logo
Doctor who worked with Biden shocked over cancer diagnosis — and claims former prez may have had disease for ‘a decade'

Doctor who worked with Biden shocked over cancer diagnosis — and claims former prez may have had disease for ‘a decade'

New York Post19-05-2025
A leading oncologist who worked for former President Biden has joined those expressing shock that his prostate cancer was not detected earlier — suggesting the oldest-ever president may even have had it for 'a decade.'
Dr Ezekiel Emanuel, a former member of Biden's transition team who helped craft the Obama-era Affordable Care Act, stunned MSNBC's left-leaning 'Morning Joe' with his stunning analysis.
'He's had this for many years, maybe even a decade, growing there and spreading,' Emanuel told the Biden-supporting hosts
Advertisement
Morning Joe hosts were left stunned as Dr Ezekiel Emanuel suggested Joe Biden's advanced prostate cancer should have been caught earlier.
MSNBC
'It's a little surprising. I looked back at the records and there's no evidence that when he got his health status and the medical records were released that he had a prostate-specific antigen.'
Emanue insisted the 82-year-old would have definitely had the disease even before he was elected to the White House — leading the MSNBC hosts visibly stunned.
Advertisement
'He did not develop it in the last 100 to 200 days,' Emanuel said.
Joe Biden has been diagnosed with prostate cancer.
AFP via Getty Images
'He had it while he was president. He probably had it at the start of his presidency in 2021. Yes, I don't think there's any disagreement about that.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Department of Veterans Affairs looks to end certain abortion services for veterans
Department of Veterans Affairs looks to end certain abortion services for veterans

CNN

time2 hours ago

  • CNN

Department of Veterans Affairs looks to end certain abortion services for veterans

The US Department of Veterans Affairs is proposing to end certain abortion services to veterans, rolling back a Biden-era move to expand abortion rights. In a proposed rule filed Friday, the department said that it is seeking to revoke access to abortions and abortion counseling for veterans and the beneficiaries of the Civilian Health and Medical Program of the Department of Veterans Affairs. 'We take this action to ensure that VA provides only needed medical services to our nation's heroes and their families,' the department said in the filing. Under the Biden administration's rule, the department currently provides access to abortions when a pregnant veteran's life or health is at risk if their pregnancy were carried to term, or if the pregnancy was the result of rape or incest — regardless of state laws. The proposed rule would allow abortions in cases where 'a physician certifies that the life of the mother would be endangered if the fetus were carried to term,' which, according to the filing, had been permitted even before the 2022 expansion. The Biden-era rule was part of the administration's efforts to expand abortion access after Republican-led states pushed ahead with restrictions in the wake of the 2022 Supreme Court ruling that eliminated the federal right to an abortion. The VA argued at the time that it was necessary to give veterans access to abortions, saying, 'As abortion bans come into force across the country, veterans in many States are no longer assured access to abortion services in their communities, even when those services are needed.' But on Friday, President Donald Trump's VA slammed the Biden administration's rule, calling it federal overreach. 'The stated reason for (the expansion) was a reaction to a Supreme Court decision, Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization … that itself was intended to prevent federal overreach and return to States control over the provision of abortion services,' the filing states. 'Yet, the last administration used Dobbs to do the exact opposite of preventing overreach, creating a purported Federal entitlement to abortion for veterans where none had existed before and without regard to State law.' Twenty states have banned or limited access to abortion. States where abortion is limited report higher rates of maternal and infant mortality, as well as greater economic insecurity. The proposed rule will now be open for public comment for 30 days starting Monday. In his first term, Trump made good on campaign promises and appointed Supreme Court justices who helped overturn Roe v. Wade. Since that ruling, Trump has been keen to leave regulations over the issue to state governments. The Trump administration has overall been quiet on the issue of abortion in his second term. However, in June, the US Department of Health and Human Services and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services moved to rescind a 2022 federal guidance to health care providers specifying that people should be able to access an abortion in the event of a medical emergency, even if state laws restrict such procedures. CNN's Veronica Stracqualursi and Jen Christensen contributed to this report.

Why your student debt balance may start climbing again this week
Why your student debt balance may start climbing again this week

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Why your student debt balance may start climbing again this week

