
China hits back at EU with reciprocal ban on major medical equipment contracts
China's finance ministry said in a statement that European Union companies, with the exception of "those with European capital established in China, will have to be excluded" from orders of more than 45 million yuan ($6.3 million).
Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi visited the EU's headquarters, as well as France and Germany, over the past week in a bid to improve relations with the 27-member bloc.
However, deep frictions remain over economic ties, including a yawning trade deficit of $357.1 billion between China and the EU.
China's ban, which comes into effect from Sunday, covers a wide range of products, from prosthetic devices and parts to medical machinery and surgical instruments.
Beijing's finance ministry also specified that the proportion of products from the EU could not exceed 50 percent in bids from non-European companies.
The EU drew an angry response from Beijing, and an accusation of double standards, when it banned Chinese firms from government medical device purchases worth more than five million euros ($5.8 million) in retaliation for limits Beijing places on access to its own market.
The European Commission said at the time the ban was a reaction to "China's longstanding exclusion of EU-made medical devices from Chinese government contracts".
According to Brussels, just under 90 percent of public procurement contracts for medical devices in China "were subject to exclusionary and discriminatory measures" against EU firms.
"China has repeatedly expressed, through bilateral dialogue, its willingness to resolve these disputes appropriately through consultations, dialogue and bilateral arrangements in the field of public procurement," China's commerce ministry said in a separate statement.
Over the last three years, Brussels and Beijing have come into conflict in a number of economic sectors, including electric cars, the rail industry, solar panels and wind turbines.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Gulf Insider
6 hours ago
- Gulf Insider
Lights Out, Europe: The Cost Of Brussels' Energy Fantasy
Spain's leading energy companies – Iberdrola, Endesa, and EDP – remain stunned. After the nationwide blackout that cut power across Spain on April 28, the government has yet to provide a clear explanation or take technical responsibility… The companies, represented by the employers' association Aelec, have denounced 'surprising omissions' in the official investigation. They demand that the extreme voltage spikes recorded in the days leading up to the collapse be included in the analysis. They have criticized the preliminary report from ENTSO-E—the European network of electricity operators—for claiming that 'the system was operating normally' just seconds before the failure. Meanwhile, severe voltage swings were recorded, going beyond safety limits and triggering automatic shutdowns of high-voltage substations and key refineries. This episode is far more than an isolated incident. It is a metaphor for the erratic direction taken by the European Union's energy policy. In the name of climate change, Brussels has embarked on a radical overhaul of its energy model driven not by technical or economic realities, but by an ideological agenda imposed by political and bureaucratic elites. What was marketed as a smooth transition toward renewable energy has turned into a forced green agenda, with no viable alternatives and little regard for its impact on competitiveness, system stability, or citizens' well-being. At the root of this drift lies the REPowerEU plan, launched after the start of the war in Ukraine with the stated aim of 'fully decoupling' Europe from Russian energy. What initially appeared to be a justified geostrategic measure quickly became, in the hands of the European Commission, a pretext to push through renewable energies at any cost. This led to a rushed and uneven transition, with citizens and businesses footing the bill. This leap into the void has destabilized key sectors such as agriculture, transport, and industry, forcing them to absorb rising costs without receiving real technological upgrades. Countries like Germany, which shut down their nuclear plants out of political conviction, have now had to reopen coal-fired stations in a contradictory reversal. Meanwhile, state propaganda continues to promote green energy self-sufficiency, while households face record electricity bills and companies lose competitiveness. The structural failures of the European power grid are becoming increasingly evident. The continental grid was designed for stable and predictable hydro, gas, and nuclear sources. The mass introduction of intermittent sources like wind and solar makes imbalances difficult to manage: without wind or sun, generation collapses; with too much, the grid becomes dangerously overloaded. On April 28th, the Iberian Peninsula experienced those consequences firsthand. Abnormal voltage levels were detected in several substations throughout the morning. To grasp the gravity: a 'voltage oscillation' involves a sudden and significant fluctuation in the grid's voltage, which can damage equipment, trigger automatic disconnections, or, in extreme cases, cause a total blackout. At the Lancha substation, voltage reached nearly 250 kV on a line rated for 220. Another line, rated at 400 kV, surpassed 470 kV just before the collapse. According to Aelec, these anomalies began as early as 10:00 a.m. While a sudden drop of 2,200 MW in generation has been cited as the trigger, the system is theoretically built to withstand a loss of up to 3,000 MW without shutting down. This was not a coincidental failure—it was a built-in weakness. Beyond technical and political issues, the forced energy transition takes a human toll. European households are paying more for electricity, hitting middle- and lower-income families especially hard. Electrification of transport, promoted without adequate foresight, is raising the cost of mobility due to a lack of reliable charging infrastructure. Farmers and truckers, already squeezed by unmanageable climate regulations, face growing expenses while being pressured to make investments they cannot afford. Moreover, blackouts are no minor issue: their impact ranges from multimillion-euro industrial losses to the paralysis of hospitals, schools, and transport networks. In Spain, the outage even cost five people their lives. An energy model that cannot ensure a steady supply threatens the economy and public safety. European industry, particularly in the central and southern parts of the continent, is already bearing the brunt. Unable to compete with American or Asian energy prices, many companies are relocating production or shutting down. Paradoxically, even sectors the green agenda promotes, such as electric vehicles, are faltering. Once-dominant car industries in Germany and France are struggling to stay afloat in an increasingly competitive global market. While Europe imposes ideological standards, China manufactures more, better, and cheaper. Deindustrialization is no longer a threat—it's a fact. Notably, some factions on the Left even embrace 'degrowth'—deliberate economic decline—as a desirable path. Worse still, despite all these sacrifices, Europe continues to import Russian energy—now via third countries—and remains vulnerable to geopolitical pressure. The promise of energy independence often rings hollow. The Green Deal has morphed from a promise of modernization into a political myth: a story no longer grounded in reality, propped up by propaganda that refuses to confront its contradictions. The public, increasingly aware of the real costs, is beginning to push back. The farmers' resistance in the Netherlands gave rise to a political party now part of the ruling coalition. In other countries, protests and citizen discontent are multiplying. And this is only the beginning. This very week, farmers returned to Brussels to protest the suffocating policies they face. An energy transition is not inherently harmful, but cannot be imposed dogmatically. It requires realism, technological pluralism, gradual implementation, and a willingness to adopt what works. Nuclear, hydro, and natural gas must be part of the energy mix while green technologies mature. Sustainability will not be achieved by denying physics or punishing citizens, but by integrating every available tool with a long-term vision. What happened in Spain is a symptom, not an accident. Europe's current energy model is not equipped to operate under the conditions imposed by Brussels. There is an urgent need to rethink energy policy—not through ideology, but through engineering, economics, and common sense. If the energy transition is to be our path forward, let it be pursued with caution, technological plurality, and respect for the system's real limitations. Europe cannot afford to stumble in the dark in the name of a green light; it still does not know how to switch on.


