logo
Video of violent altercation in Cincinnati goes viral, prompting police investigation

Video of violent altercation in Cincinnati goes viral, prompting police investigation

NBC News28-07-2025
Police are investigating a violent altercation involving multiple people that happened in downtown Cincinnati on Saturday night after video of the brawl went viral on social media.
According to police Chief Teresa Theetge, the incident 'was a sudden dispute between individuals following a verbal altercation,' and was not connected to the Cincinnati Music Festival that was happening at the same time.
Theetge said she is 'in complete disgust waking up to the viral video' of the incident circulating online.
'The behavior displayed is nothing short of cruel and absolutely unacceptable,' she said in a statement on Sunday. 'Our investigative team is working diligently to identify every individual involved in causing harm.'
Police did not share any information about the altercation, what caused it, or how many people were involved. They did not clarify if there had been any arrests as of Monday afternoon.
Theetge is asking anyone with information on the incident to contact police.
Videos circulating online show a chaotic scene involving at least a dozen people. In one video, a few men can be seen standing face-to-face, having what appears to be a verbal altercation, before one man seems to hit another in the face. This seems to set off a full-blown physical altercation, where the man who threw the first hit is beaten by multiple people in the middle of a street. The violence includes kicks and stomps to his face.
Two other men who appear to know the man being beaten also appear to be attacked by the crowd. In another video, a woman attempting to defend him gets knocked unconscious by someone in the crowd. Blood could be seen running from her mouth as she lay on the ground.
It is not clear what happened before these videos were taken.
The incident has garnered much attention on social media over the weekend, particularly on Elon Musk's X, where many high-profile rightwing accounts such as 'LibsofTikTok' and 'End Wokeness' framed the fight as an assault by a Black 'mob' on a white couple.
Musk himself published posts decrying the fight and calling for mainstream media attention. He did not mention race in his post.
Prominent Republican politicians also weighed in, with Vice President JD Vance answering a question Monday about the fight, saying he saw a 'mob of lawless thugs beating up on an innocent person.'
Vance's half brother Cory Bowman is running for mayor of Cincinnati and will face the incumbent, Aftab Pureval, in a November election. advanced on Tuesday to compete in the general election.
Pureval said he was outraged by the fight, calling it 'horrifying to watch,' and 'intolerable' in any part of the city. The mayor said he is confident that arrests are 'forthcoming.'
'That's not who we are as a city,' Pureval said in a statement on Monday. 'Since the fight occurred, I have been in consistent communication with Chief Theetge, and our police have been working around the clock to investigate and bring perpetrators of violence to justice.'
Pureval reiterated that the altercation was not connected to the Cincinnati Music Festival, Cincinnati Reds games, the Big3 tournament, 'or any of the large events that took place over the weekend.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What's known and not yet known about the Justice Department's scrutiny of Trump-Russia probe origins
What's known and not yet known about the Justice Department's scrutiny of Trump-Russia probe origins

San Francisco Chronicle​

time21 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

What's known and not yet known about the Justice Department's scrutiny of Trump-Russia probe origins

