logo
Families Face $2,150 Bill from Trump's Immigration Policies—Study

Families Face $2,150 Bill from Trump's Immigration Policies—Study

Newsweek2 days ago

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Families could see their annual expenses rise by $2,150 due to President Donald Trump's hardline deportation policies, according to a new report by FWD.us.
The additional costs stem from stricter rules, including work permit cancellations, mass deportations, and reduced legal immigration, which are expected to drive up prices for everyday goods and services nationwide.
An expert told Newsweek that removing immigrant workers leads to shortages in goods and services, which in turn pushes prices higher.
Why It Matters
Trump vowed to conduct the largest mass deportation effort in United States history as part of his hardline immigration policies. However, the proposal has raised concerns about its impact on the U.S. economy.
Agricultural production could decline by $30 billion to $60 billion if Trump's deportation policy is fully enacted, according to the American Business Immigration Coalition.
A reduced labor force in sectors like agriculture and construction leads to supply shortages and higher labor costs, which are then passed on to consumers.
Meanwhile, the American Immigration Council projects that the president's mass deportation policy could slap a one-time cost of $315 billion.
Stock image of U.S. currency.
Stock image of U.S. currency.
Soeren Stache/picture-alliance/dpa/AP Images
What To Know
The cancellation of work permits for individuals with Temporary Protected Status, Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA), and other protected statuses could result in nearly 2.6 million workers leaving the labor force. This includes significant numbers in the agriculture, construction, and hospitality sectors, leading to potential shortages and increased prices in these industries.
"The administration has been warned repeatedly that the immigration crackdowns would harm the whole economy. This report starts to quantify the exact costs to American families," Frank Knapp, managing director of the Secure Growth Initiative, a coalition of small businesses advocating for comprehensive immigration reform that grows the economy, told Newsweek.
"When immigrant labor is taken or made afraid to go to their jobs, goods and services become in short supply thus driving up cost," Knapp said.
The projected $2,150 annual increase in household expenses is comparable to the average American family's grocery bill for three months or their combined electricity and gas bills for the entire year. With many families already struggling to save, these additional costs could further strain household budgets.
According to the FWD.us report, the average American grocery bill could increase from $165 to $195 per week over the next four years. In the same period, the median price of a new home is expected to rise from $420,000 in 2024 to $468,000 by 2028.
Democratic lawmakers criticized Trump's immigration policies, emphasizing the need for approaches that support economic growth and family unity rather than causing fear and hardship.
"We need policies that grow our economy and keep families together, not ones that terrorize our communities and make it harder for everyone to make ends meet," said Democratic Senator Alex Padilla of California.
"At a time when New Mexico families are already burdened by high costs, this report underscores how the administration's immigration policies risk further straining our economy and are driving up prices," Senator Ben Ray Luján, a Democrat from New Mexico, said in a statement.
It comes after Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, speaking at a Congressional hearing, said that the Trump administration's deportation policies have contributed to the slowdown in U.S. economic growth. His remarks align with economists' concerns that targeting the removal of workers through immigration enforcement would impact the economy negatively.
What People Are Saying
Frank Knapp, managing director of the Secure Growth Initiative, told Newsweek: "Small businesses are also the victims of this immigration chaos. Not only are their workers missing, immigrant families have pulled back on consumer spending with their local small businesses. Congress needs to take charge and create a pathway for the undocumented and all the threatened immigrant groups to earn a permanent legal status. Small businesses need the labor of immigrants regardless of their legal status."
California Senator Alex Padilla, in a statement: "The Trump administration's mass deportation agenda and push to strip work permits from hardworking immigrants will not just tear families apart, it will raise costs for every American. Immigrants are essential to our economy, and removing them from our communities will make groceries, housing, and everyday services more expensive, especially for working families."
New Mexico Senator Ben Ray Luján, in a statement: Revoking work authorizations, pursuing mass deportations, and instilling fear in communities are not solutions—they are ineffective and this report details how they are harmful to the economy. I've long stood with our immigrant communities and will continue advocating for policies that are smart, equitable, and keep New Mexicans safe."
FWD.us President Todd Schulte, in a statement: "If we want to stabilize the costs of goods and services for Americans while also uphold the best of American family values, Congress and the administration should maintain work permits for temporarily protected immigrants, stop mass deportation plans, and find new pathways to legalize immigrants, while also investing in the full functioning of our legal immigration system."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump Tax Bill Hits Senate With GOP Torn by Competing Demands
Trump Tax Bill Hits Senate With GOP Torn by Competing Demands

Yahoo

time27 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump Tax Bill Hits Senate With GOP Torn by Competing Demands

