PTI denounces US strikes on Iran
ISLAMABAD: Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) vehemently denounced the US strikes on Iran's key nuclear facilities and urged the government to immediately convene an All Parties Conference (APC) to thoroughly deliberate on the rapidly deteriorating regional situation and formulate a consensus-based and clear-cut policy on belligerent Israel, pushing the entire region to the brink of a devastating war.
PTI Central Information Secretary Sheikh Waqas Akram, in a statement on Sunday, expressed alarm that the regional situation was fast changing and the government's ostrich-like approach could prove disastrous. He emphasised that the current policy of burying heads in the sand and hoping the storm will pass is futile, as the flames of war have already reached Pakistan's doorstep. He underlined that Pakistan can undoubtedly weather the storm, just as it did against India, but the power elites must take the nation into confidence and forge a consensus-driven approach because Pakistan is currently caught between a rock and a hard place.
He criticised the government for its 'habit of flattery', which he said now had crossed our national boundaries and it is now visible internationally. He pleaded that Israel could not have invaded Iran without the strong backing and support of the US. He said that the US has not only violated Iran's sovereignty but also breached the UN Charter. He maintained that the excuse for the Israeli attack on Iran was even more absurd than India's recent strike on Pakistan under the pretext of the Pahalgam attack. He said that the US and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) adopted a blatantly contradictory and biased approach towards the Muslim world in its pursuit of nuclear capability, while remaining conspicuously silent about Israel's widely acknowledged nuclear arsenal.
He demanded that the UN and OIC urge the IAEA to inspect Israel's nuclear sites and work toward a nuclear-free Middle East, rather than targeting Iran under false pretexts—just as was done with Iraq—despite the IAEA's repeated and clear stance that Tehran is nowhere near acquiring a nuclear weapon. Waqas added that Iran has consistently maintained that its nuclear programme is intended solely for peaceful purposes.
He called for the immediate release of PTI Patron-in-Chief Imran Khan and his inclusion in strategic decision-making regarding the situation arising from Israel's unprovoked attack on Iran and the subsequent US strikes on the country.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
31 minutes ago
- Express Tribune
Iran's military chief thanks Pakistan for support during conflict with Israel
Chief of Staff of the Iranian Armed Forces Major General Abdolrahim Mousavi speaks with Chief of Army Staff Field Marshal Asim Munir via telephone on Sunday. Photo: APP/Press TV Listen to article Chief of Army Staff Field Marshal Asim Munir received a call from Iran's top military commander on Sunday, with Tehran thanking Islamabad for its support during the 12-day war with Israel, Iranian Press TV media reported. During the conversation, Major General Abdolrahim Mousavi, Chief of Staff of the Iranian Armed Forces, praised Islamabad's 'courageous stance' during the crisis and thanked the people of Pakistan for their 'bold positions' in condemning what he called unprovoked attacks by the Zionist regime. He credited Islamabad for standing by Tehran as Israeli strikes targeted senior military commanders, nuclear scientists, and civilians—including women and children—starting June 13. Gen Mousavi claimed that the US administration under President Donald Trump 'spared no effort in assisting the Zionist regime' by attacking Iran's civilian nuclear facilities in Isfahan, Natanz, and Fordow—sites operating under International Atomic Energy Agency safeguards. 'Alongside the US,' he added, 'several Western countries also provided verbal and practical support to the enemy.' Read More: '71 killed by Israeli strikes on Iran's Evin Prison' Despite suffering losses, including the martyrdom of senior commanders early in the conflict, Iran asserted that it successfully prevented its adversaries from achieving their objectives, forcing them to request a ceasefire. According to military analysts cited by Iranian authorities, Israel unilaterally halted its strikes on June 23 under significant pressure. COAS Munir told his counterpart that Pakistan valued its enduring ties with Iran and underscored the importance of regional stability. Both officers agreed to maintain communication channels to promote peace and counter external threats. The Iranian commander's remarks came in the wake of a 12-day conflict that began on June 13, when Israel launched a series of targeted strikes on Iran, killing senior military leaders, including the chief of the Revolutionary Guard Corps, and striking several nuclear installations. Iran responded with retaliatory attacks on Israeli positions. On June 22, the US attacked Iran, claiming to have destroyed Iran's key nuclear facilities in Natanz, Fordow, and Isfahan. In response, Tehran launched strikes on American bases in Iraq and Qatar. The hostilities ended with a ceasefire announced on June 24, following mounting international pressure and heavy losses on both sides.
