Investors call on chemical firms to phase out toxic substances
The group of 43 investors, with four trillion dollars in assets under management, warned that the sector is not acting fast enough to protect vital ecosystems and human health.
In a statement released on Thursday, they urged companies, including agrochemical producers, to commit to aligning their business and political strategies with globally agreed targets.
This includes the UN Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework and Global Framework on Chemicals, which focus on protecting nature and tackling environmental harm caused by chemicals and waste.
The investors say companies must enhance their sharing of information on how their business impacts biodiversity as well as develop strategies to transition to making products that are safe and sustainable.
Failing to address chemical pollution exposes companies and their investors to financial risks, they argued.
The group highlighted how increased public awareness and scientific understanding of the long-term health and environmental consequences of chemicals has led to a rise in litigation and regulation.
The statement has been co-ordinated by responsible investment group ShareAction, Achmea Investment Management, ChemSec, Erste Asset Management, IEHN of Clean Production Action, Planet Tracker and Mercy Investment Services.
Signatories include BNP Paribas Asset Management, Rathbones Group, Caisse des Depots et Consignations, SVVK-ASIR, Swedbank Robur and Impax Asset Management.
It comes as Government officials, business leaders, scientists and campaigners gather in Uruguay this week for discussions on the next phase in the UN Global Framework on Chemicals.
Alexandra Pinzon, head of biodiversity at ShareAction, said: 'Chemical companies have a huge role to play in curbing pollution, which would help address the interlinked crises of biodiversity loss and climate change.
'The majority of manufactured products, from fertilisers and paints to make-up and clothes, rely on chemicals, but the toxicity and pollution associated with these chemicals is wreaking havoc on ecosystems and damaging human health.'
Julie Gorte, senior vice president for sustainable investing at Impax Asset Management, said: 'This statement on the importance of tackling pollution and biodiversity loss has never been more welcome.
'If we want to avoid a planetary catastrophe, we must all act to achieve a circular economy and eliminate the pollution that is one of the major drivers of biodiversity loss.'
Arthur van Mansvelt, senior engagement specialist at Achmea Investment Management, said: 'This statement shows investors are deeply concerned that the chemicals sector is not sufficiently mitigating the risks related to biodiversity loss from pollution.'
In a separate policy-focused statement, more than 40 investors with nearly four trillion dollars in assets under management also highlighted the crucial role that regulation plays in enabling the transition of the chemicals industry to safe and sustainable products.
The group outlined recommendations for governments around the world to strengthen and harmonise global policy frameworks on chemicals to support this transition.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
Thermo Fisher raises annual profit forecast on resilient demand for its tools and services
July 23 (Reuters) - Thermo Fisher (TMO.N), opens new tab on Wednesday raised the lower end of its annual profit forecast, banking on strong demand for its tools and services used in drug development and said the tariff situation was improving. Shares of the company were up 10% in early trading. As some of the trade tensions show signs of easing, peers such as Danaher (DHR.N), opens new tab have also cited a steady demand from pharmaceutical clients. "The US-China tariff situation has improved significantly versus our prior guidance assumptions," said Chief Financial Officer Stephen Williamson in a post earnings call. The medical equipment maker now expects annual adjusted profit of $22.22 to $22.84 per share, compared to its previous estimate of $21.76 and $22.84 per share. Analysts on average were expecting $22.32 per share. The company also beat quarterly profit estimates, helped by strong sales in its laboratory products segment. Danaher (DHR.N), opens new tab on Tuesday raised its annual profit forecast citing strong demand for tools and services used to make vaccines and therapies, and said it is seeing a robust number of clinical trials and therapies under development. On an adjusted basis, Thermo Fisher reported a profit of $5.36 per share for the quarter ended June 28, beating analysts' estimate of $5.22 per share, as per data compiled by LSEG. The company said its business strategy is helping adjust its supply chains in the tariff environment and to actively manage its cost base. Thermo Fisher also announced that CFO Williamson has decided to retire, effective March 31, 2026, and named Jim Meyer, currently vice president of financial operations, as Williamson's successor to the role. The Waltham Massachusetts-based company's quarterly revenue rose 3% to $10.85 billion, compared to analyst estimates of $10.68 billion. Sales at its laboratory products segment, which makes up more than half of Thermo Fisher's total sales came in at $6 billion, above estimates of $5.79 billion.
Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
Foreign demand for US Treasuries holds off bond vigilantes
ORLANDO, Florida, July 23 (Reuters) - So much for the bond vigilantes. The U.S. bond market has been remarkably calm lately, despite fears that inflation, tariffs, eroding Fed independence, and Washington's ballooning debt load will push up Treasury yields. What explains the resilience? The above concerns remain valid, of course, as any one of them could eventually cast a long shadow over the world's largest and most important market. But that doesn't seem to be on the immediate horizon. The so-called bond vigilantes - those investors determined to bring profligate governments into line by forcing up their borrowing costs - might have been driving bond prices lower earlier this year, but they are taking a back seat now. The 10-year Treasury yield on Tuesday closed at 4.34%. That's below the year-to-date average of 4.40%, and less than 10 basis points above the one- and two-year averages. Perhaps even more surprising, implied Treasury market volatility is hovering at its lowest levels in three-and-a-half years, further evidence that investors have little fear of an imminent spike in borrowing costs. The obvious explanation is that demand for Treasuries has picked up, investors lured back into the market by attractive yields on 10-year bonds approaching 5% and even juicer returns on 30-year paper. Concern about an economic slowdown, and thus lower interest rates, is likely adding fuel to this trend. A lot of this demand has likely come from overseas, based on the latest release of Treasury International Capital flows data. Admittedly, these figures are released with a lag, but they are among the most reliable and closely tracked of all international flows information. The TIC data show that the foreign official and private sectors bought a net $146.3 billion of U.S. Treasury notes and bonds in May on a non valuation-adjusted basis. That's the second-highest monthly total ever. And if you include corporate debt, agency bonds and equities, total foreign purchases of U.S. securities in May were the highest on record. Private sector investors accounted for roughly 80% of that total. Their holdings of U.S. Treasuries began to outstrip official holdings a few years ago, and that trend seems to be accelerating. They now hold over $5 trillion, compared to the official sector's $4 trillion. Bank of America's U.S. rates strategy team notes that outsized foreign private demand has also been evident in more recent flows data, particularly from Japanese investors who have bought more than $60 billion in overseas bonds since the start of May. Demand from private sector buyers like pension funds is generally thought to be more price-sensitive than reserve managers and sovereign wealth funds, who are more inclined to buy and hold for the very long term. Will the back end of the yield curve remain resilient? This will obviously depend in part on what happens in the U.S. economy. But there are a few exogenous factors that could boost demand moving forward, including potential regulatory changes to the U.S. banking system and the accelerated adoption of cryptocurrency stablecoins. First, the Fed has proposed revisions to the supplementary leverage ratio, which would free up capital for banks to hold more Treasuries. That could generate an estimated $1.1 trillion in extra buying capacity. Next, the increased use of stablecoins, digital tokens that are pegged 1:1 to highly liquid assets like T-bills, short-dated bonds or the U.S. dollar, could drive demand for shorter-dated Treasuries. The House of Representatives last week passed a bill to create a regulatory framework for stablecoins, and U.S. President Donald Trump is expected to sign it into law soon. Despite all this, there are still plenty of bond bears out there with good reasons to be bearish, not least the $1 trillion flood of new debt issuance expected before this year is out. But what the market action in the first half of this year has shown – filled as it has been with heightened uncertainty around tariffs, geopolitics, deficits and the Fed – is that bond market selloffs aren't likely to last long. That's partly because of the lack of a true alternative. The near-$30 trillion Treasury market is bigger than the Chinese, Japanese, French, UK and Italian government bond markets combined. And it is more than ten times bigger than the German Bund market, the euro zone's premium safe-haven asset. Underlying demand is stronger than the vigilantes have bargained for. (The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters)
BBC News
3 hours ago
- BBC News
What the US-Japan trade deal means for Asia and the world
US President Donald Trump has called the agreement he reached with Japan the "largest trade deal in history".It might be premature to make such claims, but it's certainly the most significant deal since Trump announced his so-called Liberation Day tariffs in April which roiled stock markets and created chaos for global trade. After months of negotiations, Japan's Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba said he expects the deal will help the global economy. It is a big claim. The BBC examines whether it will and if so, how? Japan Inc Japan is the world's fourth largest economy, meaning it accounts for a large part of global trade and growth. Tokyo imports a great deal of energy and food from overseas and is dependent on exports including electronics, machinery and motor vehicles. The US is its biggest export experts had warned that Trump's tariffs could knock as much as a percentage point off Japan's economy, pushing it into lower tariffs, exporters will be able to do business in the US more cheaply than if Trump had stuck to an earlier threat to levy higher the deal brings certainty, which allows businesses to announcement also strengthened the Japanese yen against the US dollar, giving manufacturers more purchasing power to buy the raw materials they need to expand their US agreement is particularly good for Japan's auto giants like Toyota, Honda and Nissan. Previously, American importers had to pay a 27.5% levy when they shipped in Japanese cars. That is now being reduced to 15%, potentially making Japanese cars cheaper compared to the likes of rival said that, US automakers have signalled they are unhappy with the deal. They are concerned they have to pay a 25% tariff on imports from their plants and suppliers in Canada and Mexico compared with Japan's 15% rate. Jobs and more deals In return for reduced tariffs, Japan has proposed investing $550bn in the US to enable Japanese firms "to build resilient supply chains in key sectors like pharmaceuticals and semiconductors," Ishiba is already a major investor in the US, but this amount of money should create jobs, make quality products and foster the deal, Trump said Japan will increase purchases of agricultural products such as US rice which could help the country's rice shortage - even if it might rattle local farmers concerned about losing market share. The 15% tariff is also a benchmark for other countries like South Korea and Taiwan who are holding their own trade negotiations with the US. South Korea's industry minister said he will take a close look at the terms of what Japan has agreed with the US as he headed to Washington for crunch trade and South Korea compete in industries like steel and broadly, the US and Japan deal will put more pressure on other countries - especially major Asia exporters - to secure better agreements before a 1 August deadline. Deals with Indonesia and the Philippines have already been announcedBut some Asian countries will suffer. Smaller economies like Cambodia, Laos and Sri Lanka are manufacturing exporters and they have little to offer Washington in terms of trade or investment. Did the US get what it wants? There were reports that the US had called on Japan to increase military spending. But Tokyo's tariff envoy has clarified that the deal does not include anything on defence spending. Ryosei Akazawa added that steel and aluminium tariffs would remain at 50%.These both may be wins for Japan, since it exports more vehicles to the US than it does steel and aluminium. The pressure is also on the US to get as many of these deals over the line before its self-imposed tariff August deadline. Alongside negotiations with the US, countries might start looking for more reliable partners the same day as Washington and Toyko announced their agreement, Japan and Europe pledged to "work more closely together to counter economic coercion and to address unfair trade practices," according European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen. The European Union is yet to agree a trade deal with the US."We believe in global competitiveness and it should benefit everyone," said Ms von der Leyen.
