
My affair with Liz Truss ruined my marriage, admits former Tory MP
Mark Field, MP for Cities of London and Westminster from 2001 to 2019, revealed the "first serious signs of cracks" in his marriage began 'just as Elizabeth Truss entered his life'.
In his new book serialised in the Mail on Sunday, Mr Field said he met the 49-day prime minister at the Conservative Party Conference in October 2002 in the "romantic dimmed lights" of the Highcliff Hotel in Bournemouth. She was married to Hugh O'Leary at the time.
He claims the pair had a brief conversation, he wished her luck in her search for a parliamentary seat and casually said, 'Please get in touch if I can be of any help.'
Ms Truss took him up on the offer almost immediately, he wrote, requesting advice on candidate selection.
As they began meeting regularly, Mr Field said she was 'an impulsive bundle of energy, obsessed by the workings and machinations of politics.' He recalled that 'even then, Liz came across' as intensely focused on success, displaying 'the parroting of slogans, the blind partisanship and the need to present it all with a veneer of absolute confidence.'
As they worked together, they spent more and more time in each other's company, he wrote. 'Before long, barely a day would pass without us at least speaking over the phone.'
He said he found her 'intoxicating, disconcerting and exhausting. Not to mention at times utterly infuriating.'
Their 'intensity of friendship' had become an affair in late 2003, he said.
'There is something very unreal in any affair, especially when both parties are married and living with their spouses,' Mr Field wrote.
He said every few months, Ms Truss would try to 'cool things down' but would always 'apologetically get back in touch' soon after.
Ms Truss was selected as the Conservative candidate for Calder Valley in early 2005, and Mr Field observed her campaign closely, admiring her 'utterly obsessive approach to politics.'
When their affair eventually ended in 2006, Field immediately recognised that 'my own marriage was over'. Ms Truss, however, remained with her husband. Their relationship became public knowledge that year when she stood as a candidate for the Bromley and Chislehurst by-election.
Reflecting on her rise to prime minister, he said Ms Trus had 'limitless ambition and self-belief, raw intelligence, resilience and an overwhelming sense of personal destiny.'
However, he argued that 'her entire decade-long ministerial career had been an object lesson in relentlessly talking a good game… but actually delivering next to nothing'.
'Having made it to 10 Downing Street against the odds, she was determined to do it her way,' he said.
He believed that her downfall stemmed from 'startlingly little to suggest that Liz had either the powers of inspirational leadership or the capacity to focus on the implementation of her policies'.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mirror
41 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Brexit a 'disaster' that 'ruined the country' - referendum 'should be repeated'
On the ninth anniversary of the day the UK voted to leave the EU, we asked readers to have their say on whether Brexit has been a success - and Mirror readers had a lot to say on the matter. Brexit has been slammed as a 'complete disaster' that 'ruined most of the country' in a poll marking nine years since the UK voted to leave the EU. Mirror readers slammed the European Union referendum, overwhelmingly voting that Brexit has failed. The UK marked nine years since the Brexit referendum on June 23 2025. The vote - which signalled the UK's intention to leave the European Union - ultimately ended a 47-year relationship with the political and economic bloc. Brits narrowly voted to leave the EU by 51.9% to 48.1%, a decision which lead to years of uncertainty across the country. A flurry of four different Conservative prime ministers ensued over a space of five years - including Liz Truss, whose premiership lasted just 49 days. Leaving the European Union has been proven to have made Brits' lives worse in at least six ways. Airport and port queues have grown drastically, food prices have spiralled out of control and small businesses have been forced to shut down. It has also become harder to work or study in the EU, music artists have been hit by a wave of barriers and NHS jobs have been left in chaos. To mark the 9th anniversary of the day the UK voted out, we asked readers to give their opinions on Brexit, with over 25,000 people voting in the poll. In response to the question 'do you think Brexit has failed?', an overwhelming 71% (18,565) voted yes, slamming the referendum as a 'disaster', while just 29% (7,520) voted no. Similarly, in response to the question 'do you feel better off since Brexit?', 78% (20,072) said no, while just 22% (20,072) said yes. We also asked 'should there be a second Brexit referendum?' and 'would you like to rejoin the EU?' - responses in both sections backed yes, with 66% (17,129) and 68% (17,572) respectively. There's still time to take the poll below - if you can't see it, click here. Results may change from those written above. What readers think In response to the poll, readers shared their thoughts in the comment section. Viking888 wrote: 'Brexit is a complete disaster. Ruined the country and most of the population.' While Bigal72 said: ' If it's been such a success why is the pound still 10% down making 40% of our food dearer.' Iron57 said: 'As far as the average person in the street is concerned, much of the pro Brexit propaganda that surrounded the leave campaign has been completely debunked. It's time for a proper debate where those wanting to remain can get their voices heard instead of having to listen to a steady stream of lies and half truths for those wanting to leave. Perhaps the remainers will also wake up this time and join the debate from the beginning rather than waiting until debate is lost.' Notanalt wrote: 'You got what you voted for, we left the EU, that the reality isn't whatever British exceptionalism fantasy you dreamed up for yourself is not the fault of anyone but you!' Suggesting Brexit is a failure, LynxVegas said: 'A vote like this should have had the agreement of every hamlet, village, town, city, county, region and country in the UK, British Isles, Commonwealth, plus all British ex-pats abroad, not just those living in the UK. A straight majority was unfair to so many people who wanted to stay in the EU. What are Brexiteers scared of? Lets have another vote.' Gozoman: 'The majority of people is not satisfied with the outcome of the previous referendum and after 5 years it should have been repeated.' However, on the opposing side of the debate, Nikgee said: 'Brexit has and hasn't failed. The main reason why Brexit failed was down to the politicians who screwed up the transition from the EU to being out.' What do you think? Do you agree with the readers' comments above? Nine years on from the Brexit referendum, h as leaving the EU has been a failure? Take our poll and have your say in the comments below.


