Iowa's civil rights protections no longer include gender identity as new law takes effect
The law also explicitly defines female and male based on reproductive organs at birth and removes the ability for people to change the sex designation on their birth certificate.
An unprecedented take-back of legal rights after nearly two decades in Iowa code leaves transgender, nonbinary and potentially even intersex Iowans more vulnerable now than they were before. It's a governing doctrine now widely adopted by President Donald Trump and Republican-led states despite the mainstream medical view that sex and gender are better understood as a spectrum than as an either-or definition.
When Republican Gov. Kim Reynolds signed Iowa's new law, she said the state's previous civil rights code "blurred the biological line between the sexes."
"It's common sense to acknowledge the obvious biological differences between men and women. In fact, it's necessary to secure genuine equal protection for women and girls," she said in a video statement.
Also taking effect Tuesday are provisions in the state's health and human services budget that say Medicaid recipients are no longer covered for gender-affirming surgery or hormone therapy.
A national movement
Iowa's state Capitol filled with protesters as the law went through the Republican-controlled Legislature and to Reynolds' desk in just one week in February. Iowa Republicans said laws passed in recent years to restrict transgender students' use of bathrooms and locker rooms, and their participation on sports teams, could not coexist with a civil rights code that includes gender identity protections.
About two dozen other states and the Trump administration have advanced restrictions on transgender people. Republicans say such laws and executive actions protect spaces for women, rejecting the idea that people can transition to another gender. Many face court challenges.
About two-thirds of U.S. adults believe that whether a person is a man or woman is determined by biological characteristics at birth, an Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research poll conducted in May found. But there's less consensus on policies that target transgender and nonbinary people.
Transgender people say those kinds of policies deny their existence and capitalize on prejudice for political gain.
In a major setback for transgender rights nationwide, the U.S. Supreme Court last month upheld Tennessee's ban on puberty blockers and hormone treatments for transgender minors. The court's conservative majority said it doesn't violate the Constitution's equal protection clause, which requires the government to treat similarly situated people the same.
Not every state includes gender identity in their civil rights code, but Iowa was the first to remove nondiscrimination protections based on gender identity, according to the Movement Advancement Project, an LGBTQ rights think tank.
Incidents of discrimination in Iowa, before and after July 1
Iowans will still have time to file a complaint with the state Office of Civil Rights about discrimination based on gender identity that occurred before the law took effect.
State law requires a complaint to be submitted within 300 days after the most recent incident of alleged discrimination. That means people have until April 27 to file a complaint about discrimination based on gender identity, according to Kristen Stiffler, the office's executive director.
Sixty-five such complaints were filed and accepted for investigation from July 2023 through the end of June 2024, according to Stiffler. Forty-three were filed and accepted from July 1, 2024, through June 19 of this year.
Iowa state Rep. Aime Wichtendahl, a Democrat and the state's first openly transgender lawmaker, fears the law will lead to an increase in discrimination for transgender Iowans.
"Anytime someone has to check your ID and they see that the gender marker doesn't match the appearance, then that opens up hostility, discrimination as possibilities," Wichtendahl said, naming examples such as applying for a job, going through the airport, buying beer or getting pulled over in a traffic stop. "That instantly outs you. That instantly puts you on the spot."
About half of U.S. states include gender identity in their civil rights code to protect against discrimination in housing and public places, such as stores or restaurants, according to the Movement Advancement Project. Some additional states do not explicitly protect against such discrimination, but it is included in legal interpretations of statutes.
Five years ago, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled LGBTQ people are protected by a landmark federal civil rights law that prohibits sex discrimination in the workplace. But Iowa's Supreme Court has expressly rejected the argument that discrimination based on sex includes discrimination based on gender identity.
Changing Iowa birth certificates before the law took effect
The months between when the bill was signed into law and when it took effect gave transgender Iowans time to pursue amended birth certificates before that option was eliminated.
Keenan Crow, with LGBTQ advocacy group One Iowa, said the group has long cosponsored legal clinics to assist with that process.
