logo
UK slides down women's health rankings for fourth year in a row

UK slides down women's health rankings for fourth year in a row

Timesa day ago

The UK has dropped down a worldwide women's health league for the fourth consecutive year, as countries such as Lithuania, Kazakhstan and Saudi Arabia perform better.
Experts described the change as 'alarming' and 'unacceptable', as it was also revealed women in the UK were more likely to experience poor emotional health and chronic pain than the EU average.
There has been a year-on-year decline in how women in the UK rate their pregnancy care, and they were less likely to be screened for conditions such as diabetes, high blood pressure and cancer than in comparable countries, the global study found.
The UK now ranks at just 41 out of 142 countries in the Hologic Global Women's Health Index, down from 37 last year and 30 in 2023. The annual league table is based on surveys of more than 78,000 women globally. The UK is also below the US, where women's healthcare has been hit by restrictions on access to abortion in many states.
The report found women living in the UK were now more likely to experience negative feelings such as sadness, stress and anger than they were in 2020 during the pandemic, with 39 per cent saying they felt 'worry'.
The number of women in the UK who thought their pregnancy care was 'high quality' has also dropped every year since the survey began, falling from 79 per cent four years ago to 72 per cent in this year's report.
• Hilary Rose: Gynaecology is seen as a lifestyle medicine — women are being betrayed
And a record 29 per cent of UK women said they experienced daily physical pain, up from 24 per cent four years ago. More than 25 per cent said they were limited in daily activities by ongoing health issues.
Janet Lindsay, the chief executive of the charity Wellbeing of Women, said: 'These figures are unacceptable for one of the world's wealthier nations and reflect long-standing underinvestment in women's health.
'Women's health should not be treated as an afterthought. It requires sustained political leadership, better access to care, increased research funding, and a shift in culture that truly values and listens to women.'
Lindsay called for women's health to be put at 'the heart of our national agenda' in the government's forthcoming ten-year plan for the NHS.
• NHS drops dementia and women's health targets to end 'overspending'
Researchers blamed the rankings slide on the UK's failure to act to improve women's healthcare since the pandemic, despite the creation of a women's health strategy.
'While the women's health strategy, now nearly three years in, has delivered some progress, it is yet to deliver significant impact,' the report's authors said. 'The latest data exposes a widening gap between policy ambition and the everyday experiences of women.'
Professor Ranee Thakar, president of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, added: 'Too often, systemic, operational, structural and cultural issues mean women do not get the care they deserve. The government's ten-year health plan offers a vital opportunity to change this.'
For the index, each country was assigned a score based on its performance in five areas of women's health and wellbeing: preventive care (such as screening for cancer and high blood pressure); basic needs (including ease of access to food and housing); health and safety (including how safe women feel walking at night and the quality of pregnancy care); individual health (including how pain affects women's daily lives); and emotional health.
The UK scored 59 out of 100, putting it below the EU average of 60 and on a par with Iceland, Bulgaria and France.
Although the UK ranked in the top third of countries worldwide, it was in the bottom third in Europe, placed at just 23 out of 31 European countries.
Other countries have made progress and moved ahead. Slovenia, for example, was ranked at 27 out of 31 European countries last year, but has now edged in front of the UK into 19th place.
'This is a four-year decline that no one can ignore,' said Tim Simpson, a senior director at Hologic. 'Women's health must remain a national priority, yet this data shows we are losing ground.'
The top-ranked countries globally were Taiwan (68), Kuwait (67), Austria (66), Switzerland (65) and Finland (65).
• Women left in pain by healthcare no better than Kosovo, poll finds
Other countries which outperformed the UK included Bahrain, which was eighth overall with a score of 64, Kazakhstan (13th with a score of 63), Saudi Arabia (14th with a score of 63), Slovenia (31st with a score of 60) and Kosovo (35th with a score of 60).
New Zealand was ranked at 37th and the USA at 38th, both with a score of 60, while Australia dropped to 43rd place, with a score of 59.
The worst countries for women's health were Afghanistan, with a score of 30, followed by the Democratic Republic of the Congo (34), Chad (35), Sierra Leone (36) and Liberia (37). Globally, the average score was 53.
This year's index was compiled based on data obtained from interviews carried out in 2023 with around 500 women in each country by the global analytics firm Gallup and Hologic, a medical technology company specialising in women's health.
A Department of Health and Social Care spokesman said that the previous government was in power at the time the surveys for the report were carried out.
'Women have been let down by a health service which was not focused on their needs, which is why we are on a mission to get the NHS working for women,' the spokesman added. 'Equality will be at the heart of our ten-year health plan to fix the NHS.
'We're making progress, including adding 4.2 million extra appointments, tackling gynaecology waiting lists using the private sector, trialling AI for breast cancer screening, and from October this year, making emergency hormonal contraception free in pharmacies.
'There's still more to do, and we are committed to turning commitments into tangible action.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Derbyshire pip claimants relieved but fearful after PM's U-turn
Derbyshire pip claimants relieved but fearful after PM's U-turn