Millions of student loan borrowers are about to see a jump in their monthly payments. That's because an interest-free pause under the Saving on a Valuable Education (SAVE) plan has ended as of Aug. 1. Emotionally intelligent people use the 2-week rule to motivate themselves and reach their biggest goals Exclusive: Google is indexing ChatGPT conversations, potentially exposing sensitive user data Cinemark is opening 6 new panoramic, 270-degree movie theaters in 2025, and 14 more next year. Is one coming near you? SAVE, rolled out in 2023 under the Biden administration, brought many borrowers' payments down to $0 a month, ensured borrowers' balances wouldn't grow as long as they made timely payments, and massively cut undergraduate loan balances. About 7.7 million federal student borrowers enrolled in the plan. But now, the end to a pause in interest under Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' means that interest will begin accruing once again on loans. In a press release earlier this month announcing the upcoming end to the pause, U.S. Secretary of Education Linda McMahon called the SAVE program 'unlawful.' McMahon asserted: 'Congress designed these programs to ensure that borrowers repay their loans, yet the Biden administration tried to illegally force taxpayers to foot the bill instead. 'Since day one of the Trump administration, we've focused on strengthening the student loan portfolio and simplifying repayment to better serve borrowers. As part of this effort, the department urges all borrowers in the SAVE plan to quickly transition to a legally compliant repayment plan—such as the income-based repayment plan (IBR).' What should SAVE enrollees expect? Starting Friday, SAVE participants will see interest charges, even if they aren't making payments. The added interest means monthly bills will be higher, but how much higher depends on income. However, if they switch plans to the IBR plan McMahon referenced, borrowers may see their monthly bills rise drastically. While the SAVE plan calculated monthly payments based on 5% of a borrower's income, the IBR plan takes 10%. For older loans, it ticks up to 15%. (Student loan forgiveness for those with IBR plans was also recently paused under Trump.) Some experts believe the transition will pose a massive challenge for borrowers as they switch to other repayment plans. Nancy Nierman, assistant director of the Education Debt Consumer Assistance Program in New York City, said, per CNBC: 'In severe cases, it could result in people being forced to move, or they will just resign themselves to default and involuntary collections.' Are there any new plans in place? In addition to IBR plans, borrowers will have access to a new Republican-led plan, the Repayment Assistance Plan (RAP), but not until next July. Under this new plan, payments will range from 1% to 10% of a borrower's earnings, with bills rising the more they earn. Unlike IBR plans, RAP does not shield a portion of the borrower's income, and is based on total earnings before taxes. According to the National Consumer Law Center, the RAP plan is 'significantly more expensive for borrowers than the SAVE plan, but will also be more expensive than the other existing IBR plans for low-income borrowers.' What should SAVE enrollees do? The Department of Education said earlier this month that it will begin contacting SAVE enrollees about next steps and that participants should begin determining which plan best suits their needs. 'To compare available repayment plans, the Department encourages borrowers with loans in the SAVE plan to use the Loan Simulator to estimate monthly payments under available repayment plans, determine repayment eligibility, and learn which option best meets their repayment goals,' it said. The department also noted that in May, it resumed collections on delinquent loans, saying it has 'emailed more than 23 million borrowers to remind them of their legal obligation to repay their loans, as well as of the benefits of making regular progress toward repayment.'SAVE participants also have the option to stay in forbearance; however, the interest they accrue could be significant. Some experts say, in that case, making interest-only payments can help stave off mounting balances down the road. 'If you know it's going to really financially hurt you to start making payments, then just stay in forbearance,' Megan Walter, senior policy analyst at the National Association of Financial Aid Administrators, said per CNBC. 'If you can at least pay the interest, I would do that.' Borrowers who can't afford their monthly payments can also apply for forbearance or deferment. SAVE will officially shutter in July 2028. This post originally appeared at to get the Fast Company newsletter: Sign in to access your portfolio

Department of Veterans Affairs looks to end certain abortion services for veterans
Department of Veterans Affairs looks to end certain abortion services for veterans

CNN

time2 hours ago

  • CNN

Department of Veterans Affairs looks to end certain abortion services for veterans

The US Department of Veterans Affairs is proposing to end certain abortion services to veterans, rolling back a Biden-era move to expand abortion rights. In a proposed rule filed Friday, the department said that it is seeking to revoke access to abortions and abortion counseling for veterans and the beneficiaries of the Civilian Health and Medical Program of the Department of Veterans Affairs. 'We take this action to ensure that VA provides only needed medical services to our nation's heroes and their families,' the department said in the filing. Under the Biden administration's rule, the department currently provides access to abortions when a pregnant veteran's life or health is at risk if their pregnancy were carried to term, or if the pregnancy was the result of rape or incest — regardless of state laws. The proposed rule would allow abortions in cases where 'a physician certifies that the life of the mother would be endangered if the fetus were carried to term,' which, according to the filing, had been permitted even before the 2022 expansion. The Biden-era rule was part of the administration's efforts to expand abortion access after Republican-led states pushed ahead with restrictions in the wake of the 2022 Supreme Court ruling that eliminated the federal right to an abortion. The VA argued at the time that it was necessary to give veterans access to abortions, saying, 'As abortion bans come into force across the country, veterans in many States are no longer assured access to abortion services in their communities, even when those services are needed.' But on Friday, President Donald Trump's VA slammed the Biden administration's rule, calling it federal overreach. 'The stated reason for (the expansion) was a reaction to a Supreme Court decision, Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization … that itself was intended to prevent federal overreach and return to States control over the provision of abortion services,' the filing states. 'Yet, the last administration used Dobbs to do the exact opposite of preventing overreach, creating a purported Federal entitlement to abortion for veterans where none had existed before and without regard to State law.' Twenty states have banned or limited access to abortion. States where abortion is limited report higher rates of maternal and infant mortality, as well as greater economic insecurity. The proposed rule will now be open for public comment for 30 days starting Monday. In his first term, Trump made good on campaign promises and appointed Supreme Court justices who helped overturn Roe v. Wade. Since that ruling, Trump has been keen to leave regulations over the issue to state governments. The Trump administration has overall been quiet on the issue of abortion in his second term. However, in June, the US Department of Health and Human Services and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services moved to rescind a 2022 federal guidance to health care providers specifying that people should be able to access an abortion in the event of a medical emergency, even if state laws restrict such procedures. CNN's Veronica Stracqualursi and Jen Christensen contributed to this report.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store