From 1976 to 2025: is protest culture still relevant to youth?
Like the youth of 1976, today's young people are passionate about creating a better world through protest, but their voices are often ignored. With many set to look back at the events of June 1976, a question many ponder is whether protest culture is still relevant to today's youth.
Mcebo Dlamini, former Witwatersrand SRC and #Feesmustfall activist, still believes that protest culture for young people is as necessary now as it was during the Soweto Uprising because he believes that protest culture in its truest sense is a disruption of the norm. If the norm does not favour young people, that norm must be disrupted. Dlamini emphasised the fact that young people must unite and devise strategies on how to make their protests sustainable and impactful.
'Young people must penetrate all spaces where there is an opportunity to change their conditions for the better, the youth must saturate such a space, at least where there is total freedom and white supremacy, along with capitalism, does not reign.'
Sihle Seleke, who is a prominent anti gender-based violence activist and founder of the Kwanele Foundation, believes protesting is not 100% relevant. While it raises public awareness, Seleke argues that leaders often fail to take meaningful action and young people can protest as much as they want, but implementation on the ground is still lacking.
Seleke said young people must protest through voting and with the local elections coming up, young people need to vote for the change they want to see.
'This thing of voting because our grandmother liked whatever party and it's trendy no longer serves a purpose. The only way we can protest in the right way is to vote, let your vote be your change, let your vote be your voice because femicide is on the rise on a daily basis,' she said
Dlamini said that as long as the hierarchies that existed during apartheid have not been altered, there is always going to be a need to protest and believes it puts local politics in a loop. He said the questions that 'our forefathers were dealing with' were still the same problems that 'we are dealing with in the present.'
'It is almost as if we are trapped in an endless cycle of suffering and the wheel just keeps on turning,' he said.
'A proper diagnosis of this is that we are not dealing with the problems of the youth from a structural level but we are too focused on the symptoms instead of dealing with the root cause. which in this case includes an education that denies black people access to tertiary institutions on the basis that they do not have money. Fees Must Fall was an opportune moment, which did give us certain gains but failure to stretch to society as a whole was the limitation.'
'Our president has signed many beautiful laws and bills into power but we're still to see implementation.
Anti-GBV activist Sihle Seleke
Dlamini said young people must unite and devise strategies on how to make their protests sustainable and impactful. 'Young people must penetrate all spaces where there is an opportunity to change their conditions for the better; the youth must saturate such a space.'
Angela Molepo, a 20-year-old gender-based violence activist who was the first young person to start a national shutdown over the Cwecwe case through an organisation called Justice SA, said if young people limit their activism to hashtags, they are not going to go anywhere. For Molepo, protest doesn't hold the same relevance nor does it help with anything, due to the government studying the new generation.
'People protest on social media, hoping it will be public knowledge to our government, which is never the case. When the government sees a group of youth fighting over something, they try to shut us down. We still have our voice, but we are waiting for people of power to remind us of that because we are conditioned into thinking we don't know ourselves and our belonging,' said Molepo. 'Young people are fighting for job opportunities because those in power, who benefited from apartheid, are holding onto positions and leaving no space for the youth.'
This is a painful reminder to Seleke who continues to highlight a concerns of South African youth. Due to a lack of employment, Seleke says it's not fair that young people still protest over such socioeconomic issues.
'Our president has signed many beautiful laws and bills into power but we're still to see implementation. Our president claims that [alleged perpetrators of] gender-based violence and femicide should not be given bail freely, but we're still seeing them getting bail. Our government is playing with our minds. For example they brought into law the POPI Act, which states you cannot disclose someone's personal details without their permission or else you will be prosecuted. It's a crime but guess what? We are amplifying our voices saying the sexual offenders' list must be made public so we will know who's on that list but the POPI Act is stopping us from making the sexual offenders' list public because we cannot expose their identity so who's fooling who,' said Seleke.
Collen Malatji of the ANC Youth League, who grew up in crime-ridden Thembisa, believes that this Youth Month should be a call to action. He urges young people to unite and fight against the systemic issues that affect them, advocating for liberation for all.
Malatji emphasises the relevance of protesting, noting that its purpose has evolved from fighting against the apartheid system to raising awareness about the prevailing agendas and cultures that perpetuate inequality. He stresses that protesting should be a regular form of expression, whether in good or bad times.
With the advent of new platforms, Malatji acknowledges that young people now have more avenues to make their voices heard. However, he notes that those in power often forget the struggles of the youth, making it necessary for young people to remind them through protest.
Malatji emphasises that addressing gender-based violence requires more male role models in communities, teaching boys how to respect and treat women. He notes that this issue transcends economic status, as even wealthy men abuse women.
