Money for minority and low-income students on chopping block
Why it matters: Indiana has struggled to boost its college-going rate, with just over half of high school graduates choosing to continue onto higher education.
Increasing the number of minority, first-generation and low-income students going to college has been one of the state's strategies to boost educational attainment, as those groups tend to be underrepresented.
Driving the news: Gov. Mike Braun's budget proposal eliminates funding for the College Success Program, created by lawmakers in 2023 with a $2.5 million annual appropriation.
It also eliminates a $2.5 million annual appropriation for Martin University, the state's only predominantly Black higher education institution.
How it works: The College Success Program, administered by the Indiana Commission for Higher Education, has funded college success coaches at nearly two dozen campuses.
They work primarily with 21st Century Scholars, helping them adjust on campus and supporting their persistence through to graduation.
The Indiana University system, awarded 12 coaches, saw more bachelor's degrees earned and increased retention rates at most of its campuses.
What they're saying: Rep. Greg Porter, D-Indianapolis, said Braun's proposal is "wrong on so many levels."
"The last administration realized that this funding would give students of color an equal chance at success," Porter said in a statement. "It was less than a century ago when Black students couldn't live in dorms, had to eat on separate sides of the dining room and couldn't swim in the university pool."
"Sadly, this decision will continue to kill the hopes, dreams and aspirations of many students."
The other side: Braun's office did not respond to a request for comment.
Flashback: Former Gov. Eric Holcomb first proposed the funding, putting $10 million for Martin in his 2023 spending plan.
House Republicans honored that request, provided the money was used for education for high-demand professions.
But Senate Republicans supported the College Success Program, and the final compromise budget divided funding between Martin and the wider program.
Senate President Pro Tempore Rodric Bray, R-Martinsville, told Axios this week it's too early in the budget process to say what his caucus will do, but he still supports the College Success Program.
He said the Martin appropriation was a "one-time investment."
A spokesperson for Martin University did not respond to a request for comment.
Reality check: Braun's proposal is the very beginning of budget negotiations.
The House will introduce its own budget in the coming weeks, followed by the Senate in the second half of the legislative session.
A final budget deal won't be struck until April, likely in the final days of the session.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
22 minutes ago
Search for answers after Texas' deadly floods brings lawmakers to devastated Hill Country
KERRVILLE, Texas -- Texas lawmakers will take their search for answers following the deadly July 4 floods to the heart of the devastation in Kerr County, where local officials were expected to face questions over their response to the disaster that swept away homes and campers along the Guadalupe River. The hearing Thursday is the first time a panel of lawmakers is visiting the hard-hit Texas Hill Country since the floods, which killed at least 136 people. Most were in Kerr County, including 27 young campers and counselors at Camp Mystic, an all-girls summer camp. Among those invited to testify were local leaders who have defended their preparations and response to the fast-rising waters. Residents will also be given the chance to address lawmakers. The hearing comes as authorities have begun publicly releasing records and audio — including 911 calls — that have provided new glimpses into the escalating danger and chaos in the early hours of the July Fourth holiday. They include panicked and confused messages from residents caught in trees as well as families fleeing with children from homes with water creeping up to the knees. 'People are dying,' one woman tells a 911 operator in call logs released by nearby Kendall County. She says she had a young relative at a church camp in Kerr County who was stranded along with his classmates because of the high waters. 'I don't want them to get stuck in a low-water crossing. And what are they going to do? They have like 30 kids," the woman says. Kerr County officials have denied several Texas Public of Information requests filed by The Associated Press for 911 calls and body-camera footage related to the floods. Lawmakers have had to address flood relief amid a busy 30-day legislative special session that has included a highly-partisan sprint by Republicans to redraw the state's maps to pick up five more seats in the U.S. House. Republican Gov. Greg Abbott added flood relief and disaster preparedness to the agenda items shortly after calling a special session in June. He also included redrawing the state's maps after receiving pressure from President Donald Trump, who has said he wants Texas Republicans to squeeze five additional seats. House Democrats have launched a series of protests that have involved fleeing the state to meet with Democratic governors to try and stop Republican redistricting. As the minority party in both chambers, the caucus has few options and lawmakers face up to $500 a day for walking out after they broke a quorum in 2021. Party leaders have said they will not engage in other legislative business until the legislature addresses flood relief. Lawmakers have filed bills to provide funding for early warning systems, improve emergency communications and strengthen flood infrastructure in flood-prone areas. Residents along the Guadalupe River have said they were caught off guard and had no warning when rainfall struck. Kerr County does not have a warning system along the river after several missed opportunities by state and local agencies to finance one. Abbott and Texas Republicans have signaled no appetite for assigning blame for the disaster or second-guessing decisions by local officials, who have described the scale of the disaster as one that no one could have saw coming. At the first hearing by Texas lawmakers this month, Texas' chief emergency management official called for better accreditation for county response officials. Democrats, meanwhile, have questioned if officials had done enough to provide sufficient infrastructure for flood-prone areas in rural counties.
