Trump-Musk feud reignites over the ‘big, beautiful bill'
Musk on Monday said he would back primary challengers against any Republicans who support Trump's megabill and promised to donate to lawmakers who have drawn the administration's ire like Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.). Trump then threatened to cut government contracts for Musk's companies and left open the possibility of deporting the South African CEO.
Trump and Musk both had signaled they were ready to move on from their bitter fight nearly a month ago, but the president's megabill that Musk has called 'political suicide for the Republican Party' has brought the two men back to snipping.
'I think Washington is confused by the on-off-again relationship between Trump and Musk. It looked like they had patched things up around a month ago,' said Republican strategist Ron Bonjean, adding that the tech billionaire's posts on the social platform X, which Musk owns, 'came out of nowhere for most people' after it seemed like he was 'looking to bury the hatchet' in recent weeks.
Trump on Tuesday shrugged off concerns that the GOP could be swayed by Musk's megabill criticism, but he doubled down on his suggestion that the federal government take a look at the contracts Musk's companies have. Musk and his businesses have received at least $38 billion in government contracts, loans, subsidies and tax credits over the years, according to a February Washington Post analysis.
'No, I don't think so. I think what's going to happen is DOGE is going to look at Musk. And if DOGE looks at Musk, we're going to save a fortune,' Trump said during a visit to a new migrant detention facility in Florida, referring to the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). 'I don't think he should be playing that game with me.'
It's a sharp change in tone from the president, who had previously said he thinks he could make amends with Musk after their nasty disagreement last month.
Asked on Tuesday morning what happened to Musk, Trump replied, 'nothing.'
'He's upset that he's losing his EV mandate and he's upset. He's very upset about things. But he could lose a lot more than that. I can tell you right now, Elon can lose a lot more than that,' he said, arguing that Musk's criticism of the bill is over a key provision that takes away tax credits for electric vehicles (EVs) that benefited his company.
The president also signaled he would consider deporting the South African-born U.S. citizen, whom he had elevated to lead the cost-cutting DOGE until late May.
'I don't know. I think we'll have to take a look. We might have to put DOGE on Elon. You know what DOGE is? DOGE is the monster that might have to go back and eat Elon. Wouldn't that be terrible,' Trump said.
The president has praised the massive cuts and sweeping changes to the federal government under DOGE, despite pushback over job losses and service disruptions, and he gifted Musk a gold key to the White House in May as recognition of the billionaire's work.
But now, Musk is arguing that Trump's ambitious tax and spending package undermines DOGE's efforts to rein in spending.
As senators squabbled over the bill this past week, Musk blasted the spending package as 'utterly insane' and 'political suicide' for the GOP. On Monday, he renewed his calls for a new political party as he lamented estimates for how much the bill would raise the debt ceiling.
'Musk is unique in that he has enough money to probably actually impact a two-party system,' said a former Trump campaign official.
'Republicans obviously face challenges in their ability to govern, and so do Democrats, but right now all Trump wants is a bill with his name on it that he thinks is a good bill. A lot of Republicans in Congress know this isn't a good bill, but fear is a motivator,' the former campaign official said. 'We're a two-party country, pure and simple. Musk is probably the only person that could change that given his money, but he'd have to find unique, credible candidates to attract the disillusioned voter who thus far has leaned Trump.'
The Senate's version of the bill, which narrowly passed earlier on Tuesday, would increase the deficit by nearly $3.3 trillion between 2025 and 2034, roughly $1 trillion more than the House-passed version, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office.
'Every member of Congress who campaigned on reducing government spending and then immediately voted for the biggest debt increase in history should hang their head in shame!' Musk wrote on X.
'And they will lose their primary next year if it is the last thing I do on this Earth.'
The promises to back primary challengers against Republicans who support the megabill come after Musk — the world's richest man, with a staggering $397 billion net worth, according to Forbes — signaled plans this spring to step back from political spending after injecting hundreds of millions into the 2024 election.
'He could absolutely become a thorn in the side of the Republican Party by funding primary challengers. That would cause some headaches, no question about it,' Bonjean said.
But Trump 'holds most of the cards,' Bonjean said, pointing to Trump's comments on the possibility of deportation and his authority over contracts that Musk and his companies touch.
