Road to Middle East peace runs through Teheran and Tel Aviv
With or without nuclear weapons, Teheran can be a force for equilibrium and stability — not just in the Middle East, but across the Eurasian heartland.
In hindsight, everything was going well with Iran's nuclear programme until US President Donald Trump decided to dump the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) on May 8, 2018.
Technically speaking, the US withdrawal from JPOA removed Iran from its obligations and expedited its "breakout time" — the time it would take for Iran to produce enough weapon-grade uranium for a nuclear bomb.
By the morning of June 22, when all hell broke loose over the Natanz, Fordow and Isfahan uranium processing sites, Iran had the capacity to enrich uranium to 60 per cent purity, short of the 90 per cent that Israel feared.
Incidentally, Israel has nuclear bombs at Dimona that could blow the entire region into pieces, and yet Tel Aviv is fearful of Teheran that has no nuclear bombs?
After the US strikes, Trump triumphantly declared that the facilities "were totally and completely obliterated".
His assessment was later downplayed by Central Intelligence Agency director John Ratcliffe.
The killing of Iran's top nuclear scientists and generals may set back the process for a few years. However, it is unlikely to undermine its technical capacity to weaponise the knowledge, if it wishes to.
The current Iran-Israel conflict is no longer based on ideological schisms or differences.
Instead, the once-dominant Arab-Israeli conflict has given way to a more complex, dangerous and region-defining rivalry between Iran and Israel — one that reflects shifting alliances, strategic ambition and a new geopolitical architecture in the Middle East.
This new fault line is less about identity or religion, and more about regional hegemony, deterrence, and resistance to unilateralism, territorial domination and land grabbing.
Lastly, Israel's genocide policy in Gaza is a stark warning to other countries that they, too, could face the same fate if they dare challenge the nuclear state of Israel openly.
Israel is a formidable military power and can respond to Iranian attacks — but without the US, it faces high strategic and operational risk.
While US involvement provides the margin between military resilience and regional catastrophe, the response from Iran touched the very heart of Middle Eastern geopolitics in that states, however weak they are perceived to be, will stand up to regional bullies, a lesson that Tel Aviv should heed.
The recent "12-day war" shows clearly that the Iran-Israel rivalry cannot be managed through bombs and diplomacy alone.
What the Middle East needs to prevent further clashes involving the big powers is a new collective security dialogue and an acknowledgement that Iran, with a population of 90 million and sophisticated homegrown hypersonic missile technology, is a force to reckon with.
Besides, it controls the Strait of Hormuz, a strategic choke point, through which some 20 million barrels of oil go through daily.
Israel's true survival lies not in bombs, walls or foreign guarantees but in reconciliation, restraint and regional trust.
Its security comes not from controlling land or stockpiling weapons — it comes from genuine coexistence with neighbours based on mutual respect, shared dignity and resilience.
The road to Middle East peace no longer runs through Cairo, Riyadh or Amman — it now runs through Teheran and Tel Aviv.
Thus, the Arab-Israeli conflict is no longer the story. The Iran-Israel confrontation is.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
23 minutes ago
- The Sun
Ukraine left scrambling after US says halting weapons shipments
KYIV: Ukraine summoned a senior US diplomat on Wednesday, urging its key ally not to cut or delay critical military aid after the White House said it was halting some weapons shipments. Kyiv said it had not been told anything by the United States about the halt to aid, which could thwart its ability to fend off escalating Russian air attacks. Moscow revelled in the decision, saying it could bring the end of the war closer. Kyiv has long feared halts to US aid after Donald Trump returned to the White House in January, having criticised the tens of billions of dollars in support and weapons sent by his predecessor, Joe Biden. The US embassy's deputy chief of mission, John Ginkel, was summoned on Wednesday -- a rare diplomatic move usually reserved for foes and rivals, not vital allies -- amid uncertainty about what the cuts would mean for Kyiv. 'The Ukrainian side stressed that any delay or procrastination in supporting Ukraine's defence capabilities would only encourage the aggressor to continue the war,' Ukraine's foreign ministry said in a statement. The White House announced Tuesday it was halting some key weapons shipments to Ukraine promised by the previous US administration, but did not provide details on what would be cut. Under Biden, Washington had spearheaded Western support for Ukraine, with Congress having approved more than $100 billion in aid, including $43 billion in weaponry. Trump, who has held several phone calls with Russian President Vladimir Putin and pushed the two sides into peace talks, has refused to announce new packages and Kyiv has been corralling Washington's European allies to step up support for when US deliveries end. Putin has rejected calls for an immediate and unconditional ceasefire and demanded Ukraine cede more territory if it wants Moscow to halt its invasion. Tens of thousands have been killed since February 2022 when Russia invaded, with millions forced to flee their homes and swathes of eastern and southern Ukraine destroyed. 'Seriously dependent' A senior Ukrainian military official raised concerns about the impact of the weapons halt to AFP. 