Express Tribune
2 hours ago
- Express Tribune
JUI-F chief says govt lacks mandate, warns of protest
Listen to article Chief of his own faction of the Jamiat Ulema-i-Islam (JUI-F), Maulana Fazlur Rehman on Sunday issued a stern warning to the federal government, claiming that his party could 'take over Islamabad within a week's notice' if pushed to the brink. Addressing the Shaair-e-Islam Conference in Battagram, the JUI-F chief said his party rejected both the 2018 and the 2024 general elections, describing them as 'fraudulent and manipulated.' He accused the ruling coalition of lacking legitimacy and warned the establishment against ignoring the public's will. 'These kinds of governments cannot last,' Rehman said. 'Those who consider themselves powerful should bow before the will of the people.' Claiming that his party stands for constitutional supremacy, the JUI-F leader vowed to lead a movement that would bring about a 'revolution' in the country. 'We want rule of law and the Constitution. JUI-F workers will be in the field, and success will be ours, because the power of Allah is with us,' he added. بٹگرام: قائد جمعیت مولانا فضل الرحمٰن مدظلہ جلسے سے خطاب کر رہے ہیں۔#JUIBattagramJalsa — Jamiat Ulama-e-Islam Pakistan (@juipakofficial) June 29, 2025 Taking a strong anti-US stance, Fazl accused Washington of hypocrisy and betrayal. 'The same America that abandoned us many times is now asking to join hands again, invoking the name of Prophet Ibrahim (AS),' he said. 'But how can we forget America's role in the oppression of Muslims in Palestine, Libya, Egypt, Syria, and Jordan?' Referring to recent praise for US President Donald Trump by the government, he criticised the prime minister's nomination of Trump for a Nobel Peace Prize. 'Our view is clear: if Trump exists, peace does not — and if peace exists, Trump does not,' he said. The JUI-F chief also expressed solidarity with Iran in opposition to Israel and pledged readiness to defend the sanctity of the holy sites. 'We are committed to the unity of the Muslim Ummah and ready to protect the Haramain,' he said. Warning of dire consequences, he said his party was being 'forced' toward a confrontation. 'We prioritise national security, but if the need arises, we will declare jihad and lay down our lives for this country's defence,' he asserted. Reiterating his rejection of the prevailing political order, Fazl said his party would continue to oppose the current setup. 'We did not allow the previous government to function, and we will not allow this one to function either,' he declared. 'We are not willing to accept this government and will continue to stand against it.' The conference was also addressed by senior JUI-F leaders, including Maulana Abdul Ghafoor Haideri, who alleged that the current provincial government in Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa had 'broken all records of corruption."
Express Tribune
3 hours ago
- Express Tribune
The Iran-Israel War: lessons learnt & unlearnt
Wars are the continuation of policy by other means. This famous dictum by Prussian military theorist Carl von Clausewitz forms the bedrock of post-industrial modern warfare. Every conflict makes military leaders unlearn some older lessons and learn new ones. However, the 'principles of war' distilled over space and centuries in time, remain unchanged. Any violation of these 'imperatives' costs dearly in time, effort and treasury, besides causing loss of life and limb. The recent 12-day war between Israel and Iran – with the US dragged into the fray at the 11th hour – is instructive, as it has profound geostrategic, political and military implications not only for the belligerents, but also for the region and the world, especially for the militaries like Pakistan Armed Forces. The rundown But first a factual recap. Israel started its air offensive against Iran on June 13, 2025, notching up the ongoing shadow war between the two counties into a full-scale shooting war. For 12 days upto June 25, both sides traded missiles, and drones, with Israel using IAF and inserting commando teams in clandestine operations. Both sides targeted military and industrial sites with civilian population targeted in collateral damage. The stated purpose of Israeli offensive was to destroy Iran's nuclear programme and facilitate regime change, as possible. The US, on Israeli PM Netanyahu's desperate urging joined the war on June 21, 2025, bombing the three Iranian nuclear sites at Natanz, Fordow and Isfahan in a complex attack involving around 125 aircraft, including seven B-2 Spirit stealth bombers, and one submarine. The US used the heaviest conventional munitions like the 30,000 pounds GBU-57 bunker busting MOP (massive ordnance penetrator), and BGM-109 Tomahawk cruise missiles. Iran after pre-coordination, retaliated the US bombing by attacking the sprawling Al Udaid US base in Qatar, firing 16 ballistic