BBC News

time13 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Derbyshire pip claimants relieved but fearful after PM's U-turn

Sharon Arrowsmith, a Labour voter all her life, says she never thought she would have to "fear" the party in she says the government's plans to change who qualifies for certain disability and sickness benefits had left her "terrified". "I can't afford to lose a single penny", she says. "It's unconscionable."But early on Friday, the government confirmed a U-turn on its cuts to disability benefits in a bid to avert rebellion by more than 120 Labour backbenchers - leaving Sharon, from Derbyshire, breathing "a huge sigh of relief". The Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill was meant to tighten eligibility requirements for personal independence payments (pips), halve the health-related element of universal credit (UC), and increase the UC standard government hoped to save £5bn a year by 2030 with the bill, while slowing the increase in people claiming benefits. It was the changes to who qualifies for pips in particular that caused deep unhappiness amongst pip claimants will continue to receive what they currently get, as will recipients of the health element of universal credit. Planned cuts will only hit future well as changing who will be affected by the cuts, ministers are also expected to fast-track a £1bn support plan originally scheduled for many charities have rejected the Amo Raju, from the Derby-based charity Disability Direct, says the legislation should still be pulled."Welfare reform does need to happen, but it needs to involve disabled people in that decision-making process," he said."Let's pull it, get the right individuals around the table and co-produce the policy in the interests of disabled people." 'There's no fun' Ms Arrowsmith, from Amber Valley, has fibromyalgia, meaning she has difficulty moving about. It causes her chronic fatigue and joint and muscle pain. She struggles to do housework and shopping and often struggles to physically get out of 55-year-old also has other conditions including diabetes type 2, underactive thyroid, and growing cataracts which means she cannot drive and is reliant on autism diagnosis leaves her struggling with impairment of executive function and staying on had to stop working in January due to these conditions, and receives the mobility element of -ip, which is about £400 a month. She also receives universal credit, the vast majority of which is spent on private rent payments and bills. The pip payment used to help her employ someone to help with house tasks, but due to rising costs she says she is now heavily reliant on it to afford food after being left unable to work."I can't afford to lose a single penny. I would no longer be able to buy food or pay rent," she said."I have already cut everything down to the bone. There is no excess. There is no fun."Sharon thought she was likely to lose out because she will not score enough points in certain areas, like being able to wash and dress, which she can mostly manage. The government had been proposing that from November 2026, pip claimants would need to score at least four points from a single pip daily living activity to qualify for the daily living component of pip, as well as scoring a total of at least eight points. Sharon says she is relieved by the climbdown."I'm so proud of [the rebel MPs] for doing that, at the risk of their careers, having the courage to stand up. They are the real Labour people," she she says she worries for new claimants who will be impacted in the future."I am concerned still, I still think they really need to look at this bill and think about the people. Not the money, the people, that's what's important."I feel like I was wrong to vote Labour." Gordon Patten, from Long Eaton, is in his early fifties and is unable to work because of sarcoidosis, a rare condition impacting the lungs that means he must sleep with a machine aid. He also has been diagnosed with depression and type 2 diabetes and has had epilepsy since he was a receives roughly £460 a month through the daily living component of pip, which helps towards expenses such as the electricity bill his breathing aid machine leaves him with, which he says has increased, and hiring a cleaner to help with also receives the standard rate for mobility and is entitled to a mobility vehicle, an element which the government says will not be impacted by the changes. Gordon says he was glad to see the Labour backbenchers who disagree with the policy "standing up" to the prime minister."It is going to be a two-tier situation but we've had this in the past with disability allowance. You're always gonna have that, where people who started on a benefit get more," he he says the Labour Party have "mucked this up completely" for people like him."If you go back to 1945, at the beginning of the welfare state, it was a core [Labour] value"Labour has kind of lost its way with looking after the working person and the vulnerable...I honestly think that being in power has gone to their heads." A Department for Work and Pensions spokesperson said: "Ministers have repeatedly recognised how anxious people are when there is talk of reform which is why we will never compromise on protecting people who need our support."Our reforms will mean the social security system will always be there for those who will never be able to work."

