
How to get an inheritance tax refund
Most of us are familiar with the idea of inheritance tax being calculated based on the value of a deceased person's assets at the date of death.
But what you might not be so clued up on, is the fact that if those assets have later fallen in value when they're sold – within certain time limits – it may be possible to claim an inheritance tax refund.
Here we take a closer look at how these rebates work, and how to go about claiming money that is rightfully yours.
Inheritance tax bills are rising
This much-maligned tax is due at 40pc on the portion of an estate worth more than £325,00, with the figure rising to £500,000 if the deceased leaves their main home to their children or grandchildren. Couples can share their allowances, meaning they have £1m in total to pass on.
More and more estates are being affected by inheritance tax as rising house prices and frozen thresholds push more families above the limit.
New figures released at the end of April by HMRC revealed that inheritance tax receipts brought in a record £8.2bn in the last tax year. This was an increase of £800m compared with the same period during the previous year.
Sarah Coles of the broker, Hargreaves Lansdown, said: 'With inheritance tax bills hitting a record high last tax year, more people need to consider how much their estate might be worth, and whether tax could be an issue.'
Laura Hayward, of professional services group S&W, added: 'Managing inheritance tax is a huge and growing concern for families.'
Why might you be due a refund?
With inheritance tax bills on the up, it's more important than ever to ensure you're not handing over more than you need to. And this is why it's worth brushing up on the rules on rebates.
Rebates can apply to properties, as well as shares and other assets.
Shaun Moore, tax and financial planning expert at Quilter, said: 'For instance, if a property drops in value – say the home was valued at £500,000 when the person died, but later sells for £450,000 – the estate may have overpaid inheritance tax on the original higher valuation.'
Properties are often over-valued, with families typically favouring quick sales over price. Shares can also go down in value, meaning they can also end up getting sold for a lower price than initially valued on death.
Mr Moore said: 'If quoted shares have fallen in value – for example due to recent stock market volatility following renewed concerns over global trade tensions and US tariff threats from Donald Trump – there could be an opportunity to reclaim some of the tax.'
Claiming back the difference in tax from HMRC is known as 'loss on sale relief', and can be worth thousands of pounds.
Mr Moore added: 'With markets often moving sharply during uncertain periods, the key is to check whether assets have lost value between death and sale.'
When is inheritance tax due?
Counter-intuitive as it may seem, families are required to pay inheritance tax before probate is granted. In other words, major assets such as property or shares cannot be sold until this has been obtained.
Charlene Young, pension and savings expert at AJ Bell, said: 'Inheritance tax is due within six months of death, so usually needs to be paid ahead of probate being granted, and ahead of the executors getting the authority to deal with the estate, including selling assets.'
As families can often experience long delays in the probate process, this tax often has to be paid long before assets are actually sold. This can leave assets exposed to market volatility for many months, and sometimes even more than a year.
Mr Moore said: 'This creates a real risk that by the time a property or shares are eventually sold, their value has dropped – opening the door to a potential refund.'
Right now, the Government is keen to point out that probate waiting time have finally eased.
Even so, complex cases will naturally take longer to process.
How can you find out if you're due an inheritance tax refund
If you're trying to work out if you're owed money, you need to compare the sale price of major assets such as property or quoted shares against the value submitted for inheritance tax purposes.
Mr Moore said: 'If the sale price is lower, there may be grounds to reclaim some of the tax.'
While shares are relatively simple to value for probate, property can be more difficult. As an executor, it's important to obtain accurate valuations.
'Don't get tempted to 'under-egg' a probate property valuation value just to try to avoid inheritance tax,' warned Ms Young.
'HMRC can challenge valuations for probate. And secondly, any capital gains tax on the sale could be higher than the inheritance tax would have been due if a more accurate valuation had been used for probate.'
As inheritance tax is a complex subject, it's worth giving some serious thought to seeking professional advice. A specialist can help you navigate the rules, and help you avoid making a potentially expensive mistake.
How to make a refund claim
If you think you may be due a refund, the onus is on you to do something about it.