WASHINGTON (AP) — News that Attorney General Pam Bondi is moving to criminally investigate the Obama-era origins of the Trump-Russia investigation means that one of the most studied, and politically polarizing, chapters of modern American history will be under the microscope yet again. A saga with a long backstory Perhaps no issue continues to aggravate President Donald Trump more than the assessment by intelligence officials that Russia interfered in the 2016 election on his behalf and the investigation by law enforcement into whether his campaign colluded with Moscow to tip the outcome of the contest. Robert Mueller, the former FBI director tapped as special counsel by Trump's first Justice Department to investigate, found that Russia had waged a multi-prong operation in Trump's favor and that the Republican president's campaign welcomed the aid. But Mueller did not find sufficient evidence of a criminal conspiracy between Russia and the Trump campaign. As president for a second time, Trump has made no secret of his desire to use the Justice Department as a weapon of retribution against perceived political adversaries he sees as having smeared him, including by calling for Obama-era officials to be jailed. And his administration, now more broadly and across multiple agencies, has been engaged in a effort to reopen the long-accepted conclusion — including among prominent Republicans — of Russian interference and to scrutinize the officials involved in reaching that assessment. A Bondi grand jury directive Bondi, a Trump loyalist, has directed Justice Department prosecutors to present evidence related to the Russia inquiry to a grand jury. Grand juries are tools used by prosecutors to issue subpoenas for records and prosecutors and to produce indictments based on the evidence they receive. The bar is low for an indictment given that the presentation of evidence by prosecutors is one-sided, though grand juries do have the option to decline to indict and have done so in the past. A person familiar with the matter confirmed Bondi's directive to The Associated Press but key questions remain. It was not disclosed, for instance, which prosecutors are pursuing the investigation, where the grand jury that might hear evidence is located and whether and when law enforcement officials might seek to bring criminal charges. The Justice Department, in an unusual statement last month, appeared to confirm the existence of an investigation into former FBI Director James Comey and former CIA Director James Brennan but provided no details or specifics. Potential targets of probe remain unclear It's not clear who might be targeted in the investigation, but the Trump administration has been aggressively challenging intelligence community conclusions about Russia's actions and intentions that had long ago seemed settled. It's been a welcome diversion for the administration as it confronts a wave of criticism from Trump's base and conservative influencers over the handling of records from the Jeffrey Epstein sex trafficking investigation. In the last month, Trump administration officials and allies have released a series of documents aimed at casting doubt on the extent of interference and at portraying the original Russia investigation as an Obama administration frame-job. The documents have been hailed as incontrovertible proof of a conspiracy, but a close inspection of the records shows they fall well short of that. Among the documents released by Tulsi Gabbard, the administration's director of national intelligence, are emails from 2016 showing that Obama administration officials recognized in 2016 that Russians had not hacked state election systems to manipulate votes in favor of Trump. But the absence of evidence that votes were switched — something the Obama administration never alleged — has no bearing on the ample evidence of other forms of Russia interference, including a hack-and-leak operation involving Democratic emails and a covert social media campaign aimed at sowing discord and spreading disinformation. Last week, Sen. Chuck Grassley, the Republican chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, released a previously classified annex of a 2023 report by John Durham, the special counsel appointed by the first Trump administration to hunt for government misconduct in the Russia probe. The annex included a series of emails, including one from July 2016 that was purportedly sent by a senior staffer at a philanthropic organization founded by billionaire investor George Soros, that referred to a plan approved by then-Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton to falsely link Trump to Russia. But Durham's own report took pain to note that investigators had not corroborated the communications as authentic and said the best assessment was that the message was 'a composites of several emails' the Russians had obtained from hacking — raising the likelihood that it was a product of Russian disinformation. Fresh scrutiny has also centered around the intelligence community assessment on Russian election interference, which was published in January 2017. An annex in a classified version of the assessment contained a summary of the so-called Steele dossier — a compilation of opposition research that included uncorroborated rumors and salacious gossip about Trump and Russia. The latest in a series of investigations Multiple government reports, including not only from Mueller but also a Republican-led Senate intelligence committee that included current Secretary of State Marco Rubio, have documented Russia's activities in sweeping details. To be sure, reports from the Justice Department inspector general and Durham also identified significant flaws in the FBI's Russia investigation, including errors and omissions in applications the Justice Department submitted to a secretive surveillance court to eavesdrop on a national security adviser to the 2016 Trump campaign. But Durham found no criminal wrongdoing among government officials, bringing three criminal cases — two against private citizens that resulted in acquittals at trial and a third against a little-known FBI lawyer who pleaded guilty to doctoring an email. It is unclear if there is any criminal wrongdoing that exists that Durham, who launched his investigation in 2019 and concluded it four years later, somehow missed during his sprawling inquiry.

House Homeland Security chair tours ‘amazing' Long Island police training center: ‘A very special place'
House Homeland Security chair tours ‘amazing' Long Island police training center: ‘A very special place'

New York Post

time21 minutes ago

  • New York Post

House Homeland Security chair tours ‘amazing' Long Island police training center: ‘A very special place'

Nassau County officials on Tuesday wowed US Rep. Andrew Garbarino, giving the new chairman of the House Committee on Homeland Security an exclusive tour of their state-of-the-art cop training center. In fact, the Empire State Republican lawmaker can't wait to tell his Capitol Hill pals about it. 'I have never seen something like this,' Garbarino told reporters. 'This was amazing. I didn't know what to expect today and even my dreams could not have reached what I saw today. This is a very special place and it's a place where we should bring law enforcement from all over the country. Advertisement 5 Nassau County cops perform a hostage situation drill at the county's new police training village and intel center. Luiz C. Ribeiro for New York Post 5 US Rep. Andrew Garbarino gets an exclusive tour of the Nassau County police new high-tech intel center on Tuesday. Luiz C. Ribeiro for New York Post 'It's something that I'm going to bring back. I'm going to speak to the chairman of the Homeland appropriation subcommittee,' he said. Advertisement The one-of-a-kind Nassau County Police Department Intel Center and Training Village — unveiled last month with a ribbon-cutting by US Attorney General Pam Bondi — is a fully developed neighborhood designed for a full range of law enforcement training scenarios, including active shooter drills. 5 Cops performing a hostage situation drill at Nassau County's new police training facility, which includes an intel center. Luiz C. Ribeiro for New York Post 5 The new Nassau County police training village even has a church, a police station, a train station and a gas station. Luiz C. Ribeiro for New York Post The sprawling facility has a simulation church, police precinct, bank, a gas station, private homes and even a train station with actual trains, allowing for a variety of training options. Advertisement Nearly 20 years in the making, the facility coincides with Nassau's efforts to beef up law enforcement capabilities, including a recent deal to train with federal immigration agents. Tuesday's tour was led by Nassau County Executive Bruce Blakeman and county police Commissioner Patrick Ryder, who also showed off the department's high-tech intelligence center. 'The hub is right here,' Ryder told Garbarino. 'Everything you see on the board is what is running out there in the police department and what they are doing every single day. What you're looking at right dead smack in the middle is a drone that we have detected that's up in our airspace now.' 5 US Rep. Andrew Garbarino on a tour of Nassau County's new police training facility and intel center on Tuesday. Luiz C. Ribeiro for New York Post Advertisement The intel center even links more than 450 school buildings to police through an alert system called the 'Rave app' that can get cops there faster than even 911, Ryder said. 'We have it in our yeshiva's, our private schools, and our colleges,' the commissioner told Garbarino. 'That gives us the access to reach them if they have a problem, they push the button, we're coming and it bypasses the 911 system.'

