Huawei must stand trial in US on tech theft, Iran charges, judge rules
In a 52-page decision, US District Judge Ann Donnelly in Brooklyn found sufficient allegations in the 16-count indictment that Huawei engaged in racketeering to expand its brand, stole trade secrets from six companies, and committed bank fraud.
The Iran accusations stemmed from Huawei's alleged control of Skycom, a Hong Kong company that did business in that country.
Donnelly said prosecutors satisfactorily alleged Skycom 'operated as Huawei's Iranian subsidiary and ultimately stood to benefit, in a roundabout way,' from more than US$100 million (RM420 million) of money transfers through the US financial system.
Huawei has pleaded not guilty and had sought to dismiss 13 of the 16 counts, calling itself 'a prosecutorial target in search of a crime.'
A trial is scheduled for May 4, 2026, and could last several months.
Neither Huawei nor its lawyers immediately responded to requests for comment. A spokesperson for Interim US Attorney Joseph Nocella in Brooklyn declined to comment.
The criminal case began during US President Donald Trump's first term in 2018, the same year the Department of Justice launched its China Initiative to address Beijing's alleged theft of intellectual property.
Huawei Chief Financial Officer Meng Wanzhou, whose father founded the company, had been a defendant, and was detained in Canada for nearly three years before being allowed to return to China. Charges against her were dismissed in 2022.
In 2022, President Joe Biden's administration scrapped the China Initiative, after critics said it amounted to racial profiling and caused fear that chilled scientific research.
Based in Shenzhen, Huawei operates in more than 170 countries and has about 208,000 employees.
The US government has restricted Huawei's access to American technology since 2019, citing national security concerns. Huawei denies it is a threat.
The case is US v. Huawei Technologies Co et al, US District Court, Eastern District of New York, No. 18-cr-00457. — Reuters
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
31 minutes ago
- Malay Mail
‘Owned bad facts' to sway jury: Sean Combs' lawyers concedes abuse in trial strategy but secure acquittal on most serious charges
Combs acquitted of sex trafficking, convicted on lesser charges Defence argued relationships were consensual despite abuse Prosecutors said threats, financial control indicated trafficking NEW YORK, July 3 — With their client caught on tape beating one of his former girlfriends, Sean 'Diddy' Combs' lawyers at his sex trafficking trial never sought to deny that he was physically abusive. Instead, their trial strategy focused on convincing jurors that there was no direct link between what they called domestic violence and two of Combs' ex-girlfriends' decisions to take part in drug-fuelled sex marathons with paid male escorts. Legal experts said the argument appeared to have been successful, with jurors voting on Wednesday to acquit Combs, 55, on the most serious charges of racketeering conspiracy and sex trafficking. Combs was convicted on two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution, a lesser offense. 'His attorneys were smart and they owned the bad facts,' said Anna Cominsky, a professor at New York Law School. 'They fought on the things that mattered and it paid off.' The verdict spared Combs, who founded Bad Boy Records and is credited with popularising hip-hop in American culture, a potential life sentence. He faces up to 10 years in prison on each prostitution count. Prosecutors acknowledged in a court filing that federal sentencing guidelines appeared to recommend a maximum sentence of about 5-1/4 years. Combs' lawyers argued that two years would be the outer limit. Still, the argument appeared to have been a double-edged sword when it came to Combs' bid for bail. US District Judge Arun Subramanian on Wednesday denied Combs' request to be released from jail ahead of his sentencing later this year, citing defence lawyer Marc Agnifilo's concession in his June 27 closing argument that Combs had committed abuse. 'Domestic violence is violence, and you said that this is a case that did involve violence,' Subramanian said in court. The jury's deliberations took place behind closed doors, and the reasoning of their decision is not known. But legal experts said the defence put forth a strong case that Combs' romantic relationships may have been combustible and at times violent, but that his conduct did not meet the definition of sex trafficking. Defence lawyers argued that both of his former girlfriends who testified, the rhythm and blues singer Casandra Ventura and a woman known in court by the pseudonym Jane, loved Combs and consensually took part in the sexual performances to make him happy. Lawyer Teny Geragos speaks to the media next to lawyers Marc Agnifilo outside the US federal court, following a bail hearing, after the jury reached verdicts in the Sean 'Diddy' Combs sex trafficking and racketeering conspiracy trial, in Manhattan, New York City, US, July 2, 2025. — Reuters pic 'A different scenario' To convict Combs of sex trafficking, prosecutors would have had to show that Combs used force, fraud or coercion to compel Ventura and Jane to take part in ecstasy-fuelled, days-long sexual performances with male sex workers sometimes known as 'Freak Offs.' Both women testified that during the encounters, Combs would watch, masturbate, and occasionally film. The case differed from recent high-profile sex trafficking convictions, including those of British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell and rhythm and blues singer R. Kelly. Those cases involved underage victims, meaning prosecutors did not have to prove a lack of consent to secure a conviction. At Combs' trial, prosecutors had the burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that adult women, who said they loved Combs and had consensual sex with him many times, did not consent to the 'Freak Offs' on certain occasions. 