Make Bobby Moore a Knight! Bowel cancer survivors join the masses as campaign to honour England's World Cup-winning captain gains momentum
Make Bobby Moore a Knight! Bowel cancer survivors join the masses as campaign to honour England's World Cup-winning captain gains momentum

Daily Mail​

time26 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Make Bobby Moore a Knight! Bowel cancer survivors join the masses as campaign to honour England's World Cup-winning captain gains momentum

Bowel cancer survivors have backed calls to honour England football legend Bobby Moore, after using his name to raise tens of millions for charity. The former West Ham and Fulham defender, who captained the Three Lions to the 1966 World Cup victory over West Germany at Wembley, died with cancer in 1993, aged just 51. But the charity fund which bears his name has generated more than £31 million for Cancer Research UK, helping spread awareness, support those with the disease and pay for treatment. Former cancer patients who have been supported by the Bobby Moore Fund today joined the calls from household names across football, sport and entertainment in urging the Government to create a new posthumous knighthood in tribute to the east Londoner's significant contribution to life, both on and off the field. Marcus Hitchens, whose footballer father Gerry Hitchens played alongside a young Bobby for England in the early 1960s, said: 'I remember my father saying what a great person he was, even as a young footballer, my father thought very highly of Bobby, he commanded respect from everyone, including the more seasoned professionals with a lot more years in the game. 'Sadly I think he was let down a bit by the authorities - he wasn't looked after when he left the game, he didn't have the opportunities that some former footballers do when they retire. 'So I think it's the right time to change that now, and give him in death the recognition he sadly failed to get - but completely deserved - during his lifetime.' Mr Hitchens, a sales manager from Carmel, Holywell in north east Wales, said the fund has given him the 'platform' to spread the message about bowel cancer after being diagnosed with it himself as a young man. Mr Hitchens, 66, said: 'Sometimes people are a bit embarrassed about bowel cancer but that is something the fund, in Bobby's name, has been so successful at trying to change over the years. 'It's not for everyone standing up in a room full of people and talking about your poo, but I felt comfortable doing that because I know what difference it makes spreading awareness of bowel cancer, and the Bobby Moore Fund has given me the platform to do that and hopefully reach as many men as possible.' A petition to create a posthumous award for Bobby has now passed 174 signatures, and has been supported by the likes of 1966 hat-trick hero Sir Geoff Hurst, former England captains Bryan Robson and Terry Butcher, and Three Lions regulars including Frank Lampard, Stuart Pearce and Les Ferdinand. Fellow bowel cancer survivor Matt Black said the charity shone a light on an unglamorous disease by using Bobby's name to target men who might not otherwise pay attention to symptoms or get checked out. The 60-year-old property developer from London said: 'The Bobby Moore Fund has given me a platform and a voice. 'Post my operation I was very keen to talk about my situation, how I got through it, what are the signs to look out for, and I became incredibly passionate about that. 'Until 'Bowel Babe' Dame Deborah James came to prominence a few years ago, there was no one really advocating the issues around bowel cancer, about cancer research. 'It wasn't linked to an individual and the Bobby Moore Fund drove that force really hard for last 30 years. 'Middle aged blokes especially don't talk about it, yet Bobby has turned tragedy into something positive, given recognition through sport and through football to the awareness and the issues and the concerns surrounding bowel cancer. 'By linking it with sports, as he has done, it has made his reach beyond what you would normally expect.' He added: 'It is right that he is recognised for this fantastic dedication to saving lives.'