Daily Tribune
9 hours ago
- Daily Tribune
BRICS criticism brings Trump 10% tariff threat
US President Donald Trump threatened China, India, and some of the world's fastest-emerging economies with higher import tariffs, hitting back at BRICS criticism of his trade policies as the bloc meets Monday. The 11-nation grouping -- which also includes US allies Brazil, Saudi Arabia, and Indonesia -- is concluding a two-day summit in Rio de Janeiro. On Sunday, BRICS leaders described Trump's stop-start tariff wars as 'indiscriminate,' damaging, and illegal, drawing a late-night rebuke from the pugilistic US president. 'Any Country aligning themselves with the Anti-American policies of BRICS, will be charged an ADDITIONAL 10% Tariff. There will be no exceptions to this policy,' Trump wrote on social media. BRICS members account for about half the world's population and 40 percent of global economic output. Conceived two decades ago as a forum for fast-growing economies, BRICS has come to be seen as a Chinese-driven effort to curb US global influence. But it is a quickly expanding and often divergent grouping -- bringing together arch US foes like Iran and Russia, with some of Washington's closest allies in Latin America, the Middle East, Africa, and Asia. Some US allies inside the bloc had tried to blunt criticism of Trump by not mentioning him or the United States by name in their summit statement. Saudi Arabia -- one of the world's biggest purchasers of US high-tech weapons -- even kept its foreign minister away from Sunday's talks and a BRICS group photo of leaders, seemingly to avoid Washington's ire. But such diplomatic gestures were lost on the US president.


Daily Tribune
10 hours ago
- Daily Tribune
Trump threatens allies Japan, South Korea with 25% tariffs
President Donald Trump threatened Japan and South Korea with 25 percent tariffs yesterday, stepping up pressure on the two historical US allies and a dozen other economies to reach trade deals with Washington. Trump had said at the weekend that starting from Monday he would send a first batch of up to 15 letters to countries, informing them that he would reimpose harsh levies earlier postponed in April. In near-identically worded letters to the Japanese and South Korean leaders, Trump said the tariff hikes would apply from August 1 because their trading relationships with Washington were 'unfortunately, far from Reciprocal.' Trump warned the countries, both key US allies in East Asia, of an escalation if they responded to the duties. Currently, both countries have been hit with a 10% levy imposed on almost all US trading partners. But Trump said he was ready to lower the new levels if Japan and South Korea changed their trade policies: 'We will, perhaps, consider an adjustment to this letter.' Japan's Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba said Sunday that he 'won't easily compromise' in trade talks with Washington. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters Monday that Trump would sign an order later in the day to delay his July 9 deadline for steeper tariffs to take effect -- postponing their imposition to August 1. She added that besides Japan and South Korea, there would be approximately 12 other partners receiving letters from Trump soon. With the deadline extension, Leavitt said Trump would be setting out the 'reciprocal tariff rate' for economies in the coming month as negotiations continue. Trump originally announced sweeping tariffs on world economies on what he called 'Liberation Day' on April 2, claiming the United States was being 'ripped off.' Amid market turmoil, Trump then suspended the initial tariffs for 90 days, a deadline that would have expired Wednesday without the latest extension. While the Trump administration had signaled hopes of striking dozens of deals by July -- at one point boasting of '90 deals in 90 days' -- there have been limited results so far. 'Change their tune' Asked why Trump opted to start with South Korea, Leavitt said: 'It's the President's prerogative, and those are the countries he chose.' 'This announcement will send a chilling message to others,' said Asia Society Policy Institute Vice President Wendy Cutler. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Monday that there would be a number of deals coming up: 'We are going to have several announcements in the next 48 hours.' 'We've had a lot of people change their tune in terms of negotiations. So my mailbox was full last night with a lot of new offers, a lot of new proposals,' Bessent told CNBC. He added that he would meet with his Chinese counterpart in the coming weeks. On whether he was disappointed in the number of trade deals achieved so far, Trump's trade adviser Peter Navarro maintained that he is 'happy with the progress we've had.' 'Every country that we run a major deficit with is fully engaged,' he told CNBC on Monday. Trump has also threatened another 10% tariff on countries aligning themselves with the emerging BRICS nations, accusing them of 'Anti-American policies' after they slammed his duties at a summit. For now, partners are still rushing to avert Trump's tariffs altogether. The European Commission said that EU chief Ursula von der Leyen had a 'good exchange ' with Trump on trade when the pair spoke Sunday.