missiles, most of which were intercepted. On June 24, President Trump announced a complex ceasefire as dramatically as he had entered the war, which after some angry US reactions on violations, still holds. Decoys, covert operations and deception movements were used liberally especially by the US/Israel. Results and implications Iran's Fordow complex, containing around 3,000 sophisticated centrifuges in two enrichment halls, was attacked using the GBU-57s, and is 'severely damaged but not destroyed' as per agreed intelligence assessments, including that of Iran. The IDF-US Combo destroyed the above ground structures, electric supply and underground enrichment centrifuges at Natanz, the largest uranium enrichment facility. The laboratories at Isfahan complex, the storage site for the near bomb-grade nuclear fuel, were also destroyed. Tehran still possesses over 400kg of Uranium, reportedly enriched up to 60 per cent, below the weapons grade enrichment of around 80-90 per cent. This is enough for some nine nuclear bombs. Iran is likely to have stored this enriched Uranium safely elsewhere, and most likely shifted some critical infrastructure to other unknown, undeclared and undetected sites beforehand. So, it is safe to assume that Irani nuclear progamme is mauled, delayed but probably not eliminated. The nuclear programme seems to have survived the strongest possible challenge, and Iran's missiles capability remains intact and able to re-establish deterrence. Geostrategically, Iran's 3H (Hamas, Houthi and Hezbollah) proxies are effectively degraded in the IDF and Mossad's joint military and covert operations. Consequently, Irani military and political influence got a big hit in Syria, Iraq, Lebanon and Yemen. The Sunni crescent seems to have come out stronger. Militarily, the IDF has extensively degraded Iran's air defence system, and left over air power through effective SEAD (Suppression of Enemy AD) operations. It targeted missile sites, launchers and manufacturing facilities. Through clandestine teams using agents, moles within the Irani military and government, Tel Aviv has killed the top leadership of Revolutionary Guards (IRGC or Pasadaran) and other branches of Irani military, and upto a dozen top nuclear scientists and clergy. However, despite this attrition, Ayatollahs remain in power with no immediate threat to their rule and authority for now. Irani people were subjected to intense psy-ops, and propaganda involving pro-Shah expat Irani communities, to rise up against the regime and vacate Tehran during hostilities. However, despite deep fissures, unrest and suppression and faltering economy, Iran seemed to hold its ground during this brief but intense combat. The Middle East (ME) balance of power is altered decidedly away from Iran and tilted towards Israel. This will have implications. For now, Israel seems to be the dominant military power in the ME and is on the roll with the US backing. China and Russia provided diplomatic, political and 'some' military support to Tehran. Türkiye, Qatar, UAE, Egypt and Saudi Arabia played helpful role in the ceasefire and containment of hostilities. COAS Field Marshal Asim, during his recent visit to the US, was reportedly able to persuade President Trump not to use excessive force against Iran, during their unprecedented Oval Office meeting. Lessons unlearnt 'The first lesson 'was'…that nuclear sites are not to be attacked'. Israel's no-holds-barred illegality aside, the unprecedented US attack on another country's nuclear sites sets a new normal by the sole superpower. This could and would be emulated in future conflicts with immense consequences. Nuclear facilities are no longer sacrosanct in a military conflict. Modi's India, following Netanyahu's template, can and might replicate this brazenness. 'Second, technological advantage is guarantee for security'. Unlearnt. Israel emerged neither victorious nor unscathed from the relentless and en-masse Irani hypersonic missile response, that during the last days of the war was able to penetrate Israel's multi-layered AD system, comprising Arrow Missiles, David's Sling and the Iron Dome. This costly AD system (costing some 167 million USD per engagement) was swarmed, saturated and exhausted repeatedly by low-cost Irani drone and missile combos, in layers, wearing it down. 'Third, Israel's effective strategy of 'Escalation Dominance', (that is to disproportionately punish any state or non-state actor committing violence against Israel) will ensure peace and security for Israel'. Unlearnt. Irani drone-missile barrages undermined not only Israel's 'Escalation Dominance' but also its strategy under the Dahiya Doctrine, that involves large-scale destruction of civilian infrastructure, like in Gaza. Dahiya is also called 'domicide' and is employed to pressure foreign governments. Despite being without effective air cover, Iran was able to absorb IDF attacks and sustain its own drone/missile offensive till the very end. The roughly 11 per cent mostly hypersonic ballistic missiles getting through the Israeli AD and hitting electricity grids, refineries, and in some cases, Israeli settlements on occupied lands, caused mass exodus of Jewish settlers. The bunker psychosis, and vanishing sense of security forced many Israelis to flee to other countries, to a not very warm welcome. 