she was a French teacher at his Jesuit secondary school in Amiens, directing him in a school play. The Macrons' US lawsuit this week stated: 'Through the school's theatre programme, president Macron and Mrs Macron formed a deeper intellectual connection.' It added: 'At all times the teacher-student relationship between Mrs Macron and President Macron remained within the bounds of the law.' Brigitte Macron, who has three children from her first marriage, divorced in 2006 and she and Emmanuel Macron married the following year when he was 30. In early 2022, after the first viral video allegations, Brigitte Macron and her brother, Jean-Michel Trogneux, filed a defamation case in France against Roy and Rey, who both denied wrongdoing. In September 2024, a Paris court found the two women guilty and ordered them to pay €8,000 in damages to Brigitte Macron and €5,000 in damages to Jean-Michel Trogneux. The women appealed against the verdict and, this month, they were acquitted by a Paris appeals court. The appeal court verdict did not imply that the claims that Brigitte Macron was a man were true, but instead judges ruled that the case against the women did not fit the definition of defamation. Brigitte Macron and Jean-Michel Trogneux have taken the case to France's highest appeals court, the cour de cassation. Brigitte Macron has filed a separate case for online harassment and 10 people will go on trial in Paris in October. Each time the Macrons' relationship is in the spotlight, the false allegations about gender spread again online. This was the case in May, when video images appeared to show Brigitte pushing her husband away with both hands on his face before they disembarked from a plane on a tour of Southeast Asia. Macron dismissed the incident as play-fighting, telling reporters that 'we are squabbling and, rather, joking with my wife', and that it had been overblown into 'a sort of geo-planetary catastrophe'. Brigitte Macron has not spoken publicly on the false gender claims since 2022 when she told French radio, RTL, that allegations that 'I am my brother' were an 'impossible' attack on her parents' family tree. She told TF1 TV at the time she wanted to set an example so other people would not suffer in the same way. She said fighting online bullying 'is my battle'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store