Gulf deal-making spree also benefited Elon Musk and his family
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
Musk occupies a unique role, even for an administration that has shattered norms around governance and private deal-making. He has attended Cabinet meetings and wields incredible power to cut programs across the government -- all while operating companies that profit from federal spending and foreign contracts.
Advertisement
He and his family have riches at stake in the Persian Gulf, a region whose autocratic monarchies have tried to cultivate closer ties to the West. In doing so, its leaders have courted international executives, invested in big-name sports leagues or teams and at times, authorities say, bribed lawmakers and their family members.
For years, Musk's companies have raised money from government-linked and regional funds in the Gulf. That includes Vy Capital, a Dubai-based firm that has backed at least five Musk-led businesses. SpaceX provides launch services for some UAE satellites, and Musk's tunneling firm, the Boring Co., inked an agreement with Dubai's transit authority in February to build a transport system under the city.
Advertisement
Musk said last week in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, that he would like to see the Boring Co. work with Saudi Arabia as well.
Musk joined Saudi and US officials for lunch with other business leaders last May 13. The White House invite list also included his younger brother, Kimbal Musk, whose company Nova Sky Stories recently announced agreements with Qatar and Abu Dhabi to provide a series of drone light shows. Kimbal Musk said on social media that the Abu Dhabi events would feature 10,000 drones, making them 'the world's largest' of their kind.
Earlier this year, Maye Musk, the mother of Kimbal and Elon Musk, was a headliner at a government conference in the UAE. And Errol Musk, Elon Musk's father, has said he is in talks with an Emirati firm to build a Musk Tower in Dubai to house the Musk Institute, a planned technology hub.
Maye and Kimbal Musk did not respond to requests to comment. In an email to The New York Times, Errol Musk said the Musk Institute he envisioned would be devoted to studying 'gravity and space-time travel.'
'The popular vision of the future seen in movies where vehicles go about up and down in the air and into space will never happen unless we solve these problems,' he wrote. Errol Musk said that Elon, with whom he has a fraught relationship, was not involved with the Musk Tower or Musk Institute.
Advertisement
Errol Musk has said that his support of Donald Trump in the 2016 election further strained his relationship with his sons. 'But since then, both my boys have 'seen the light,'' he wrote to the Times.
He said he travels often to the UAE and late last year, he and Kimbal had lunch together there. 'We were guests of the sheikh of Abu Dhabi,' he wrote.
On a trip in February, Errol Musk told Arabian Gulf Business Insight that he was working with the Al Khaili Group of Abu Dhabi to build the tower. He was seeking to raise between $150 million and $200 million through his cryptocurrency, called MuskIt. In February, the company behind MuskIt claimed its total value had reached $500 million, though as of this week, that valuation has dropped to less than $1.5 million.
The Al Khaili Group could not be reached for comment, and it is unclear whether a site for the Musk Tower has been selected, or how firm the plans for construction are.
Errol Musk's digital currency efforts follow in the path of the Trump family. At a major cryptocurrency conference in Dubai last month -- two weeks before Trump and Elon Musk traveled to the region -- the president's son Eric Trump took part in an announcement that a state-backed Emirati firm would use the Trump firm's digital coins for a $2 billion business deal.
Matthew Hedges, a researcher at Durham University in England and an expert on the UAE security apparatus, said that Gulf intelligence services were likely to look for people within Trump's 'personalized power structure' with access to the president but who have few security checks around them, making Elon Musk and his family prime targets.
Advertisement
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
an hour ago
Profits drop at Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway as it writes down its Kraft Heinz investment
OMAHA, Neb. -- OMAHA, Neb. (AP) — Warren Buffett's company reported less than half as much profit in the second quarter as it took a $3.76 billion writedown on the value of its stake in Kraft Heinz, as that iconic food producer considers largely undoing the merger that Berkshire Hathaway helped bankroll. Berkshire said it earned $12.37 billion, or $8,601 per Class A share, during the quarter. That's down from $30.248 billion, or $21,122 per Class A share, a year ago, because it recorded a much smaller paper investment gain this year. Berkshire's earnings can swing wildly from quarter to quarter because it has to record the current value of its massive investment portfolio even though it doesn't sell most of the stocks. That's why Buffett has long recommended that investors pay more attention to Berkshire's operating earnings, which exclude those investment gains. Although last year Berkshire did surprise shareholders by selling off a huge chunk of its Apple stake which inflated the investment gains then. By that measure, Berkshire's operating earnings were only down slightly at $11.16 billion, or $7,759.58 per Class A share. That compares with $11.598 billion, or $8,072.16 per Class A share, a year ago. Most of Berkshire's myriad assortment of companies — major insurers like Geico, BNSF railroad, a group of utilities and a collection of manufacturing and retail businesses — generally performed well despite the uncertainty about the economy and President Donald Trump's tariffs. The four analysts surveyed by FactSet Research expected Berkshire to report earnings per Class A share of $7,508.10, so the Omaha, Nebraska-based conglomerate's