Trump imposes tougher US policy toward Cuba, enforces ban on US tourism
The directive will enforce a statutory ban on U.S. tourism to Cuba while supporting an economic embargo of the country, the White House said in a fact sheet.
While Americans cannot visit Cuba for leisure, travel has been allowed for activities including educational or humanitarian trips.
As one of his first acts after taking office in January, Trump, a harsh Cuba critic, revoked the Biden administration's last-minute decision to remove the country from the U.S. list of state sponsors of terrorism. He has also partially restricted the entry of people from Cuba.
More: Top Cuban official accuses Trump admin of escalating tensions, raises concerns of conflict
Under Monday's memorandum, Trump renewed a ban on direct or indirect financial transactions with entities controlled by the Cuban military, such as Grupo de Administracion Empresarial S.A. (GAESA), and its affiliates, with exceptions for transactions that advance U.S. policy goals or support the Cuban people.
Biden had revoked a 2017 Trump order that restricted financial transactions with some military and government-linked Cuban entities.
The new memorandum "enforces the statutory ban on U.S. tourism to Cuba and ensures compliance through regular audits and mandatory record-keeping of all travel-related transactions for at least five years," the White House fact sheet said.
It also supports the economic embargo of Cuba and opposes calls in the United Nations and other international forums for its termination, the fact sheet said.
Cuban Foreign Minister Bruno Rodriguez posted on social media platform X that "the Presidential Memorandum against Cuba made public today by the US government reinforces the aggression and economic blockade that punishes the entire Cuban people and is the main obstacle to our development."
"It is a criminal act and a violation of the human rights of an entire nation. The main obstacle to our development," he said.
(Reporting By Steve Holland; additional reporting by Marc Frank in Havana; Editing by Franklin Paul and Chris Reese)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Washington Post
14 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Venezuelan lawmakers declare UN human rights chief persona non grata
CARACAS, Venezuela — Venezuela's ruling party-controlled National Assembly on Tuesday declared Volker Türk , the United Nations high commissioner for human rights, persona non grata, criticizing the U.N. official for failing to protect the rights of Venezuelan migrants deported by the Trump administration to a prison in El Salvador.
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump-Musk feud reignites over the ‘big, beautiful bill'
The public and messy feud between President Trump and tech billionaire Elon Musk was reignited this week over the president's 'big, beautiful bill' as Congress works to get the massive package to Trump's desk by July 4. Musk on Monday said he would back primary challengers against any Republicans who support Trump's megabill and promised to donate to lawmakers who have drawn the administration's ire like Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.). Trump then threatened to cut government contracts for Musk's companies and left open the possibility of deporting the South African CEO. Trump and Musk both had signaled they were ready to move on from their bitter fight nearly a month ago, but the president's megabill that Musk has called 'political suicide for the Republican Party' has brought the two men back to snipping. 'I think Washington is confused by the on-off-again relationship between Trump and Musk. It looked like they had patched things up around a month ago,' said Republican strategist Ron Bonjean, adding that the tech billionaire's posts on the social platform X, which Musk owns, 'came out of nowhere for most people' after it seemed like he was 'looking to bury the hatchet' in recent weeks. Trump on Tuesday shrugged off concerns that the GOP could be swayed by Musk's megabill criticism, but he doubled down on his suggestion that the federal government take a look at the contracts Musk's companies have. Musk and his businesses have received at least $38 billion in government contracts, loans, subsidies and tax credits over the years, according to a February Washington Post analysis. 'No, I don't think so. I think what's going to happen is DOGE is going to look at Musk. And if DOGE looks at Musk, we're going to save a fortune,' Trump said during a visit to a new migrant detention facility in Florida, referring to the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). 'I don't think he should be playing that game with me.' It's a sharp change in tone from the president, who had previously said he thinks he could make amends with Musk after their nasty disagreement last month. Asked on Tuesday morning what happened to Musk, Trump replied, 'nothing.' 'He's upset that he's losing his EV mandate and he's upset. He's very upset about things. But he could lose a lot more than that. I can tell you right now, Elon can lose a lot more than that,' he said, arguing that Musk's criticism of the bill is over a key provision that takes away tax credits for electric vehicles (EVs) that benefited his company. The president also signaled he would consider deporting the South African-born U.S. citizen, whom he had elevated to lead the cost-cutting DOGE until late May. 'I don't know. I think we'll have to take a look. We might have to put DOGE on Elon. You know what DOGE is? DOGE is the monster that might have to go back and eat Elon. Wouldn't that be terrible,' Trump said. The president has praised the massive cuts and sweeping changes to the federal government under DOGE, despite pushback over job losses and service disruptions, and he gifted Musk a gold key to the White House in May as recognition of the billionaire's work. But now, Musk is arguing that Trump's ambitious tax and spending package undermines DOGE's efforts to rein in spending. As senators squabbled over the bill this past week, Musk blasted the spending package as 'utterly insane' and 'political suicide' for the GOP. On Monday, he renewed his calls for a new political party as he lamented estimates for how much the bill would raise the debt ceiling. 'Musk is unique in that he has enough money to probably actually impact a two-party system,' said a former Trump campaign official. 'Republicans obviously face challenges in their ability to govern, and so do Democrats, but right now all Trump wants is a bill with his name on it that he thinks is a good bill. A lot of Republicans in Congress know this isn't a good bill, but fear is a motivator,' the former campaign official said. 