New deep sea mining rules lack consensus despite US pressure
Following a meeting in March and the current session in Jamaica, the 36 members of the ISA's executive council completed on July 17 a line-by-line reading of the proposed "mining code" and its 107 regulations for exploitation of the ocean floor in international waters.
The minerals and metals in question, such as cobalt, nickel, and manganese, are used for electric vehicles and other emerging technologies.
"This marks a significant milestone," council president Duncan Muhumuza Laki said to applause.
But after more than a decade of talks, crucial sections of the proposed rules including mechanisms for protecting the marine environment are far from winning consensus, and several delegations have publicly opposed calls from Laki to work quickly to finalise the code this year, as envisioned in a 2023 roadmap.
"The exploitation activities cannot begin as long as we do not have a solid, equitable framework," Chilean representative Salvador Vega Telias, whose country is one of 37 asking for a moratorium on deep sea mining, told the plenary session.
He also said mining could not begin until experts could pinpoint "all the scientific knowledge that we need to have to identify the potential impacts and effects on the marine environment."
For ISA Secretary-General Leticia Carvalho, "the deep sea needs rules."
But, she added, "I firmly believe that the success of deep sea governance will depend on our ability to draw from robust science, inclusive dialogue, and the wisdom to act with precaution."
Canadian mining firm
The ISA session, which will continue this week with the assembly of all 169 member states, comes as US President Donald Trump threw a monkey wrench into the process in April.
The Republican instructed his administration to fast-track the granting of permits for deep sea mining in domestic and international waters, citing an obscure 1980 US law and sidestepping the process undertaken by the ISA.
The United States is not party to the independent ISA or to the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), under which the ISA was established in 1994.
Canada's The Metals Company (TMC) quickly jumped at the opportunity, lodging the first request for a high seas mining license -- a short-circuiting of the ISA process that was slammed by non-governmental organisations and some member states.
Those parties appear to want to send a message to TMC on Friday, the last day of the council's session.
A draft text still under discussion calls on the ISA's legal and technical commission to investigate "possible issues of non-compliance of contractors that may arise out of the facilitation of or the participation in actions intended to appropriate resources... contrary to the multilateral legal framework."
The draft calls on the commission to report any instances of non-compliance or potential violations of the Law of the Sea and "recommend, where appropriate, measures to be taken by the Council."
Nori, a subsidiary of TMC, has held since 2011 an exploration contract for an area of the Clarion-Clipperton Zone in the Pacific Ocean, which expires in one year.
The Canadian firm had hoped to be the first recipient of an ISA-awarded commercial mining license to be used in that area, before pivoting to apply to Washington to work there.
'Common heritage'
The talks in Kingston have been tense at times, with several delegations miffed about the rules put in place by the council president, including convening some negotiations behind closed doors.
'What the council is discussing currently is the common heritage of humankind,' Emma Watson of the Deep Sea Conservation Coalition, an alliance of NGOs, told AFP, criticizing what she called a 'big shift' in procedure.
Ocean defenders have battled against what they say is the advent of an industry that will threaten isolated ecosystems, which have still not been thoroughly studied.
