Letters to the Editor: Building more affordable housing is key to getting the homeless off downtown streets
In my role as vice chair of the Buena Park Navigation Center Oversight Commission, I see that less than 15% of clients leave to go to stable housing in spite of extensive housing navigation support. The lucky few who are able to obtain housing are in the center for more than a year, a place designed for short-term stays.
We need more creative strategies to ensure that safe places to call home are available for everyone. We need to build more housing and, while waiting five to 10 years for it to be built, we need creative solutions such as single-room occupancy spaces, tiny homes and shared-housing models. We also need more programs to prevent people from falling into homelessness in the first place, such as rental assistance, utility assistance, legal representation at eviction courts and support when a crisis hits and people are living check to check. Our state, county and city budgets and policies can support these strategies.
Barry Ross, Santa Ana
..
To the editor: It is really disappointing to see a Los Angeles Times opinion writer say that officials shouldn't be focused on "offering tax breaks to would-be developers" for building places for the homeless in downtowns. It shows that people don't have a basic understanding of why others are homeless. We have a skyrocketing homeless population because we don't have enough places for people to live.
Changing the rules to build more homes is the best thing that politicians could do to help the homeless. Sure, the homeless might not move into all those new shiny downtown towers, but having people living in those new towers would free up more housing for the people who need it the most.
Or we can just keep stalling on new housing and the rich will take the housing the poorer population currently has and the number of homeless people in downtowns will increase.
Josh Albrektson, South Pasadena
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
22 minutes ago
- USA Today
Harrison Ford slams state of American politics: 'Rich get richer, poor get poorer'
Harrison Ford is opening up about the state of U.S. politics in a new interview. The "Indiana Jones" actor, 83, told Variety in a story published Wednesday, July 30, that "the pendulum doth swing in both directions, and it's on a healthy swing to the right at the moment" when asked about where the country is in the six months since the start of President Donald Trump's second term "And, as nature dictates, it will swing back," Ford said. The "Shrinking" star added that "the issue is not who we are, but that we're not who we used to be because we've been purposefully disaggregated into serviceable political units." Which celebs support Harris, Trump? Beyoncé, Taylor Swift, Amber Rose, Jason Aldean, more The Oscar nominee told the outlet that shifts in political tone have "caused the middle to become frayed," but said that "the middle is where we belong" because "compromise is fair and honest." The leading man – who clenches his hands together on a wooden chair in a black tuxedo on the Variety cover – said the country is "having a hard time finding commonality." But he pointed to Americans figuring out "where the commonality is" as they look to the economy: "It's where it always was: Rich get richer, and poor get poorer. And that ain't exactly right." Ford endorsed Trump's opponent – former Vice President Kamala Harris – days before the Nov. 5 election, which she ultimately lost. In his endorsement video of Harris, the Hollywood icon told fans "look, I've been voting for 64 years." In the black-and-white video footage posted online, Ford went on to say he never really wanted "to talk about it very much," and urged voters to "move forward" with Harris. "When dozens of former members of the Trump administration are sounding alarms saying, 'for God's sake, don't do this again,' you have to pay attention," Ford said in the video. "They're telling us something important." Contributing: Natalie Neysa Alund
New York Post
22 minutes ago
- New York Post
Arizona political battle over border rages as local governments choose whether to cooperate with ICE
National news constantly highlights the turmoil at the U.S.-Mexico border, but in southern Arizona—where red desert dust swirls and cacti rise like sentinels—the people living closest to the issue face a daily reality shaped by more than headlines. Amid this rugged landscape, a political battle simmers as local leaders grapple with balancing community safety and the broader national immigration debate. Kathleen Winn, chair of the Pima County Republican Party, expressed her dissatisfaction with how federal budgets have been managed over the past four years. Speaking to Fox News Digital, Winn said infrastructure received 'millions and millions of dollars' under the Biden administration, alleging that some of those funds were used to 'encourage the facilitation of illegal immigration into this country.' Advertisement 'That money went unaccounted for, it was infused into the budgets. And so now they're finding that they have to cut programs because they don't have that money anymore,' she continued. 'We were the front door for the last four years of all kinds of atrocities happening in this country… we're paying a price for it now.' In a statement to Fox News Digital, Eric Robbins, chair of the Pima County Democratic Party, sharply criticized what he described as the Trump administration's legacy of cruelty and misinformation on immigration policy. 