(Bloomberg) -- Senate Majority Leader John Thune is rushing to meet President Donald Trump's July 4 deadline for pushing through his massive tax and spending bill, but first he has to work through a list of approximately eight Republican senators who have expressed opposition to portions of it. Philadelphia Transit System Votes to Cut Service by 45%, Hike Fares Squeezed by Crowds, the Roads of Central Park Are Being Reimagined Sprawl Is Still Not the Answer Mapping the Architectural History of New York's Chinatown Sao Paulo Pushes Out Favela Residents, Drug Users to Revive Its City Center Within the next two days, he needs to find a way to appease most of them. The South Dakota Republican has one of the least enviable jobs in Washington in the coming hours — trying to knit a compromise between factions of his party: one side pushing for more spending cuts in the legislation and senators who are threatening to withhold their support unless there is more funding for health benefits, renewable energy subsidies and other priorities. Thune can afford to lose only three his 53 members in the chamber, with Vice President JD Vance breaking the tie. Trump is closely watching the talks, quick to issue a harsh social media broadside to anyone who criticize his signature tax-cut legislation. Just ask North Carolina Senator Thom Tillis, one of two Republicans who voted against a late-night Saturday procedural vote to begin debate on the legislation. Trump unleashed a series of scathing posts, threatening to primary Tillis. The president took personal swipes, calling him a 'talker and complainer, NOT A DOER!' before also getting in a jab at Rand Paul, the other GOP senator to oppose the vote to advance the bill. Tillis on Sunday announced he wouldn't be running for reelection, a decision that unshackles him from any need to show fidelity to Trump to preserve his political career. He's indicated he's likely to oppose the bill. Paul has said he is also likely to vote 'no' on the legislation based on the price tag and the inclusion of a $5 trillion debt ceiling increase. If both Tillis and Paul remain in opposition, Thune can only lose one more. Polls show that Americans are wary of the bill. A recent Pew Research survey found that 49% of Americans oppose the bill, while 29% supported it. Some 21% weren't sure what to think. Republicans in Congress broadly support the $4.5 trillion worth of tax cuts in the package, which extend the 2017 tax cuts and create new breaks for tipped and hourly workers, along with seniors and car buyers. But the $1.2 trillion worth of spending cuts have created numerous problems. Moderates including Tillis, Susan Collins of Maine and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska are pushing to scale back cuts to Medicaid benefits, warning that those reductions could come at a great political cost if millions of Americans lose health coverage as a result of the bill. Some 11.8 million people could lose access to insurance benefits over the course of a decade, according to the Congressional Budget Office's most recent estimate. Murkowski and Tillis have also called to slow down planned phaseouts of solar, wind and other renewable energy credits that have spurred job creation in their states. Those asks are in direct opposition to demands from Senator Ron Johnson of Wisconsin and others to bake in more Medicaid cuts in a bid to shrink the overall price tag of the bill. He says Rick Scott of Florida, Mike Lee of Utah and Cynthia Lummis of Wyoming will join with him to back an amendment to include faster health coverage cuts during an a marathon voting session slated to start late Sunday or early Monday. Trump has not delved into the details of the legislation. Instead, the president has pushed for speed, demanding that Congress deliver the bill to him by July 4. The House will also need to vote on the Senate-passed version before it can go the president's desk to be signed into law. Meeting the July 4 deadline is ambitious — but possible if Republican leaders can successfully navigate thorny fights. Senators are expected to remain in the Capitol Sunday into Monday for an overnight voting session. Final passage of the bill could come sometime Monday if Thune is able to cut deals with enough senators for passage. The House then will need to vote on the Senate package. That likely means Speaker Mike Johnson will have to wrangle House Republicans to support the Senate package. Several members have already signaled they aren't satisfied with aspects of the bill, but any further changes likely mean missing Trump's July 4 deadline and risking his ire. America's Top Consumer-Sentiment Economist Is Worried How to Steal a House Inside Gap's Last-Ditch, Tariff-Addled Turnaround Push Luxury Counterfeiters Keep Outsmarting the Makers of $10,000 Handbags Apple Test-Drives Big-Screen Movie Strategy With F1 ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

US Senate pushes ahead on Trump tax cuts as nonpartisan analysis raises price tag
US Senate pushes ahead on Trump tax cuts as nonpartisan analysis raises price tag

Yahoo

time30 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

US Senate pushes ahead on Trump tax cuts as nonpartisan analysis raises price tag