results were ahead of that. Berkshire owns more than 27% of Kraft Heinz' stock and, for years, it had representatives on the company's board. Buffett has said previously that he believes the company's iconic brands will do well over time, but in hindsight, he overpaid for the investment and underestimated the challenges branded foods face from retailers and the growth of private label products. This spring, Berkshire's representatives resigned from the Kraft Heinz board shortly before the company announced it is exploring strategic options that may include spinning off a large part of its portfolio of brands. Over the years since Berkshire helped Kraft buy Heinz in 2015, the company has been hurt by changing consumer tastes and a shift toward healthier options than Kraft's core collection of processed foods. Buffett's is still sitting on a massive pile of $344.1 billion in cash, although the company's reserves dipped slightly from the $347.7 billion cash it was holding at the end of the first quarter. Buffett told shareholders in May he just isn't finding any attractive deals for companies he understands. Buffett surprised shareholders at the annual meeting when he announced that he plans to give up the CEO title at the end of the year and hand over operations to Vice Chairman Greg Abel, but Buffett will remain Chairman. Berkshire shareholders might be disappointed that the company didn't repurchase any of its shares this quarter, even though the price has fallen more than 12% since just before Buffett announced his retirement. Many investors are watching Berkshire's BNSF closely after rival Union Pacific announced a plan to buy Norfolk Southern earlier this week to create the nation's first transcontinental railroad. The speculation is that BNSF needs to pursue a merger with eastern rail CSX to be able to compete. But CFRA Research analyst Cathy Seifert said it isn't Buffett's style to jump into a deal just because the market thinks he should. Over the decades, he has built Berkshire by finding strong companies selling for less than they are worth. CSX is trading near its 52-week high at $35.01 amid all the deal speculation. 'He wants to do it because he found an undervalued franchise -- not because the market says you need to do a deal,' Seifert said. 'I think one of the reasons why that cash hasn't been deployed is that valuations run through the Berkshire M-and-A model tend to be too rich. But if there's a logical case to be made they'll accept it.' And BNSF appears to be doing fine right now on its own. The railroad recorded a 19% jump in its operating profit this quarter at $1.47 billion as it cut costs and delivered about 1% more shipments.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
The Saturday Spread: How to Use Descriptive Math to Play the Hand, Not the Dealer
Suppose that you're the manager of an MLB team and it's the bottom of the ninth of the World Series. You're down to your last out. Do you go with the player who has a great career batting average but can't perform well under pressure or elect the guy who had a relatively average season but consistently comes through in the clutch? If you're into baseball or just sports in general, the answer is obvious: you go with the competitor that contextually gives you the best chance to win. Ultimately, your job is to take home championships, not dabble with math exercises. More News from Barchart How to Buy KO for a 2% Discount, or Achieve a 17% Annual Return Coinbase Shows Huge Unusual Options Volume After Lower Results Stop Missing Market Moves: Get the FREE Barchart Brief – your midday dose of stock movers, trending sectors, and actionable trade ideas, delivered right to your inbox. Sign Up Now! However, what seems so obvious isn't that way in the financial sector. Practically every western approach — from Black-Scholes-Merton-based models to the efficient market hypothesis — utilizes prescriptive financial modeling. Essentially, these methodologies dictate what should be, which theoretically sounds enticing. However, my contention is that this prescription is flawed. In contrast, I prefer a Markovian approach, which models behavior based on a descriptive framework. Such methodologies demonstrate what has been, not what should be. As such, we don't need complicated formulas rooted in stochastic calculus and other difficult concepts. A key reason why I'm not a fan of prescriptive models like Black-Scholes (aside from its inapplicability with American options) is that the underlying probabilities are based on the entire distribution of the dataset. That's like trying to predict hurricanes based on the last ten years' worth of weather reports. Instead, to accomplish this, you would focus on the immediate conditions that cause hurricanes to be more likely. With that said, below are three stocks that are potentially flashing buy signals based on a descriptive framework. Kroger (KR) Quantitatively, Kroger (KR) makes for an intriguing idea for bullish speculators. In the past 10 weeks, the market has essentially voted to buy KR stock four times and sell six times. Throughout this period, KR enjoyed an upward bias. For brevity, we can abbreviate the sequence as 4-6-U. At first glance, it may seem silly to compress the price magnitude of KR stock into a simple binary code. But what we have accomplished here is to define KR's price discovery process as a behavioral state. Through the study of past analogs, we can determine how the market responds to the 4-6-U sequence relative to the baseline. It's just like card counting in blackjack. If the deck favors us, we bet big. If it doesn't, we bet small (or in this case, not at all). On any given week, the chance that a long position in KR stock will rise is only 51.74%. It's an upward bias but a very modest one. However, this statistic stems from the derivative probability of upside across the entire distribution of the dataset. But our contention is that because the deck is flashing a 4-6-U sequence, the odds of upside are actually 72.73%. Barchart