Company executives and some countries say the world needs these strategic minerals and metals to propel clean energy technologies, such as electric cars.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
21 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Columbia University agrees to pay more than $220 million in deal with Trump to restore federal funding
Columbia University announced Wednesday (July 23, 2025) it has reached a deal with the Trump administration to pay more than $220 million to the federal government to restore federal research money that was cancelled in the name of combating antisemitism on campus. Under the agreement, the Ivy League school will pay a $200 million settlement over three years, the university said. It will also pay $21 million to resolve alleged civil rights violations against Jewish employees that occurred following the October 7, 2023, Hamas attack on Israel, the White House said. 'This agreement marks an important step forward after a period of sustained federal scrutiny and institutional uncertainty," acting University President Claire Shipman said. The school had been threatened with the potential loss of billions of dollars in government support, including more than $400 million in grants canceled earlier this year. The administration pulled the funding because of what it described as the university's failure to squelch antisemitism on campus during the Israel-Hamas war. Columbia has since agreed to a series of demands laid out by the Republican administration, including overhauling the university's student disciplinary process and applying a contentious, federally endorsed definition of antisemitism not only to teaching but to a disciplinary committee that has been investigating students critical of Israel. Wednesday's agreement — which does not include an admission of wrongdoing — codifies those reforms while preserving the university's autonomy, Shipman said. Columbia's reforms are a roadmap,' Trump administration says Education Secretary Linda McMahon called the deal 'a seismic shift in our nation's fight to hold institutions that accept American taxpayer dollars accountable for antisemitic discrimination and harassment.' 'Columbia's reforms are a roadmap for elite universities that wish to regain the confidence of the American public by renewing their commitment to truth-seeking, merit, and civil debate,' Ms. McMahon said in a statement. As part of the agreement, Columbia agreed to a series of changes previously announced in March, including reviewing its Middle East curriculum to make sure it was 'comprehensive and balanced' and appointing new faculty to its Institute for Israel and Jewish Studies. It also promised to end programs 'that promote unlawful efforts to achieve race-based outcomes, quotes, diversity targets or similar efforts.' The university will also have to issue a report to a monitor assuring that its programs 'do not promote unlawful DEI goals.' Crackdown follows Columbia protests The pact comes after months of uncertainty and fraught negotiations at the more than 270-year-old university. It was among the first targets of President Donald Trump's crackdown on pro-Palestinian campus protests and on colleges that he asserts have allowed Jewish students be threatened and harassed. Columbia's own antisemitism task force found last summer that Jewish students had faced verbal abuse, ostracism and classroom humiliation during the spring 2024 demonstrations. Other Jewish students took part in the protests, however, and protest leaders maintain they aren't targeting Jews but rather criticizing the Israeli government and its war in Gaza. Columbia's leadership — a revolving door of three interim presidents in the last year — has declared that the campus climate needs to change. Columbia agrees to question international students Also in the settlement is an agreement to ask prospective international students 'questions designed to elicit their reasons for wishing to study in the United States,' and establishes processes to make sure all students are committed to 'civil discourse.' In a move that would potentially make it easier for the Trump administration to deport students who participate in protests, Columbia promised to provide the government with information, upon request, of disciplinary actions involving student-visa holders resulting in expulsions or suspensions. Columbia on Tuesday announced it would suspend, expel or revoke degrees from more than 70 students who participated in a pro-Palestinian demonstration inside the main library in May and an encampment during alumni weekend last year. The pressure on Columbia began with a series of funding cuts. Then Mahmoud Khalil, a former graduate student who had been a visible figure in the protests, became the first person detained in the Trump administration's push to deport pro-Palestinian activists who aren't U.S. citizens. Next came searches of some university residences amid a federal Justice Department investigation into whether Columbia concealed 'illegal aliens' on campus. The interim president at the time responded that the university was committed to upholding the law. University oversight expands Columbia was an early test case for the Trump administration as it sought closer oversight of universities that the Republican president views as bastions of liberalism. Yet it soon was overshadowed by Harvard University, which became the first higher education institution to defy Trump's demands and fight back in court. The Trump administration has used federal research funding as its primary lever in its campaign to reshape higher education. More than $2 billion in total has also been frozen at Cornell, Northwestern, Brown and Princeton universities. Administration officials pulled $175 million from the University of Pennsylvania in March over a dispute around women's sports. They restored it when school officials agreed to update records set by transgender swimmer Lia Thomas and change their policies. The administration also is looking beyond private universities. University of Virginia President James Ryan agreed to resign in June under pressure from a U.S. Justice Department investigation into diversity, equity and inclusion practices. A similar investigation was opened this month at George Mason University.
