Three Days Left To Buy ITV plc (LON:ITV) Before The Ex-Dividend Date
The company's next dividend payment will be UK£0.033 per share, on the back of last year when the company paid a total of UK£0.05 to shareholders. Based on the last year's worth of payments, ITV has a trailing yield of 7.1% on the current stock price of UK£0.709. Dividends are a major contributor to investment returns for long term holders, but only if the dividend continues to be paid. So we need to check whether the dividend payments are covered, and if earnings are growing.
Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit.
Dividends are typically paid out of company income, so if a company pays out more than it earned, its dividend is usually at a higher risk of being cut. That's why it's good to see ITV paying out a modest 48% of its earnings. That said, even highly profitable companies sometimes might not generate enough cash to pay the dividend, which is why we should always check if the dividend is covered by cash flow. It paid out more than half (70%) of its free cash flow in the past year, which is within an average range for most companies.
It's encouraging to see that the dividend is covered by both profit and cash flow. This generally suggests the dividend is sustainable, as long as earnings don't drop precipitously.
Check out our latest analysis for ITV
Click here to see the company's payout ratio, plus analyst estimates of its future dividends.
Companies that aren't growing their earnings can still be valuable, but it is even more important to assess the sustainability of the dividend if it looks like the company will struggle to grow. If business enters a downturn and the dividend is cut, the company could see its value fall precipitously. With that in mind, we're not enthused to see that ITV's earnings per share have remained effectively flat over the past five years. Better than seeing them fall off a cliff, for sure, but the best dividend stocks grow their earnings meaningfully over the long run.
Many investors will assess a company's dividend performance by evaluating how much the dividend payments have changed over time. ITV has seen its dividend decline 4.3% per annum on average over the past 10 years, which is not great to see.
From a dividend perspective, should investors buy or avoid ITV? Earnings per share are down very slightly in recent times, and ITV paid out less half its profit and more than half its cash flow as dividends, which is not the worst combination but could be better. To summarise, ITV looks okay on this analysis, although it doesn't appear a stand-out opportunity.
If you want to look further into ITV, it's worth knowing the risks this business faces. For instance, we've identified 3 warning signs for ITV (1 is significant) you should be aware of.
If you're in the market for strong dividend payers, we recommend checking our selection of top dividend stocks.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
2025's Most Attractive Employers For MBAs: Finance Surges, Tech Fades
JPMorgan Chase is the most attractive employer for U.S. business students, signaling a shift to tried and true employment pipelines in an uncertain job market. What a difference a few years makes. In 2022, when tech was still flying high, business students wanted to work in FAANG – the now out-dated acronym for the five best-performing American tech stocks of the time (Facebook, Apple, Amazon, Netflix, and Google.) That year, three of the top five of the were FAANG: Apple was voted the most attractive by business students followed by Google at No. 2. Amazon was No. 4 another tech behemoth – Microsoft – came in at No. 3. But in 2025? None of them cracked the top three. Facebook is now Meta. Google is Alphabet. And amid high-profile layoffs and the disruptive rise of artificial intelligence, . Business students are coming back to their finance roots. All three of the top employers in Universum's 2025 Most Attractive Employers in the U.S. ranking are bulge-bracket banks: JPMorgan Chase took the No. 1 spot for the second straight year, followed by Goldman Sachs (No. 2) and Morgan Stanley (No. 3) Universum, the global employer branding firm, surveys more than 130,000 business, engineering, and IT students across 11 key markets each year to complete its ranking. In the U.S. alone, more than 33,000 students – including thousands of MBAs and business students – shared their career preferences in the 2025 survey. This year, five of the top 10 most attractive employers for U.S. business students were banks or asset managers. Just three were in tech. JPMorgan Chase was No. 1 for the second straight year while Morgan Stanley made one of the most dramatic moves on the list. It rose 9 spots from No. 12 in 2024 to No. 3. Other newcomers to the top 10 included Deloitte, BlackRock, and Bank of America, signaling renewed interest in firms and industries with established business school pipelines. 