'We're a two-party country, pure and simple. Musk is probably the only person that could change that given his money, but he'd have to find unique, credible candidates to attract the disillusioned voter who thus far has leaned Trump.' The Senate's version of the bill, which narrowly passed earlier on Tuesday, would increase the deficit by nearly $3.3 trillion between 2025 and 2034, roughly $1 trillion more than the House-passed version, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. 'Every member of Congress who campaigned on reducing government spending and then immediately voted for the biggest debt increase in history should hang their head in shame!' Musk wrote on X. 'And they will lose their primary next year if it is the last thing I do on this Earth.' The promises to back primary challengers against Republicans who support the megabill come after Musk — the world's richest man, with a staggering $397 billion net worth, according to Forbes — signaled plans this spring to step back from political spending after injecting hundreds of millions into the 2024 election. 'He could absolutely become a thorn in the side of the Republican Party by funding primary challengers. That would cause some headaches, no question about it,' Bonjean said. But Trump 'holds most of the cards,' Bonjean said, pointing to Trump's comments on the possibility of deportation and his authority over contracts that Musk and his companies touch. 'I don't think any candidate wants to have the world's richest man open up his war chest against him. But I think most members of Congress would rather have Trump's endorsement than Musk's millions,' said GOP strategist Alex Conant. One source who worked in Trump's first administration described the situation with Musk as not overly concerning, given the support the president has from GOP lawmakers. 'The White House doesn't love the renewed back-and-forth, but no one sees this as a major political threat. It looks more like a flare-up than a serious inflection point,' the source said. 'This is Trump's party. The idea that rank-and-file Republicans would suddenly abandon him because of a feud with Elon just doesn't hold water.' Musk spent at least $250 million through his America PAC on Trump's election. During his tenure with DOGE, he kept an office in the White House complex, slept over in the Lincoln Bedroom and touted that he and Trump were 'good friends.' Trump also consistently defended Musk while he faced backlash over his work to make cuts to federal spending and as Teslas were vandalized around the country. When asked about the reignited feud, the White House argued that the president is saving money for taxpayers with his policies. 'Many Presidents have promised, but none other than President Trump has delivered to actually make government more efficient and root out waste, fraud, and abuse in Washington, and that mission is moving full steam ahead,' White House spokesperson Harrison Fields said in an emailed statement. 'Under the President's leadership, every agency and department is executing this mission seamlessly and, as a result, has yielded more than $170 billion in savings for the American people.' The public nature of Trump and Musk's spat last month and renewed fight this week is one of the more remarkable parts of their friends-turned-foes saga. 'These are not two men who quietly settle their differences in the background. They're content to brawl it out in public,' said Conant. Musk wouldn't be the first figure in Trump's orbit he elevated to a position of power 'only to fire and then fight with,' Conant noted, pointing to Trump's frayed relationship with his first-term Vice President Mike Pence. 'Anybody who's paid attention to Trump over the last 10 years should not be surprised that he's not backing down from a fight with Elon Musk.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Politico
30 minutes ago
- Politico
Vance's potential 2028 Democratic rivals want him to be the face of the megabill
Senate Majority Leader John Thune's ability to pass the 'big, beautiful bill' is hinging on Sen. Lisa Murkowski. The Alaska senator has been the subject of an intense whip effort by GOP leaders over the past couple of hours as they try to offer her reassurances on Medicaid and food assistance. Thune, Finance Chair Mike Crapo (R-Idaho) and Senate Majority Whip John Barrasso talked to Murkowski on the floor for roughly an hour overnight. Thune and Murkowski huddled briefly in his office, and they were mum on details when they emerged shortly before 4 a.m. Just moments ago, the Senate parliamentarian ruled that proposed SNAP carve-outs for an expanded list of states including Alaska are compliant with the Byrd rule. But the parliamentarian ruled a provision that would have boosted federal payments for Medicaid in Alaska and four other states is noncompliant, according to a person granted anonymity to share the decision. Murkowski is also among the Republicans who have been pushing an amendment to undo the rollback of clean-energy credits under the Biden-era climate law. Thune insisted to reporters moments ago that senators were closing in on the end of their vote-a-rama. 'We're close,' he said, adding that they have a few more amendments from senators and a final so-called wraparound amendment to come. In a potential sign of just how dire Thune's whip count was looking in the wee hours, the majority leader huddled in his office with Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), who's long said he would be a 'no' on the bill over its debt-ceiling hike. Another big unknown right now is where Sen. Susan Collins will fall. The Maine senator reminded us less than two hours ago that she's 'said all along that I have concerns with the bill' and also reiterated, when prompted by reporters, that she would have preferred breaking out the tax portion of the policy package on a separate track. Certainly not helping win Collins over: Her bid to boost money for rural hospitals went up in flames. And major policy fights remain unresolved, including Sen. Rick Scott's (R-Fla.) divisive amendment to scale back federal payments under the Affordable Care Act's Medicaid expansion. Scott has leadership's support on this one and said he expects it to pass. But several GOP senators have openly raised concerns with it. What else we're watching: — Megabill goes to House Rules: Assuming the Senate passes the bill, the House is expected to bring the bill to the Rules Committee at noon Tuesday, though two people with direct knowledge of the plans say it could get pushed amid delays with the Senate vote-a-rama. — The next funding battle begins: Senate appropriators plan to move forward with marking up fiscal 2026 government funding bills starting next week. House Appropriations is scheduled to vote July 10 on the Commerce, Justice, Science bill and the Energy and Water Development bill. House Appropriations Chair Tom Cole (R-Okla.) wants to finish marking up all 12 funding bills by the end of July.