'The fourth lesson to be unlearnt is that antisemitism is dead for good'. Conversely, antisemitism spiked to an all-time high and remains so for the 'child killers of Gaza' as IDF and Israeli Government are referred to. The over 600-day wars in Gaza and Iran has left deep scars on the already stressed Israeli state, society, psyche and armed forces. This exhaustion will have socio-psychological implications. 'Fifth, the rule-based international order has no scope for 'rogue' behaviour'. Unlearnt. This conflict validates the age-old dictum of 'might is right', demonstrating that rules, regulations and statutes are only for the weak and voiceless. The strong can trample them with impunity. International organisations like the UN, established for the very purpose of ensuring global peace and security, remain hostage to the powerful. The US vetoes in the UNSC in favour of a genocidal Israel are cases in point. Geostrategic realignment The global chessboard is re-aligned like never before. Israel although bruised and battered by the Iranian onslaught, remains a dominant military power in the ME, for now. Iran will recuperate from its moment of peril and weakness overtime. Iran has undergone a reality check and would be a nuclear power sooner than later. Rationally speaking, it would mend its fractured ties with the Sunni world and avoid nurturing destabilising proxies. It has realised the value of its relationship with Pakistan, and seen the Indian duplicity, given New Delhi's friendship with and support to Israel. Jewish and Zionist causes took a great hit and sympathy towards Jewish people among gentiles is at an all-time low. Israel under BB has greatly damaged the Jewish cause by bringing to limelight the Jewish stranglehold on the US power levers. This is not to the liking of majority of non-Jewish Americans, most of whom comprise Trump's power base. The US attacks on Iran remained conspicuously unpopular within the US, and exacerbated divisions among Americans and among the Europeans, stemming from Israeli conduct and cruelty in Gaza over the last some two years. Russia is likely to be an assertive player with or without China and may push for ingress into Syria, its erstwhile ally. Its tacit support will continue for Tehran. Middle East per se is likely to go towards multipolarity with the US, China and Russian fiefs, especially after America's direct involvement in the war. Political lessons Politically, the war will reverberate into the domestic politics of belligerents. Bibi Netanyahu, for now idolised as 'Mr. Security' by a paranoid Israel, will ultimately have to deal with the more complex question of 'what now' in Gaza and the West Bank in dealing with the hereafter of his genocidal destruction. He or the future Israeli leadership will have to calibrate relations with an Iran that will ultimately be a nuclear power. Iran will have to decide if its proxy power is to stay or otherwise, as it is to the great chagrin of most stake holders in the greater Middle East. Lebanon wants to re-assert its control that was ceded to Hezbollah; Yemen would like to restrain in the Houthis; and Hamas may not die its death but would look for alternative patrons, after the Syrian route for their logistic replenishment is gone. The Sunni crescent would like to see Iran defanged from its interventionist politics and brinkmanship. Military lessons Militarily this war will, heretofore, intensify the race to acquire nuclear weapons globally, hitting at the very basis of non-proliferation. Iran may be restrained for some time, but a nuclear Iran in the mid to long-term is a reality, that Israel will have to live with, with or without the Ayatollahs in power. Physical infrastructure of a nuclear progamme can be destroyed but not the knowledge base. In this case, even the physical infrastructure was not completely taken out, given its impossibility. Destroying Iran's knowledge base by assassinating its scientists is just an act of desperate jitteriness by Israel. Knowledge is non-perishable. Nuclear sites are no more kosher in a shooting war, especially since the sole superpower has set a new normal by participating in attacks on Irani nuclear facilities. This will have lasting implications for America and other nuclear powers especially China and Russia. Pakistan will also need to consider this once unthought scenario in dealing with Modi's India. Asset hardening like in Fordow is the way to go. Small powers like Pakistan, facing