Malatji's vision is for South Africa's youth to take ownership of the country's economic activities, becoming responsible leaders who drive positive change. He urges young people to be proactive, responding to economic demands and speaking out against injustices, rather than passively observing wrongdoing. Young people can protest as much as they want, but implementation on the ground is still lacking.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

TimesLIVE
6 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
Protesters demand debt cancellation, climate action ahead of UN summit
Activists marched in blistering heat through southern Spain's Seville on Sunday, calling for debt cancellation, climate justice and taxing the super rich on the eve of a UN summit on financing development that critics said lacks ambition and scope. The four-day meeting which is held once every decade promises to take on poverty, disease and climate change by mapping out the global framework for development. However, the decision by the US to pull out and wealthy countries' shrinking appetite for foreign aid have dampened hopes the summit will bring about significant change. Greenpeace members carried a float depicting billionaire Elon Musk as a baby wielding a chainsaw seated on top a terrestrial globe. Others held up banners reading 'Make Human Rights Great Again', 'Tax justice now' and 'Make polluters pay'. Beauty Narteh of Ghana's Anti-Corruption Coalition said her group wanted a fairer tax system and 'dignity, not handouts'. Sokhna Ndiaye, of the Africa Development Interchange Network, called on the public and private sectors to be 'less selfish and show more solidarity' with developing countries. Hours earlier, however, Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez said 'the fact this conference is happening while conflict is raging across the globe is a reason to be hopeful'. Speaking at an event by nonprofit Global Citizen, Sanchez reiterated Madrid's commitment to reach 0.7% of GDP in development aid and urged other countries to do the same. Jason Braganza, executive director of the pan-African advocacy group Afrodad, who took part in the year-long negotiation on the conference's final outcome document, said countries including the US, the EU and Britain had obstructed efforts to organise a UN convention on sovereign debt. 'It's a shame the countries have opted to protect their own interests and those of creditors over lives that are being lost,' he said.


The Citizen
12 hours ago
- The Citizen
Cyril must seize opportunity
Iran's vulnerabilities have been exposed and its confidence has been shaken. The Israel-Iran war lasted only 12 days but its consequences will reshape global politics for years. One positive is that the battering taken by South Africa's ally, Iran, could paradoxically greatly benefit this country, if President Cyril Ramaphosa had the wit and courage to seize the opportunity. SA-Iran ties The greatest impediment to a good relationship with the United States has been SA's support of Iran. It is hardly surprising, then, that SA's increasing alignment with Iran's 'axis of resistance' and its self-appointed role as a spokesperson for the global south in siding with Russia and China against Western democracies, has caused the US steadily growing concern over the past dozen or so years. This came to a head in February under the combative presidency of Donald Trump, who issued a punishing executive order against SA. Despite these substantial economic costs caused by the order and Ramaphosa speaking fervently about the need to 'reset' ties with the US, the government seems paralysed. It boils down to the fact that foreign policy is not determined by pragmatism and national interest, but by ideology and party interest. The foundation of SA's post-1994 risky friendship with Iran stems from an anti-Western ideological outlook that the ANC has historically shared. This has been amplified by a powerful Islamist clique within the department of international relations and cooperation that is strong enough within ANC party structures to dictate a harder line on Middle East matters than many in the Cabinet would choose. ALSO READ: Iran voices 'serious doubts' over Israel commitment to ceasefire Iran's vulnerabilities have been exposed The drubbing that Iran took in the 12-day war changes everything. Iran's new precariousness as a functional state, its wavering status as a revolutionary beacon and its more circumscribed financial circumstances reduce Monday 10 30 June 2025 its usefulness to the ANC on all fronts. Whether its nuclear programme has been destroyed or only set back months, Iran undoubtedly will have reduced capacity for mischief-making in the Middle East, while preoccupied with internal reconstruction. Infrastructure has to be rebuilt, lost nuclear and military expertise replaced and weaponry stocks replenished, all while fretting whether the ayatollah's government might be toppled in a popular uprising. Iran's vulnerabilities have been exposed and its confidence has been shaken. Israel effortlessly thwarted its much-hyped missile barrages, while the US demonstrated decisively that it would not sit idle while Tehran lashed out. The loop of perpetual Middle East conflict has been broken, or at least dramatically reset. Iran's terror proxies are isolated, vulnerable and on the back foot. ALSO READ: Six Israelis detained for attacking soldiers in West Bank Israel's upper hand and mending ties For the first time in decades, the strategic initiative lies firmly with Israel. Militarily, the Jewish state has never been stronger but it is being comprehensively bested on the battlefield of international public opinion over the conflict in Gaza. With Iran down, for the moment, and Syria making noises, this is Israel's best window yet to resolve the Palestinian question; to trade restraint for recognition and to convert tactical dominance into a durable regional peace through a revitalised and expanded Abraham Accords. South Africa faces its own fork in the road. It can continue acting as a megaphone for radical Islam and a cheerleader for rogue states or it, too, can seize the moment. Re-establishing ties with Israel, mending its fractured relationship with Washington and offering itself as a credible, post-ideological broker in the Middle East would not only serve the national interest, it would rescue a South African foreign policy now adrift in ANC moral incoherence, under Ramaphosa's timorous captaincy. READ NEXT: Zelensky signs decree for Ukraine's withdrawal from anti-landmine treaty


Daily Maverick
14 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Crossed Wires: Which billionaires have not bent the knee to Trump?