'This was a very different scenario than what we usually see with sex trafficking cases,' said Sarah Krissoff, a former federal prosecutor in Manhattan and current partner at law firm Cozen O'Connor. 'These were messy, toxic, violent relationships with lots of drama.' During cross-examination of the government's witnesses, the defence brought jurors' attention to sexually explicit text messages in which the women expressed affection for Combs. 'She was always free to leave,' Agnifilo said in closing, referring to Ventura. 'She chose to stay because she was in love with him.' The Manhattan US Attorney's office, which brought the case, said in a statement after the verdict: 'Sex crimes are all too present in many aspects of our society.' 'They didn't want to leave' Prosecutors pointed to testimony from both Ventura and Jane that Combs threatened to cut off financial support and release sex tapes. They showed jurors a hotel surveillance video of Combs attacking Ventura. 'No was never an option for Cassie,' prosecutor Maurene Comey told jurors in her final argument last month. To undermine the defence argument that Ventura and Jane took part in the 'Freak Offs' consensually, prosecutors called forensic psychologist Dawn Hughes as an expert witness. She said victims sometimes form a 'trauma bond' with perpetrators that can make it difficult to leave an abusive relationship. Agnifilo urged jurors to rely on their own intuitions about relationships rather than expert testimony. 'They didn't always like him, but they loved him,' Agnifilo said. 'They didn't want to leave him.' — Reuters
Malay Mail
an hour ago
- Malay Mail
Trump's US$3.4t tax-and-spend bill faces resistance in divided House
WASHINGTON, July 3 — Republicans in the House of Representatives on Wednesday struggled to pass President Donald Trump's massive tax-cut and spending bill as a handful of hardliners withheld their support over concerns about its cost. As lawmakers shuttled in and out of closed-door meetings, House Speaker Mike Johnson said he was trying to convince the holdouts to back Trump's signature bill, telling reporters, 'We're planning on a vote today.' With a narrow 220-212 majority, Johnson can afford no more than three defections from his ranks, and skeptics from the party's right flank said they had more than enough votes to block the bill. 'He knows I'm a 'no.' He knows that I don't believe there are the votes to pass this rule the way it is,' Republican Representative Andy Harris of Maryland, leader of the hardline Freedom Caucus, told reporters. Trump, who is pressing lawmakers to get him the bill to sign into law by the July 4 Independence Day holiday, met with some of the dissenters at the White House. But with the outcome uncertain, Republican leaders delayed a procedural vote for hours as they worked to shore up support. The Senate passed the legislation, which nonpartisan analysts say will add US$3.4 trillion to the nation's US$36.2 trillion in debt over the next decade, by the narrowest possible margin on Tuesday after intense debate on the bill's hefty price tag and US$900 million in cuts to the Medicaid healthcare program for low-income Americans. Representative Lisa McClain, who chairs the House Republican Conference, told Reuters she expected her colleagues to work through procedural votes and bring the bill to a vote before the full House on Wednesday night. 'I think we'll put it on the floor tonight. It may be 10 or 11 o'clock,' McClain said. Democrats are united in opposition to the bill, saying that its tax breaks disproportionately benefit the wealthy while cutting services that lower- and middle-income Americans rely on. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimated that almost 12 million people could lose health insurance as a result of the bill. 'This bill is catastrophic. It is not policy, it is punishment,' Democratic Representative Jim McGovern said in debate on the House floor. Trump effect Republicans in Congress have struggled to stay united in recent years, but they also have not defied Trump since he returned to the White House in January. Representative Chip Roy of Texas was leading three holdouts who have raised concerns about increasing the deficit and high levels of spending. Asked why he expects the bill to pass, Republican Representative Derrick Van Orden told reporters: 'Because 77 million Americans voted for Donald Trump, not Chip Roy. That's why.' Any changes made by the House would require another Senate vote, which would make it all but impossible to meet the July 4 deadline. The legislation contains most of Trump's top domestic priorities, from tax cuts to immigration enforcement. The bill would extend Trump's 2017 tax cuts, cut health and food safety net programs, fund Trump's immigration crackdown, and zero out many green-energy incentives. It also includes a US$5 trillion increase in the nation's debt ceiling, which lawmakers must address in the coming months or risk a devastating default. The Medicaid cuts have also raised concerns among some Republicans, prompting the Senate to set aside more money for rural hospitals. — Reuters