Premier members gain full access to the platform's options pricing tools, which can be incredibly powerful when integrated with a Markovian approach. Here, we can identify that the 72/73 bull call spread expiring Aug. 29 may be the least expensive multi-leg strategy that has a realistic chance of being fully profitable. Cinemark (CNK) For extreme contrarians, Cinemark (CNK) may be an intriguing name for its implied discount. On Friday, CNK stock dropped nearly 4%, while for the trailing week, it hemorrhaged almost 11%. On a year-to-date basis, the security — which is tied to the struggling movie theater business model — is down 16.49%. It's a mess but it has the potential to be meme-able. In the past 10 weeks, the market voted to buy CNK stock four times and sell six times. Throughout this period, CNK incurred a downward trajectory. For brevity, we can label this sequence as 4-6-D. Through past analogs, we can identify that this sequence has materialized 46 times on a rolling basis since January 2019. In 58.7% of cases, the following week's price action results in upside, with a median return of 3.87%. As a baseline, the next-week upside probability is only 51.16%. Therefore, assuming that the implications of the 4-6-D hold up, there's a compelling incentive to place a wager. With CNK stock closing at $25.87, it could swing close to $27 in short order. It's a terribly risky idea but for hardened speculators, the 26/27 bull call spread expiring Aug. 15 could be attractive. Confluent (CFLT) It's no exaggeration to say that Confluent (CFLT) got obliterated this past week. On Friday, CFLT stock dropped 3%, which would be notable in and of itself. However, the real drama occurred the day before. Following a second-quarter earnings print that left investors severely disappointed, CFLT opened sharply lower against Wednesday's close. When the dust settled, the security had lost almost 38% in the trailing five sessions. Generally, it's best to avoid enterprises exhibiting such extreme volatility. However, the market has enticingly printed a relatively rare 6-4-D sequence. It's unusual because, despite the number of accumulative sessions outweighing distributive, the overall trajectory is negative. This quantitative signal has flashed 23 times since the company's public market debut in 2021. Notably, in 65.22% of cases, the following week's price action results in upside, with a median return of 3.79%. As a baseline, the chance that a long position in CFLT stock will rise is only 53.49%. Subsequently, there appears to be a clear incentive to place a wager. With CFLT closing at $17.20 on Friday, it could jump to $17.85, perhaps close to $18, in short order. With that said, the most aggressive idea that you can arguably consider while still being rational is the 17/18 bull spread expiring Aug. 15. On the date of publication, Josh Enomoto did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
The Hill
2 hours ago
- The Hill
Profits drop at Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway as it writes down its Kraft Heinz investment
OMAHA, Neb. (AP) — Warren Buffett's company reported less than half as much profit in the second quarter as it took a $3.76 billion writedown on the value of its stake in Kraft Heinz, as that iconic food producer considers largely undoing the merger that Berkshire Hathaway helped bankroll. Berkshire said it earned $12.37 billion, or $8,601 per Class A share, during the quarter. That's down from $30.248 billion, or $21,122 per Class A share, a year ago, because it recorded a much smaller paper investment gain this year. Berkshire's earnings can swing wildly from quarter to quarter because it has to record the current value of its massive investment portfolio even though it doesn't sell most of the stocks. That's why Buffett has long recommended that investors pay more attention to Berkshire's operating earnings, which exclude those investment gains. Although last year Berkshire did surprise shareholders by selling off a huge chunk of its Apple stake which inflated the investment gains then. By that measure, Berkshire's operating earnings were only down slightly at $11.16 billion, or $7,759.58 per Class A share. That compares with $11.598 billion, or $8,072.16 per Class A share, a year ago. Most of Berkshire's myriad assortment of companies — major insurers like Geico, BNSF railroad, a group of utilities and a collection of manufacturing and retail businesses — generally performed well despite the uncertainty about the economy and President Donald Trump's tariffs. The four analysts surveyed by FactSet Research expected Berkshire to report earnings per Class A share of $7,508.10, so the Omaha, Nebraska-based conglomerate's results were ahead of that. Berkshire owns more than 27% of Kraft Heinz' stock and, for years, it had representatives on the company's board. Buffett has said previously that he believes the company's iconic brands will do well over time, but in hindsight, he overpaid for the investment and underestimated the challenges branded foods face from retailers and the growth of private label products. This spring, Berkshire's representatives resigned from the Kraft Heinz board shortly before the company announced it is exploring strategic options that may include spinning off a large part of its portfolio of brands. Over the years since Berkshire helped Kraft buy Heinz in 2015, the company has been hurt by changing consumer tastes and a shift toward healthier options than Kraft's core collection of processed foods. Buffett's is still sitting on a massive pile of $344.1 billion in cash, although the company's reserves dipped slightly from the $347.7 billion cash it was holding at the end of the first quarter. Buffett told shareholders in May he just isn't finding any attractive deals for companies he understands. Buffett surprised shareholders at the annual meeting when he announced that he plans to give up the CEO title at the end of the year and hand over operations to Vice Chairman Greg Abel, but Buffett will remain Chairman.