7 Kathleen Winn, chair of the Pima County Republican Party, in an interview. Fox News Digital 'Arizonans are exhausted by the Trump administration's gaslighting, cruelty, and lies,' Robbins said. He accused Republican leaders—both nationally and within Arizona—of profiting from fear, citing what he called a surge in unjustified arrests by 'masked, unidentifiable agents' targeting individuals without criminal records. Advertisement 'These agents have reportedly detained mothers en route to buy food, leaving their children alone by the roadside,' he said. Robbins further claimed that such tactics have undermined local law enforcement efforts and funneled detainees into what he described as 'for-profit detention centers.' Labeling these practices as part of a 'documented pattern of abuse,' Robbins cited allegations, including the harassment of nonprofit workers, increased privatization and militarization at the border, due process violations, and widespread family separations. 'This isn't security—it's systemic failure dressed as patriotism,' Robbins stated. 'Trump is not a patriot. He's a nationalist, and Americans need to recognize that distinction.' Advertisement On the other hand, Jesus Jerez, a member of the Santa Cruz County Republican Committee, echoed Winn's concerns and claimed enforcement had been limited during the last four years. 7 Military vehicles and a soldier overlooking a border fence. AP 'The last four years, there was no enforcement activity,' Jerez told Fox News Digital. '[Agents were] told that you can't arrest anybody, but you give them these papers, and you hold them until someone can take them to be processed and then released.' Winn underscored Tucson's importance in the national immigration flow. Advertisement 'Everything that happens at the border in order to get into the innermost regions of the country. [Tucson is] a stopping point once you go into the country,' she said. 'It erodes the quality of life here because people don't have [financial] means, so crime gets increased, people steal… We are at the effect of whatever is happening at the border.' When asked about border security changes under Trump, Winn aligned her view with that of Customs and Border Patrol (CBP). 'We're not seeing as many illegal immigrants,' she said, although she acknowledged that drug smuggling remains an issue in the region. 'Even though human being smuggling has stopped, the drug smuggling has not. And there's a huge network set up in Arizona. So drugs come over the border in whichever way,' Winn said. Winn also outlined the challenges facing Pima County due to what she described as a mismanaged policy. 7 When asked about border security changes under Trump, Winn aligned her view with that of Customs and Border Patrol (CBP). REUTERS 7 Winn also outlined the challenges facing Pima County due to what she described as a mismanaged policy. AFP via Getty Images 'Pima County is experiencing high homelessness, high drug use, and not a lot of solutions, and we're low on police because… they underfunded the police over the last three years. So we are at the effects of the bad policies from the last four years. 'Although it's getting better, it seems that it got worse, to [the] great detriment of the people of Pima County,' she added. Advertisement Dan Dellinges, a state committeeman for the Santa Cruz County Republican Party, noted an uptick in property theft along common travel routes. 'We've had an increase in general property theft along routes of travel [and] pass-throughs here. We also have a number of people who die crossing the desert here to the east, coming into the country illegally, and oftentimes those bodies are discovered by hunters or hikers or side-by-side drivers and then the county or the border patrol comes in and recovers those bodies,' he said. Dellinges criticized what he described as a breakdown in cooperation between local and federal authorities. 7 Jesus Jerez, member of the Santa Cruz County Republican Party. Fox News Digital Advertisement 7 U.S. Army soldiers stand next to Stryker combat vehicles on a hilltop overlooking the U.S.-Mexico border fence in Nogales, Ariz. AP 'Arizona state constitution recognizes supremacy with federal, United States Constitution. At this county it's not recognized, there's very little cooperation with the federal government,' he explained. When asked to expand on this claim, Dellinges pointed to a fundamental disagreement he has with the county sheriff. In the context of immigration enforcement, the Santa Cruz County Sheriff's Office in Arizona, led by Sheriff David Hathaway, has shown reluctance to fully cooperate with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Advertisement According to a January report from KGUN9, Hathaway pulled his deputies out of a program where they worked alongside Border Patrol. 'The City of Nogales, Arizona is 95% Hispanic. The County of Santa Cruz is 80% Hispanic. I don't want there to be fear or tension between the community and my Sheriff's Office. We run the 911 dispatch center for the county, and most households are Hispanic here, so I don't want them to fear that they're inviting an immigration officer, a border patrol agent, into their house if they hear an intruder at the back door. I want them to not fear calling us,' he said at the time. 7 Vehicle driving near border wall with razor wire. AP Hathaway has pointed to courts ruling that state and local agencies cannot be forced to enforce immigration law, labeling it a federal issue. He also believes his team does not have the specific training or funding necessary for immigration enforcement–instead urging his office to focus on local violent crimes. Advertisement Jerez warned of the risks posed by letting in large numbers of unvetted migrants. 'We let in so many people: unknown people, unvetted people, and some very bad people. The people here know how many people came through… These people are desperate and they don't know our rules. We're catching up, slowly catching up,' he said. He also expressed concern about public complacency.
