Hezbollah rejects US push for disarmament in Lebanon-Israel ceasefire framework
In a televised speech aired by Hezbollah's Al-Manar channel during a ceremony honoring slain commander Ali Karaki, Qassem warned that disarmament would amount to facilitating Israeli expansion.
'We fully implemented the ceasefire agreement in southern Lebanon, south of the Litani River,' he said. 'Now the U.S. wants a new deal starting with disarming us for a partial withdrawal by Israel.'
Qassem reiterated Hezbollah's refusal to respond to any calls to hand over its weapons unless Israeli aggression on Lebanon stops.
The remarks come ahead of a scheduled visit by U.S. Special Envoy Tom Barrack to Beirut next week.
Lebanese Prime Minister Nawaf Salam confirmed the visit Friday, saying that the Lebanese government had reviewed and commented on a U.S. proposal Barrack submitted via President Joseph Aoun.
According to Salam, the American paper proposes a phased process tied to key elements: a complete Israeli withdrawal from occupied Lebanese territory, extension of Lebanese state authority across the entire country, and exclusive control of weapons by the state.
'The proposal includes ideas related to arrangements for the cessation of hostilities, and we have conveyed our observations,' Salam said in comments reported by the National News Agency.
He emphasized transparency, stating, 'We do not work in black rooms,' without disclosing the full content of Lebanon's feedback.
A Lebanese official earlier told Anadolu Agency that Barrack's proposal, submitted June 19, links Hezbollah's disarmament and state monopoly over weapons to Israel's withdrawal from five remaining positions in southern Lebanon.
It also includes provisions for releasing funds to rebuild war-damaged areas and implementing reforms in border control, smuggling prevention, customs collection, and public facility oversight.
Hostilities between Hezbollah and Israeli forces erupted into full-scale warfare last September, despite a ceasefire agreement brokered in November.
Israeli strikes have continued in southern Lebanon, with Tel Aviv citing Hezbollah activities as justification.
Lebanese authorities have documented nearly 3,000 Israeli violations of the ceasefire, with more than 250 deaths and over 560 injuries reported since the truce began. Israel was supposed to fully withdraw by Jan. 26 but extended the deadline to Feb. 18, refusing to vacate five military outposts along the border. — Agencies
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab News
2 hours ago
- Arab News
Lost cause? Let the people of Lebanon have their say
There is a strange situation in Lebanon. For decades, politicians and their staff have been permanently present on the media scene — commenting, contesting, making their clan's voice heard, and, in short, occupying space. This was true whether in opposition or government. Today, there is a period of quasi-silence. This silence indicates a loss of direction and an inability to read what is coming next regionally. There is another serious and pressing element that is changing the equation: the erosion of security and the impact of the difficult situation in the Syrian Arab Republic. While the new leadership in Syria faces a lot of challenges and risks, the one that presents the biggest danger for Lebanon is not the military clashes between communities, but the lack of order and security, a threat that can easily spread. Syria's security forces are unprepared to fight crime due to corruption, fragmented control, and, as stated, much bigger issues than public safety. This situation creates great instability for Lebanon, as organized crime does not stay within borders. As the new president, Joseph Aoun, came to power, most Lebanese — some politicians included — hoped he would deliver on his promises to restore sovereignty to the country. Many imagined that a negotiated outcome with Hezbollah was possible and that soon Lebanon would be back to its short-lived 'Switzerland of the Middle East' model. Close to seven months later, the optimists — not to call them naive — agree with the cynics of the first hour that this is just quixotic. There was never going to be, and never will be, a negotiated outcome with Hezbollah. We nevertheless need to put things back into perspective. Aoun came to power after Israel defeated Hezbollah using strikes that brought the Iranian proxy to a level of vulnerability never witnessed before. This extreme weakness, and the shell-shocked status of Hezbollah with the change of regime in Syria, made people believe that this was the perfect time. Is it a lost opportunity, just like what happened in the 2000s, not taking the bold step needed and losing the window to make a real change? No one knows. Perhaps, despite years of US support and financing, the Lebanese armed forces still do not represent the stick that can challenge Hezbollah. Or perhaps the answer is simply closer than people think. There is no doubt that even if negotiated, projecting strength would be a necessity. This does not exist today. Organized crime does not stay within borders Khaled Abou Zahr There is also within Lebanon an echo of what we see in Western capitals. We cannot ignore the protest posters in New York showing an image of Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei with a slogan telling people to be on the right side of history. Yet, there are, even in Lebanon, people who are puzzled about what comes next. This is why it is time to leave