DRDO 2.0: From lasers to AI, top defence R&D official shares the big 'pizza' plan for India's next-gen warfare
Directed energy and photonic radar advancements
Live Events
Bridging technology gaps
Project delays and technical challenges
Private sector role through DCPP model
Indigenous technology and operational success
Strategic shift to DRDO 2.0
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
In a major shift, the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) is moving away from conventional weapons to focus on advanced technologies like directed energy weapons quantum systems and artificial intelligence . The new approach, called DRDO 2.0 , is aimed at preparing India for the next era of warfare, according to senior DRDO official Dr. B.K. Das.Dr. B.K. Das, Distinguished Scientist and Director General (Electronics & Communication Systems) at DRDO, said in a recent television interview that the organisation is undergoing a transformation to align with future warfare requirements. He said DRDO is shifting its focus away from traditional weapons development and instead concentrating on areas such as directed energy, photonics , quantum systems, and AI.'If we want to win the war, it's going to be the war of technology,' he said.To support this change, DRDO is handing over the majority of conventional system development and production to private industry. The organisation will remain involved in a limited capacity, providing 10 to 20 percent support. This allows DRDO to concentrate on long-term strategic research while enabling industry partners to scale up production.Dr. Das shared details of recent breakthroughs, including India's first photonic radar and a 30-kilowatt laser-based weapon designed to target drones and small projectiles. He said that DRDO had already demonstrated a 2-kilowatt laser system as part of its D4 anti-drone platform in operational conditions.'The future of warfare is going to be directed energy,' Dr. Das said. 'If we continue to intercept incoming missiles with missiles of our own, the economics of prolonged conflict will not favour us. That is why technologies like high-energy lasers and microwaves are crucial.'Responding to concerns raised by the Defence Secretary about a 'yawning gap' in certain defence technologies, especially in air power, Dr. Das admitted there were challenges. He said DRDO is investing in foundational research for AI/ML, quantum systems, and cognitive systems to bridge those gaps. He added that such deep-technology projects take time to mature.He compared the development process to preparing a pizza, saying the final product may not be visible today, but the essential ingredients are being prepared for future use.On the subject of delays in DRDO projects, Dr. Das said that past issues were often caused by inaccurate timelines and underestimating the complexity of projects.'We over-speculated, thinking we could realise things much faster. When we dive deep into development, we often discover the true scale and complexity of the challenge,' he said.He noted that DRDO is now focusing on mature technologies that are closer to deployment in order to meet immediate defence needs.DRDO has adopted a new collaboration model called Develop and Produce with Production Partner (DCPP). Under this approach, private companies are involved from the initial stages of design and development. This model is meant to ensure smoother production when systems are ready.Dr. Das said the Indian defence industry has grown significantly, with private players now taking on key roles in developing and producing high-tech systems.'The generation has changed. Their aspiration has gone sky high. The industry is coming up in a big way,' he said.He added that DRDO-developed systems like the D4 anti-drone platform are already being produced by private firms and were deployed successfully during recent military operations, including Operation Sindoor . He also mentioned that Akash and BrahMos systems performed well during the same operation.The DRDO 2.0 vision marks a shift in India's defence R&D strategy. By focusing on future technologies and allowing the private sector to handle conventional systems, DRDO aims to stay relevant in a fast-changing global defence environment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Melania should be on first boat: Deportation calls for US' First Lady gains traction amid Trump's immigration crackdown
Petition calling for Melania's deportation Live Events Melania Trump visa controversy (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel Americans have started a petition asking the US government to deport Melania Trump, her parents and Barron Trump amid the President's plan to target naturalised citizens for deportation. A petition on MoveOn has gained traction online demanding that US First Lady Melania Trump her son Barron, and her parents also be deported, reports The Irish petition says that since the President wants to deport naturalized citizens, "it's only fair that Melania and her parents are on the first boat out." This comes as the Department of Justice began to prioritize stripping naturalized Americans of their citizenship when charged with petition claims that since Melania Trump is a naturalised citizen, she and her family should be 'on the first boat out' if Trump's proposals are applied also refers to Barron Trump as an 'anchor baby' and cites the birth of Melania's mother outside the US as part of the criteria Trump's policy reportedly Anchor Baby is a term used to refer to a child born to a non-citizen mother in the US, especially when viewed as providing an advantage to family members seeking to secure citizenship or legal residency.'Since Trump wants to deport naturalized citizens, I believe it is only fair that Melania and her parents are on the first boat out,' the page reads. 