"The last one that we had was by far the biggest," Crow said.
Iowa's Department of Transportation still has a process by which people can change the gender designation on their license or identification card but has proposed administrative rules to eliminate that option.
Wichtendahl also said she has talked to some families who are looking to move out of state as a result of the new law.
"It's heartbreaking because this is people's lives we're talking about," Wichtendahl added. "These are families that have trans loved ones and it's keeping their loved ones away, it's putting their loved ones into uncertain future, putting their health and safety at risk."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
8 minutes ago
- The Guardian
How Trump's big bill will supercharge his immigration crackdown
Thousands of new immigration enforcement officers. Tens of thousands of new detention beds. New fees on asylum applications. And new construction on the border wall. Donald Trump's sweeping spending bill would vastly expand the federal government's immigration enforcement machinery and, if passed by the House, supercharge the president's plan to carry out what he has vowed will be the largest deportation campaign in US history. The measure would authorize what analysts and advocates describe as a level of immigration enforcement spending without precedent in American history. Trump's so-called 'big, beautiful bill' dedicates roughly $170bn for immigration and border-related operations – a staggering sum that would make US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Ice) the most heavily funded law enforcement agency in the federal government, and that critics warn will unleash more raids, disrupt the economy and severely restrict access to humanitarian protections like asylum. 'We've already seen aggressive, indiscriminate immigration enforcement across the country – and protests in reaction to how horribly it's been carried out,' said Daniel Costa, director of immigration law and policy research at the liberal Economic Policy Institute. 'And we're going to see such a massive increase that most people can't even begin to wrap their heads around it.' The 940-page bill passed the Senate on Tuesday, with JD Vance casting the tie-breaking vote. It now returns to the House, which approved an initial draft by a single vote in May. While some elements of the spending package could still change, the immigration-related provisions in the House and Senate versions are largely aligned. And despite mounting public backlash over the Trump administration's sprawling immigration crackdown – which has separated families and even swept up US citizens – the proposal's 'unimaginable' border enforcement spending has received notably less scrutiny than its tax cuts and deep reductions to social safety net programs like Medicaid. 'It's going to fundamentally transform the immigration system,' said Adriel Orozco, senior policy counsel at the American Immigration Council (AIC). 'It's going to transform our society.' The Senate-passed bill would authorize $45bn to build and operate new immigration detention centers – including facilities for families – marking a 265% increase over Ice's current detention budget and enabling the detention of at least 116,000 non-citizens daily, according to an analysis by theAIC. Experts say language in the bill could allow families to be detained indefinitely, in violation of the Flores settlement, the 1997 consent decree that limits the amount of time children can be detained by immigration officials. The measure would allocate $46.6bn for border wall construction – more than three times what was spent on the barrier during Trump's first term – and provide billions in grant funding to support and expand state and local cooperation with Ice. Though the legislation allots $3.3bn to the agency that oversees the country's immigration court system, it caps the number of immigration judges at 800, despite a massive backlog with millions of pending cases. It also imposes a series of new or elevated fees on immigration services. Asylum seekers – those fleeing persecution – would now be subject to a $100 application fee, plus an additional $100 for every year the application is pending. (The original House bill proposed a $1,000 fee.) Currently there is no fee, and experts warn that the added financial burden would in effect restrict asylum access to those who can afford it. The legislation would also levy new or heightened fees on