1 JPMorgan Chase Banking 1 2 Goldman Sachs Financial Services 4 3 Morgan Stanley Financial Services 12 4 Apple Technology 3 5 Google Technology 2 6 Nike Consumer Goods 5 7 Deloitte Professional Services 11 8 Bank of America Banking 13 9 BlackRock Asset Management 14 10 Microsoft Technology 8 During the COVID-19 pandemic and the years that followed, many MBAs turned to tech and consulting for their innovation, pay, and flexibility. But tech started a very public which continued through the Business students are recalibrating. 'Now it's shifted, and it's gone the other direction. It's a very different market than just a few years ago,' said Jeff Rugg, global account director at Universum, during a recent webinar on the rankings. In an unsure job market, finance has resurged. Among the top 100 preferred U.S. employers for business students, 34 were finance-related, compared to 23 in tech and just 9 in consulting. Even the MBB firms – McKinsey (No. 27), Bain & Co. (No. 74), and Boston Consulting Group (No. 36) – fell out of the top 20. Consulting, the other big MBA-destination industry, had only 9 companies on the list. The MBB – McKinsey (ranked No. 27), Bain (No. 74), and Boston Consulting Group (No. 36) – fell out of the top 20 altogether. 'The job market is moving, but not for everyone,' says Paola Ospina, a global account manager at Universum. 'Companies are pulling back on entry-level hiring. This generation is facing an employment crisis, and landing a job has become a real challenge for many of them.' Where MBAs once targeted a short list of 'dream' companies, many are now casting wider nets. While students in past surveys emphasized purpose, flexibility, and making an impact, 2025's survey suggests business students are making more pragmatic decisions. Career growth and competitive pay are now the top two attributes business students look for in an employer, according to Universum. A respectful workplace culture ranked third. 'There's a completely frustrated pool of candidates being ghosted by employers, wasting their time,' Ospina says. 'They're not really being valued. And again, it's all over social media.' Flexibility still matters, but not necessarily remote work. Only 4% of students said they would refuse a job that didn't offer remote options. The rest either preferred flexibility or said they could adjust. 'This generation wants to go into the office,' says Ospina, noting that younger grads started college during the pandemic, when campuses were either closed down or heavily restricted. 'They are craving that in-person interaction.' As Rugg notes, companies like JPMorgan Chase and Amazon – both of which require employees to be in the office – are ranked highly by business students. 'It should give confidence to employers in the marketplace,' he said. Artificial intelligence was another hot topic in this year's survey. While 75% of students said they felt positive or curious about working for an employer that uses AI, 57% said they had not developed AI-related skills. 'So there's a bit of a disconnect,' says Nikki Trifunovic, an employer brand and talent acquisition advisor. The gap is even more pronounced for women, who reported lower levels of AI preparedness than their male peers. For employers, that's both a challenge and an opportunity. Companies that offer robust training and upskilling could be better positioned to attract and retain early-career MBA talent. The 2025 Universum rankings land at a tricky moment in the U.S. labor market. On one hand, it is still adding jobs (147,000 in June alone) while unemployment sits at 4.1%. On the other? 'There is growing uncertainty for employers on what's to happen with the tariffs and all of the policy shifts that are coming,' Ospina says. 'We'll definitely see the full effect of this as we get into the second half of the year.' In response, many employers are moving into a conservative hiring mode. Budgets are tighter. Teams are being asked to do more with less. And companies are laser focused on hiring the right talent, especially those who can drive digital transformation. For candidates, especially new grads, the result is a job market that feels pretty bleak. Only 35% of students felt confident that they would be able to find a job after graduation. The uncertainty feels a lot like the pandemic when companies froze hiring and layoffs were everywhere, Ospina says. Particularly for Generation Z. 