
Why is the Indian far-right attacking New York mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani?
A Democratic Socialist assembly member from Queens, Mamdani ran on a campaign pushing progressive policies such as a citywide rent freeze, taxpayer-funded childcare and "fast and free" public buses.
New Yorkers of all faiths rallied around the 33-year-old, and on 25 June he secured a stunning political upset, defeating his main rival, the political heavyweight Andrew Cuomo.
Despite being a relative unknown before the primary election, and polling as low as one percent in February, Mamdani's campaign mobilised a coalition of voters, including many from New York's 600,000 strong South Asian community.
But since his shock win, some within the Indian-American community have put a target on his back, making it abundantly clear they don't want, and will never vote for, a Muslim candidate.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
Last week, at a packed event in Queens, New York, a far-right Hindu activist pulled out the knives for the progressive candidate.
Kajal Shingala, also known as Kajal Hindusthani, a keynote speaker at the event, called Mamdani a "jihadi zombie" and said New York would become another Pakistan if he was elected mayor in November.
Listed as one the top 10 purveyors of hate speech in India, Shingala's social media accounts are rife with Islamophobic content, where she labels Muslim men as terrorists, rapists and "love jihadists" - a conspiracy theory that Muslim men are trapping Hindu women into marriage in order to convert them to Islam.
Her comments at the event, which were met by a round of applause from the hundreds of attendees - organised by the Gujarati Samaj and supported by a coalition of different Hindu groups such as the Vaishnav Temple of New York and the Brahman Samaj of New York - were a prelude for her to bring up the 2002 Gujarat riots which Mamdani described as a "mass slaughter" of Muslims at a mayoral forum.
India's current Prime Minister Narendra Modi was chief of minister of Gujarat at the time, leading to Mamdani calling him a "war criminal".
Modi was banned from entering the US for nearly a decade for failing "to control the persistent violation of rights of life, liberty, equality, and dignity of the people of the state".
Despite this, the Gujarati Samaj sought to cultivate strong ties with Modi, with its vice-president, Manikant Patel, saying back in 2012, while the ban was still in place, that he was in "constant contact" with Modi before he became Indian prime minister.
Lies and conspiracy theories
Shingala later said that electing Mamdani would mean that New York - supposedly like London under Mayor Sadiq Khan - would become another Pakistan and Hindu businesses would be under threat.
Since becoming mayor of London, Khan has faced a deluge of criticism from right-wing commentators, including Islamophobic abuse, despite the murder rate going down, an increase in public transport infrastructure and free meals for public primary school children.
Shingala spent most of her speech warning about the threat Muslims pose to the community and encouraged the attendees to learn self-defence to protect themselves from marauding Muslims, to boycott Muslim products, to protect their daughters from Muslim men who sought to lure and oppress them, and to produce more Hindu leaders to protect Indian and Hindu interests.
Sunita Viswanath, executive director of Hindus for Human Rights, told Middle East Eye that Shingala was using the event to extend her hateful rhetoric "from India to the US".
"It pains me that such extreme messages find platforms with mainstream cultural organisations like Gujarat Samaj," she said.
'The Hindu nationalist attacks on Mamdani are a predictable display of depraved bigotry'
- Audrey Truschke, Rutgers University-Newark
She added that recent Carnegie Institute data revealed that "the majority of Indian Americans - even Hindu Americans - do not support such hate. This is why opportunistic hate mongers like Kajal Hindustani have to huddle in closed door private events. We in Savera and Hindus for Human Rights will continue our work to unite across all our differences to fight hate together."
New York City Mayor Eric Adams, who will run as an independent against Mamdani, was originally billed to be the guest of honour according to flyers advertising the event.
Without explanation, however, he pulled out of the event.
According to reports, he received a letter last Thursday signed by more than two dozen interfaith organisations asking him to withdraw and assert that such bigotry has no place in New York.
New York Focus reported that the president of the Gujarati Samaj, Harshad Patel, organised a fundraiser for Adams' re-election campaign at his home last week, which the mayor was supposed to attend.
Mamdani's deputy press secretary, Zachary Nosanchuk, told MEE that the "event is not on the mayor's public schedule, and he is not set to attend."
Neither the mayor's office nor the Gujarati Samaj would answer MEE's questions as to whether Adams attended the fundraiser at Patel's house.
String of attacks
Shingala's attacks were the latest in a string by Hindu nationalists who have weaponised his ethnic and religious identities to smear him.
