logo
Pa. public schools may be liable if they fail to prevent student-on-student sexual abuse

Pa. public schools may be liable if they fail to prevent student-on-student sexual abuse

Yahoo12-06-2025
(Philadelphia Tribune photo)
A Philadelphia high school student who was sexually assaulted by classmates can sue the school district under an exception to governmental immunity for sexual abuse, a Commonwealth Court panel ruled this week.
The seven-judge panel ruled unanimously in favor of the intellectually disabled 10th grader and her parents. The decision clarified that a school district may be held liable for negligence leading to a student's sexual assault by a third party and its responsibility is not limited to abuse by school employees.
Lawyers for the girl, who is identified only by the initials L.F.M. in court documents, and an education advocate said the decision significantly improves protection for students.
'Today is a better day for children,' said Nadeem Bezar of Kline & Specter, who brought the lawsuit on behalf of the girl and her parents with co-counsel Helen Lawless. 'We are happy that the Commonwealth Court interpreted the statute the way the legislature intended. We understand the case still has a ways to go. But today is a step in the right direction.'
Spokesperson Monique Braxton said the School District of Philadelphia is reviewing the decision and anticipates seeking review by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court.
'The district values the safety of our students and staff. If a student sees something that they feel is concerning, we encourage them to share their concerns with their parents, teachers, and other district staff,' Braxton said in a statement. 'We all play a role in keeping our schools and communities safe, and encourage students, staff, and families to say something if they see something.'
According to the lawsuit, L.F.M. was enrolled in a co-ed gym class at South Philadelphia High School with other students with disabilities and learning impairments. In October 2021, two classmates pushed her behind the bleachers, sexually assaulted her and demanded that she go into a bathroom to take and share sexually explicit images.
One of the students continued to harass and demand explicit images from L.F.M. by telephone that evening, when the girl's mother overheard. The girl told her mother what had happened in school and the mother reported the assault to the district and police, the suit says.
The lawsuit alleges the school district failed to ensure that its employees properly supervised students in the gym class, permitting the girl's attackers to carry out the assault. It claims the district is liable for negligently permitting the assault.
The Commonwealth Court decision centers on a relatively new addition to the state law that limits tort liability for public agencies in Pennsylvania. The Political Subdivision and Torts Claims Act (PSTCA) grants immunity to government entities except under a handful of scenarios and limits damages to $500,000.
As part of a legislative package to secure justice for victims of childhood abuse, former state Rep. Mark Rozzi (D-Berks) won approval of the sexual assault exception. Signed into law by Gov. Tom Wolf in 2019, it allows individuals to sue public schools if they are victims of acts that would constitute criminal sexual assault under state law.
In response to L.F.M.'s lawsuit, the Philadelphia School District argued the exception applies only to acts by the district and employees. A Philadelphia judge rejected the district's argument and it appealed in Commonwealth Court. The student's lawyers argued the exception permits claims for sexual abuse by a third-party, such as other students, if it results from negligent actions or omissions by the school district.
In an opinion by Judge Lori Dumas, the court found the purpose of the exception was to hold public entities accountable for enabling abusers and to expand the rights of victims to sue.
Dumas cited Rozzi's statement in a 'friend-of-the-court brief' that the purpose was not to hold institutions accountable for employing abusers but for enabling abusers to carry out their crimes against children.
The district claimed the primary purpose of the PSTCA is to protect taxpayers and that broadly interpreting the exception could impede the district's financial ability to serve its 200,000 students.
'We must presume the legislature also recognized its duty of protecting the public fisc, including the potential monetary harm to municipalities from large tort recoveries,' Dumas wrote. 'Upon balancing those duties, the legislature nevertheless enacted an exception to governmental immunity, removed the damages cap, and extended the statute of limitations. We cannot reweigh those considerations.'
Maura McInerney, legal director at the Education Law Center, a nonprofit legal advocacy organization dedicated to ensuring access to education, said the decision makes clear that public schools have an obligation to protect children so that incidents such as the one in the lawsuit cannot happen.
'I think the case should send a powerful message to school districts,' McInerney said, adding that the plaintiffs in the case still have to show that the district's actions or omissions have a causal relationship to the assault.
Rozzi, who was raped by a priest as a child, drew on his experience as a sexual abuse survivor to champion victims' rights in the General Assembly. In addition to the PSTCA exception, he succeeded in passing laws to extend the statute of limitations for survivors to pursue civil claims against abusers and enablers until age 55. He also won approval of a law to eliminate the criminal statute of limitations for sexual offenses.
Before he retired after six terms in the state House last year, Rozzi had also pursued a state constitutional amendment to provide a two-year window for survivors to pursue civil sexual abuse claims, regardless of their age. Although the legislation failed, it was reintroduced this session and passed in the House again Monday. The bill will now be considered in the Senate.
Rozzi said the Commonwealth Court ruling would help school districts 'analyze their policies to protect children thoroughly and extensively.'
'It is a matter of life and death, and they are in your hands when they're here in your school,' Rozzi said, adding that a moment of inattention by a school employee could be tragic. 'In that 10 or 15 minutes, that's all it takes for a child to be raped.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Pa. public schools may be liable if they fail to prevent student-on-student sexual abuse
Pa. public schools may be liable if they fail to prevent student-on-student sexual abuse