the decision to the people in Lebanon. The electoral system for years has been carved out by politicians to accommodate their deals. They have been, in a sense, accomplices of Hezbollah. It is time to ask the people what they want. It is time to put forward two questions to the people of Lebanon. The first is: Do you back the sovereignty of the country? And the second question: Do you prefer a centralized political system or a federation? There also should be a two-level count — one for the entire nation and one for each community. It is now important to see what each community needs and wants for the future. There is no doubt that, for example, today the Sunni community — to which I belong — expects the change of regime in Syria from a pro-Iran to a Sunni one that is representative of the majority of the Syrian population to work to their advantage in the long term. In my opinion, Lebanon's specificity will clash with the uniformity of the Syrian model. This was true yesterday and will still be true tomorrow. The main objective should be to initiate a dialogue Khaled Abou Zahr Yet, it is this entrenched thinking that needs to be destroyed. This historical clan setup has partially been responsible for the ills of the country. Whether Hezbollah or the groups before it, it is the same cycle. I would like to see this setup and political system obliterated. I believe that federalism will bring stability to Lebanon. Yet, perhaps I am a tiny minority within the country or my community. This is why reverting to the people is important. It is also important to have a view of what each community needs and wants. This should be stated by the people and not the clan leaders who have perpetuated the cycles generation after generation. If we believe in the sovereignty and independence of Lebanon, we cannot be influenced by how the geopolitical shifts affect our community in the balance of power. It is contradictory. We need a system that gives each citizen within each community the capacity to lead a stable life. What would be the outcome of such referendums? How to manage fragmented results where a community or a group of communities vote differently? What happens if people vote against the state? Does this mean that all communities can arm themselves again? What if they vote for sovereignty — who will execute the will of the people? There are many unanswered questions. Yet the main objective should be to initiate a dialogue, or perhaps accept that, for now, Lebanon is still a lost cause. Either way, the people will know. And those who wish to be Don Quixote can still carry on.
Asharq Al-Awsat
5 hours ago
- Asharq Al-Awsat
Saudi-Syrian Investment Forum 2025 Aims for Lasting Economic Partnership
Saudi Arabia's growing role in Syria's post-war reconstruction took a major step on Thursday with the launch of the 2025 Saudi-Syrian Investment Forum in Damascus, underscoring Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman's push to anchor Riyadh's influence in shaping Syria's future economy. Held under the Crown Prince's directive, the forum marks a significant political and economic milestone, signaling the Kingdom's intent to forge a sustainable partnership with the Syrian government and position itself as a key driver of reconstruction and development in the war-ravaged country. High-Level Delegation and Billion-Dollar Deals A Saudi delegation led by Investment Minister Khalid Al-Falih arrived in Damascus on Wednesday, accompanied by more than 120 investors. The high-level visit, expected to result in the signing of dozens of agreements worth billions of dollars, was met with an official reception by Syria's ministers of economy, energy, and telecommunications. Also greeting the delegation were Saudi Ambassador to Syria Faisal Al-Mujfel, embassy officials, and figures from both public and private sectors. The forum, announced earlier by Saudi Arabia's Ministry of Investment, aims to deepen bilateral economic ties and identify joint investment opportunities across key sectors. Saudi Investment on the Ground During the visit, Al-Falih laid the foundation stone for the ''Fayhaa'' white cement factory in Adra Industrial City, northeast of Damascus. The facility, slated for completion within months, is among the first major Saudi investments in Syria following a series of exploratory business visits. Speaking to reporters at the site, Al-Falih said dozens of Saudi companies were ready to invest in Syria across construction, energy, agriculture, IT, and industrial sectors. 'We will announce tomorrow the planned investment volumes for the Syrian market,' he added. The white cement plant is valued at around 100 million riyals ($27 million) with a projected annual output of 150,000 tons. It is expected to create 130 direct jobs and more than 1,000 indirect positions. Reviving a War-Torn Economy The forum comes as the Syrian government, now led by President Ahmed Al-Sharaa following the ouster of Bashar al-Assad late last year, seeks to attract international investors to help rebuild a country devastated by 14 years of war. While UN estimates put Syria's reconstruction needs at $400 billion, Damascus says the actual cost could reach $600 billion. Riyadh has also led high-level diplomatic efforts to ease Western sanctions on Syria. The campaign culminated in US President Donald Trump's decision to lift certain restrictions during his recent visit to Riyadh, following discussions with the Saudi Crown Prince. "Start of a New Chapter" Issam Zuhair Al-Ghreiwati, Deputy Chairman of the Syrian Chambers of Commerce and head of Damascus's Chamber of Commerce, called the Saudi delegation 'the largest and most significant from any Arab country.' 