The Ugandan-born state assemblyman and his family identify as Muslim, which has led to many accusing him of being a jihadi.
But it is his criticisms of Modi that seem to have incensed politicians on both sides of the political divide in India, who have derided him as anti-Indian.
Former actress and Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) parliamentarian Kangana Ranaut - who has almost 3 million followers on X - shared a post on 25 June that falsely accused Mamdani of once leading "a mob of protestors in Times Squre calling Hindus as bastards and heaping abuses upon Lord Rama, who is worshipped by Hindus. A true scumbag."
Mamdani, in actual fact, was speaking out about the construction of the Ram temple on the site of the former 16th century Babri mosque in Uttar Pradesh, which was destroyed by far-right Hindu mobs in 1992, triggering Hindu-Muslim riots which led to the death of 2,000 people, mainly Muslim.
Ranaut's comment above the post she shared said: "He [Mamdani] sounds more Pakistani than Indian… whatever happened to his Hindu identity and now he is ready to wipe out Hinduism, wow!! It's the same story everywhere."
Across the political aisle, Indian parliamentarian Abhishek Singhvi, of the Indian National Congress party, also attacked Mamdani.
"When Zohran Mamdani opens his mouth, Pakistan's PR team takes the day off. India doesn't need enemies with 'allies' like him shouting fiction from New York," he wrote on X on 26 June to his 305,000 followers.
Although most of the vitriol against Mamdani originates from India, MEE has found that there are also a growing number of Indian-Americans - influenced by right-wing politics in India - who have sought to smear him.
During Mamdani's primary election campaign, a group called Indian Americans for Cuomo - who are based in New Jersey rather than New York - spent thousands on Cuomo's campaign.
They paid for a radio slot on an Indian radio station rubbishing Mamdani, as well as for a banner to fly over New York with the line: "Save NYC from Global Intifada. Reject Mamdani."
The group's authorised representative is Satyanarayana Dosapati, who has also organised a pro-Trump rally in Pennsylvania as well as being involved in pro-BJP politics in India.
New Yorkers won't be duped by the far right
Amid the attacks, scholars and analysts have differed over the impact the Hindu right wing poses to Mamdani's election ambitions.
Audrey Truschke, a history professor of modern India at Rutgers University-Newark, told MEE she doesn't think New Yorkers will be influenced by the "depraved bigotry" of right-wing Hindu forces.
"The Hindu nationalist attacks on Mamdani are a predictable display of depraved bigotry, especially anti-Muslim hate," she told MEE. "I doubt New Yorkers will be fooled by such execrable, anti-pluralistic sentiments."
She said: "I do hope the attacks [on Mamdani] serve as a wake-up call to the harms of far-right Hindutva ideology and groups who promote such intolerance in American society."
'If you are on the left of progressive politics, you get targeted'
- Manan Ahmed, Columbia University
David Ludden, emeritus professor of history at New York University, said the attacks on Mamdani by right-wing Hindus and pro-Israel factions were rooted in ethnonationalism.
"Claiming Mr Mamdani is anti-Hindu or anti-Indian has the same Islamophobia logic as claiming he is antisemitic or anti-Israel, and is equally far-fetched and baseless," he said.
"Ideologically, Hindutva and Zionism are both based on the populist claim that one ethno-religious group owns national territory, where it has exclusive rights to livelihood, wealth, and resources,' he added. 'Politically, Modi and Netanyahu regimes are allied against enemies they identify with Islam, whom they claim threaten national survival, to justify violence, expulsion, even genocide, in defence of the nation."
Ludden explained that both ideologies derive from early 20th century British imperial policies that carved the empire into national territories and made them fertile ground for "racist imperial ideologues, and for global Islamophobia today".
Trump backlash
Just like in India, support among Hindu nationalists for US President Donald Trump is strong.
The US president's right-wing politics, his stance on immigration and his denigration of Muslims have appealed to India's far-right, whose rhetoric is predicated on ethnonationalism.
During his first term, Trump ran on an anti-immigrant and anti-Muslim platform. He controversely implemented a "Muslim ban" and in 2019 appeared at a mass rally in support of Modi in Houston where he told the 50,000 strong crowd that the Indian leader was "one of America's greatest, most devoted and most loyal friends".
Since Mamdani's primary win, Trump has repeatedly accused the Democratic Socialist of being a communist, with little to no push-back from the Democratic Party.