Yahoo

time12-06-2025

  • Yahoo

Pa. public schools may be liable if they fail to prevent student-on-student sexual abuse

(Philadelphia Tribune photo) A Philadelphia high school student who was sexually assaulted by classmates can sue the school district under an exception to governmental immunity for sexual abuse, a Commonwealth Court panel ruled this week. The seven-judge panel ruled unanimously in favor of the intellectually disabled 10th grader and her parents. The decision clarified that a school district may be held liable for negligence leading to a student's sexual assault by a third party and its responsibility is not limited to abuse by school employees. Lawyers for the girl, who is identified only by the initials L.F.M. in court documents, and an education advocate said the decision significantly improves protection for students. 'Today is a better day for children,' said Nadeem Bezar of Kline & Specter, who brought the lawsuit on behalf of the girl and her parents with co-counsel Helen Lawless. 'We are happy that the Commonwealth Court interpreted the statute the way the legislature intended. We understand the case still has a ways to go. But today is a step in the right direction.' Spokesperson Monique Braxton said the School District of Philadelphia is reviewing the decision and anticipates seeking review by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court. 'The district values the safety of our students and staff. If a student sees something that they feel is concerning, we encourage them to share their concerns with their parents, teachers, and other district staff,' Braxton said in a statement. 'We all play a role in keeping our schools and communities safe, and encourage students, staff, and families to say something if they see something.' According to the lawsuit, L.F.M. was enrolled in a co-ed gym class at South Philadelphia High School with other students with disabilities and learning impairments. In October 2021, two classmates pushed her behind the bleachers, sexually assaulted her and demanded that she go into a bathroom to take and share sexually explicit images. One of the students continued to harass and demand explicit images from L.F.M. by telephone that evening, when the girl's mother overheard. The girl told her mother what had happened in school and the mother reported the assault to the district and police, the suit says. The lawsuit alleges the school district failed to ensure that its employees properly supervised students in the gym class, permitting the girl's attackers to carry out the assault. It claims the district is liable for negligently permitting the assault. The Commonwealth Court decision centers on a relatively new addition to the state law that limits tort liability for public agencies in Pennsylvania. The Political Subdivision and Torts Claims Act (PSTCA) grants immunity to government entities except under a handful of scenarios and limits damages to $500,000. As part of a legislative package to secure justice for victims of childhood abuse, former state Rep. Mark Rozzi (D-Berks) won approval of the sexual assault exception. Signed into law by Gov. Tom Wolf in 2019, it allows individuals to sue public schools if they are victims of acts that would constitute criminal sexual assault under state law. In response to L.F.M.'s lawsuit, the Philadelphia School District argued the exception applies only to acts by the district and employees. A Philadelphia judge rejected the district's argument and it appealed in Commonwealth Court. The student's lawyers argued the exception permits claims for sexual abuse by a third-party, such as other students, if it results from negligent actions or omissions by the school district. In an opinion by Judge Lori Dumas, the court found the purpose of the exception was to hold public entities accountable for enabling abusers and to expand the rights of victims to sue. Dumas cited Rozzi's statement in a 'friend-of-the-court brief' that the purpose was not to hold institutions accountable for employing abusers but for enabling abusers to carry out their crimes against children. The district claimed the primary purpose of the PSTCA is to protect taxpayers and that broadly interpreting the exception could impede the district's financial ability to serve its 200,000 students. 'We must presume the legislature also recognized its duty of protecting the public fisc, including the potential monetary harm to municipalities from large tort recoveries,' Dumas wrote. 'Upon balancing those duties, the legislature nevertheless enacted an exception to governmental immunity, removed the damages cap, and extended the statute of limitations. We cannot reweigh those considerations.' Maura McInerney, legal director at the Education Law Center, a nonprofit legal advocacy organization dedicated to ensuring access to education, said the decision makes clear that public schools have an obligation to protect children so that incidents such as the one in the lawsuit cannot happen. 'I think the case should send a powerful message to school districts,' McInerney said, adding that the plaintiffs in the case still have to show that the district's actions or omissions have a causal relationship to the assault. Rozzi, who was raped by a priest as a child, drew on his experience as a sexual abuse survivor to champion victims' rights in the General Assembly. In addition to the PSTCA exception, he succeeded in passing laws to extend the statute of limitations for survivors to pursue civil claims against abusers and enablers until age 55. He also won approval of a law to eliminate the criminal statute of limitations for sexual offenses. Before he retired after six terms in the state House last year, Rozzi had also pursued a state constitutional amendment to provide a two-year window for survivors to pursue civil sexual abuse claims, regardless of their age. Although the legislation failed, it was reintroduced this session and passed in the House again Monday. The bill will now be considered in the Senate. Rozzi said the Commonwealth Court ruling would help school districts 'analyze their policies to protect children thoroughly and extensively.' 'It is a matter of life and death, and they are in your hands when they're here in your school,' Rozzi said, adding that a moment of inattention by a school employee could be tragic. 'In that 10 or 15 minutes, that's all it takes for a child to be raped.'