'I don't think any candidate wants to have the world's richest man open up his war chest against him. But I think most members of Congress would rather have Trump's endorsement than Musk's millions,' said GOP strategist Alex Conant.
One source who worked in Trump's first administration described the situation with Musk as not overly concerning, given the support the president has from GOP lawmakers.
'The White House doesn't love the renewed back-and-forth, but no one sees this as a major political threat. It looks more like a flare-up than a serious inflection point,' the source said. 'This is Trump's party. The idea that rank-and-file Republicans would suddenly abandon him because of a feud with Elon just doesn't hold water.'
Musk spent at least $250 million through his America PAC on Trump's election. During his tenure with DOGE, he kept an office in the White House complex, slept over in the Lincoln Bedroom and touted that he and Trump were 'good friends.'
Trump also consistently defended Musk while he faced backlash over his work to make cuts to federal spending and as Teslas were vandalized around the country.
When asked about the reignited feud, the White House argued that the president is saving money for taxpayers with his policies.
'Many Presidents have promised, but none other than President Trump has delivered to actually make government more efficient and root out waste, fraud, and abuse in Washington, and that mission is moving full steam ahead,' White House spokesperson Harrison Fields said in an emailed statement. 'Under the President's leadership, every agency and department is executing this mission seamlessly and, as a result, has yielded more than $170 billion in savings for the American people.'
The public nature of Trump and Musk's spat last month and renewed fight this week is one of the more remarkable parts of their friends-turned-foes saga.
'These are not two men who quietly settle their differences in the background. They're content to brawl it out in public,' said Conant.
Musk wouldn't be the first figure in Trump's orbit he elevated to a position of power 'only to fire and then fight with,' Conant noted, pointing to Trump's frayed relationship with his first-term Vice President Mike Pence.
'Anybody who's paid attention to Trump over the last 10 years should not be surprised that he's not backing down from a fight with Elon Musk.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
4 minutes ago
- Forbes
How Trump's Spending Bill Helps The Rich Buy Their Private Jets
A little-discussed portion of the billionaire President Donald Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill" hands a lucrative break to ultrawealthy Americans in the form of a tax policy for private jet purchases. An under-the-radar provision of Trump's spending bill lands a massive potential tax advantage for ... More the ultrawealthy as part of a provision which would cost an estimated $378 billion. Patrick McMullan via Getty Images Part of the spending package that just passed the Senate is the permanent restoration of the 100% 'bonus depreciation' federal law, which allows businesses to write off the full amount of qualifying items in the year of purchase. Bonus depreciation was originally a part of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, but phased down from the 100% level beginning in 2023 and was set to permanently expire by 2027, according to Thomson Reuters. The bonus depreciation policy applies to a slew of qualified, physical business expenses which depreciate over time, such as machinery and company cars, but the policy is often associated with big-ticket luxury items, such as private aircraft, and its institution last decade led to a boom in jet sales. That means that unlike standard business accounting procedures in which capital investments are spread across multiple years and are never fully written off, the full value of qualified property could be written off year one. A $10 million plane could now be a $10 million deduction in that same year, noted the aviation industry publication Flying magazine. 'For someone interested in buying a jet, whether new or used, this is a very big deal,' Matthew Bere, managing director of aviation at the Oklahoma-based bank BOK Financial, said this week, saying he expects the megabill's passage to 'spur a lot of activity in aircraft sales.' This is an 'example of oligarch friendly rules,' says Chuck Collins, director of the Program on Inequality and the Common Good at the Institute for Policy Studies progressive think tank. Collins described the bonus depreciation provision as a 'massive tax break for billionaires and centi-millionaires' from the 'private jet lobby' in a Tuesday post. Big Number $378 billion. That's how much the permanent establishment of 100% bonus depreciation would cost taxpayers over 10 years, according to Congressional Budget Office estimates. 