logo
Investors call on chemical firms to phase out toxic substances

Investors call on chemical firms to phase out toxic substances

Independent25-06-2025
A coalition of investors is calling on chemical companies to phase out highly hazardous chemicals and transition to safer alternatives.
The group of 43 investors, with four trillion dollars in assets under management, warned that the sector is not acting fast enough to protect vital ecosystems and human health.
In a statement released on Thursday, they urged companies, including agrochemical producers, to commit to aligning their business and political strategies with globally agreed targets.
This includes the UN Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework and Global Framework on Chemicals, which focus on protecting nature and tackling environmental harm caused by chemicals and waste.
The investors say companies must enhance their sharing of information on how their business impacts biodiversity as well as develop strategies to transition to making products that are safe and sustainable.
Failing to address chemical pollution exposes companies and their investors to financial risks, they argued.
The group highlighted how increased public awareness and scientific understanding of the long-term health and environmental consequences of chemicals has led to a rise in litigation and regulation.
The statement has been co-ordinated by responsible investment group ShareAction, Achmea Investment Management, ChemSec, Erste Asset Management, IEHN of Clean Production Action, Planet Tracker and Mercy Investment Services.
Signatories include BNP Paribas Asset Management, Rathbones Group, Caisse des Depots et Consignations, SVVK-ASIR, Swedbank Robur and Impax Asset Management.
It comes as Government officials, business leaders, scientists and campaigners gather in Uruguay this week for discussions on the next phase in the UN Global Framework on Chemicals.
Alexandra Pinzon, head of biodiversity at ShareAction, said: 'Chemical companies have a huge role to play in curbing pollution, which would help address the interlinked crises of biodiversity loss and climate change.
'The majority of manufactured products, from fertilisers and paints to make-up and clothes, rely on chemicals, but the toxicity and pollution associated with these chemicals is wreaking havoc on ecosystems and damaging human health.'
Julie Gorte, senior vice president for sustainable investing at Impax Asset Management, said: 'This statement on the importance of tackling pollution and biodiversity loss has never been more welcome.
'If we want to avoid a planetary catastrophe, we must all act to achieve a circular economy and eliminate the pollution that is one of the major drivers of biodiversity loss.'
Arthur van Mansvelt, senior engagement specialist at Achmea Investment Management, said: 'This statement shows investors are deeply concerned that the chemicals sector is not sufficiently mitigating the risks related to biodiversity loss from pollution.'
In a separate policy-focused statement, more than 40 investors with nearly four trillion dollars in assets under management also highlighted the crucial role that regulation plays in enabling the transition of the chemicals industry to safe and sustainable products.
The group outlined recommendations for governments around the world to strengthen and harmonise global policy frameworks on chemicals to support this transition.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

McGraw Hill notches $3.25 billion valuation in NYSE debut as shares open at par
McGraw Hill notches $3.25 billion valuation in NYSE debut as shares open at par

Reuters

time15 hours ago

  • Reuters

McGraw Hill notches $3.25 billion valuation in NYSE debut as shares open at par

July 24 (Reuters) - U.S. publisher McGraw Hill (MH.N), opens new tab was valued at $3.25 billion and its shares opened at par in their New York debut on Thursday, hinting at a mixed response from investors in the IPO market. IPO market activity has rebounded strongly following a significant setback earlier in the year caused by tariff tensions, although investors have remained selective in their investment choices. Advent-backed consumer insights company NIQ Global's (NIQ.N), opens new tab shares dipped 3.6% in their NYSE debut on Wednesday, while a bunch of others are choosing to stay private to bypass the market uncertainty. Meanwhile, digital bank Chime (CHYM.O), opens new tab and stablecoin issuer Circle's (CRCL.N), opens new tab shares were lapped up by investors on their respective first trading days, marking blowout debuts for both. McGraw Hill's shares opened at $17 apiece, at par with its IPO price of $17.

Wise co-founder accuses £10bn fintech of 'misleading' investors
Wise co-founder accuses £10bn fintech of 'misleading' investors