By Bo Erickson and Phil Stewart WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The U.S. Senate version of President Donald Trump's sweeping tax-cut and spending bill will add $3.3 trillion to the nation's debt, about $800 billion more than the version passed last month by the House of Representatives, a nonpartisan forecaster said on Sunday. The Congressional Budget Office issued its estimate of the bill's hit to the $36.2 trillion federal debt as Senate Republicans sought to push the bill forward in a marathon weekend session. Republicans, who have long voiced concern about growing U.S. deficits and debt, have rejected the CBO's longstanding methodology to calculate the cost of legislation. But Democrats hope the latest, eye-widening figure could stoke enough anxiety among fiscally-minded conservatives to get them to buck their party, which controls both chambers of Congress. The Senate only narrowly advanced the tax-cut, immigration, border and military spending bill in a procedural vote late on Saturday, voting 51-49 to open debate on the 940-page megabill. Trump on social media hailed Saturday's vote as a "great victory" for his "great, big, beautiful bill." In an illustration of the depths of the divide within the Republican Party over the bill, Senator Thom Tillis said he would not seek re-election next year, after Trump threatened to back a primary challenger in retribution for Tillis' Saturday night vote against the bill. Tillis' North Carolina seat is one of the few Republican Senate seats seen as vulnerable in next year's midterm elections. He was one of just two Republicans to vote no on Saturday. Trump wants the bill passed before the July 4 Independence Day holiday. While that deadline is one of choice, lawmakers will face a far more serious deadline later this summer when they must raise the nation's self-imposed debt ceiling or risk a devastating default on $36.2 trillion in debt. 'We are going to make sure hardworking people can keep more of their money,' Senator Katie Britt, an Alabama Republican, told CNN's State of the Union on Sunday. HITS TO BENEFITS Senator Mark Warner, a Democrat from Virginia, said this legislation would come to haunt Republicans if it gets approved, predicting 16 million Americans would lose their health insurance. "Many of my Republican friends know ... they're walking the plank on this and we'll see if those who've expressed quiet consternation will actually have the courage of their convictions," Warner told CBS News' "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan." The legislation has been the sole focus of a marathon weekend congressional session marked by political drama, division and lengthy delays as Democrats seek to slow the legislation's path to passage. Top Senate Democrat Chuck Schumer called for the entire text of the bill to be read on the Senate floor, a process that began before midnight Saturday and ran well into Sunday afternoon. Following that lawmakers will begin up to 20 hours of debate on the legislation. That will be followed by an amendment session, known as a "vote-a-rama," before the Senate votes on passage. Lawmakers said they hoped to complete work on the bill on Monday. Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky, the other Republican "no" vote, opposed the legislation because it would raise the federal borrowing limit by an additional $5 trillion. "Did Rand Paul Vote 'NO' again tonight? What's wrong with this guy???" Trump said on social media. The megabill would extend the 2017 tax cuts that were Trump's main legislative achievement during his first term as president, cut other taxes and boost spending on the military and border security. Representative Michael McCaul, however, warned that fellow Republicans who do not back Trump on the bill could face payback from voters. "They know that their jobs are at risk. Not just from the president, but from the voting -- the American people. Our base back home will not reelect us to office if we vote no on this," McCaul also told CBS News. Senate Republicans, who reject the CBO's estimates on the cost of the legislation, are set on using an alternative calculation method that does not factor in costs from extending the 2017 tax cuts. Outside tax experts, like Andrew Lautz from the nonpartisan think tank Bipartisan Policy Center, call it a "magic trick." Using this calculation method, the Senate Republicans' budget bill appears to cost substantially less and seems to save $500 billion, according to the BPC analysis. If the Senate passes the bill, it will then return to the House of Representatives for final passage before Trump can sign it into law. The House passed its version of the bill last month. (Writing by Phil Stewart; Editing by Scott Malone and Chris Reese)

Chris Murphy calls birthright citizenship ruling ‘dangerous'
Chris Murphy calls birthright citizenship ruling ‘dangerous'

Politico

time34 minutes ago

  • Politico

Chris Murphy calls birthright citizenship ruling ‘dangerous'

Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) on Sunday condemned the Supreme Court's decision to rule in President Donald Trump's favor over nationwide injunctions in its birthright citizenship case. Murphy on Sunday told MSNBC's Kirsten Welker that the ruling allows Trump to 'undermine' democracy. 'Taking away the power of courts to restrain the president when he's clearly acting in an unlawful manner, as he is when he says that children born in the United States are no longer citizens, you are assisting him in trying to undermine the rule of law and undermine our democracy,' Murphy said on 'Meet the Press.' Though the Supreme Court's decision did not give Trump a complete win, it did narrow nationwide injunctions that blocked his January executive order trying to end birthright citizenship for certain individuals. By a 6-3 ruling, the Supreme Court said that federal judges can't, with perhaps limited exceptions, issue injunctions that go beyond their regional authority. 'It's really dangerous because it will incentivize the president to act in a lawless manner,' Murphy added. 'Because now only the Supreme Court, who can only take a handful of cases a year, can ever stop him from violating the laws and the Constitution.' Trump has long supported ending birthright citizenship. On his first day in office this year, Trump signed an order to deny American citizenship to anyone born in the U.S. to foreigners on short-term visas or without legal status. But the 14th Amendment declares anyone 'born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof' as a citizen of the United States. The 6-3 decision down ideological lines did not weigh in on the constitutionality of Trump's order or interpret the meaning of that clause, but the White House declared Friday's ruling to be a major victory for the administration. 'I'm grateful to the Supreme Court for stepping in and solving this very, very big and complex problem, and they've made it very simple,' Trump said of the ruling. Still, Murphy said the ruling, which will take effect later in July, only creates a 'patchwork' of citizenship laws that could differ from state to state. 'Both the Constitution and the law is clear. If you're born in the United States of America, you're a U.S. citizen,' Murphy said. 'But now because there's no longer going to be a federal policy, it's going to be different in every state. A child born in the United States, born in Connecticut will be a citizen. But that same child if they were born in Oklahoma might not be. That's chaos.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store