'This is the most important economic event in Syria since the liberation and the relaunch of our economy,' Al-Ghreiwati told Asharq Al-Awsat. He said Saudi investors were returning after 14 years of absence, marking a 'new era of cooperation' between the two countries. 'Syria was off the investment map due to the previous regime,' he said. 'Now, with the rise of a new government and the immense financial surpluses in Saudi Arabia looking for emerging markets, we are entering what could become the largest Arab economic partnership.' Al-Ghreiwati said Syria had reformed investment laws, liberalized foreign exchange controls, and modernized trade regulations, rapidly shifting toward a free-market economy. 'We now have one of the most attractive investment landscapes in the region,' he said. Saudi Commitment Seen as Transformational He added that the most critical takeaway from the forum was Saudi Arabia's confidence in Syria's recovery. 'This isn't just about money; it's about belief in Syria's future,' he said. 'The Kingdom sees Syria as a nation rebounding from crisis, not a liability. There's no turning back.' The private sector, he said, sees this event as 'the official green light for reconstruction, with Saudi Arabia leading the economic charge.' Challenges Remain Despite the optimism, experts warn that Syria's fragile economy faces major hurdles, including inflation, currency volatility, and limited purchasing power. Mohammad Al-Hallak, deputy head of the Economic Sciences Association and former vice president of Damascus's Chamber of Commerce, said the focus now must be on restoring industrial output and job creation. 'We need to restart the production cycle quickly,' Al-Hallak told Asharq Al-Awsat. 'This forum must go beyond talks. We need actionable partnerships.' He urged Saudi Arabia to support Syrian exports through specialized exhibitions and to foster demand for Syrian products. 'Increased demand drives production, which creates jobs and strengthens purchasing power,' he said. Al-Hallak also called for the creation of a Saudi-Syrian joint bank to facilitate cross-border financial transactions and investment flows. 'That would be the most practical first step to convert goodwill into real momentum,' he said. 'Syria Is Thirsty for Investment' 'There are enormous investment opportunities here—in tourism, trade, industry, agriculture, insurance, banking, and the stock market,' Al-Hallak said. 'Syria is one of the most investment-hungry nations in the world right now.' He emphasized that Riyadh's leadership sees Syria not through a lens of transactional interest but as a country to support and integrate into a shared economic future. 'Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman is not dealing with Syria as an equal party in negotiation,' he said. 'He sees it as a responsibility—Saudi Arabia is stepping in to help rebuild, not to exploit.' When asked if there was an estimate of the total investment Syria needs in the next phase, Al-Hallak replied: 'There's no ceiling. Syria will absorb every dollar that comes its way. This is just the beginning.'
Saudi Gazette
5 hours ago
- Saudi Gazette
Saudi Arabia, Arab and Islamic nations condemn "Israeli sovereignty" move in West Bank
Saudi Gazette report RIYADH — Saudi Arabia, alongside key Arab and Islamic countries, has strongly condemned the Israeli Knesset's recent declaration calling for the imposition of so-called "Israeli sovereignty" over the occupied West Bank, denouncing it as a blatant and unacceptable violation of international law. In a joint statement issued on Thursday by Saudi Arabia's Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the condemnation was supported by Bahrain, Egypt, Indonesia, Jordan, Nigeria, Palestine, Qatar, Türkiye, the United Arab Emirates, the League of Arab States, and the Organization of Islamic Cooperation. The group of nations described the Israeli move as a 'flagrant breach' of multiple United Nations Security Council resolutions, including Resolutions 242 (1967), 338 (1973), and 2334 (2016). All these resolutions reject the legitimacy of the Israeli occupation and settlement activity in Palestinian territories occupied since 1967. The joint statement reaffirmed that Israel holds no sovereignty over the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, which was described as an integral part of the Palestinian state. The declaration further emphasized that the unilateral Israeli action has no legal effect and only serves to escalate tensions in the region—already worsened by ongoing Israeli aggression on the Gaza Strip and the resulting humanitarian crisis. The signatories called on the international community, particularly the UN Security Council and other relevant bodies, to uphold their legal and moral responsibilities by acting to halt Israel's illegal policies, including attempts to impose a fait accompli by force. Such actions, they warned, jeopardize the prospect of a just and lasting peace, and undermine the viability of the two-state solution. Concluding the statement, the parties reaffirmed their unwavering commitment to the establishment of an independent, sovereign Palestinian state on the 1967 borders, with East Jerusalem as its capital, in line with international law and the Arab Peace Initiative.