'In addition, Melania's anchor baby, Baron, should be forced to leave as well because we know that his mother's mother was born in a different country. That is part of the criteria that Trump is putting into place. Your mother's mother has to have been born in the United States and we know Melania's mother was born elsewhere. If it's good for one, it's good for all! There should be no exceptions! On the first boat or flight out!'The petition further argued that the move would prevent perceptions of favoritism, adding, "If this is truly about national security, then Melania needs to go!" The remarks reflected growing public frustration over what many viewed as double standards in Trump's deportation though the petition was launched five months ago, it has gained popularity over the last few months, going from 100 signatures two days ago to over 3,300 at the time of publication. Earlier this year, Congresswoman Maxine Waters called for the deportation of Melania, saying Trump should "first look at Melania's records.' Waters' remarks came after Trump signed an executive order on his first day in office seeking to restrict birthright citizenship by reinterpreting the 14th amendment. The order is currently under judicial review."When he [Trump] talks about birthright, and he's going to undo the fact that the Constitution allows those who are born here, even if the parents are undocumented, they have a right to stay in America. If he wants to start looking so closely to find those who were born here and their parents were undocumented, maybe he ought to first look at Melania," Waters was seen saying from the stage, various videos posted on social media showed, Fox News added, "We don't know whether or not her parents were documented. And maybe we better just take a look." According to Fox News, her remarks were met with loud cheers from protestors at the rally, which focused on opposing Trump's federal government downsizing Democratic Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett turned her sights on First Lady Melania Trump over her visa."We don't know whether or not her parents were documented. And maybe we better just take a look," Waters said at a rally. 'If he wants to start looking so closely to find those who were born here and their parents were undocumented, maybe he ought to first look at Melania.''The first lady, a model—and when I say model, I'm not talking Tyra Banks, Cindy Crawford, or Naomi Campbell-level—applied for and was given an EB-1 visa,' Crockett said.'Let me tell you how you receive an Einstein visa,' she said, 'you're supposed to have some sort of significant achievement, like being awarded a Nobel Peace Prize or a Pulitzer, being an Olympic medallist, or having other sustained extraordinary abilities and success in sciences, arts, education, business, or athletics. Last time I checked, the first lady had none of those accolades under her belt. It doesn't take an Einstein to see that the math ain't mathin' here.'Melania was born in Slovenia in 1970 and moved to New York in 1996. She is the first Lady of the United States to become a naturalized citizen. She was a Slovenian model living in New York when she applied for the EB-1 in 2000. The visa was approved in 2001, and she became a US citizen in 2006. That citizenship later allowed her to sponsor her parents for green about her immigration status before she got her green card in 2001 have remained unclear, often kicking off conspiracy theories about whether or not she had maintained legal immigration 2018, The New York Times reported that Melania sponsored her parents, Viktor and Amalija Knavs, for green cards and later citizenship. Amalija Knavs passed away in 2024, while Viktor Knavs has been seen at recent public events with the Trump familyHowever, Robert Scott, an immigration attorney based in New York, told Fact Check last year: 'There's really no sound argument that any of Donald's children are not U.S. citizens.' The 14th Amendment states, 'All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and the State wherein they reside.'
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Leftover missile money? US Air Force spends ICBM funds to revamp Qatar's gift jet to Trump
Why is the U.S. Air Force using missile funds for Trump's Qatar plane? How much will Trump's temporary Air Force One cost? Live Events When will Trump's gift jet be ready for use? Why is this plane gift from Qatar so controversial? Foreign gift laws: Accepting a multimillion-dollar gift from a foreign government may violate the Emoluments Clause of the U.S. Constitution. Accepting a multimillion-dollar gift from a foreign government may violate the of the U.S. Constitution. Congressional oversight: Several lawmakers argue that the administration sidestepped Congressional approval and transparency requirements. What are the national security concerns? Advanced military communication systems Missile defense countermeasures Shielded avionics and cybersecurity Frequent security sweeps to ensure no espionage vulnerabilities exist How does this impact the Sentinel missile program? Is the Qatar-donated jet really ready to serve as Air Force One? How much would it really cost to convert the Qatari jet into Air Force One? Can the Qatari 747 be made secure enough for the president? What features would this plane lack compared to the VC-25B? Will this quick fix delay the actual Air Force One even more? FAQs: (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel U.S. Air Force is redirecting leftover funds from its nuclear missile program to retrofit a luxury jet—originally gifted by Qatar—for President Donald Trump. The move is stirring up a whirlwind of political, ethical, and budgetary Air Force confirmed it's repurposing surplus funds from the Sentinel ICBM modernization program—formerly the LGM‑35A—to begin modifying a Boeing 747‑8 jet gifted by Qatar to President Trump. The funds, labeled as "excess to need," were left over from fiscal year 2024, according to Secretary of the Air Force Troy emphasized that the reallocation doesjeopardize the Sentinel program, which remains "fully funded" and on track to replace the aging Minuteman III missile the Qatar-gifted 747 is expected to cost approximately, according to official Air Force estimates. However, critics—including members of Congress—warn that the actual cost could balloon to nearlyonce communication systems, defense tech, and presidential security upgrades are factored context, this temporary aircraft will serve as an interimuntil the much-delayedis ready—now expected in 2027 or overhaul is projected to take just under a year, positioning the aircraft for use starting in. If the timeline holds, President Trump could use it for roughlybefore the new VC-25Bs enter service. After that, the plane is expected to be transferred to the, adding another layer to the ongoing debate over its aircraft was originally