'We are now seriously dependent on American arms supplies, although Europe is doing its best, but it will be difficult for us without American ammunition,' a high-ranking source in the Ukrainian military said, speaking on condition of anonymity. In Moscow, the Kremlin said reducing the flow of weapons to Kyiv will help end the conflict faster. 'The fewer the number of weapons that are delivered to Ukraine, the closer the end of the special military operation,' Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters in response to a question by AFP, using Russia's term for its more than three-year offensive. The US decision was taken 'following a DOD (Department of Defense) review of our nation's military support and assistance to other countries across the globe,' White House Deputy Press Secretary Anna Kelly told AFP in an email. Kyiv said it was caught off-guard by the move. 'Ukraine has not received any official notifications about the suspension or revision of the delivery schedules for the agreed defence assistance,' the defence ministry said. 'The path to ending the war lies through consistent and joint pressure on the aggressor, as well as through continued support for Ukraine,' it added. 'We are clarifying the situation. I think that everything will be clarified in the coming days,' presidential aide Dmytro Lytvyn told reporters. Politico and other US media reported that missiles for Patriot air defence systems, precision artillery and Hellfire missiles are among the items being held back. Last week at a NATO summit in the Netherlands, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky met with Trump, who gave no public indication he was thinking of cutting aid. 'We're going to see if we can make some available,' Trump said of the air defence missiles that Kyiv desperately seeks to shoot down Russian attacks. 'They're very hard to get,' Trump added. Russia has ramped up attacks on Ukraine in June, launching nearly twice as many missiles and over 30 percent more drones than in May, according to an AFP analysis of Ukrainian air force data.
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Diversification ensures Malaysia's economy remains resilient: Miti official
PUTRAJAYA: Malaysia remains on solid footing due to its inclusive and long-term economic strategy despite geopolitical tensions in the Middle East raising concerns over the potential closure of the Strait of Hormuz and disruptions to global energy supply. The Investment, Trade and Industry Ministry's bilateral economic and trade relations division director, Raveendran Nair, said Malaysia's consistent approach of diversifying into new markets has allowed the country to stay competitive and resilient against external pressures. 'To be fair, we faced numerous major challenges – from the Asian financial crisis to the US financial crisis, and then the Covid-19 pandemic. 'During Covid-19, we faced an unprecedented and extraordinary situation. Yet, we managed to recover and move towards a progressive recovery trend in this post-pandemic era,' he said at Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia's forum Bicara Persada – Iran-Israel War: Implications for Malaysia and the New World Order held here. Raveendran said challenges such as the retaliatory tariffs imposed by the United States do not pose a significant threat to Malaysia's economy because the impact is also felt by other countries. 'There are concerns that these tariffs could shrink our economy. But from a broader perspective, Malaysia is not the only one affected. In Southeast Asia, for example, Singapore faces a 10% tariff, the Philippines is second, and Malaysia faces a 24% rate. Compared to other neighbouring countries in the region, some face tariffs as high as 30 to 40%. So in terms of competitiveness, Malaysia still has an edge,' he said. Raveendran noted that Malaysia's trade with the US accounts for only about 13% (of its total trade), with the rest involving a variety of global markets. 'Our strategy is not to depend on a single country. That's why we continue to diversify our markets. As seen recently, Prime Minister (Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim) has frequently travelled abroad with Miti to conduct business programmes, meet local industry leaders, and identify potential investors to bring into Malaysia. 'This strategy ensures we are not reliant on just one country. If one country's economy declines, we still have other alternatives,' he said. As part of the effort to strengthen trade connectivity, Malaysia is actively signing free trade agreements (FTA) to open up opportunities for national exports. 'For instance, we recently signed the Malaysia-European Free Trade Association agreement, which involves Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland. We have also resumed FTA negotiations with the European Union and Gulf countries. Overall, we have 18 FTAs with various nations,' he said. On tensions in the Strait of Hormuz, Raveendran said the situation could potentially impact the global energy supply chain but Malaysia remains focused on strengthening its economic resilience through diverse trade networks and strong internal preparedness. He also said no country can survive on its own without a stable supply network in an interconnected global economic landscape. – Bernama
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
Trump's 35% tariff threat feeds Japan's worst-case scenario fear