Sky News

time16 hours ago

  • Sky News

Wise co-founder accuses £10bn fintech of 'misleading' investors

The fintech entrepreneur who has gone to war with the £10bn payments company he co-founded has accused it of 'misleading' its own investors and warned that a move to extend its current governance arrangements could be derailed in court. In a statement issued to Sky News, Taavet Hinrikus's investment vehicle, Skaala, said Wise's claim that its proposals to extend its dual-class share structure by a decade when it moves its main listing to the US should have been updated through a formal stock exchange announcement. Mr Hinrikus is angry that the voting share structure has been wrapped up in a wider vote on the move to the US, which he says is undemocratic and unfair on investors. "On 21 July, Wise released a market announcement claiming that 'three key independent proxy advisory firms - ISS, Glass Lewis and PIRC - have come out unanimously in favour of the proposal and recommend shareholders vote for it'," Skaala said. "This statement has subsequently been proven to be misleading. "In reality, PIRC's report - issued on 15 July - explicitly recommended shareholders vote against the scheme, citing serious concerns about governance. "Investors are overwhelmingly influenced by the views of professional proxy advisors. "Wise should have made a corrective announcement via RNS to update the market. "Skaala called for this immediately on learning of the issue, but Wise instead chose to quietly issue a statement on its website on 23 July 2025 with no accompanying statement to the market." It is the latest salvo in an escalating row between Skaala, which owns just over 5% of Wise's shares, and the company - which continues to be run by his co-founder, Kristo Kaarmann. Glass Lewis and ISS have both amended their reports since the public disclosure of the dispute on Monday, although neither has changed their voting recommendations. Mr Hinrikus also said that Wise's chairman, David Wells, had claimed incorrectly that "Skaala's call to separate the extension of dual-class rights from the US listing 'misrepresents how a scheme of arrangement operates legally and in practice'". He accused Mr Wells of making claims which were "legally and commercially unfounded". "Skaala has put forward several practical, legally viable options for Wise to address shareholder concerns," it told Sky News on Thursday. "These include proposing two alternative schemes of arrangement - both facilitating the US dual-listing, but offering shareholders the choice to approve it either with or without the 10-year extension of the dual-class voting rights. "These alternatives have been clearly set out in Skaala's correspondence with Wise and referenced in Glass Lewis's Report Feedback Statement to its clients. "Wise has thus far rejected these proposals out of hand." Skaala also claimed there was "a substantial risk the [High] Court will decline to sanction [the proposals] at the sanctions hearing in [the second quarter of 2026], given the procedural, fairness and transparency issues surrounding the scheme as presented". " In such a scenario, the dual listing would be materially delayed - possibly by months - and significant cost and risk would be introduced unnecessarily. "Should Wise only seek to restructure the Scheme after a failed Court sanction, any new scheme would face further delays and risk regulatory clearances being lost or needing to be reobtained. "This entirely avoidable situation is the direct result of the Company's insistence on securing enhanced voting rights for CEO Kristo Käärmann under the current proposal," Skaala said. Wise's existing dual-class structure was put in place in 2021, when the company floated in London with a pledge that it would revert to a single class of shares five years after its stock market debut. In response, Wise said PIRC's recommendation to shareholders to vote in favour of the company's plans was contained in a report submitted to it on July 10. "We were made aware [on July 23] that PIRC had made available reports to subscribers on 15 July 2025 that recommended against the proposal.

Cheaper Model Y Can't Come Soon Enough As Tesla's Profits Tank Again
Cheaper Model Y Can't Come Soon Enough As Tesla's Profits Tank Again

Auto Blog

time17 hours ago

  • Auto Blog

Cheaper Model Y Can't Come Soon Enough As Tesla's Profits Tank Again

By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime. View post: Which is the Cooler Rally‑Car Homage: MAT New Stratos or the Kimera Automobili EVO37? Tesla's rough year continues It doesn't seem that long ago that Tesla was an unstoppable force, as it experienced an unprecedented rate of growth. While the Model 3 and Model Y continue to sell strongly, Tesla's latest Q2 quarterly results continue to demonstrate a sharp decline for the EV giant. In an earnings conference call, Elon Musk focused on automated driving software, robots, and robotaxies, rather than vehicle sales, as he tried to paint a more positive picture of the company's future. Let's take a more detailed look at the numbers. Previous Pause Next Unmute 0:00 / 0:09 Full screen 2025 Nissan Z undercuts Toyota Supra by a surprising amount Watch More Revenue And Profits Both Tumble In Q2 Tesla Model X — Source: Tesla In Q2 of 2025, Tesla's revenue dropped 12% and profits were down by 16% year-on-year, due to a sharp decline in sales, reports The Globe And Mail. Revenue was down from $25.5 billion to $22.5 billion, while quarterly profits dropped from $1.4 billion to $1.17 billion. In premarket trading on Thursday, Tesla's shares dropped by close to 7%, and its stock is down by around 18% so far in 2025, according to Reuters. Elon Musk's political controversies are widely believed to have damaged Tesla's image. This, together with stronger and stronger competition, has resulted in the decline we're witnessing in 2025. Furthermore, the groundbreaking Cybertruck was expected to take over the electric pickup segment, but that hasn't happened. 'Musk is the face of Tesla, and for many people, the brand can't exist outside of his influence. So, when his credibility and trust decline, so does the equity of the Tesla brand', said Daniel Binns, Global CEO at Elmwood. Musk Predicts More Struggles, Confirms Cheaper Model Y Parked 2025 Tesla Model Ys — Source: Tesla In the earnings call, Musk admitted that the company expects a 'few rough quarters' in the near future. Contributing to this is the fact that federal tax incentives for EVs are falling away at the end of September, which will significantly affect the value proposition of Tesla's two high-volume cars, the Model Y and Model 3. Many expected a cheaper car to boost Tesla's fortunes, but this vehicle won't be an all-new car. 'It's just a Model Y,' said Musk when talking about the lower-cost EV, reports Inside EVs. 'Let the cat out of the bag there,' he said. Autoblog Newsletter Autoblog brings you car news; expert reviews and exciting pictures and video. Research and compare vehicles, too. Sign up or sign in with Google Facebook Microsoft Apple By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime. 'We continue to expand our vehicle offering, including first builds of a more affordable model in June, with volume production planned for the second half of 2025,' said Tesla. We don't expect anything close to the once-promised $25,000 EV. Now that we know a cheaper Model Y is coming, a less powerful version that starts at below $40k looks likelier. 'We're in this weird transition period where we'll lose a lot of incentives in the U.S.,' Musk said. 'Once you get to autonomy at scale in the second half of next year, certainly by the end of next year, I would be surprised if Tesla's economics are not very compelling.' Musk is known for his hyperbolic promises, so we would take that statement with a pinch of salt. It's clear that Tesla has an image problem, and changing that with Musk still at the helm is going to be an uphill battle. About the Author Karl Furlong View Profile

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store