'And in their true Gen Z fashion, they're being very vocal about it all over TikTok and social media. They're calling it like they see it – messy, and I think, literally, the worst job market ever,' she says. 'All of that frustration we're seeing online and in the media articles, it's not just noise. It's actually showing up in our data too.' Read Universum's 2025 report on the Most Attractive Employers In The United States. NEXT PAGE: The 100 most-desired employers of B-school students according to Universum's 2025 survey. Goldman Sachs was the second most attractive employer for business school students, according to Universum's 2025 ranking. Universum publishes its Most Attractive Employer Rankings every year in more than 20 countries. Rankings are a reflection of talent's overall opinion of employers in their countries. The top 100 companies as ranked by U.S. business students are listed below. 1 JPMorgan Chase Banking 1 2 Goldman Sachs Financial Services 4 3 Morgan Stanley Financial Services 12 4 Apple Technology 3 5 Google Technology 2 6 Nike Consumer Goods 5 7 Deloitte Professional Services 11 8 Bank of America Banking 13 9 BlackRock Asset Management 14 10 Microsoft Technology 8 11 Amazon E‑commerce / Technology 10 12 Netflix Media & Entertainment 6 13 Spotify Media & Entertainment 7 14 Fidelity Investments Financial Services 15 15 Charles Schwab Financial Services 20 16 EY (Ernst & Young) Professional Services 16 17 The Walt Disney Company Media & Entertainment 9 18 KPMG Professional Services 22 19 PwC Professional Services 23 20 Wells Fargo Banking 28 21 Blackstone Private Equity 43 22 L'Oréal Groupe Consumer Goods 37 23 American Express Financial Services 33 24 Lockheed Martin Aerospace & Defense 40 25 Berkshire Hathaway Conglomerate 39 26 Vanguard Financial Services 27 27 McKinsey & Company Management Consulting 36 28 Mercedes-Benz Group Automotive 26 29 The Coca-Cola Company Consumer Goods 35 30 Tesla Automotive / Tech 17 31 Capital One Financial Services 45 32 Patagonia Retail / Apparel 24 33 Delta Air Lines Airlines 18 34 Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Government 30 35 Nintendo Technology / Entertainment 21 36 Boston Consulting Group (BCG) Management Consulting 44 37 Sony Technology / Entertainment 25 38 Warner Bros. Discovery Media & Entertainment 29 39 Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) Government 34 40 BMW Group Automotive 42 41 Marriott International Hospitality 38 42 Ford Motor Company Automotive 49 43 adidas Retail / Apparel 47 44 Airbnb Travel / Tech 55 45 Estée Lauder Consumer Goods 73 46 PNC Financial Services Group Banking 64 47 Toyota Automotive 41 48 Target Retail 31 49 Edward Jones Financial Services 69 50 PepsiCo Consumer Goods 59 51 Paramount Media & Entertainment 46 52 General Motors Automotive 66 53 IBM Technology 70 54 National Geographic Media / Publishing 32 55 SpaceX Aerospace 53 56 Johnson & Johnson Healthcare 87 57 Boeing Aerospace 51 58 Hilton Hospitality 58 59 Meta Technology / Social Media 85 60 Federal Reserve Government 54 61 Procter & Gamble Consumer Goods 99 62 LVMH Luxury Goods 71 63 United Airlines Airlines 48 64 United Nations International Organization 62 65 Citi Banking 86 66 American Airlines Airlines 52 67 Zara Retail / Apparel 67 68 Adobe Technology 56 69 TD Bank Group Banking — 70 S&P Global Financial Data 91 71 Starbucks Retail / Food 75 72 Mayo Clinic Healthcare 65 73 Barclays Banking — 74 Bain & Company Management Consulting 88 75 Nordstrom Retail 92 76 Southwest Airlines Airlines 63 77 Salesforce Technology — 78 State Farm Insurance Insurance 84 79 UBS Banking — 80 Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Government 60 81 Mastercard Financial Services 98 82 Under Armour Retail / Apparel 100 83 Department of Defense (DOD) Government 57 84 Northwestern Mutual Insurance — 85 Department of the Treasury (USDT) Government 90 86 Electronic Arts Entertainment / Gaming 80 87 Visa Financial Services 74 88 Oracle Technology — 89 Robinhood Fintech — 90 Deutsche Bank Banking 61 91 Intel Technology 76 92 Live Nation Entertainment Entertainment 89 93 Honda Automotive 81 94 United States Department of State (DOS) Government 96 95 National Institutes of Health (NIH) Government / Healthcare — 96 Bloomberg Financial Media 82 97 MGM Resorts International Hospitality 94 98 Walmart Retail 93 99 Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Government — 100 The Hershey Company Consumer Goods — DON'T MISS: THE SECRET STANFORD PROGRAM NO ONE'S HEARD ABOUT AND WHY THIS FASHION-TECH FOUNDER CHOSE THE DUKE FUQUA MBA TO PIVOT TO PRODUCT MANAGEMENT The post 2025's Most Attractive Employers For MBAs: Finance Surges, Tech Fades appeared first on Poets&Quants. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