work permits, nonimmigrant visas and Temporary Protected Status applications, essentially imposing what Orozco calls a 'wealth test' on some of the world's most vulnerable people. An analysis by David Bier, associate director of immigration studies at the libertarian Cato Institute, argues that even without new funding, immigration enforcement spending was already 'extreme'. Congress had allocated nearly $34bn for immigration and border enforcement in fiscal year 2025 – more than double the combined budget for all other federal law enforcement agencies. That amount, according to the report, is about 36 times the IRS's budget for tax enforcement, 21 times the firearms enforcement budget, 13 times the drug enforcement budget, and eight times more than the FBI's. As the bill heads to the House, it has drawn opposition from some fiscal conservatives, who are furious over projections that the package would add $3.3tn to the national deficit over the next decade, according to an analysis by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO). In a recent report based on the House's plan, Bier said CBO fails to account for the lost tax revenue from millions of immigrants who would otherwise contribute more in taxes than they receive in public benefits. He projects that mass deportations enabled by the bill could add nearly $1tn to the deficit – roughly a quarter of the bill's total price tag. The White House insists the enforcement spending is worth it. Before the Tuesday Senate vote, Vance dismissed concerns about social safety net cuts and deficit projections, writing on X: 'The thing that will bankrupt this country more than any other policy is flooding the country with illegal immigration and then giving those migrants generous benefits.' He added that the president's policy package 'fixes this problem'. The proposed spending surge comes as the Trump administration moves aggressively to scale up arrests and deportations of undocumented immigrants. Despite promising a 'worst first' approach focused on violent offenders, Ice arrests of immigrants without any criminal history have skyrocketed since the start of Trump's term, according to a Guardian analysis of federal data. The number spiked even more dramatically after a meeting in late May, during which Stephen Miller, White House deputy chief of staff and chief architect of Trump's hardline immigration policies, set a target of 3,000 arrests a day, or one million per year. 'Right now you have masked agents on the streets, collaborating with other federal law enforcement agencies and local law enforcement agencies, to try to meet these quotas for mass deportation,' Orozco said. 'We're just going to see that at a massively larger scale if this bill gets passed.' Following protests that erupted last month in Los Angeles against the administration's immigration sweeps, Trump has directed immigration officials to prioritize enforcement operations in Democratic-run cities. A new NPR/PBS News/Marist poll found that a majority of Americans – 54% – say they believe Ice operations have gone 'too far' while nearly six in 10 do not agree that the administration's deportation policies are making the country safer. 'There's virtually no support for this mass deportation effort outside of [Trump's] rabid Maga base,' said Matt Barreto, a Democratic pollster who studied Latinos and voter sentiment on immigration for decades. 'Other than that, people want immigrants to work here and to be here and to contribute to America.' As the Senate debated the bill on Tuesday, Trump was in Florida, touring the state's new migrant detention camp built in a remote area of the everglades, known as 'Alligator Alcatraz'. 'This is a model,' Trump declared, 'but we need other states to step up.' Critics say there's little evidence to support the White House's contention that mass deportations will benefit the American workers. 'They're going to be deporting not just workers, but also consumers,' Costa said. 'That's a pretty big share of the workforce that you're going to be impacting.' An analysis published on Tuesday by his colleague at EPI, economist Ben Zipperer, estimates mass deportations would result in the loss of nearly 6 million jobs over the next four years, both for immigrants and US-born workers. 'There is no upside to the mass deportations enabled by the Republican budget bill,' Zipperer wrote. 'They will cause immense harm to workers and families, shrink the economy, and weaken the labor market for everyone.'
