Trump vents online about service provider after conference call marred by glitch
WASHINGTON: On Monday afternoon, the president of the United States was just another person complaining online about his service provider.
Donald Trump wrote in a pair of posts on Truth Social that he was trying to hold a conference call with faith leaders from all over the country but was unable to start the call because of technical difficulties.
"AT&T is totally unable to make their equipment work properly,' the Republican president said in a post. "This is the second time it's happened. If the Boss of AT&T, whoever that may be, could get involved – It would be good. There are tens of thousands of people on the line!'
Trump then followed up with another post in which he said, "AT&T ought to get its act together.'
Representatives for AT&T responded to a post from the White House press secretary sharing Trump's complaints.
"We've reached out to the White House and are working to quickly understand and assess the situation,' AT&T said.
AT&T reached out immediately, according to a White House official who was not authorised to speak publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity. The issue was resolved and the call started 20 minutes late.
AT&T said in a follow-up statement posted on X Monday night that it appeared "the disruption was caused by an issue with the conference call platform, not our network. Unfortunately, this caused the delay, and we are working diligently to better understand the issue so we can prevent disruptions in the future.'
Trump rarely shies away from posting his gripes on social media, whether the target is foreign leaders, media organisations, elected officials or telecommunication companies.
The call he was delayed from holding was not on his publicly released schedule.
Between 8,000 and 10,000 leaders of Christian, Jewish and Muslim faiths were on the call, the first of a series that the White House expects to regularly hold with religious leaders.
During the call, according to the official, Trump spoke for about 15 minutes and touted provisions in his big tax breaks and spending cuts bill, like the boost to the child tax credit, the Israel-Iran ceasefire and African peace deals he brokered, and the pardons he issued for anti-abortion activists. – AP
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
25 minutes ago
- The Star
Majority of Finns prefer to shift away from U.S. products, investment: survey
HELSINKI, July 1 (Xinhua) -- A recent survey conducted by Finnish financial services group LahiTapiola reveals that two out of three Finns now prefer to purchase products and services from Europe rather than the United States. The shift is largely attributed to U.S. President Donald Trump's unpredictable trade policies. According to the survey results released Tuesday, 66 percent of respondents said Trump's policies have made them more inclined to favor European goods and services. Only 16 percent disagreed, while 18 percent remained undecided. The findings also show that 56 percent of Finns believe that avoiding investments in U.S. companies is a responsible value-based choice. Among those who currently hold investments, that figure rises slightly to 59 percent. The accompanying press release cites growing concern over the negative impact of Trump's policies on Europe, particularly regarding economic stability and security, as the main driver behind this shift away from U.S. goods and investments. Beyond economic and political concerns, many Finns expressed frustration with Trump's communication style. The survey indicated that his rhetoric and behavior have fostered an emotional resistance toward American products. This sentiment appears to extend beyond Finland. The press release mentioned Tesla as a notable example, pointing out that its sales have been hit hard. According to the European Automobile Manufacturers' Association, registrations of new Tesla vehicles in EU countries dropped by more than 45 percent between January and May 2025, compared to the same period in 2024. Heikki Urpelainen, portfolio manager at LahiTapiola Asset Management, noted that escalating trade restrictions are making the United States a less attractive export market. In response, European companies are increasingly lowering prices and focusing on domestic sales. While this trend may provide short-term advantages for some European firms, Urpelainen warned that the broader impact of Trump's tariffs is detrimental to European exporters overall. The survey, conducted in April 2025, collected responses from 1,100 Finnish residents aged 18 and older.