'The all-at-once tax deduction could potentially reduce' jet buyers' taxable income by 'millions of dollars in a given year,' explained Bere. How The Senate Made This Deduction Permanent The version of Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' passed by the House in May only extended the 100% bonus depreciation through 2029, while the Senate made the deduction permanent. The private aviation industry celebrated the change, and charter plane provider FlyUSA described the legislation as 'a power-packed provision that could change the game for private aircraft acquisition.' Key Background The private jet friendly bonus depreciation provision adds to heavy criticism from Democrats and nonpartisan watchdogs who say the bill will disproportionately help the rich and hurt the poor. The bill will lower the lowest 20% of American earners' incomes by 2.9% while the top 1% of earners will get a 1.9% boost, according to the Yale University Budget Lab. 'This bill gives another tax break to the ultrawealthy — so they can buy another private jet,' Sen. Mark Kelly, D-Ariz., said this week. Environmental groups frequently criticize private jet usage for its outsized emission, and U.S. departures account for 65% of private jet flights globally, according to the International Council on Clean Transportation. Kyle Khan-Mullins and Lily Ogburn contributed reporting. Further Reading Forbes Senate Passes One Big Beautiful Bill Despite One Big Not-So-Beautiful Price Tag By Kelly Phillips Erb Forbes How Trump's Spending Bill Impacts Student Loans—Including Higher Payments And More Restrictions By Alison Durkee
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
What to know about buying electric vehicles after the federal tax incentives end
The massive tax and spending cut bill that Congress passed Thursday ends federal tax incentives for electric vehicles. Buyers have until Sept. 30 to qualify for the federal tax credits on EVs before they are terminated. But experts say there are still strong financial reasons to consider buying the vehicles even without those incentives. Before the bill passed, new electric vehicles came with a $7,500 federal tax credit, and used EVs included up to $4,000. Those incentives were originally designed to help make the vehicles more affordable. According to the latest data from Kelley Blue Book, the average purchase price of a new EV is roughly $9,000 higher in the United States than the average new gas-powered car. Used EVs on average cost $2,000 more than comparable gas cars. Those credits, paired with other incentives in many states, helped bridge that price gap. Without them, Senior Policy Director Ingrid Malmgren of the nonprofit advocacy group Plug In America said they will become unaffordable to many lower- and middle-income Americans. 'That's really disappointing because ... they're just a really great way to reduce transportation energy cost burden," Malmgren said. The up-front cost of an electric vehicle might be higher, but for those who can afford to consider the lifetime fuel and maintenance savings, Malmgren said the EV is still a good financial and environmental move in every state. EVs are typically still cheaper to own long-term That is because electric vehicles might not be cheaper to buy, but they are cheaper to drive. Malmgren said that even without the federal tax credits, an electric vehicle owner would still come out ahead. 'Quickly you'll end up paying less than a gas car because it costs much less to fuel, and it needs almost nothing for maintenance,' Malmgren said. Malmgren said the point at which an EV driver's savings on fuel and maintenance outweigh the higher initial price varies. It depends on the kind of car and how often they are driven, as well as the cost of gasoline and electricity in an area. She said EV owners pay less in upkeep because the cars typically have fewer moving parts to maintain and require less frequent servicing. There are multiplecalculators online that pinpoint that moment based on some of those criteria. A 2020 study in the academic journal Joule found that the average EV in the U.S. charged with a typical mix of public and private chargers saves the driver $7,700 in fuel costs over a 15-year life span, compared to filling a car with gas. Savings vary by state. The study found that someone charging a car at home during off-peak hours, deemed as a best-case scenario, could save more than $14,000 over 15 years in Washington, where electricity is relatively affordable. The study said that an EV driver in any state exhibiting typical driving and charging behavior would save money on fuel costs. The study did not account for the car's purchase price, its maintenance cost or associated tax credits. EVs are still cleaner, even when they charge on coal power Manufacturing an electric vehicle typically creates more pollution than making a traditional gas-powered one. But experts say that driving an EV over the long-term is still less polluting than a gas car. Once they both drive about 15,000 miles (24,000 km) — slightly more than the average American drives in a year — the total pollution that has gone into making and driving each type of car has evened out, said Peter Slowik, U.S. Passenger Vehicles Lead for the International Council on Clean Transportation. Every mile after that widens the gap between the cleaner electric car and the more pollutive gas car. By the end of the car's life, emissions caused by the average EV are roughly half the average gas car, according to the U.S. Department of Energy. So unless you buy a new car each year, the EV is the cleaner choice, he said. 