US President Donald Trump threatened Japan with tariffs of up to 35% as he ramped up tensions for a third straight day, fueling fears of a worst-case scenario among market players and raising doubts over Tokyo's tactics in trade talks. Japan should be forced to "pay 30%, 35% or whatever the number is that we determine, because we also have a very big trade deficit with Japan,' Trump said, again flagging the possibility that across-the-board tariffs could go much higher than the 24% initially penciled in for July 9. "I'm not sure we're going to make a deal. I doubt it with Japan, they're very tough. You have to understand, they're very spoiled.' Market participants and analysts warned against taking Trump's comments at face value and suggested that some kind of deal will eventually get done. But they also warned that Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba's government may need to change tack from a friendly and firm stance that is now leading the two sides to brinkmanship. "There is some risk of a US tantrum that results in higher punitive actions by Washington this month,' said Kurt Tong, a former senior US diplomat in Asia who's now a managing partner at the Asia Group. "If that happens, Japan may have no choice but to hit back with its own specific countermeasures.' Trump's latest threat fits in with a high-pressure deal-making strategy that sometimes results in big last-minute concessions on both sides, as seen with China, but market players still need to game out how to position themselves should talks founder. While few analysts see Japan's stocks collapsing on a no-deal scenario, some of them forecast the Nikkei 225 to fall into the 38,000 range, a decline of more than 4%, rather than rallying above 40,000 if there's an agreement. The Nikkei 225 edged down 0.6% to close at 39,762 on Wednesday while the yen was trading at 143.88 against the dollar, down around 0.3%. Japan has so far stood firm in negotiations over across-the-board reciprocal tariffs, insisting that they be removed along with additional sectoral tariffs on autos, steel and aluminum. The car duties are particularly painful for Japan as the industry contributes the equivalent of almost 10% of gross domestic product and employs around 8% of the workforce. Tokyo has insisted that a "win-win' deal must encompass all the tariffs in one go with Ishiba preferring no deal to a bad deal ahead of a July 20 upper house election. The prime minister on Wednesday reiterated his view that focusing on jobs and investment in the US was the way forward, just like it was for Nippon Steel as it patiently sought to change Trump's view and take over US Steel. "Japan is the biggest global investor in the US and the world's biggest contributor to US jobs,' Ishiba said in Tokyo on Wednesday. "That means Japan is different from other countries.' But as July 9 gets closer, some observers say more needs to be done to convince the US to back off. "We have to work on Trump himself, to first try to avoid the tariffs to be imposed from July 9,' said Ichiro Fujisaki, former Japanese ambassador to the US, adding that the president's remarks show that Tokyo hasn't brought enough to the table yet. "We don't have something like rare earths but the US is dependent on Japanese industry as well. About half of materials for making semiconductors come from Japanese industry,' Fujisaki said, pointing to a possible area of leverage, too. In the meantime, market players are evaluating the potential scale of the fallout. "There is a lot more risk of things falling apart than is being priced in by the market,' said Zuhair Khan, a fund manager at UBP Investments. "There is always the risk of a policy blunder by either side.' He points to the 32,000 Nikkei level on the day Trump first announced the reciprocal tariffs. "If the probability of a no deal is 25% then the Nikkei should be at 38,000.' What Bloomberg Economics Says... "If Japan is ultimately forced to pay reciprocal tariffs at those rates, on top of the 24% rate announced on 'Liberation Day' - currently suspended at 10% - the macroeconomic fallout would be sizable. Our estimate through a model of global trade suggests a medium-term GDP hit of around 1.2%, roughly double the 0.6% drag expected under the current levy.' - Taro Kimura, economist For the full report, click here. The point of imposing a deadline in negotiations is to create an opportunity for leverage, so it's not surprising to see Trump pushing high tariffs as a threat to push for better deals as the date approaches, said Phillip Wool, head of portfolio management at Rayliant Global Advisors Ltd. "There's also an element of political theater here, as Trump's narrative to American voters is that the US has been bullied on trade for so long, and there's clearly a desire to look 'tough' on trade,' Wool said. "But there has to be a face-saving deal at some point so that it looks like the negotiation was truly a success as opposed to the mutually assured destruction of impasse and perpetually high tariffs.' Like some other market players, Wool is wary of an overly pessimistic knee-jerk response to each remark Trump makes. If there is a big selloff in a worst-case scenario, Wool sees it as a great buying opportunity for long-term, active investors. Strategists are split on how a bad scenario might play out for the yen. While some such as SBI Liquidity Market Co.'s Marito Ueda see the possibility of risk aversion sparking a strengthening of Japan's currency to the 138 range against the dollar, others see a weakening as more likely. A stalemate in trade talks would likely delay the Bank of Japan's next interest rate hike, especially if it led to tariffs of up to 35% in the meantime, said Akira Moroga, chief market strategist at Aozora Bank. Movement would slow after the 145 mark, making a push past 147 difficult, he said. Still, the consensus is that a deal will be reached sooner or later, and that Japan will have to concede more ground to achieve it. "If it's concluded I don't think it's going to be a win-win situation,' said Fujisaki. "Maybe a capital-letter 'WIN' for US, but a small letter 'win' for Japan.' --With assistance from Momoka Yokoyama, Toshiro Hasegawa, Umesh Desai, Hidenori Yamanaka, Mari Kiyohara, Aya Wagatsuma and Akemi Terukina. - Bloomberg