New Straits Times
an hour ago
- New Straits Times
More investors flocking to 'stable' Europe
PETER Roessner is feeling both sides of United States President Donald Trump's trade war. While tariff risks mean the chief executive officer of Luxembourg-based hydrogen firm H2Apex can no longer rely on US suppliers for its more than €200 million project in Lubmin, Germany, investor interest in European projects is rising. "Investors in the hydrogen sector are now focusing more on the European market due to the absolute uncertainty and planning insecurity in the US," he said, adding that this included both local and US players. "The framework conditions in Europe are not ideal, but they are stable." Roessner's comments are indicative of a trend that has taken hold in recent months: Investors and companies are increasingly turning to Europe, drawn by an infrastructure- and defence-led spending push that offers stability at a time when Trump's erratic tariff policies have made the US market a less safe bet, according to more than a dozen interviews with executives and fund managers. The shift has also been fuelled by Trump's tendency to make sweeping tariff threats and announcements that are then often delayed or changed, and to draw up executive orders that have tested the limits of his presidential power. "The US is coming from a very capital market-friendly and stable environment. Now, there is political intervention and also an attempt to expand power," said Christoph Witzke, who heads the CIO office at Deka, one of Germany's largest investment funds. "This creates uncertainty that some kind of intervention ... could come at any time," he said, adding that Europe had become the centre of attention in the most recent investor conferences as a result. With a July 9 deadline for a trade deal less than two weeks away — and Trump saying he will impose 50 per cent tariffs on all European Union goods without a deal — investors have started shifting their money. Data from LSEG's Lipper Funds show that more than US$100 billion has flowed into European equity funds so far this year — up threefold from the same period last year — while outflows from the US more than doubled to nearly US$87 billion. "All that is an indication that at least market forces, investors, those who move real money around, actually see value and have confidence in Europe," said European Central Bank president Christine Lagarde earlier this month. This shift in focus was also illustrated by the weak market debut of Holcim's North American spin-off Amrize late last month, which was announced to much fanfare in early 2024 at a time when the lure of US valuations also got some of its rivals excited. In contrast, the share price of Holcim itself, now squarely focused on Europe, Latin America and North Africa, soared 15 per cent. Siemens Energy, which makes more than a fifth of its sales in the US, has noted a shift in sentiment, said finance chief Maria Ferraro, on the back of a recent US roadshow and an 84 per cent rise in the group's share price year-to-date. Apart from the improved market view, more investments are also crucial in efforts to revive the EU's economy and narrow its competitiveness gap compared with other regions, most notably China and the US. Closely watched foreign direct investment flows into Germany, the bloc's largest economy, more than doubled to €46 billion in the first four months of 2025, according to the most recent data from the Bundesbank, marking the highest level since 2022. It also shows that German companies even pulled money out of the US in three of the first four months of the year, with their balance of foreign direct investments in April at a negative €2.38 billion. Negative balances emerge when companies either divest more than they invest in a foreign country or decide against extending credit lines to local counterparts. But the picture is not all rosy, with several investors pointing out that Europe is now under pressure to act faster, create better regulation and make good on its spending pledges. "This sentiment can quickly turn again. This should be both a warning and an incentive to use the momentum now and consistently implement the planned agenda," said Stefan Wintels, head of German state-backed lender KfW.
New Straits Times
2 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Road to Middle East peace runs through Teheran and Tel Aviv
IRAN stands at the crossroads of history for resisting Israel and the United States that went all out to destroy the Islamic republic's uranium enrichment facilities. With or without nuclear weapons, Teheran can be a force for equilibrium and stability — not just in the Middle East, but across the Eurasian heartland. In hindsight, everything was going well with Iran's nuclear programme until US President Donald Trump decided to dump the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) on May 8, 2018. Technically speaking, the US withdrawal from JPOA removed Iran from its obligations and expedited its "breakout time" — the time it would take for Iran to produce enough weapon-grade uranium for a nuclear bomb. By the morning of June 22, when all hell broke loose over the Natanz, Fordow and Isfahan uranium processing sites, Iran had the capacity to enrich uranium to 60 per cent purity, short of the 90 per cent that Israel feared. Incidentally, Israel has nuclear bombs at Dimona that could blow the entire region into pieces, and yet Tel Aviv is fearful of Teheran that has no nuclear bombs? After the US strikes, Trump triumphantly declared that the facilities "were totally and completely obliterated". His assessment was later downplayed by Central Intelligence Agency director John Ratcliffe. The killing of Iran's top nuclear scientists and generals may set back the process for a few years. However, it is unlikely to undermine its technical capacity to weaponise the knowledge, if it wishes to. The current Iran-Israel conflict is no longer based on ideological schisms or differences. Instead, the once-dominant Arab-Israeli conflict has given way to a more complex, dangerous and region-defining rivalry between Iran and Israel — one that reflects shifting alliances, strategic ambition and a new geopolitical architecture in the Middle East. This new fault line is less about identity or religion, and more about regional hegemony, deterrence, and resistance to unilateralism, territorial domination and land grabbing. Lastly, Israel's genocide policy in Gaza is a stark warning to other countries that they, too, could face the same fate if they dare challenge the nuclear state of Israel openly. Israel is a formidable military power and can respond to Iranian attacks — but without the US, it faces high strategic and operational risk. While US involvement provides the margin between military resilience and regional catastrophe, the response from Iran touched the very heart of Middle Eastern geopolitics in that states, however weak they are perceived to be, will stand up to regional bullies, a lesson that Tel Aviv should heed. The recent "12-day war" shows clearly that the Iran-Israel rivalry cannot be managed through bombs and diplomacy alone. What the Middle East needs to prevent further clashes involving the big powers is a new collective security dialogue and an acknowledgement that Iran, with a population of 90 million and sophisticated homegrown hypersonic missile technology, is a force to reckon with. Besides, it controls the Strait of Hormuz, a strategic choke point, through which some 20 million barrels of oil go through daily. Israel's true survival lies not in bombs, walls or foreign guarantees but in reconciliation, restraint and regional trust. Its security comes not from controlling land or stockpiling weapons — it comes from genuine coexistence with neighbours based on mutual respect, shared dignity and resilience. The road to Middle East peace no longer runs through Cairo, Riyadh or Amman — it now runs through Teheran and Tel Aviv. Thus, the Arab-Israeli conflict is no longer the story. The Iran-Israel confrontation is.