Much has been written about the surprising political pivot of erstwhile Democrat-supporting billionaires (many of them from tech) to the welcoming embrace of Maga after decades of support for liberalism. Bezos of Amazon, Musk of X/Tesla, Zuckerberg of Meta and Andreessen of Andreessen Horowitz have all shed blue cloaks since Trump's ascendance and donned bright red ones. Some others have shifted more quietly and pragmatically, perhaps making some allowance for the new winds of politics and a vengeful president. These are not normal times, of course. The current president is slashing and burning any entity that does not toe his thick red line, whether they are Harvard, CBS, NPR, Voice of America or Associated Press. Not to mention Canada, for God's sake. It is unprecedented. A large pair of balls is required if you want to refuse to pay obeisance – there are real consequences, as we have seen. It is with this in mind, and catalysed by the stunning success of self-declared socialist Zohran Mamdani in the New York Democratic mayoral candidate race last week, that I set out to find some tech bros who remain committed to good old liberal values and who continue to talk about climate change and renewables, as well as DEI and trans and immigrants' rights, as though Maga had never happened. It turns out that there are still quite a few – some more vocal and others keeping quiet. Perhaps these 'woke' holdouts will feel the wind at their backs again in 2028. Politics is fickle and forgetful, and public perception apt to balance on the wobbly fence of economic good times. No-man's-land Let's dispense with those who have been careful to stay in no-man's-land. Tim Cook of Apple has stayed partially out of the fray. He made the trek to Mar-a-Lago to dine with Trump early on, if only to say, 'We are as happy to work with you as with all other presidents.' Then he got into a small spat with Trump about where to manufacture iPhones, which argument seems to have dissipated, probably because Trump was informed that iPhones simply cannot be manufactured in the US at a competitive cost. How about Sergey Brin and Larry Page of Alphabet/Google? They are both longtime left-leaning centrists who have managed to stay out of the debate by saying little and keeping their personal opinions private. Jensen Huang of Nvidia, on the other hand, has found himself in a bit of a pickle. In 2016, he was quoted as saying, 'In general I prefer a more liberal government', but now, at the head of what is possibly the US's most politically sensitive technology, AI, he has to make nice with the administration that holds all the keys to sanctions and IP restrictions. Mind you, what with Nvidia's dominance in AI hardware, the Trump administration has to make nice with Huang too, so Trump and Huang exist in a politely necessary co-dependent relationship. They are not bros. Anti-Trump brigade This brings us to the others – the ones who clearly do not like Trump and will not bend the knee, the ones whose moral compass has not changed. (I am not passing judgment here on whether that moral compass's needle is pointed in the right direction, only that it seems not to have moved.) These include, most notably, Mark Cuban. Cuban made his fortune in streaming in the late '90s and has since diversified promiscuously. He is (like many self-made-billionaires-at-40) brash, opinionated and smart. He has accused Trump of being a 'snake oil salesman', of being scared of 'strong, intelligent women', of being 'a threat' to the US and of having 'fascist tendencies'. He has been critical of the Democrats, too, accusing them of 'not being able to sell shit' but he has also remained steadfastly outspoken on core left-wing planks like DEI. Then there is Reid Hoffman, co-founder of LinkedIn. His outspoken criticism of Trump caused him to consider leaving the US when Trump was re-elected (out of fear of retribution), but he has not done so and continues to actively support Democratic causes and candidates. And Reed Hastings, co-founder of Netflix, remains firmly 'progressive' except for his controversial support of private over public schooling, which has put him at odds with traditional Democrats. Finally, Satya Nadella of Microsoft. He is also seemingly untainted one way or the other, is unfailingly diplomatic and not given to political statements. But Microsoft's contributions tell a different story – they are 4:1 in favour of the Democratic Party. Billionaire influence The narrative in its entirety tells an interesting story. These people have enormous influence and deep pockets. Where they lean has direct influence on the direction of US governance, not only via their monetary contributions, but in terms of the messages they implicitly whisper to their large customer bases. So, why have some moved to the right, either publicly or privately? Mark Andreessen, in a recent podcast, described a meeting at the Biden White House with other tech executives and some of Biden's team. The subject was AI regulation. At the conclusion of the meeting, the executives went downstairs and huddled in the parking lot. One of them said, 'So I guess it's Trump for us?' They all agreed, at least in Andreessen's telling. For them, the issue was government regulation, nothing else. It was not the money, or at least not completely. It was what Andreessen and the others saw as clumsy and constraining government interference in the sort of innovation they believed to be a national imperative. It may be the case that some of these billionaires left their longtime political homes because Democratic policies pushed them away, but I suspect others moved to the right (and particularly toward Trump) because that's where the money is. Perhaps also because no one wants to deal with Trump's wrath. The only way we'll know for sure is if and when a new Democratic president is elected and the Zuckerbergs and Bezoses come crawling back or not. Only then will we know whether they are motivated by money or principle. DM Maverick451