Transgender campaigners call for European rights body to report on UK
Transgender campaigners call for European rights body to report on UK

The Guardian

time28 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Transgender campaigners call for European rights body to report on UK

A collection of groups campaigning on transgender issues have urged Europe's main human rights body to investigate the UK over the implementation of the supreme court's ruling on gender. In a joint letter to the Council of Europe, the organisations said the situation in which transgender people were likely to be barred from using toilets of their acquired sex or joining single-sex organisations placed them in an 'intermediate zone' of gender, saying this was a violation of the European convention on human rights (ECHR). The five groups, Trans+ Solidarity Alliance, TransActual, Equality Network and Scottish Trans, Trans Safety Network and Feminist Gender Equality Network, have asked the council to report on trans rights in the UK, adding: 'We note that the situation is urgent and that without intervention, it seems likely to further deteriorate.' The letter follows April's landmark supreme court ruling that 'woman' and 'sex' in the Equality Act referred only to a biological woman and to biological sex. In its 88-page judgment, the court said that while the word 'biological' did not appear in the definition of man or woman in the Equality Act, 'the ordinary meaning of those plain and unambiguous words corresponds with the biological characteristics that make an individual a man or a woman'. If 'sex' did not only mean biological sex in the 2010 legislation, providers of single-sex spaces including changing rooms, homeless hostels and medical services would face 'practical difficulties', it said. The justices added: 'Read fairly and in context, the provisions relating to single-sex services can only be interpreted by reference to biological sex.' According to the Equality and Human Rights Commission, which is consulting on the formal post-ruling guidance, due out later this summer, transgender people should not be allowed to use toilets or changing spaces of the gender they live as, and that in some cases they also cannot use toilets of their birth sex. The letter argues that this would leave transgender people reliant on gender-neutral facilities, which are often unavailable 'and mandating their usage may require trans people to out themselves'. It argues that this, plus the post-ruling interim advice that transgender people would not be allowed to join single sex associations of their acquired sex, would place them in an 'intermediate zone' on sex, a violation of their right to respect for private life under article 8 of the ECHR. The convention is interpreted by the European court of human rights, part of the Strasbourg-based Council of Europe, which is separate from the EU and to which Britain remains a member. Jess O'Thomson from Trans+ Solidarity Alliance said trans people had already experienced 'a huge rollback' of rights even before the final guidance on implementing the ruling had been published: 'We are asking for a report to be opened into the state of trans people's human rights in the UK, in the hope that this will encourage our politicians to listen and take action.' Rebecca Don Kennedy, chief executive of Equality Network, said: 'Trans people and their allies all over the UK are horrified with the recent chain of events following the supreme court ruling in April. The threat to trans people's autonomy, freedom and dignity should concern anyone who values equality and human rights. 'Trans people have a right to public life, and dignity in social interaction, they have a right to use the toilet safely, to leave their homes knowing that they can. They have a right to privacy, a right to engage with the world as themselves, to join clubs that fully celebrate and welcome them as who they are.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store