larger enemies will have to seriously invest in hardening their aerial, missile and nuclear assets. For nuclear powers, announcement of a clear nuclear policy is a compulsion now to remove any misunderstanding and/or breakdown of conventional deterrence during escalation. Iran will have to come clear on the issue of nuclearisation, civil or military; scale down its revolutionary rhetoric; and deal with its post-nuclear policy. Pakistan must announce its nuclear policy to debunk the strategic thinking among some Indian decision-makers, civil and military, that there is space for a limited punitive conventional conflict with Pakistan, under the nuclear overhang. Escalation control was demonstrated by both Iran and Israel, through limiting their attacks largely to the military targets, agreeing to a ceasefire and re-establish deterrence once military options were not making headway. Iran re-established conventional deterrence through its relentless missile barrages, especially immediately after the US attack, when its longest attack lasted a good 40 minutes. The conflict validated the use of drone and missile technologies by the weaker states, and their socio-psychological impact on the population. Warfare, given the intense involvement of media especially the amok social media, is now a whole-of-the nation affair, not restricted to the military alone. Likewise, as experienced in this conflict, AD with continuous upgradation, acquisition of cutting-edge aircraft, investment in the drone and missile technologies, and strengthening air force are critical, especially for Pakistan now, like never before. Contact ground battle is taking a back seat, especially when belligerents are distant and do not share any land border like Iran and Israel. This may in such cases, gradually diminish the role and importance of services like the Army, and particularly the infantry. This validates greater significance of air force, drones, missiles, electronic warfare, space and cyber capabilities. Pakistani military should need to keep a watchful eye on these domains. For us, following a 'Continental Strategy' would remain vogue, as ground war with India is a lurking possibility. Pakistan would need the dual investment in conventional force structure, as well as niche capabilities, as cited. Our own short skirmish with India in May this year has validated these lessons. Israel's bold and successful manipulation of Irani assets to their great advantage, substantiates the importance of counterintelligence. Insertion of commando teams inside Iran, establishing bases, recruiting agents and moles, assassinations, pager explosions, and induction of cyber tools are some areas where IDF worked very closely with Mossad. Pakistan will have to ensure counterintelligence vis-à-vis India, and strengthen its own intelligence collection and counterintelligence capabilities, using paramilitary, espionage and other assets. One of the glaring weaknesses was Israel's ability to sustain regular AD at home, and aerial onslaught over Iran, due to the dual challenges of geography and logistics. The over 3,000 kms roundtrip to attack Iran needed multiple midair refueling by IAF fighter jets. IAF's limited KC-707 air refuellers fleet curtailed the size of IAF flotilla, making its offensive punch lighter over targets, needing multiple revisits. Non- availability of bunker busting munitions and long-range bombers to carry these over to targets in Iran also limited Israeli options, enhancing its dependence on the US. Over employment of the AD system created munition shortfalls even within the US, allowing more Irani missiles to penetrate through, particularly during the last days of war. Finally, the resolve of leadership, civil and military, is very important. Iran's refusal to surrender; and Netanyahu who mostly followed his gut rather than the advice of World Jewry; remained decisive during various stages of the war. Iran's will to fight, its ingenious employment of drones, and Tehran enhancing the tyranny of its geography for Israel, remained decisive factors. Every major conflict changes the nature of warfare, without affecting the rules and principles of warfare. In geostrategy, Israel was a victim of over-stretch, trying to overcome its demographic and geographic vulnerabilities; just like Iran was a victim of its own over-stretch by raising, mentoring and financing proxies and muddying its ties with stake holders in the region. One hopes, this war leads to some sort of wise accommodation on the core issues like the Palestinian problem, Iran's nuclear programme, and Israel's heartless application of force and America's blind support. Inam ul Haque is a retired Pakistan Army major general who writes on defence, global affairs and political sociology. He can be reached at tayyarinam@ and his Twitter handle @20_Inam All facts and information are the sole responsibility of the author
