Fact check: Does Antarctic ice increase expose climate hoax? – DW – 06/26/2025
Satellite data shows that Antarctic ice sheets have grown in size, prompting claims that climate change is in reverse or even a hoax. But it's not that simple.
A recent study has found that the Antarctic Ice Sheet (AIS) mass has slightly increased in size in recent years, prompting a wave of claims on social media (such as here and here) that global warming may be reversing.
Published in March 2025 by researchers at Tongji University in Shanghai, China, the study reported that the Antarctic ice sheet gained approximately 108 billion tons of ice annually between 2021 and 2023. This data focused on four glacier basins in the Wilkes Land-Queen Mary Land (WL-QML) region of the East AIS (EAIS), has been misinterpreted by some climate skeptics as evidence that climate change is a "hoax."
DW Fact check looked at the numbers.
Claim: Posts on platforms like X (formerly Twitter) have gone viral, with one stating, "Moral of the story: Never believe a climate alarmist," garnering over 270,000 views. Another viewed more than 55,000 times, claimed,"Scientists have had to pause the Climate Change Hoax Scam."
DW Fact check: Misleading
One post even featured a GIF that the user believed showed new land emerging off the coast of Dubaidue to falling sea levels—apparently unaware of the man-made Palm Islands constructed there between 2001 and 2007.
The findings in the Chinese study are based on publicly available data from NASA's GRACE and GRACE Follow-on satellites, that have been measuring the Earth's gravitational field since 2002 and have documented changes in the planet's ice and water masses.
The data may be correct, but its interpretation by conspiratorial social media users is not—a situation not helped by the researchers' decision to insert an increasing average trend curve next to the preceding decreasing curve depicting ice mass.
"This is perfect fodder for people who are intentionally looking to spread disinformation," says Johannes Feldmann, a physicist at the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK) near Berlin, Germany.
Feldmann emphasizes that climate science relies on long-term data—typically over 20 to 30 years—to identify meaningful trends. "Two, three, or even five years are far too little to identify a long-term trend," he explains.
Cherry-picking short-term data is a common tactic among climate change deniers. "There are always phases where the increase [in temperature] levels off a bit, which people suddenly take to mean: global warming has stopped, the trend is reversing," Feldmann adds. "But it's never turned out to be true."
The Antarctic ice sheet, like many natural systems, is subject to fluctuations. A 2023 study from the University of Leeds in the United Kingdom, highlighted how meteorological events, such as unusually heavy or light snowfall, can temporarily affect ice mass and sea levels. Therefore, fluctuations such as those observed between 2021 and 2023 are only to be expected.
"We're dealing with a natural system that is subject to fluctuations—and this is nothing unusual," says Angelika Humbert, a glaciologist at the Alfred Wegener Institute in Bremerhaven, Germany. "We sometimes have years with a lot of snow and sometimes years with no snow at all, and it's the same for ice sheets."
The Tongji University researchers themselves acknowledged this in a separate 2023 study, linking increased ice mass in eastern Antarctica to unusually high snowfall.
"Given the warmer atmosphere, we know that these snowfall events could increase in the coming years," says Feldmann. "On the one hand, this means that more snow could fall more often [on the ice sheets] but also that more could melt—because it's getting warmer.