Ms Young said: 'It will come as no surprise to learn that claims are not automatic. It is up to the executors or trustees to lodge a claim with HMRC.'
You must take care to submit the correct form. For property, the form is IHT38. For qualifying shares and investments sold at a loss, it is IHT35.
Don't delay, as there are strict rules and time restrictions. Ms Young said: 'The assets must have been sold (at a loss) by the executors within specific timeframes. For shares, it is 12 months following the date of death. For property, it is four years.'
When it comes to making a claim for a fall in property value, HMRC will expect clear evidence of the sale and an explanation for the drop – particularly if the difference is significant.
Be sure to provide supporting documents, such as sales contracts, valuations and evidence of when the property was sold.
Rebates can only be claimed on the first transfer
Note that claims cannot usually be made for any investments or properties already transferred to beneficiaries who go on to sell them at a loss.
Ms Hayward said: 'Refunds can only be claimed on the first transfer. They cannot be claimed if the asset leaves the estate without falling in value, then subsequently falls in value. Executors need to take this into account when considering what assets are being sold, and when.'
Be prepared for a long wait
Tax specialists warn that HMRC can take many months to process refund claims, particularly when dealing with large or complex estates, or where there are missing documents.
Mr Moore said: 'Families need to be prepared for a potentially lengthy wait before receiving any money back.'
You could be owed interest on inheritance tax overpayments
You might also be due interest from HMRC on the excess inheritance tax you are owed back with your refund, and especially if it takes a long time to process your eligible claim.
The interest rate you'll get is 3.5pc and is payable from the date you overpaid – until the date of the repayment from HMRC.
Ms Young said: 'Just be aware that this is a whole five percentage points less than the whopping 8.5pc interest charge levied on those who fail to pay inheritance tax on time – or who underpay what was due.'
Why the difference? HMRC's website says the disparity in the rates 'is in line with the policy of other tax authorities worldwide' and that it 'compares favourably' with commercial rates. In short, it does it because it can.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
13 minutes ago
- The Independent
Welfare cuts will still plunge thousands into poverty despite U-turn, MPs warn
Tens of thousands of people are still at risk of being pushed into poverty due to Labour's welfare cuts despite last-minute changes to the plans, a group of MPs has warned. Around 50,000 people who become disabled or ill will face poverty by the end of the decade because of the remaining reforms, the cross-party Work and Pensions Committee has found. A cut to the health-related element of Universal Credit (UC health) which will take effect from April next year and will see monthly payments nearly halved for most new claimants, dropping from £423.27 to £217.26. At the same time, the standard rate of Universal Credit will increase for all claimants by £17.39 a month, from £400.14 to £417.53. This marks the first time the benefit has been uprated above the inflation rate (CPI). These extra-inflationary increases will continue until at least 2029/30, by which point they will amount to an extra £725 in cash terms for a single person aged 25 or over, the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) says. The committee welcomed this 'much-needed and long-overdue increase' but added that its MPs remain critical of the 'failure' to assess the impact of UC health cuts on poverty, health and employment. This is now the main measure that the bill will deliver after the government removed changes to the Personal Independence Payment (PIP) following the threat of a major backbench rebellion by over 100 Labour MPs. The health and disability-linked benefit will instead by subject to a fully-consulted review by social security Minister Sir Stephen Timms, due to be completed in autumn 2026. Committee chair Debbie Abrahams said: 'We welcome the concessions that the government made to the UC and PIP Bill (now the UC Bill); but there are still issues with these welfare reforms not least with the cut in financial support that newly sick and disabled people will receive. 'The government's own analysis published in March indicates that from next April approximately 50,000 people who develop a health condition or become disabled – and those who live with them - will enter poverty by 2030 as a result of the reduction in support of the UC health premium. 'We agree in a reformed and sustainable welfare system, but we must ensure that the wellbeing of those who come into contact with it is protected. The lesson learned from last month should be that the impact of policy changes to health-related benefits must be assessed prior to policy changes being implemented to avoid potential risks to claimants.' A government spokesperson said: 'Our welfare reforms will support those who can work into jobs and ensure there is always a safety net for those that need it. The impact assessment shows our reforms will lift 50,000 children out of poverty – and our additional employment support will lift even more families out of poverty. 'The reforms will rebalance Universal Credit rates to reduce the perverse incentives that trap people out of work, alongside genuinely helping disabled people and those with long-term health conditions into good, secure work – backed by £3.8bn in employment support over this parliament. 'We are also tackling poverty by extending free school meals to all households on Universal Credit, helping to address holiday hunger with our Crisis and Resilience Fund, supporting over a million households by introducing a Fair Repayment Rate on Universal Credit deductions, and delivering the biggest increase in social and affordable housebuilding in a generation, as part of our Plan for Change.'