The Hill
22 minutes ago
- The Hill
Bipartisan Senate price transparency bill can fix US health care
In the aftermath of Republicans' divisive reconciliation bill, Congress has the opportunity to come together and pass bipartisan legislation to address one of the nation's biggest problems: The broken health care system. Approximately 100 million Americans have health care debt, and one-quarter of insured families avoid care each year due to unknown costs. The Patients Deserve Price Tags Act, recently introduced by Sens. Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) and John Hickenlooper (D-Colo.), can reverse runaway health care costs that are placing a tremendous burden on American families by empowering them to compare and save. Since 2000, hospital prices have increased by 257 percent, which explains why the growth rate in health insurance premiums has outstripped workers' earnings by a ratio of almost 3 to 1 over this timeframe. The Marshall-Hickenlooper bill gives employers and patients the upfront price information they need to protect themselves from overcharges and choose affordable care. It requires the publication of actual prices, including discounted cash and negotiated insurance rates, not estimates, throughout the health care system. And it requires insurers to give patients an advanced explanation of benefits —a breakdown of costs, including their out-of-pocket responsibility — before care is delivered. I joined a letter signed by 40 leading health economists calling on senators to co-sponsor and quickly pass this crucial legislation. Economists understand actual prices are essential to functioning marketplaces that generate fair-market costs. Under the opaque status quo, consumers are essentially required to pay for care with the equivalent of a blank check, giving hospitals and health insurers tremendous market power to overcharge and profiteer. Hidden prices result in wide cost variations for the same care, a sign of market failure. Recent research I conducted for Rice University's Baker Center reveals that mean outpatient hospital prices in Houston vary by nearly 200 percent for the same insurer. A recent study in Health Affairs Scholar shows that colonoscopy rates can vary by seven times for those with the same health coverage. Price transparency corrects this information asymmetry between consumers and providers, putting downward and convergent pressure on prices. It fosters competition and returns excessive health industry profits to patients, businesses, unions, school districts and workers where they belong. Redirecting funds from the health care industrial complex back to the private economy can create an enormous economic stimulus. Employers and employees especially stand to benefit. The average employer-sponsored family health insurance plan now costs $24,000 per year, with workers bearing the majority of the cost through premium deductions and lower wages. One analysis found that about the same amount of employee compensation growth since 2000 has gone to premium costs as to paychecks. Transparency empowers employers to steer workers to high-value care, reducing premium costs and increasing take-home pay. The Marshall-Hickenlooper bill also gives employers access to their claims data and reveals the contractual relationships of their health plan administrators, allowing them to remedy overbilling and spread pricing. My research suggests that lowering annual premiums by just $1,373 per employee can boost the profitability of retail businesses by an average of 12.4 percent. You don't need to be an economist to understand that upfront prices are needed to avoid overcharges and shop for affordable care and coverage. But economists can speak to the significant impact of price transparency on business earnings, worker paychecks and economic dynamism. Actual prices, as required by the Marshall-Hickenlooper bill, can restore affordability, accountability and trust to American health care. That's something people of all political persuasions can support.