Nevada woman sentenced to 10 years for $7M Ponzi scheme
Nevada woman sentenced to 10 years for $7M Ponzi scheme

Yahoo

time10-06-2025

  • Yahoo

Nevada woman sentenced to 10 years for $7M Ponzi scheme

LAS VEGAS (KLAS) — A federal judge sentenced a woman to 10 years in prison for orchestrating a $7 million Ponzi scheme and obstructing the government's investigation into it, a release from the Department of Justice said Monday. Anna Kline, formerly Jordana Weber, 35, of Sparks, Nevada, previously pleaded guilty to two counts of wire fraud. A federal judge sentenced her to 120 months in prison. The judge also ordered Kline to serve three years of supervised release and pay $3,403,000 in restitution. According to court documents, between April 2017 and July 2019, Kline owned and operated several shell companies that falsely offered lending services to customers, typically small business owners seeking high-value loans, often more than $100 million. As part of the scheme, Kline required that the victims pay up to 5% of the loan total amount as a 'fee' before it was funded. After the 'fee' was paid, Kline did not give the funding for the loan and gave the victims 'bogus' explanations for why the loans were delayed. Some victims were also given fake documents, including bank statements, that 'showed' the shell companies had sufficient money to fund the loan. During the scheme, Kline and her significant other used the 'fees' paid by the victim for their daily living expenses and numerous lavish purchases, including several luxury vehicles, high-priced artwork, and vacations. Some of the 'fees' were also used to pay back previous victims of the fraud. Documents show at least six victims transferred around $7 million to Kline. Kline was arrested on charges related to the scheme in July 2019. While released on bail, Kline provided the government documents that purported to be text messages from Kline's significant other, appearing to show threats toward Kline and insinuating that the partner was primarily responsible for the scheme. A forensic review of the document revealed it to be fake. Further investigation showed the Kline presented the fake report to a family court in California as part of a custody dispute between Kline and her partner. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

2025 Pennsylvania primary election results for Philadelphia DA, controller and more
2025 Pennsylvania primary election results for Philadelphia DA, controller and more

CBS News

time21-05-2025

  • CBS News

2025 Pennsylvania primary election results for Philadelphia DA, controller and more

Voters in the Philadelphia area cast their ballots in the 2025 Pennsylvania primary election on Tuesday. The polls are now closed, and results are starting to come in. See live results for Philadelphia district attorney, Philadelphia controller, Commonwealth Court and Superior Court. Philadelphia District Attorney Former Philadelphia Municipal Court President Judge Pat Dugan is hoping to unseat two-time incumbent Larry Krasner in the Democratic primary. Krasner is seeking a third term after he focused on reducing incarceration, supporting victims and holding police accountable during his first two terms as DA. Despite political opposition claiming he should be tougher on crime, Krasner points to significant drops in violent crime and homicides as evidence his reforms are working. Meanwhile, Dugan, a U.S. Army veteran, is running for district attorney to take a tougher stance on crime, criticizing Krasner's approach. He plans to localize the DA's office, prioritize prosecuting violent offenders, expand resources for diversionary programs for low-level crimes, and hire more locally trained attorneys. No Republican filed to run for DA. Philadelphia Controller In the Philadelphia City Controller race, incumbent Christy Brady is running unopposed in the Democratic primary, and stockbroker Ari Patrinos is running unopposed in the Republican primary. Commonwealth Court The Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania has one open seat after Judge Ellen Ceisler retired in January. In the Democratic primary, Stella Tsai, a judge on the Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, is running unopposed. In the Republican primary, environmental attorney Matthew Wolford and civil rights attorney Joshua Prince are vying for the nomination. The Commonwealth Court is an appellate court that handles appeals to decisions made by Pennsylvania state agencies and civil cases brought by and against Pennsylvania. Superior Court The Superior Court of Pennsylvania has one open seat after Judge Dan McCaffery's election to the state Supreme Court in 2023. In the Democratic primary, Brandon P. Neuman, a judge on the Washington County Court of Common Pleas and former Democratic state representative, is running unopposed. In the Republican primary, Maria Battista, a former assistant district attorney, and Ann Marie Wheatcraft, president judge of the Chester County Court of Common Pleas, are vying for the nomination. On the same level as the Commonwealth Court, the Superior Court handles appeals in criminal and civil cases from the lower Courts of Common Pleas. The primary results will determine each party's nominee for the general election in November.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store