"The Democrats have crossed the line," Trump wrote on Truth Social after his primary win. "Zohran Mamdani, a 100% Communist Lunatic, has just won the Dem Primary, and is on his way to becoming Mayor. We've had Radical Leftists before, but this is getting a little ridiculous."
Later, during a dinner at the White House for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Trump reiterated to a reporter that Mamdani was a communist.
"I think he's going through a little bit of a honeymoon right now, but he might make it. But, you know, it all comes through the White House. He needs the money through the White House. He needs a lot. He's going to behave... He better behave. Otherwise, he's going to have big problems," Trump said.
"It's a philosophy [communism] this country is not ready for, and never will be," he added.
Why is The New York Times so afraid of Zohran Mamdani? Read More »
Manan Ahmed, a professor of history at Columbia University said that amid the alliance between pro-Trump and Hindutva forces the attacks served what he called a global fascist movement.
"The Hindutva support for Trump, and Trump's focus on Zohran as a communist or as a socialist or as anti-Israel means that the Hindutva interest in Zoran goes up," he said.
As well as anti-leftist sentiment, he said there was a constellation of interests in which Mamdani's candidacy had became fertile ground for right-wing figures and groups - including the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), the Hindu America Foundation (HAF), Trump and Modi - to advance their agenda such as anti-immigrant and anti-Muslim sentiment.
He said that BJP or Hindutva groups had a history of attacking prominent figures from the diaspora whose politics contrast with the divisive type of politics they are invested in, as a means to "shape the cultural conversation on both ends". He cited figures like the Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, who faced attacks by UK-based versions of BJP and Hindutva groups.
He pointed to similiar dynamics in the US where both former US vice-president Kamala Harris (who is half-Indian) and Seattle Assembly councilwoman Kshama Sawant, who spearheaded a resolution to ban caste discrimination in the city, have been subject to attacks. Sawant was also denied a visa to India earlier this year.
Ahmed added that the reason that support against Mamdani could be "operationalised so quickly" is because the Hindutva infrastructure in the US has been established for a while. "That's the reason someone in New Jersey can hire a plane to fly a banner," he added.
According to Ahmed, far-right ethnonationalists don't want a candidate who may challenge them
"If you are on the left of progressive politics, you get targeted," he said. "Obviously, if it is a Muslim subject, they have added language, but that language can be just as easily tailored if the person is not Muslim.
"That's why it's important to understand the relationship between the ADL and the Hindutva ecosystem. The ADL can target a Jewish person who takes an anti-zionist stance just as easily as the ADL can target a Palestinian or someone who's taking a stance for Gaza, even if they're not Jewish."
Punjabi and Sikh support
Fahd Ahmed, the executive director of community social justice organisation Desis Rising Up and Moving (Drum), told MEE that he didn't believe that Hindutva supporters will have much influence on electoral politics in New York due to the demographic make-up of the city.
He said the number of Indian Hindus who formed the working-class South Asian communities in New York City was "limited" and those who did exist were in neighbourhoods that are further out such as Flushing and Fresh Meadows.
Ahmed added it was important to distinguish between Indian Hindus - who were influenced by right-wing politics - and Hindus from other cultures who were not.
"We have lots of Hindu members who are from Guyana, Nepal, and even from Bangladesh," Ahmed said. "All of those people have been very deeply involved in supporting Zohran, doing work on the ground, knocking doors, making calls, talking to their neighbours, talking to their co-workers, and things like that."
'They have their own hesitations around Hindutva forces'
- Fahd Ahmed, Desis Rising Up and Moving (DRUM)
He said that Indian New Yorkers, who were largely Punjabi and Sikh, were also supportive of Mamdani.
"They have their own hesitations around Hindutva forces, coupled with Zohran himself being partially of Punjabi origin. He was involved in the taxi workers' strike, so the enthusiasm for him in that community where people know him is pretty high."
Ahmed added that young professional Indian Hindus who had moved to New York and were living in hip parts of Brooklyn or Manhattan were also supportive of Mamdani and had volunteered with Drum.
"They're not a very large number, but they turned out for the election at pretty high rates. I think it's fair to say that they turned out in support of Zohran."
Overall, he said Hindutva forces were largely present outside of New York City in New Jersey, Long Island and Westchester, which is why he hadn't seen much right-wing mobilisation for the primary election.