Daily Mail
20 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Nancy Mace's overnight 'party bus' antics in pink PJs to rush back for vote on Trump's Big Beautiful Bill
House lawmakers have rushed back to Washington to vote on President Donald Trump 's sweeping domestic agenda taking planes, trains and even a party bus to make it in time. The Senate passed the president's marquee legislative package dubbed the 'Big, Beautiful Bill' on Tuesday setting up the House for a last-second vote on the multi-trillion-dollar tax and spending package before Independence Day on Friday. Trump has repeatedly prodded Congress to pass the bill before then so he can have a signing ceremony at the White House on the federal holiday, but as bad weather snarled Washington's airports, many had their flights canceled. Refusing to let the inclement weather derail her travel plans, Rep. Nancy Mace, R-S.C., decided to ride in style for the overnight drive from her district to D.C. Mace, 47, and her staff posted videos of their half-day journey aboard a decked-out sprinter van with LED lights and plush leather seats. The clips of the impromptu road trip show Mace donning pink heart pajamas while traveling from the Palmetto State to Capitol Hill with her team and her dog named Liberty. 'I'm here to save my country, so come hell or high water, I was gonna get here on time,' she told the Daily Mail just after her arrival. 'We got here five minutes before the first vote.' On the journey Mace and her staffers made stops at road trip staples Wawa and Waffle House. A video posted by the congresswoman's team shows Mace carrying her dog into Wawa and purchasing three Redbull for the overnight voyage. She wanted to keep their driver, a constituent, fueled and alert for the 12-hour ride. When she needed to refuel herself, the South Carolina lawmaker ordered a stop at Waffle House for some breakfast chocolate pie. 'Their chocolate pie is the best,' she admitted, but she was soon disappointed because 'they ran out' of her favorite treat. 'So I had chocolate chip waffles and I had hash browns, and we made sure that they had fresh coffee available,' she told the Daily Mail. It was unclear whether the congresswoman originally had a flight into D.C. that was canceled, as was the case for scores of lawmakers trying to get back in time to vote on Trump's agenda. Fellow South Carolina Republican Rep. Russell Frye, for example, opted to drive to the Capitol from Myrtle Beach after his flight was canceled on Tuesday. Other lawmakers had more harrowing journeys, like Illinois Democrat Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi, who was forced to drive 14 hours from Chicago to D.C. after his flight was canceled. We made it. Drove overnight from IL to vote NO on this Large Lousy Law. — Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi (@CongressmanRaja) July 2, 2025 Both sides of the aisle felt the urgency to return to Capitol Hill to vote for or against Trump's mega-bill, which includes no tax on tips or overtime, funding for border security, reforms to Medicaid and SNAP and many other provisions. Nobody wants to talk about growth, which will be the primary reason that the Big, Beautiful Bill will be one of the most successful pieces of legislation ever passed,' the president posted on social media Wednesday. 'Our Country will make a fortune this year, more than any of our competitors, but only if the Big, Beautiful Bill is passed!' And Trump is personally lobbying on-the-fence lawmakers to get in line and support his agenda. The president has planned meetings at the White House on Wednesday to sway lawmakers who are considering voting against the sweeping, nearly 900-page measure. Following the meeting, the House is expected to take a procedural vote to advance the One Big Beautiful Bill Act.
Reuters
21 minutes ago
- Reuters
What's that smell? Trump unveils new fragrances with his name as the brand
WASHINGTON, July 1 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump is adding fragrances to the growing list of merchandise that bear his name, raising fresh questions about his use of the presidential bully pulpit to hawk products that enrich him and his family. The former New York real estate tycoon, who moved back into the White House in January for his second term, announced this week that a new Trump-branded cologne for men and perfume for women were available for purchase. "Trump Fragrances are here. They're called 'Victory 45-47' because they're all about Winning, Strength and Success," he wrote on his Truth Social account on Monday. Trump, a Republican, served as the 45th U.S. president from 2017-2021 and became the country's 47th president with his 2024 win. The fragrances come in a black box with gold lettering for men and a red box with gold lettering for women. The fragrance containers look like mini statues of Trump. Reaction was swift online, with critics accusing the president of corruption. "There's never been, and I don't think in American history, someone who's stealing so much in plain sight - grifting and graft," U.S. Senator Mark Warner of Virginia said in a video shared on X. Senator Peter Welch, a Democrat from Vermont, noted Trump was advertising the fragrances while Republicans sought to reduce Medicare benefits for low-income Americans in his budget bill. "Senate Democrats are fighting to prevent President Trump from kicking 17 million people off their health care and he's promoting his line of fragrances," Welch said on X. The White House declined to comment about the criticism. The scents are the most recent products that the Trump family has unveiled. In June his family business licensed its name to launch a U.S. Mobile service and a $499 smartphone. The phone was promoted as sleek and gold, Trump's preferred color. The president has said he put his business interests in a trust managed by his children to avoid conflicts of interest, but income from such business ventures will eventually enrich the president, who sits atop the series of Trump family firms. Trump receives income from licensing deals, crypto projects, golf clubs and other ventures. He has also hawked gold sneakers and a "God bless the USA Bible."