The Independent
13 minutes ago
- The Independent
Cancer drug demand drives higher sales for AstraZeneca
AstraZeneca has announced a jump in sales in recent months after a surge in demand for cancer drugs, as the pharmaceutical giant prepares to plug 50 billion dollars (£37 billion) into its US expansion. The drug-maker reported total revenues of 28 billion US dollars (£21 billion) for the first half of 2025. This is 11% higher, at constant exchange rates, than the same period a year ago. AstraZeneca said the uplift was largely driven by its oncology medicines, with product sales surging by 16% year on year, thanks to growth in demand for drugs including Tagrisso and Imfinzi. Revenues from oncology products, which refer to the diagnosis and treatment of cancer, made up 43% of the company's total sales. The group's pre-tax profit soared by 27% to 6.5 billion US dollars (£4.9 billion) for the first half, compared with last year. AstraZeneca, which is based in the UK, last week pledged a mammoth investment into the US over the next five years, where it generates the highest proportion of sales. The money will fund a new multibillion dollar manufacturing facility in Virginia, to be the firm's largest single manufacturing investment in the world. The new factory will produce drug substances for its growing weight management and metabolic portfolio, including oral GLP-1 products. GLP-1 is the scientific term for weight-loss medication, which works by reducing food cravings. Oral medicines can be taken in tablet form, while other drugs are taken as injections. 'Our strong momentum in revenue growth continued through the first half of the year and the delivery from our broad and diverse pipeline has been excellent,' Pascal Soriot, AstraZeneca's chief executive, said. 'This landmark investment reflects not only America's importance but also our confidence in our innovative medicines to transform global health and power AstraZeneca's ambition to deliver 80 billion dollars revenue by 2030.'


The Independent
13 minutes ago
- The Independent
Uber loses UK Supreme Court appeal over tax on rival apps
Uber's rival taxi operators outside London will not face a 20 per cent Value Added Tax (VAT) charge on their profit margins, the UK Supreme Court ruled on Tuesday. The unanimous decision dismissed an appeal brought by Uber, confirming that private-hire operators do not enter into a direct contract with passengers. Uber had initiated the legal challenge following a 2021 Supreme Court ruling that classified its own drivers as workers, which had significant implications for its tax and other obligations. The ride-hailing company sought a declaration that all private-hire taxi operators should be considered to have a direct contractual relationship with passengers, thereby incurring VAT. Last year, London's High Court initially ruled in Uber's favour, suggesting operators would be liable for the 20 per cent tax. However, this decision was reversed by the Court of Appeal in July 2024, following a challenge from private hire operators Delta Taxis and Veezu. The Supreme Court has now upheld the Court of Appeal's judgment, concluding the legal battle. The Supreme Court ruling will clarify the legal position for operators across much of England and Wales and may have significant implications for how private hire services are structured and delivered outside London. The news comes after Uber announced it will launch self-driving taxis in London from spring 2026. This has been enabled by the Government's decision to bring forward trials of self-driving commercial taxis and 'bus-like services' in England to next spring. In a separate case, Estonian ride-hailing and food delivery startup Bolt this year defeated an appeal by Britain's tax authority HMRC about what it should pay VAT at 20 per cent. HMRC has since been granted permission to challenge the ruling that Bolt is only liable for VAT on its margin, rather than the full cost of the trip, at the Court of Appeal.