"This is all well-researched and will continue to be researched," he continues. "There was a brief increase [in Antarctic ice mass], but it didn't come anywhere close to replacing the losses of recent decades. The long-term development we are observing is a large-scale loss of the Antarctic ice sheet."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
DW
an hour ago
- DW
Fact check: Climate deniers misinterpret Antarctic ice study – DW – 06/26/2025
Satellite data shows that Antarctic ice sheets have grown in size, prompting claims that climate change is in reverse or even a hoax. But it's not that simple. A recent study has found that the Antarctic ice sheet mass has slightly increased in size in recent years, prompting a wave of claims on social media (such as here and here) that global warming may be reversing. Published in March 2025 by researchers at Tongji University in Shanghai, China, the study reported that the Antarctic ice sheet gained approximately 108 billion tons of ice annually between 2021 and 2023. This data focused on four glacier basins in the Wilkes Land-Queen Mary Land region of the eastern Antarctic ice sheet, has been misinterpreted by some climate skeptics as evidence that climate change is a "hoax." DW Fact Check looked at the numbers. Claim: Posts on platforms like X (formerly Twitter) have gone viral, with one stating, "Moral of the story: Never believe a climate alarmist," garnering over 270,000 views. Another viewed more than 55,000 times, claimed,"Scientists have had to pause the Climate Change Hoax Scam." DW Fact Check: Misleading One post even featured a GIF that the user believed showed new land emerging off the coast of Dubai due to falling sea levels — apparently unaware of the artificial Palm Islands constructed there between 2001 and 2007. The findings in the Chinese study are based on publicly available data from NASA's Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment satellites, which have been measuring the Earth's gravitational field since 2002 and have documented changes in the planet's ice and water masses. The data may be correct, but its interpretation by conspiratorial social media users is not — a situation not helped by the researchers' decision to insert an increasing average trend curve next to the preceding decreasing curve depicting ice mass. "This is perfect fodder for people who are intentionally looking to spread disinformation," said Johannes Feldmann, a physicist at the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research near Berlin. Feldmann emphasized that climate science relies on long-term data — typically over 20 to 30 years — to identify meaningful trends. "Two, three or even five years are far too little to identify a long-term trend," he explained. Cherry-picking short-term data is a common tactic among climate change deniers. "There are always phases where the increase [in temperature] levels off a bit, which people suddenly take to mean: global warming has stopped, the trend is reversing," Feldmann added. "But it's never turned out to be true." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The Antarctic ice sheet, like many natural systems, is subject to fluctuations. A 2023 study from the University of Leeds in the United Kingdom highlighted how meteorological events, such as unusually heavy or light snowfall, can temporarily affect ice mass and sea levels. Therefore, fluctuations such as those observed between 2021 and 2023 are to be expected. "We're dealing with a natural system that is subject to fluctuations — and this is nothing unusual," said Angelika Humbert, a glaciologist at the Alfred Wegener Institute in Bremerhaven, northern Germany. "We sometimes have years with a lot of snow and sometimes years with no snow at all, and it's the same for ice sheets." The Tongji University researchers themselves acknowledged this in a separate 2023 study, linking increased ice mass in eastern Antarctica to unusually high snowfall. "Given the warmer atmosphere, we know that these snowfall events could increase in the coming years," said Feldmann. "On the one hand, this means more snow could fall more often [on the ice sheets] but also that more could melt — because it's getting warmer. "This is all well-researched and will continue to be researched," he added. "There was a brief increase [in Antarctic ice mass], but it didn't come anywhere close to replacing the losses of recent decades. The long-term development we are observing is a large-scale loss of the Antarctic ice sheet."
DW
3 days ago
- DW
Strikes on Iran nuclear sites could cause environmental harm – DW – 06/26/2025
Recent Israeli and US attacks on Iran's nuclear and military facilities could cause long-term environmental damage, including soil contamination. It is not yet known how many missiles and bombs were fired at Iranian nuclear and military facilities during 12 days of war. On June 22, the US attacked the Fordo, Isfahan and Natanz nuclear sites with 14 "bunker busting" bombs weighing 30,000 pounds (13,600 kilograms) each, along with 30 Tomahawk missiles. According to Gaukhar Mukhatzhanova from the Vienna Center for Disarmament and Non-Proliferation, the actual extent of the damage is still unclear. On June 23, she told DW that the UN's International Atomic Energy Commission (IAEA) has not yet been able to fully verify the effects of the attacks, particularly on the underground enrichment plant at Fordo. "We can see some damage on satellite images, but we don't know the actual extent and cost." The IAEA assumes that there is radioactive and chemical contamination at several sites. Thousands of centrifuges could have been damaged by the sudden power outages. The centrifuges work with the highly reactive uranium hexafluoride (UF6). Although no increased radiation levels have yet been measured outside the plants, a possible leakage of these substances poses considerable health and environmental risks. IAEA inspectors currently have no access to the affected nuclear facilities. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video "There is a lot we don't know, and that is really the big problem," said Roozbeh Eskandari, an independent environmental researcher who has studied pollution in Iran for years. "Those responsible in Iran always claim that everything is under control. But now there is hardly any information about possible environmental dangers, not even for the people living in the immediate vicinity of the targets," Eskandari told DW. Eskandari points to a serious explosion that occurred at the end of April in the port of Bandar Abbas in southern Iran. The smoke caused by the combustion of chemical substances released large quantities of soot, nitrogen oxides (NOx), sulfur dioxide (SO₂) and other pollutants, which caused a massive deterioration in air quality in the surrounding areas for several days. Similar clouds of smoke could also be seen in videos circulating on social media following attacks by the Israeli army on some missile installations in Iran. "These pollutants contaminate the soil. Soil contamination in military conflicts is one of the worst, yet most overlooked, environmental consequences of war," Eskandari added. Pollutants often remain in the topsoil for decades and impair soil quality, which leads to loss of fertility and problems with soil regeneration. Iran experienced these kinds of long-term ecological consequences after its eight-year war with Iraq from 1980 to 1988. The provinces of Khuzestan, Ilam, and Kermanshah in the west and southwest of the country, located on the border with Iraq, were the most affected at that time. Khuzestan, with its important oil refineries and industrial facilities, was heavily bombed. Many once-fertile fields became unsuitable for agriculture. Studies by local universities have also shown increased rates of cancer, respiratory diseases, and skin problems. The ecological destruction, coupled with the chronic mismanagement of the political system and the increasing impact of climate change, continue to have direct consequences today. According to the latest available government statistics, Khuzestan Province, home to ancient cities and a UNESCO World Heritage Site, has had the highest emigration rate of all Iranian provinces over the past 20 years. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
DW
3 days ago
- DW
Fact check: Does Antarctic ice increase expose climate hoax? – DW – 06/26/2025
Satellite data shows that Antarctic ice sheets have grown in size, prompting claims that climate change is in reverse or even a hoax. But it's not that simple. A recent study has found that the Antarctic Ice Sheet (AIS) mass has slightly increased in size in recent years, prompting a wave of claims on social media (such as here and here) that global warming may be reversing. Published in March 2025 by researchers at Tongji University in Shanghai, China, the study reported that the Antarctic ice sheet gained approximately 108 billion tons of ice annually between 2021 and 2023. This data focused on four glacier basins in the Wilkes Land-Queen Mary Land (WL-QML) region of the East AIS (EAIS), has been misinterpreted by some climate skeptics as evidence that climate change is a "hoax." DW Fact check looked at the numbers. Claim: Posts on platforms like X (formerly Twitter) have gone viral, with one stating, "Moral of the story: Never believe a climate alarmist," garnering over 270,000 views. Another viewed more than 55,000 times, claimed,"Scientists have had to pause the Climate Change Hoax Scam." DW Fact check: Misleading One post even featured a GIF that the user believed showed new land emerging off the coast of Dubaidue to falling sea levels—apparently unaware of the man-made Palm Islands constructed there between 2001 and 2007. The findings in the Chinese study are based on publicly available data from NASA's GRACE and GRACE Follow-on satellites, that have been measuring the Earth's gravitational field since 2002 and have documented changes in the planet's ice and water masses. The data may be correct, but its interpretation by conspiratorial social media users is not—a situation not helped by the researchers' decision to insert an increasing average trend curve next to the preceding decreasing curve depicting ice mass. "This is perfect fodder for people who are intentionally looking to spread disinformation," says Johannes Feldmann, a physicist at the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK) near Berlin, Germany. Feldmann emphasizes that climate science relies on long-term data—typically over 20 to 30 years—to identify meaningful trends. "Two, three, or even five years are far too little to identify a long-term trend," he explains. Cherry-picking short-term data is a common tactic among climate change deniers. "There are always phases where the increase [in temperature] levels off a bit, which people suddenly take to mean: global warming has stopped, the trend is reversing," Feldmann adds. "But it's never turned out to be true." The Antarctic ice sheet, like many natural systems, is subject to fluctuations. A 2023 study from the University of Leeds in the United Kingdom, highlighted how meteorological events, such as unusually heavy or light snowfall, can temporarily affect ice mass and sea levels. Therefore, fluctuations such as those observed between 2021 and 2023 are only to be expected. "We're dealing with a natural system that is subject to fluctuations—and this is nothing unusual," says Angelika Humbert, a glaciologist at the Alfred Wegener Institute in Bremerhaven, Germany. "We sometimes have years with a lot of snow and sometimes years with no snow at all, and it's the same for ice sheets." The Tongji University researchers themselves acknowledged this in a separate 2023 study, linking increased ice mass in eastern Antarctica to unusually high snowfall. "Given the warmer atmosphere, we know that these snowfall events could increase in the coming years," says Feldmann. "On the one hand, this means that more snow could fall more often [on the ice sheets] but also that more could melt—because it's getting warmer. "This is all well-researched and will continue to be researched," he continues. "There was a brief increase [in Antarctic ice mass], but it didn't come anywhere close to replacing the losses of recent decades. The long-term development we are observing is a large-scale loss of the Antarctic ice sheet."