America's Most Wanted: Texas senator calls on FBI director Kash Patel to hunt down ‘fleeing' Democrats
America's Most Wanted: Texas senator calls on FBI director Kash Patel to hunt down ‘fleeing' Democrats

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

America's Most Wanted: Texas senator calls on FBI director Kash Patel to hunt down ‘fleeing' Democrats

Republican Senator John Cornyn is calling on the FBI to track down and arrest Texas Democrats who left the state to derail a vote on new congressional districts explicitly designed to elect more Republicans to Congress. In a letter to FBI Director Kash Patel on Tuesday, Cornyn requested the agency's help to 'locate the out-of-state Texas legislators who are potentially acting in violation of the law.' 'The FBI has tools to aid state law enforcement when parties cross state lines, including to avoid testifying or fleeing a scene of a crime,' he added. Democrats did not break the law by denying the Texas House of Representatives a quorum. Texas House rules allow lawmakers to issue civil arrest warrants to force members back to the capitol, but leaving the chambers is not a criminal offense, and federal law enforcement does not have authority to compel lawmakers to come back to Texas. But Cornyn, echoing claims from Texas Republicans, has accused Texas Democrats of 'potential criminal acts' — including bribery or 'other public corruption offenses' — for allegedly receiving monetary support to leave the state until the end of a 30-day legislative session. The senator's allegations have escalated law enforcement threats against Texas lawmakers who are protesting a GOP plan, requested by Donald Trump, to redraw political boundaries in the hopes of electing five more Texas Republicans into the House of Representatives in next year's midterm elections. Trump on Tuesday claimed he is 'entitled' to those seats. The office of Governor Greg Abbott, who launched the legislative session to explicitly approve the new congressional maps before 2026 midterm elections, said he supports Cornyn's move. The governor has said that the use of campaign funds to help pay for hefty fines for 'truancy' amounts to bribery. On Monday, he called on the Texas Rangers to investigate his allegations as well as 'potential legal violations connected to their refusal to appear for a quorum, conduct business, and cast votes.' Abbot 'fully supports using all necessary tools to discover potential legal violations connected to their refusal to appear for a quorum, conduct business, and cast votes,' his office said in a statement. Texas Republicans failed to reach a quorum a second day in a row on Tuesday while more than 50 Texas Democrats remain in Illinois, New York and elsewhere. 'This is not a decision we make lightly, but it is one we make with absolute moral clarity,' Democratic state Rep. Gene Wu said from Illinois on Sunday night after leaving the state with several other Democrats. On Monday, state Republicans voted in favor of their arrest. Republican House Speaker Dustin Burrows said he would immediately sign civil warrants for those missing Democratic members, giving the greenlight to the chamber's sergeant-at-arms and state troopers to make arrests and bring them to the state Capitol. The warrants only apply within state lines, making the legislative threats a largely symbolic maneuver. The House met for roughly five minutes on Tuesday before adjourning. 'It is evident to the chair that [the Department of Public Safety] will need some time to work, and we will try again to make quorum on Friday,' Burrows said. Burrows met with state law enforcement officials on Tuesday morning to discuss how to enforce the warrants. 'The Texas Constitution requires members of the Legislature to show up, and Texans expect us to do our jobs,' Burrows wrote on X. 'I remain fully committed to obtaining a quorum and resuming the business of the Texas House.' Following Monday's vote, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton said he is 'prepared to do everything in my power to hold them accountable because these liberal lawmakers are not above the law.' 'It's imperative that they be swiftly arrested, punished, and face the full force of the law for turning their backs on the people of Texas,' he said. Texas Democrats had similarly left the state in 2021 to protest Republican-backed voting restrictions. After nearly five weeks on the road, enough lawmakers returned home to establish a quorum, and the measure passed. Republican lawmakers had similarly tried to force back missing Democrats at the time, though they obtained a court-ordered injunction blocking their arrest. The state's Supreme Court later struck down the injunction, finding that while the state Constitution 'enables 'quorum-breaking' by a minority faction of the legislature, it likewise authorizes 'quorum-forcing' by the remaining members.' Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store