'They are a no-brainer,' Slowik said. 'Electric vehicles are already inherently so much more efficient.' A 2023 analysis by Yale Climate Connections found that electric vehicles are responsible for less carbon dioxide pollution even in areas where the electricity used to charge them comes from coal. An EV in West Virginia, which is one of the most coal-reliant states, still pollutes 31% less than an equivalent gas-powered car, according to the analysis. Slowik said that is because electric cars are better at translating energy into forward motion. For example, the most popular EVs in the US, the Tesla Model Y and the Tesla Model 3, can drive more than 100 miles (161 km) on energy equivalent to what is provided by a gallon of gasoline. 'If you compare that to a 25-mpg gasoline vehicle, that's already four to five times more efficient,' Slowik said. ___ The Associated Press' climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
CNN
5 minutes ago
- CNN
A group of lawmakers attempt to visit ‘Alligator Alcatraz' amid humanitarian concerns
Florida lawmakers worried about 'humanitarian concerns' are attempting to access 'Alligator Alcatraz' Thursday to inspect the grounds of the new detention center, just hours after the arrival of its first group of detainees. 'What's happening here is un-American,' Florida state Sen. Shevrin Jones and four other Democratic state lawmakers said in a joint news release. 'What we're witnessing isn't about security or solving problems—it's about inhumane political theater that endangers real people.' The lawmakers spoke to reporters outside the facility Thursday afternoon but it's unclear whether they were allowed inside. Detainees arrived at the facility in the middle of the Florida Everglades, the Florida Division of Emergency Management said Thursday, following reports of flooding earlier this week. The lawmakers noted there have been reports of extreme heat, structural issues, environmental threats, and human rights violations that 'demand immediate oversight.' President Donald Trump toured the facility Tuesday and shortly after, summer storms amid the region's hurricane season brought flooding to it, adding to a list of concerns about the facility's readiness to house migrants. Wires were seen submerged in pooling water across the floor and high winds made the facility's floor and walls tremble, reporter video from CNN affiliate Spectrum News 13 showed. A combination of weather observations and estimates from radar indicate that anywhere from around 0.40 to 1.5 inches of rain fell at the facility in less than two hours on Tuesday, according to CNN Weather. Later that night, 'vendors went back and tightened any seams at the base of the structures that allowed water intrusion during the heavy storm, which was minimal,' Stephanie Hartman, a spokesperson for the Florida Department of Emergency Management, told CNN. But more rainfall could be on the horizon amid the region's hurricane season and the chance for storms in the forecast every day in the next week, according to CNN Weather. It's unclear how many detainees are currently being housed at the compound as of Thursday, but it has the capacity to hold 3,000 people, with room for more, Kevin Guthrie, executive director of the Florida Division of Emergency Management, said in a roundtable Tuesday alongside Trump. Tricia McLaughlin, the assistant secretary for public affairs at the Department of Homeland Security, said authorities will 'expand facilities and bed space in just days.' Nestled in the middle of Florida's humid, subtropical wetland ecosystem, 'Alligator Alcatraz' was transformed from a training and transition airport to a temporary tent city for migrants. The expected cost to run the detention center for one year is $450 million, a Department of Homeland Security official told CNN, adding that Florida will front the costs of the facility and then 'submit reimbursement requests' through FEMA and the Department of Homeland Security. Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis said the facility is necessary to alleviate burdens on the state's law enforcement agencies and jails, and touted it for being designed to be 'completely self-contained' – which has prompted local immigration rights advocates to accuse the DeSantis administration of creating a facility 'engineered to enact suffering.' 'Clearly from a security perspective, if someone escapes, there's a lot of alligators you're going to have to contend (with),' DeSantis said last week. 'No one is going anywhere once you do that. It's as safe and secure as you can be.' Migrants will be housed in repurposed FEMA trailers and 'soft-sided temporary facilities,' a Department of Homeland Security official told CNN. The same tents are often used to house those displaced by natural disasters, like hurricanes, DeSantis' office said. They likely will provide the only shelter from mother nature as summer in South Florida proves to be the region's wettest season, in part due to the tropical activity of hurricane season and daily thunderstorms. State officials said they are developing evacuation plans for the facility in the event of severe weather. CNN's Devon M. Sayers, Chelsea Bailey and Luke Snyder contributed to this report.