Malay Mail
2 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Jury clears Sean Combs of racketeering, convicts him on prostitution-related charges; bail denied
Combs found guilty of prostitution-related offenses Faces maximum 10-year sentence on each of two counts Defence had asked judge to release Combs on bail NEW YORK, July 3 — Sean 'Diddy' Combs' will remain behind bars for now, a judge ruled yesterday, after the music mogul was cleared of sex trafficking and racketeering charges that could have put him behind bars for life but found guilty of lesser prostitution-related offenses. In rejecting the defence's request for bail, US District Judge Arun Subramanian said prosecutors had presented ample evidence at Combs' trial that he had committed violent acts and should remain in jail until his sentencing on two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution. 'It is impossible for the defendant to demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that he poses no danger,' Subramanian said during a hearing in Manhattan federal court hours after the verdict. The seven-week trial focused on allegations that Combs forced two of his former girlfriends to partake in drug-fuelled, days-long sexual performances sometimes known as 'Freak Offs' with male sex workers in hotel rooms while Combs watched, masturbated and occasionally filmed. Both women — the rhythm and blues singer Casandra 'Cassie' Ventura, and a woman known in court by the pseudonym Jane — testified that he beat them and threatened to withhold financial support or leak sexually explicit images of them. As Subramanian denied bail, Combs stared straight ahead and one of his family members in the courtroom gallery hung their head. It was a far cry from the jubilant reaction after the verdict. 'I'm gonna be home soon,' Combs said, prompting applause and cheers from his family and supporters. 'Thank you, I love you.' The 12-member jury unanimously acquitted Combs of racketeering conspiracy and two counts of sex trafficking Ventura and Jane. The Bad Boy Records founder could have faced life in prison if convicted on those counts. Combs, once famed for hosting lavish parties for the cultural elite in luxurious locales like the Hamptons and Saint-Tropez, had pleaded not guilty to all five counts. The verdict was overall a win for Combs, a former billionaire known for elevating hip-hop in American culture. 'It's a great victory for Sean Combs, it's a great victory for the jury system,' defence lawyer Marc Agnifilo told reporters. Under federal law, Combs faces up to 10 years in prison on each of the two prostitution counts. But prosecutors acknowledged in a court filing that federal sentencing guidelines appeared to recommend a sentence of at most 5-1/4 years total, well below the statutory maximum. Combs' lawyers argued that two years would be the outer limit. The judge suggested sentencing Combs on October 3, but will consider a defence request for an earlier date. Prosecutors argued Combs should remain in jail because he remained a danger, pointing to Jane's trial testimony that he assaulted her in June 2024 while aware he was under investigation. 'He's an extremely violent man with an extraordinarily dangerous temper who has shown no remorse,' prosecutor Maurene Comey said in court. Lawyer Marc Agnifilo speaks to the media, following a bail hearing, after the jury reached verdicts in the Sean 'Diddy' Combs sex trafficking and racketeering conspiracy trial, in Manhattan, New York City July 2, 2025. — Reuters pic Acquittal on three charges The jury's acquittal on the most serious charges signalled that the prosecution failed to draw a direct line between Combs' abuse of Ventura and Jane and their participation in the sexual performances. The defence acknowledged that Combs engaged in domestic violence, but argued that Ventura and Jane were strong, independent women who consensually took part in the sexual performances because they wanted to please Combs. Sarah Krissoff, a former federal prosecutor in Manhattan, said the jury may have viewed Combs' conduct as evidence of toxic romantic relationships, but not sex trafficking. In a statement after the verdict, Manhattan US Attorney Jay Clayton and Homeland Security Investigations Special Agent in Charge Ricky Patel said sex crimes were 'all too present' across society and that Americans wanted it to stop. Combs still faces dozens of civil lawsuits accusing him of abuse. Ventura sued him in November 2023 for sex trafficking, and they settled a day later for US$20 million (RM84.3 million). Combs, once feted for turning artists like Notorious B.I.G. and Usher into stars, has denied all wrongdoing. After the verdict, Ventura's lawyer Douglas Wigdor said in a statement that she had 'paved the way' for Combs' conviction on the prostitution counts. — Reuters