As we edge close to the November election, Ahmed said Mamdani's Muslim and Indian heritage, along with his strong pro‑Palestine positions and criticism of Hindu nationalism, rendered him an outlier in the race and a major target.
"Whether it's Zionist or Hindutva forces, they want to make sure that they're never critiqued," he said.
"Having somebody in office that is doing that is a threat to them."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Middle East Eye
an hour ago
- Middle East Eye
Columbia University to pay $220m, undertake major reforms in bid to restore federal funding
Columbia University announced on Wednesday that it would pay more than $220m to the Trump administration to restore federal research funding it lost after being accused of not doing enough to combat antisemitism on campus. The agreement, months in the making, will see Columbia pay a $200 million settlement to the federal government over three years, and $21 million to settle alleged civil rights violations against Jewish employees. The agreement will also have the senior vice provost conduct a "thorough review" of the Center for Palestine Studies, the Institute for Israel and Jewish Studies, the Middle Eastern, South Asian and African Studies, the Middle East Institute, the global hubs in Tel Aviv and Amman, the School of International and Public Affairs, the Middle East policy major and other programmes focused on the Middle East. In addition, the university is not allowed to maintain programmes that "promote unlawful efforts to achieve race-based outcomes, quotas, diversity targets or similar efforts", which could threaten several departments and fellowships. The university will also be prohibited from implementing affirmative action in its admissions policies. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters The agreement also asks Columbia to reduce its dependence on international students, and asks for the university to provide, upon request, "all disciplinary actions involving student visa-holders resulting in expulsions or suspensions and arrest records" that the university is aware of. Claire Shipman, acting president of Columbia University, said in a statement: "This agreement resolves multiple federal agency investigations and protects Columbia's academic mission, research enterprise and independence." Shipman said the agreement would allow billions of dollars in federal research funding to resume, and that the university would retain control over its academic and operational decisions since the federal government would not dictate what it teaches, who teaches, or which students they could admit. Shipman also said the university did "not agree with the government's conclusion that it violated Title VI of the Civil Rights Act" but did not deny the "very serious and painful challenges our institution has faced with antisemitism". She denied the university had capitulated to President Donald Trump's administration's demands. The university and the federal government are also appointing a monitor to ensure they both stick to their agreements. The new monitor, Bart M Schwartz, is the co-founder and chairman of an organisation that sponsored an event in June about "helping Israel heal and rebuild". Schwartz will provide a report every six months. The agreement also sees the establishment of a whistle-blower hotline for the university to raise complaints to. Demands The Trump administration froze $400m in federal grants in March over its claims that the Ivy League institution failed to tackle antisemitism on campus. Shipman said it also placed the majority of $1.3bn a year in federal funding on hold. Columbia University suspends or expels almost 80 students for pro-Palestine protest Read More » It also issued nine demands to the university, including adopting the controversial International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) definition of antisemitism, which academics and members of the Jewish community have criticised as conflating criticism of Israel with antisemitism. The university pushed back on some of the administration's demands in March, such as putting the renowned Middle Eastern, South Asian and African Studies (MESAAS) department under academic receivership. Instead, they put MESAAS under review. They did not abolish the University Judicial Board. Instead, it was moved under the Office of the Provost. They agreed to some demands, such as a mask ban on campus. Ahead of its deal on Wednesday, Columbia suspended or expelled almost 80 students for pro-Palestine protests. The suspensions will last between one and three years and will require students to write an apology letter if they wish to return to the university.