Mint
22 minutes ago
- Mint
Some Canadian Leaders Want Thaw With China to Offset US Trade War
Some senior officials in Canada say it's time to repair trade relations with China, arguing US tariff policy is pushing them to deal with Asia's largest economy. Last year, the Canadian government put tariffs of 100% on Chinese-made electric vehicles and 25% on steel and aluminum products, aligning with what the Biden administration had done. The move also protected Canada's auto industry. China struck back with retaliatory 100% tariffs on Canadian canola oil and pea products, and a 25% levy on pork and seafood — a move that underscored the sharp deterioration in ties between Beijing and Ottawa in recent years. Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe, whose province is Canada's top canola producer, said the country must 'reset our relationship with China if we are going to have any hope of diversifying.' The US bought about three-quarters of Canada's goods exports last year. 'China is one of the largest markets in the world. It's our second-largest trading partner as the province of Saskatchewan,' Moe said during an interview in Huntsville, Ontario, where he attended meetings with other provincial leaders and Prime Minister Mark Carney. 'They'll need to be a part of that process.' In a joint statement Tuesday, Canada's premiers urged Carney to 'improve the overall trade relationship' with Beijing and remove the tariffs. Tensions have been building for years. In 2018, Canadian police arrested Meng Wanzhou, chief financial officer and daughter of the founder of Huawei Technologies Co. That same month, China arrested two Canadians, detaining them for almost three years. During his leadership campaign, Carney called China the biggest threat to his country. However, last month he spoke with Premier Li Qiang about the trade disputes and told reporters it's important that Canada 're-open' dialogue with Beijing. Some Canadians say Washington has given them no credit for aligning with US policy on China — leaving Ottawa squeezed between its two largest trading partners. British Columbia Premier David Eby said in March: 'The initial tariffs that were put on by Canada as an attempt to curry favor with the president, in my opinion, have not had the intended effect. The president's been completely indifferent to our policy towards China, and in fact he doesn't seem to have any designs on treating Canada better than China.' Eby added: 'It'll be necessary for the federal government to have a look at tariff policy with respect to trading partners around the world, understanding that we don't want to get crushed between the two biggest economies in the world.' He said he'd support diversifying away from both the US and China and toward other markets. Last month, he visited Asian countries, but not China, on a trade mission. Wab Kinew, the leader of another major agricultural exporter province, Manitoba, said he told Carney that Canada must plot a path with 'room to maneuver' amid the tariffs from the US and China. US President Donald Trump has sidestepped the trade agreement he signed with Canada and Mexico during his first term to impose levies on steel, aluminum and automobiles. He has also put 25% tariffs on many other Canadian products if they aren't shipped under the deal's rules, and threatened to raise that to 35%. His actions have led to layoffs and business losses in the steel and auto industries, sparking outrage among Canadians — many of whom have responded by avoiding travel to the US. Doug Ford, premier of Ontario, Canada's auto heartland, said he's against removing tariffs against Chinese electric vehicles, but he would have no problem doing more business with China 'as long as China plays fair and doesn't undercut our markets.' 'I don't consider Americans the enemy, but right now President Trump himself is acting like the enemy,' Ford said. Moe said expanding trade ties with other nations is about shielding Canada's economy over the long run from protectionism. 'In order for us to have a serious amount of leverage in that conversation, you need to be able to access all markets,' he said. With assistance from Derek Decloet. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Trump administration recommends location verification for AI chips
U.S. President Donald Trump's administration on Wednesday recommended implementing export controls that would verify the location of advanced artificial intelligence chips, a move that was applauded by U.S. lawmakers from both parties in both houses of Congress. The recommendation was part of a broader AI blueprint released on Wednesday that aimed to boost exports of AI hardware and software to U.S. allies and relax U.S. environmental rules to speed the construction of new AI data centers. But the plan released Wednesday also said the U.S. should continue denying access to advanced U.S. AI chips made by companies like Nvidia and AMD to foreign adversaries. It added the U.S. government should "explore leveraging new and existing location verification features on advanced AI compute to ensure that the chips are not in countries of concern." The recommendation drew support from two lawmakers who previously introduced bills that would require location verification of chips after sale over concerns that they are finding their way to countries such as China, where their export is banned. Key details - such as how the technology would be implemented and how much cost it would add - remain to be worked out, both in the proposed bills and the Trump administration's recommendations. "I was encouraged to see that the recommended export control policy includes location verification mechanisms and aligns closely with our bipartisan Chip Security Act. I look forward to learning more of the technical details and next steps for end-use verification," Representative Bill Foster, an Illinois Democrat who helped introduce a chip-location bill in May, told Reuters. "Senator Cotton was pleased to see verification included in President Trump's AI Action Plan, as it's a vital part of his bipartisan, bicameral Chip Security Act and an important tool to keep advanced American technology out of the hands of Communist China," said Patrick McCann, a spokesperson for Senator Tom Cotton, an Arkansas Republican who introduced a similar bill in the U.S. Senate.
