Nine deaths in fire at Massachusetts assisted living facility
FALL RIVER, Mass. — Nine people have died in a fire at an assisted living facility in Massachusetts, where people were hanging out of windows screaming for help, authorities said Monday. At least 30 people were injured.
Firefighters responded to the Gabriel House assisted living facility in Fall River at about 9:50 p.m. Sunday and were met with heavy smoke and flames at the front of the building, with occupants trapped inside, the state Department of Fire Services said in a news release. About 70 people live in the house.
The fire was out by Monday morning and firefighters were able to get inside and rescue numerous occupants. About 50 firefighters responded, including 30 who were off-duty.
Many of those rescued were taken to local and regional hospitals in varying conditions. Five firefighters suffered injuries that were not life-threatening, the statement said.
'This is an unfathomable tragedy for the families involved and the Fall River community,' said Chief Jeffrey Bacon.
He told reporters 'multiple people were hanging out the windows looking to be rescued.' Family members who showed up said police were trying to break windows.
Leo Johnson, 45, of Fall River, told The Boston Globe he rushed over to find his 68-year-old mother, who lives on the top floor of Gabriel House.
'I was kinda freaking out because she wasn't one of the ones outside,' he said. He eventually found her, saying she was outside soaking wet because the sprinklers were going off.
Joe Alves, who lives several houses down from the facility, said he was watching TV when he heard the wave of sirens and fire crews responding to the fire.
He said he saw officials pulling bodies and injured pets out of the building, with some pouring water bottles on burns as they desperately tried to help those in need.
'There were people in wheelchairs, a lot of people missing limbs, it was terrible,' he said, choking up slightly.
The Fall River Police Department in a statement said that 'without hesitation, officers entered the smoke-filled facility, breaking down doors and escorting residents to safety.
'Approximately a dozen non-ambulatory residents were physically carried out by our officers. Their bravery and quick action undoubtedly saved many lives.'
The origin and cause of the fire are under investigation, state and local authorities said.
Fall River, which has about 94,000 people, is about 20 miles (32 kilometres) southeast of Providence, Rhode Island.
Michael Casey And Kimberlee Kruesi, The Associated Press
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
3 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
A Canadian died in ICE custody. His family wants answers
In May, a Canadian man, 49-year-old Johnny Noviello, was arrested by U.S. Immigrations and Customs Enforcement (ICE) at a probation office in Florida. He came to the U.S. legally in 1988, and had been a permanent resident. Later, on June 23, he died while in ICE custody. Noviello was one of dozens of Canadians currently in immigration-related detention in the United States, as the Trump administration has ramped up deportations. Janice Dickson, an international affairs reporter for the Globe, went to Florida to find out what happened to Noviello in the weeks before his death. She'll tell us what she heard from Noviello's loved ones, and how his death highlights the lack of transparency in the Trump administration's push to remove migrants. Questions? Comments? Ideas? Email us at thedecibel@
CTV News
3 hours ago
- CTV News
People who see world as cutthroat and competitive prefer tough leaders: study
People who see the social world as a competitive jungle are more likely to appreciate antagonistic leaders, according to a new study on worldviews and perceptions of workplace leadership. 'Why do some people see antagonistic behaviour in leaders – especially when it's particularly mean or forceful or disagreeable – as a sign of incompetence, while others view it as a mark of savvy leadership?' co-author and Columbia Business School doctoral student Christine Nguyen said in a news release from the American Psychological Association (APA). The study, titled 'Savvy or savage? How worldviews shape appraisals of antagonistic leaders,' was published in the APA's Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Nguyen says the results may depend on what individuals personally think. 'We suspect the answer might be not only about the leaders but also about the people evaluating them, and how those people see the world,' she continued. 'In other words, beastly is in the eye of the beholder.' People who see the world as a cutthroat and competitive place where might makes right were found to have more positive views about the competence and leadership of antagonistic individuals, according to the study. Based on seven surveys involving 2,065 participants, the study also found that people who see the world as co-operative and caring were more likely to view antagonistic leaders as misguided and ineffective. 'People who see the world as a competitive jungle may forgive, or even credit, leaders for being aggressive and heavy-handed,' co-author, social psychologist and Columbia Business School professor Daniel Ames explained. 