Middle East Eye
3 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
How right-wing America is falling out of love with Israel
A recent report from CNN revealed that in just eight years, Democratic voters in the United States had reversed their views on Israel. In 2017, Democrats sympathised more with Israel over the Palestinians by 13 percent. In 2025, Democrats sympathised more with Palestinians by 43 percent. That is an unprecedented swing in so short a time. In many ways, this completed a trend that has been building for years, as Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has openly embraced the Republican Party, leading the once solid, bipartisan support for Israel to split along party lines. Until now, Israel could always count on rock-solid support among Republicans and senior Democratic leaders, as proven by President Joe Biden's unstinting support for Israel's genocidal war in Gaza. That bet seemed even surer as President Donald Trump, with his fanatical Christian Zionist base, returned to office. But it turns out that support among Republicans is not so solid. In recent weeks, there has been increasing evidence that support for Israel among conservatives is fraying significantly. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Last month, a Quinnipiac poll found that 64 percent of Republicans sympathised more with Israel than with the Palestinians. That sounds like a lot - until you consider that just one year earlier, that number was 78 percent in the same poll. Sympathy for Palestinians did not increase: only 7 percent said they sympathised with Palestinians. So the drop was solely due to a declining view of Israel. The dynamic is not confined to polls by any means. Negative attitudes There has long been a sector of the American right wing that holds negative attitudes towards Israel. For the most part, that attitude has little to do with sympathy for Palestinians. Rather, it stems from either isolationism, antipathy towards Jews, or some combination of the two. Both of those tendencies have been magnified recently. Though the amendment to cut Israeli military aid received only six votes, the fact that it came from within Trump's camp was a shock The roiling, revived controversy over serial sexual predator Jeffrey Epstein's mysterious client list has rocked Trump and, for the first time in a decade, shaken support among parts of his MAGA base. The president who once seemed to be made of Teflon - immune to every controversy - is finally showing signs of vulnerability to a scandal he himself long tried to weaponise against Democrats. Similarly, some of Trump's most vocal and racist supporters have come out strongly against him on matters concerning the Middle East. Tucker Carlson, the former Fox News pundit who once called Iraqis "primitive monkeys" and promoted antisemitic theories that Jews were facilitating the entry of undocumented immigrants to undermine "white America" - known as the "Great Replacement Theory" - has become an increasingly vocal critic of Trump's policies. This reached new heights when Trump threatened, and then followed through with, bombing Iran. In a viral interview with far-right Senator Ted Cruz, Carlson ridiculed the senator for blindly backing the policy while knowing nothing about Iran. The criticism of Trump was blatant. Another long-time Trump supporter, Republican Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene from Georgia, has broken ranks with Trump on Israel. Greene, a known conspiracy theorist, Islamophobe, and antisemite, who once posited that space lasers operated by Jews started a catastrophic fire in California, recently brought an amendment to the Defence Appropriations Bill that, among other things, would have stripped half a billion dollars from Israel's annual funding for its Iron Dome missile system. Unsurprisingly, the amendment received only six votes in support. But that it came from within Trump's camp was a shock. The only other Republican to support it, Congressman Thomas Massie, is not in Trump's good graces. Greene's amendment did receive support from four progressive Democrats. Notably, it stirred anger at leading progressive Democrat Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, who opposed the amendment, arguing that the Iron Dome - which gives Israel the ability to attack others without significant fear of retaliation - is a purely defensive weapon. Her progressive community clearly disagreed. Still, the fact that a proposal to cut military aid to Israel received bipartisan support and originated with Republicans was notable. Israel targeting churches Into this mess came a high-profile Israeli attack on the Holy Family Catholic Church in Gaza City. It was at least the sixth attack on a church in Gaza since 7 October 2023, but this one caught the attention of the US. Just days earlier, an attack by Israeli settlers on a church in the West Bank village of Taybeh also drew attention. The Church of al-Khader (St George), which dates back to the fifth century, was damaged when settlers attempted to burn it to the ground. Follow Middle East Eye's live coverage of the Israel-Palestine war Israel has been evasive about the incident and has yet to arrest anyone in connection with the attack. It claims that the settlers were trying to put out the fire and that the arsonists are unknown. Few outside of the settlers' supporters put much faith in that account, given well-documented Israeli settler hostility to Palestinian Christians. US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee condemned the attacks on Palestinian churches - a remarkable shift for a man who has long defended Israel against virtually every allegation, no matter how well documented. Why do evangelical Protestants hate Palestinians? Read More » "It doesn't matter whether it's a mosque, a church, a synagogue," he told reporters. "It's unacceptable to commit an act of sacrilege by desecrating a place that is supposed to be a place of worship." Huckabee has never spoken out about the more than 960 mosques that Israel had damaged or destroyed in