gifted by the Qatari royal family in what critics call an unprecedented gesture toward a sitting U.S. president. Lawmakers, particularly Democrats, have raised seriousSen. Chris Murphy labeled the decision "one of the bigger wastes of taxpayer money in recent memory," pointing to the aircraft's limited projected say retrofitting the Qatar jet to matchis no small feat. It involves:Critics argue the process is risky and expensive—especially when the VC-25Bs are already in the the optics, the Air Force insists the Sentinel ICBM program won't suffer. The funds being redirected were part of an overestimated allocation in FY2024 and won't delay missile upgrades or modernization critics question whether those funds should have been returned to the federal budget or used for more pressing defense Boeing 747-8 offered by Qatar is luxurious, no doubt. But experts say luxury isn't what defines Air Force One. Richard Aboulafia, managing director at AeroDynamic Advisory and a renowned defense aviation expert, warns this move misunderstands the aircraft's purpose.'If it's just about having a flying palace, this might work,' Aboulafia said. 'But Air Force One is a flying command center, built for worst-case scenarios, including nuclear war. This plane is not designed for that.'The existing VC-25B aircraft, originally planned for delivery in 2024, are still years from being completed. Now, officials are looking into the possibility of modifying the Qatari 747 in a much shorter timeframe—but experts warn it's not that the aircraft itself may be a donation, converting it into a full Air Force One could end up costing taxpayers 'billions and billions,' according to a jet to meet presidential standards means far more than adding a few secure phones. The aircraft must support encrypted global communications, aerial refueling, defense systems, hardened electrical systems, a medical bay, and total information security—capabilities that are built into the VC-25B aircraft, but completely missing from the donated plane.L3Harris, the defense firm selected to begin converting the jet in Texas, is reportedly working to finish the conversion by the end of this year. But the timeline has raised eyebrows across the defense experts are extremely wary about the origins of the aircraft. Coming from Qatar's royal family, the plane would need to be completely stripped down and thoroughly inspected for any hidden surveillance devices or stressed, 'It would present a major security concern.' The aircraft would likely undergo deep forensic examination, disassembly, and re-engineering to meet U.S. presidential standards—processes that could take Force One is often referred to as the most secure flying communications and command platform in the world. Any vulnerabilities could have grave consequences in times of Qatari jet, though a Boeing 747-8 like the VC-25B, lacks critical features. For instance, while aerial refueling was scrapped from the VC-25B for cost reasons, it would likely also be missing from the Qatar plane—limiting the president's ability to stay airborne in Birkey, executive director of the Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies, explained how advanced Air Force One's communication capabilities are. 'It functions as a command and control center under some of the most trying conditions imaginable,' he said. 'Even day-to-day, that thing is hyper-connected.'This level of infrastructure is the result of years of engineering and classified work, which cannot be rushed or duplicated original VC-25B aircraft were supposed to be delivered in 2024. Due to the pandemic, supply chain issues, and internal setbacks at Boeing, that date has already been pushed to 2029. However, recent reports say the Pentagon may revise requirements to potentially speed up delivery to Trump, frustrated by the repeated delays, has previously criticized Boeing for its slow pace and cost overruns. That's partly why the idea of an interim aircraft became appealing. But aviation analysts warn that this "shortcut" may only create further delays and deeper over with a second 747-8 might require the same, if not more, time and investment as finishing the VC-25B aircraft already under the Qatar-donated Boeing 747-8 may seem like a cost-saving gift on the surface, experts say the risks of converting it into a new Air Force One far outweigh the perceived benefits. From massive upgrade costs to deep security concerns and strategic capability gaps, the jet may turn out to be more of a burden than a Force officials have not confirmed how the plane will be handled, and both Boeing and L3Harris have declined to comment. For now, all eyes are on the Trump administration's next move—and whether America's next Air Force One will truly be fit for the may cost billions and pose major security say it could take several years, possibly into the 2030s.
The Print
2 hours ago
- The Print
India becoming self-reliant in defence capabilities: Ex-DRDO chief
'Now, the trend has reversed and we produce 70 per cent of our needs indigenously,' Saraswat, a former chief of the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO), said. Addressing a press conference, Saraswat, who was in the steel city to participate in the fifth platinum jubilee lecture of CSIR-National Metallurgical Laboratory here, said India used to import 70 per cent of its defence requirements. Jamshedpur (Jharkhand), Jul 2 (PTI) NITI Aayog member and former DRDO chief V K Saraswat on Wednesday said India has been becoming self-reliant in its defence capabilities in the last 11 years of the Modi government. Barring a few equipment such as S-400 air defence system, a majority of the weapons and missiles — such as Akash and Brahmos — used during Operation Sindoor were manufactured in the country, he said. 'Today, the country is dependent on arms imports only for immediate requirements of the armed forces or where we do not have the technology,' he said. He said the country's self-reliance in defence capabilities has grown substantially in the last 11 years as the Centre promotes private sector participation. Saraswat said he was impressed with the work done in various fields by CSIR-NML scientists. The government has made provision of Rs 1 lakh crore to promote research and development in the private sector, he added. PTI BS ACD This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.