'Those who see the world as a collaborative place may see such leaders as obnoxious, ineffective or naive.' Antagonistic behaviours were described as being mean, tough, forceful and intimidating, while opposite behaviours were described as being kind, agreeable, friendly and caring. The study could help explain why some workplace and organizational leaders succeed, despite creating tense environments. 'When we asked employees about their current managers, we found that employees higher in competitive jungle beliefs currently had more antagonistic managers compared with those lower in competitive jungle beliefs,' Nguyen said. 'This suggested to us that, over time, through processes like employees selectively joining and leaving, antagonistic leaders may find themselves surrounded by a subset of employees with stronger competitive jungle beliefs, who are more tolerant and approving of their behaviour.' Participants who saw the world as a competitive place were also more likely to assume that prominent CEOs, like Apple's Tim Cook and General Motors' Mary Barra, used confrontational tactics to rise to the top and succeed. 'Our findings may help explain how and why antagonistic leaders might be endured, excused or even celebrated by those who work with or under them, allowing them to attain and remain in positions of power,' Ames added. The authors note that most participants were from the U.S. and results could differ in other areas. Future research could explore these dynamics in other cultural or social contexts, such as politics. 'How people react to an actor's traits and behaviors critically depends on how they think the world works, with implications not only for interpersonal relationships but also for workplace environments and management,' the study concluded. 'Our various reactions to the actors around us may depend not only on the actors themselves but also on our theories of the wider social world and our idiosyncratic understanding of how it operates, what it requires, and what it rewards.'
Globe and Mail
4 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
With Epstein conspiracy theories, Trump faces a crisis of his own making
As his supporters erupt over the Justice Department's failure to release much-hyped records in Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking investigation, President Donald Trump's strategy has been to downplay the issue. 'I don't understand what the interest or what the fascination is,' Trump told reporters Tuesday. His problem? That nothing-to-see-here approach doesn't work for those who've learned from him they must not give up until the government's deepest, darkest secrets are exposed. Last week, the Justice Department and the FBI abruptly walked back the notion there's an Epstein client list of elites who participated in the wealthy New York financier's trafficking of underage girls. Trump quickly defended Attorney General Pam Bondi and chided a reporter for daring to ask about the documents. The online reaction was swift, with followers calling the Republican president 'out of touch' and demanding transparency. Trump's comments to reporters Tuesday while returning to Washington from a brief Pittsburgh trip were just the latest in a days-long campaign to quell the uproar. He called the Epstein case 'pretty boring' and said 'the credible information has been given.' 'I don't understand why the Jeffrey Epstein case would be of interest to anybody.' he said. Over the weekend, Trump used his Truth Social platform to attempt to call supporters off the Epstein trail amid reports of infighting between Bondi and FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino over the issue. He suggested the turmoil was undermining his administration – 'all over a guy who never dies, Jeffrey Epstein.' That did little to mollify Trump's supporters, who urged him to release the files or risk losing his base. The political crisis is especially challenging for Trump because it's one of his own making. The president has spent years stoking dark theories and embracing QAnon-tinged propaganda that casts him as the only savior who can demolish the 'deep state.' Now that he's running the federal government, the community he helped build is coming back to haunt him. It's demanding answers he either isn't able to or doesn't want to provide. Asked Tuesday whether Bondi had told him his name was in the Epstein files, Trump said no. He praised her handling of the case and said she should release 'whatever she thinks is credible.' But he also claimed there were credibility issues with the documents, suggesting without citing evidence they were 'made up' by former FBI Director James Comey and former Presidents Barack Obama and Joe Biden, both Democrats. Bondi declined to discuss the Epstein files Tuesday during a press briefing about drug trafficking. 'The faulty assumption Trump and others make is they can peddle conspiracy theories without any blowback,' said Matt Dallek, a political scientist at George Washington University. 