The Herald Scotland
3 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Labour urged to ‘have courage' to trigger vote on Chagos deal
But the Conservative Party's shadow foreign secretary Dame Priti has called for a similar vote in the Commons. 'With the 21-day Crag (Constitutional Reform and Governance Act 2010) process about to conclude, it is a disgrace that Labour have breached the parliamentary conventions and denied this House a meaningful debate and vote on ratification,' she told MPs. To accompany the treaty, MPs will need to sign off on a Bill to wind up the current governance of the British Indian Ocean Territory (BIOT). The treaty will only come into force once the legislation is 'in place', according to the Government. Yesterday dozens of Chagossians came to Parliament to tell us how they feel let down, neglected and betrayed by Labour's £30bn Chagos Surrender Treaty. Labour are denying them their rights and blocking the House of Commons from a meaningful debate and vote! @CllrABClarkson — Priti Patel MP (@pritipatel) July 1, 2025 Dame Priti added: 'Having a vote on the Bill is not the same as voting on the treaty under Crag. Earlier this week, the House of Lords – the other place – had a debate and vote where the Lib Dems sided with Labour in backing this £30 billion surrender treaty, which is subsidising tax cuts in Mauritius. 'So, why can't we have a debate and vote in this House? What are ministers afraid of? 'Are they afraid that their backbenchers, now worried about benefit cuts and the impact of unpopular tax rises, will question why so much money is being handed over for a territory that we own and force them into another embarrassing U-turn?' Dame Priti urged ministers to 'scrap this treaty or at least have the courage to bring it here for a proper debate, full scrutiny, and finally, a vote in this House'. Treaties are laid before Parliament before they are ratified, but there is no requirement for a debate or vote. Peers in their vote, which Conservative shadow Foreign Office minister Lord Callanan triggered, agreed not to reject the treaty by 205 votes to 185, majority 20. Stephen Doughty said he was disappointed by the shadow foreign secretary's tone (House of Commons/UK Parliament) Responding, Stephen Doughty told the Commons he was 'disappointed by the tone' of Dame Priti's comments. 'I don't know who writes this stuff,' the Foreign Office minister said. 'I don't know whether it's just performative politics or rhetoric, I don't know what. 'But I should point out that I have received and answered over 100 written parliamentary questions from (Dame Priti), I've answered over 250 questions on this deal and the process in total. 'We've had no less than six urgent questions in this House. We have had two statements from this Government by the Foreign Secretary (David Lammy) and the Defence Secretary (John Healey). 'I personally briefed (Dame Priti) and answered many of her questions in my office just a couple of weeks ago in good faith and in detail, and indeed, I was subjected – quite rightly – to robust scrutiny not only from the Foreign Affairs Committee of this House, but also from the International Relations and Defence Committee in the other House, and indeed the International Arrangements Committee in great detail on these issues.' Mr Doughty said a Bill would follow 'in due course' but added the deal with Mauritius, presented to Parliament in May, 'secures' the UK-US military base on Diego Garcia, 'secures our national security and that of our allies'.


Metro
4 hours ago
- Metro
Rachel Reeves wipes tears from her cheeks at PMQs after Welfare bill U-turn
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Kemi Badenoch described Rachel Reeves as looking 'absolutely miserable' at Prime Minister's Questions after a tough day for the Chancellor. Reeves appeared to cry on the front bench as Keir Starmer responded to the Conservative leader's questions – and notably failed to confirm she would stay in her role until the next election. Her sister, Labour Party chair Ellie Reeves, was seen holding her hand as they left the chamber together at the end of the session. A Treasury spokesperson described the situation as 'a personal matter', adding it was something 'we are not going to get into'. They added: 'The Chancellor will be working out of Downing Street this afternoon.' At a briefing after PMQs, a Downing Street spokesperson said the Chancellor was 'going nowhere', arguing the PM had backed her several times before and did not need to explicitly repeat his support. Craig Munro breaks down Westminster chaos into easy to follow insight, walking you through what the latest policies mean to you. Sent every Wednesday. Sign up here. Reeves is facing a serious economic dilemma after a bill aiming to bring down the UK's welfare bill was gutted before being voted through yesterday evening. As a result, billions of pounds in savings that might have eased the Chancellor's job balancing the books will no longer happen. More Trending Changes to Universal Credit were included in the final bill that passed its second reading, but changes to the Personal Independence Payment – where most of the savings were set to come from – were scrapped. Instead, alterations to the disability benefit will come from a review by Work and Pensions minister Stephen Timms which is set to be published next autumn. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: 'UK taxpayers will pay price': How people are reacting to the Welfare Bill vote MORE: Full list of 38 New Look stores closing down in 2025 MORE: The stress caused by welfare reform flip-flopping left me feeling sick