The Hill
16 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump seeks trade deals with deadline approaching
Trump suggested Monday that any nation that refuses to strike a deal with the U.S. would face a tariff between 15 and 20 percent. 'We're going to be setting a tariff for essentially the rest of the world, and that's what they're going to pay if they want to do business in the United States. Because you can't sit down and do 200 deals. But we made the big ones,' he said. Here are some of the top trading partners that have not struck deals with the U.S. China: Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and his Chinese counterparts held talks this week in China and Stockholm this week, which marked the third round of talks between the two nations. The talks led to another possible extension in the trade deal that was announced in May, without details about the timing of that extension. Canada: Negotiations between the Trump administration and Canada have stalled, Trump said last week. 'We haven't really had a lot of luck with Canada. I think Canada could be one where they'll just pay tariffs. It's not really a negotiation,' Trump said on Friday. Mexico: The president also threatened to impose a 30 percent tariff on goods from Mexico in a letter, citing the flow of fentanyl across the southern border that was the original basis for a 25 percent tariff he imposed on Mexican goods earlier this year.


TechCrunch
16 minutes ago
- TechCrunch
Space Force bets on commercial entrants in $4B satcom contest
American warfighters need jam-proof communications, and the Space Force is planning to spend hundreds of millions to ensure they have them. As part of that effort, the service established the Protected Tactical Satcom program to build out secure battlefield communications via satellites. The Space Force has already awarded contracts to defense primes Boeing and Northrop Grumman to develop prototype payloads for satellites heading to far-away geostationary orbit. Now, the program is entering a new phase. On Tuesday, the Space Force awarded five additional contracts for the design and demonstration of purpose-built satellites to provide jam-resistant comms to tactical forces. The winners include previous winners Boeing, Northrop Grumman, Viasat, and Intelsat, plus a relative newcomer: Astranis, a venture-backed startup based in San Francisco. (Intelsat will buy its satellite bus from K2 Space, another venture-backed startup.) The initial awards are relatively small, totaling $37.3 million combined. But the program has a $4 billion award ceiling, so the winners could sign on to a much more lucrative defense deal. Each firm will develop its architectures through January 2026. After that, the Space Force will select one design and award an additional contract for the first satellite, with a launch planned in 2028. Additional production awards will be doled out, also in 2028. The PTS-G contracts are a notable departure from how the military has historically procured geostationary satellites, which have typically had extremely long timelines from contract award to launch, and would cost hundreds of millions to over a billion dollars per spacecraft. In contrast, the Space Force is clearly trying to leverage the speed of commercial entrants and encourage competition by selecting multiple vendors for the initial phase of the program. Techcrunch event Tech and VC heavyweights join the Disrupt 2025 agenda Netflix, ElevenLabs, Wayve, Sequoia Capital — just a few of the heavy hitters joining the Disrupt 2025 agenda. They're here to deliver the insights that fuel startup growth and sharpen your edge. Don't miss the 20th anniversary of TechCrunch Disrupt, and a chance to learn from the top voices in tech — grab your ticket now and save up to $675 before prices rise. Tech and VC heavyweights join the Disrupt 2025 agenda Netflix, ElevenLabs, Wayve, Sequoia Capital — just a few of the heavy hitters joining the Disrupt 2025 agenda. They're here to deliver the insights that fuel startup growth and sharpen your edge. Don't miss the 20th anniversary of TechCrunch Disrupt, and a chance to learn from the top voices in tech — grab your ticket now and save up to $675 before prices rise. San Francisco | REGISTER NOW 'Our PTS-G contract transforms how SSC acquires SATCOM capability for the warfighter,' program executive officer Cordell DeLaPena Jr. said in a news release. 'The incorporation of commercial baseline designs to meet military capability significantly enhances the Space Force's speed and efficiency to add capability to meet emerging threats.'