'The Epstein case is a neat encapsulation that it is hard to put the genie back in the bottle.' Last week's two-page statement from the Justice Department and the FBI saying they had concluded Epstein didn't possess a client list roiled Trump's supporters, who pointed to past statements from several administration officials that the list ought to be revealed. Bondi had suggested in February such a document was sitting on her desk waiting for review, though last week she said she'd been referring generally to the Epstein case file, not a client list. Conservative influencers have since demanded to see all the files related to Epstein's crimes, even as Trump has tried to put the issue to bed. Far-right commentator Jack Posobiec said at Turning Point USA's Student Action Summit on Saturday he wouldn't rest 'until we go full Jan. 6 committee on the Jeffrey Epstein files.' Trump's weekend post called on supporters to focus on investigating Democrats and arresting criminals rather than 'spending month after month looking at nothing but the same old, Radical Left inspired Documents on Jeffrey Epstein.' His first-term national security adviser, retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn, pleaded with him to reconsider. '@realdonaldtrump please understand the EPSTEIN AFFAIR is not going away,' Flynn wrote. Other Trump allies continue to push for answers, among them far-right activist Laura Loomer, who has called for Bondi to resign. She told Politico's Playbook newsletter on Sunday a special counsel should be appointed to investigate the handling of the files on Epstein, who was found dead in his federal jail cell in 2019 weeks after he was arrested. House Speaker Mike Johnson told right-wing influencer Benny Johnson in an interview released Tuesday that he is 'for transparency,' and wants Bondi to 'put everything out there and let the people decide.' He said the Justice Department needs to focus on crime and other priorities, including elections and investigating ActBlue, the Democrats' top fundraising platform. Experts who study conspiracy theories warned more sunlight doesn't necessarily make far-fetched narratives disappear. 'For some portion of this set of conspiracy theory believers, no amount of contradictory evidence will ever be enough,' said Josephine Lukito, who studies conspiracy theorists at the University of Texas at Austin. There is no Epstein 'client list,' U.S. Justice Department says Trump defends Attorney-General Bondi over refusal to release more Epstein documents The president and many figures in his administration – including Bondi, Bongino and FBI Director Kash Patel – earned their political capital over the years in part by encouraging disproven conspiracy theories. Now, they're tasked with trying to reveal the evidence they'd long insisted was there – a challenge that's reached across the government. Last week, Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lee Zeldin posted on X what seemed like an endorsement of a conspiracy theory that the contrails left by aircraft are releasing chemicals for potentially nefarious reasons. But a second post from Zeldin underscored the fine line the Trump administration is trying to walk by linking to a new page on the EPA website that essentially debunked the theory. The value of conspiratorial fabrications is they help people get political power, said Russell Muirhead, who teaches political science at Dartmouth College. He said Trump has been skilled in exploiting that. But the Epstein case brings unique challenges, he said. That's because it's rooted in truth: A wealthy and well-connected financier did spend years abusing large numbers of young girls while escaping justice. So, Trump needs to come forward with truth and transparency on the topic, Muirhead said. If he doesn't, 'large segments of his most enthusiastic and devoted supporters are going to lose faith in him.' Two of Jeffrey Epstein's close advisers can face victims' claims Trump's rivals have been taking advantage of right-wing fissures over Epstein. Democrats sought to capitalize on the controversy, with several lawmakers calling for the release of all Epstein files and suggesting Trump could be resisting because he or someone close to him is featured in them. The Democratic House Majority PAC on Tuesday emailed a memo that called out some House Republicans by name. It said they are 'complicit' with the Trump administration because they had called for the Epstein files to be made public but then voted against a Democratic amendment to force their release. Conservatives expressed concerns Trump's approach on Epstein could hurt them in the midterms. 'For this to go away, you're going to lose 10 per cent of the MAGA movement,' right-wing podcaster Steve Bannon said during the Turning Point USA Student Action Summit on Friday. There's also the challenge of governing. Bondi and Bongino had a tense exchange last week at the White House over a story about Epstein, according to a person familiar with the matter who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss a private conversation. And Loomer, who's close to Trump, said Friday she was told Bongino was 'seriously thinking about resigning.' The FBI declined to comment. Dallek, the George Washington University professor, said it's alarming that the country's top law enforcement officials are feuding over a conspiracy theory. 'It's possible at some time voters are going to notice the things they want or expect government to do aren't being done because the people in charge are either incompetent or off chasing rabbits,' he said. 'Who is fulfilling the mission of the FBI to protect the American people?'