Gaza as of January 2025. But the attack on the Holy Family Church has resonated. Right-wing pundits have expressed outrage and frustration at Israel's attack on the church, with few believing Israel's claim that it was an artillery misfire. US Senator Lindsey Graham, another staunch supporter of Israel, expressed similar concern: "When you have Christian churches under siege in Gaza and the West Bank, it needs to stop," he told Jewish Insider. "You're not helping your cause by allowing people to abuse Christian holy sites," he added, warning that such actions could undermine Israel's ability to maintain support in the United States. "You're losing me," said influential conservative pundit Michael Knowles. "The Israeli government is really screwing up. This horrific war must come to a complete end." Epstein fallout Another issue that has exposed a growing rift within Trump's base is the resurfacing of the Jeffrey Epstein scandal and the president's close personal friendship with the convicted sex offender. Epstein was finally jailed for his crimes in 2019 and was found dead in his cell, ostensibly by suicide, a little more than a month later. For a variety of reasons - some more substantial than others - many suspect Epstein was murdered. The connection between Epstein and Israel is now gaining traction in right-wing circles Given that he was trafficking underage girls for sex and is known to have handed those girls over to at least some very prominent global figures, the roots of the theory are obvious, even if some of the speculation remains wild and unsubstantiated. A purported list of clients that Epstein allegedly maintained is at the centre of the controversy, although it is not at all clear that the list exists. For years, Trump and others within his circle - such as the pro-Trump lawyer and pro-Israel zealot Alan Dershowitz - hinted that there were prominent Democratic figures on that list. Trump detractors, naturally, pointed to his long-time friendship with Epstein, along with various videos and photos of them together at Epstein's parties, as proof that Trump had something to hide. Adding fuel to the speculation is the fact that Epstein's accomplice, Ghislaine Maxwell, was the daughter of Robert Maxwell, who also died under mysterious circumstances and was widely believed - though never proven - to have been associated with the Israeli spy agency Mossad. (The media tycoon received a grand state funeral in Israel's Mount of Olives cemetery, attended by senior Israeli leaders.) The connection between Epstein and Israel is now gaining traction in right-wing circles. All of these factors are converging and revealing a deepening split on Israel from the right. A Pew Research poll in April found that 50 percent of Republicans aged 18 to 49 have a negative view of Israel - a 15 percent jump from 2022. Of course, Republican megadonors like Miriam Adelson and others will continue to pump as many dollars as they deem necessary to maintain solid support for Israel. But in the end, money in politics is only worth as much as the votes it can buy. Netanyahu made a bet years ago that if he were more brazenly brutal and radical in his oppression of Palestinians and aggression towards Israel's neighbours, solid support among Republicans - bolstered by the American pro-Israel lobby on both sides of Congress - would compensate for losing liberal Democratic voters. That looks like an increasingly poor bet today. The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.


Middle East Eye
4 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Syria asks Turkey for defence support following Sweida violence
Syria's interim government has asked Turkey for support to strengthen its defence capacities, Turkish officials announced on Wednesday. Speaking on condition of anonymity, Turkish defence officials also confirmed that Syria is seeking Turkey's assistance to combat "terrorist organisations", including the Islamic State group. "As long as our brotherly country, Syria, requests it, Turkey will continue to stand firmly by its side," Omer Celik, spokesperson for Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan's ruling party, told reporters. 'The heroic Turkish armed forces will fulfil this, both to assist our Syrian brothers and to prevent instability there, which is vital for Turkey's national security,' he added. Turkey is already training and advising Syrian armed forces, and told Reuters in June that it has no plans to withdraw Turkish troops currently stationed in Syria. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Having long supported Syrian opposition to Bashar al-Assad, Turkey has become a key supporter of the interim Syrian government led by Ahmed al-Sharaa, which has emerged following Assad's fall in December. The request follows violent clashes between Druze and Bedouin militias in Syria's southern Sweida region last week that resulted in over 1,000 deaths, and precipitated further Israeli intervention within Syrian territory. The 'bigger strategic problem' Turkey has been a strong critic of the recent Israeli interventions in Syria, including those near a strategic air base in the city of Hama, where Israel has accused Turkey of exploring military interests. 'The bigger strategic problem in the region is Israel's attempt to invade the region,' Erdogan said on 20 July. 'Israel strives to set the entire region on fire, but Syria's stance cautiously reined in this process,' he added. However, Turkey has so far been hesitant to offer full-scale defence support to the Syrian government, holding talks in April with the Israeli government over the establishment of a deconfliction line aimed at avoiding direct confrontation between the Turkish and Israeli militaries. An American-brokered ceasefire between Israel and Syria was announced by US ambassador to Turkey and special envoy to Syria Tom Barrack on 19 July. Barrack told Associated Press earlier this week that the US has 'no position' on a potential defence pact between Syria and Turkey. Syrian officials could not be immediately reached for comment.