San Francisco Chronicle
2 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Long before calls to disband ICE, there was a movement to end the INS
On May 23, 1980, around 1,000 people, representing some 200 organizations from every border state, Colorado, Chicago and nearby Tijuana, assembled in San Diego for the National Chicano Immigration Conference by the Committee on Chicano Rights (CCR), a local grassroots activist group advocating for its community's self-determination. The historic meeting was a culmination of years of collective rage against increasing violence emanating from the U.S. Border Patrol, police and vigilantes against Mexican migrants. Attendees determined that the current immigration system, built by Republicans and Democrats, could not be reformed, noting that the very category of 'illegal alien' was invented to exploit Mexican immigrants' labor. And so, they put forward a call for the 'abolishment of the INS/border patrol,' rejecting militarization as a solution to the U.S. immigration issue. 'Abolishment' was not a cynical call to start over. It was a means to imagine a more democratic border policy from the perspective of those most affected by it and end a system that took advantage of virtually rightless laborers. That framework continues to guide social movements seeking the abolition of the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) today. While people had always moved between the U.S.-Mexico border, migration increased exponentially after the U.S. government, facing a labor shortage in World War II, established the Bracero Program, which brought millions of Mexican contract workers to the U.S. After the program's termination in 1964, U.S. employers — now dependent on cheap, imported labor — continued recruiting Mexican migrant workers at the same pace. They did so despite a 40,000-person cap imposed by the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965. This created a growing population of vulnerable, undocumented workers in the 1960s and '70s who increasingly faced brutal apprehensions. The aggression was especially evident in the San Diego-Tijuana region, where migrants reported experiencing police brutality, family separation through deportation, wage theft and other types of abuse. Chicano activists mobilized resistance. They documented reports of heinous strip-searches by border agents from hundreds of women of Mexican origin, along with other accounts of Border Patrol violence, and angrily wrote to government officials. In 1972, they succeeded in obtaining a congressional hearing that brought widespread attention to the issue of Border Patrol violence, but little structural change. As apprehensions surpassed 1 million and continued climbing during President Jimmy Carter's administration, the CCR was among the Chicano Movement activist confronting the police violence, media scapegoating, and deportations targeting their communities. Despite their efforts, elected officials continued to make concessions to employers who hired undocumented migrants and increase border policing. By the time the CCR convened the 1980 conference, the continued escalation of violence had convinced activists: abolishment, not reform, was the only way forward. There, in San Diego's St. Rita Catholic Church, under banners of Cuban revolutionary hero Ernesto 'Che' Guevara and Mexican Revolution leader Emiliano Zapata and the flags of Mexico, the U.S., and the United Farm Workers, conference attendees broke out into workshops to come up with solutions to immigration policy problems. The Chicano/Mexicano Perspective Workshop, notably, considered an argument La Raza Unida Party had introduced as early as 1972 — that the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, which ended the 1848 U.S.-Mexico War and granted U.S. citizenship to Mexicans living on land captured by the U.S., should also apply for 'easy entry of Mejicanos into the U.S. at any time.' This perspective defied the notion that Mexican-origin people were foreigners, positing that in fact they held legal rights to the territory. Activists also extended this anti-imperialist analysis to call for 'abolishing all quotas on immigration from countries where the USA has political, economic and military domination.' The following year, attendees reconvened at the 1981 National Chicano Immigration Tribunal, where migrants and advocates testified to further incidents of violence, including the deaths of two children denied access to crossing the border. CCR sent these accounts, as well as the resolutions that had come out of the 1980 conference, to the presidents of the U.S. and Mexico, Ronald Reagan and Jose López Portillo. This laid the groundwork for the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 (IRCA), which created a pathway to citizenship protection for 3 million. However, the IRCA ignored Chicano abolitionists' fundamental call for change. Instead, it further militarized the border by allocating resources for more police, military equipment and infrastructure. In 2025, immigration policy in the U.S. remains compromised by bipartisan interests that rely on immigrant labor but perceive immigrants themselves as a threat. But CCR's conference and tribunal show there is another way forward. And their proclamation 45 years ago — to reject the exploitation and racial violence of U.S. immigration system and to create something better led by those most impacted by the policy — continues to be advanced by advocates, organizers and community members who push for fundamental change today. It's no coincidence that the 1,000-page tribunal document activists sent to Reagan and López Portillo began with the words of the formerly enslaved leader, Frederick Douglass. 'Power concedes nothing without a demand,' it noted. 'The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those whom they oppress.'
Washington Post
2 hours ago
- Washington Post
Most Democrats vote for failed resolutions to block arms sales to Israel
More than half of Senate Democrats voted for two resolutions Wednesday night to block weapons sales to Israel, highlighting the party's growing frustration with Israel's handling of the war in Gaza nearly two years after Hamas's attack on Israel. The Senate rejected both resolutions introduced by Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vermont). The first, which would block the sale of tens of thousands of assault rifles, failed 70-27. The second, which would block the sale of $675.7 million of bombs and other materiel to Israel, failed 73-24.
