Android 16 vs Android 15: Is the Material 3 Expressive glow-up worth the hype?
More than four years after the most recent Material You redesign, Google's latest Material 3 Expressive is here to shake up the design language of the wildly popular operating system once again.
As Google beautifully puts it, Material 3 Expressive is all about "vibrant colors, intuitive motion, adaptive components, flexible typography, and contrasting shapes", and that's pretty much the gist of the upcoming restyling. The latest Android 16 QPR1 beta introduces Material 3 Expressive to any eligible Pixel phones, allowing any adventurous user with a Pixel phone lying around to try it out for a spin. In case you would rather not do that, it's fine: this is where we come in! Led by the mantra that a phone that's NOT running a beta version of something is a boring one ( and who even wants to use a boring phone? ), we quickly installed Android 16 on a trusty old Pixel and went on to detail the changes against Android 15. Spoiler alert, there are many changes that will definitely make your Pixel phones that much more customizable, but the included personalization options aren't that expansive just yet.
One thing that's immediately noticeable once you spin Android 16 for a round is the much more expressive and colorful appearance of most interface elements. Just opening the main settings page or swiping down on the quick settings pane immediately reveals the nature of the new update from a visual standpoint, which isn't something that can be said about most previous Android updates.
The most major new change with Android 16 is arguably the major redesign of the quick settings/notification shade. It's not totally revolutionary, but it introduces many important changes.
For one, you can now change the general shape and size of the existing tiles, which was previously unavailable on "stock" Android 15 . By default, the older quick settings tiles all used the same elongated squircle shape, which displays a lot of useful info but also takes up a lot of precious space.
With Android 16 , any tile can be changed from the default long squircle to a way more compact one. That's now more in line with the vast amount of custom Android skins out there, which have always focused on smaller and more compact toggles and buttons, though many are now also experimenting with customizable interfaces, sliders, and others.
And this space-saving change definitely works, and it's not subjective at all. On Android 15 , you get four quick tiles when you swipe down, or up to eight if you fully expand the shade. That's not very efficient.
With Android 16 's mix-and-match approach, you can have up to 16 small squircle buttons per page, which will display no text but an easily recognizable icon with the feature you're about to turn off or on. Long-pressing works in this mode, so the only thing you're losing is the superfluous text.
What's more, interacting with any of the buttons in Android 16 introduces a slight jiggly motion that affects the other buttons around, which is neat.
That's shaping up to be a very beneficial change for Pixel users.
With the stockish Android that's available on Pixel phones, the lock and home screen customization is bundled together in the same "Wallpaper and style" menu, accessible either by pressing the home screen or from the respective option in the main settings page.
The changes here are mostly in the presentation. The interface is slightly flashier, but the overall theme here is that the magical ergonomic essence achieved by Android 15 's customization menu is missing here––while the options are there, they're tucked away in dedicated menus and not immediately available, making personalization a few extra swipes or taps away. While the new menu feels a bit cleaner and more polished, it removes some of that user friendliness that we had with the previous Android.
Android 16
With Android 16 , the interface has been juggled up a bit, with some essential features like the lock screen clock style and theme colors getting nested inside other menus. While their changed places are logical and intuitive to get to, you now have to take one extra swipe or tap, which isn't beneficial to the overall usability and somewhat hurts the user-friendliness as well as the ergonomics.
The older Android 15 isn't drastically different, as the feature set is largely the same. What's more, the use of space here is a bit more efficient, though, as pretty much all essential options are available as soon as you open the customization menu. You can change the clock style, main theme colors, and the wallpaper straightaway. Definitely a more efficient use of space here.
New with Android 16 are Google's cool new Magic Wallpaper options available when you use any of your photos as a backdrop.
When you select a photo as your wallpaper, it will be searched for any depth information, allowing you to highlight the subject in one of the few wacky cutout shapes. You get to pick the shape, as well as the color and intensity of the background color. This effect works best with portraits.
Another new feature here are the live weather effects, which can apply an effect to your photos in accordance to the local weather conditions, like rain, snow, fog, or sun rays. It's a fun feature that works best with landscape photos, though seeing snow pile up on your portrait wallpaper is also fun!
On the other hand, Android 15 is lighter in terms of features: it only has the Cinematic wallpapers option available, which applies a subtle 3D effect to your photos. Pretty humble.
The main settings page hasn't gone through major changes. Sure, some secondary menus have been shuffled around and others have moved, but just about anything is right where you'd expect it to be.
New are the backdrops on the menu icons, which add a much-needed splash of color to an otherwise drab-looking menu.
One of the few changes is inside the different settings pages. Previously, each one of these got a uniform color wallpaper at the rear, which didn't help much in the way of differentiating between the separate sections.
Android 16 revises that and adds a secondary, slightly lighter coat of paint as a backdrop of the different sections, which definitely aids the legibility of the different menus.
A subtle change can be found in the recent apps. Aside from an updated physics model that bounces an app when you swipe-to-dismiss it, Google has also introduced a small dropdown menu that collates all available options, like app info, split screen, pause app, screenshot, select, and more.
In Android 15 , many of these were available by tapping the icon of the app itself at the top, but that wasn't a very intuitive option at all. Thankfully, Android 16 revises that.
Android 16
Android 16
Android 15
Android 15
From what the current beta hints at, it appears that Android 16 will be all about the presentation aspect of it all. As Google's operating system has peaked long ago and doesn't lack any particular major feature, it's all about the aesthetics of it right now, and the new Material 3 Expressive is definitely where it's at in terms of overall appeal and added functionality.
However, this might turn out to be the case for Pixel phones only. As we don't know just how much of Android 16 's aesthetics and novel features will get adopted by the custom skins of all other Android manufacturers, there's a chance that many Android users will never experience a semblance of the Material 3 Expressive aesthetics.
Still, Pixel users can rest easy as Android 16 is shaping up to be one of the better Android updates in years.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
GSM Arena
an hour ago
- GSM Arena
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 official unboxing highlights the advantages of the new FlexWindow
Samsung has posted an official unboxing of the Galaxy Z Flip7, which goes over the main upgrades for the 2025 generation. A lot of it is centered around the larger 4.1' cover display, plus the new AI features introduced with One UI 8 (based on Android 16). First things first, the phone comes in a small box that also contains a USB C-to-C cable and a short user manual. The Z Flip7 is the thinnest Z Flip to date, measuring 13.7mm when folded and 6.5mm when unfolded. And Samsung has the photos to prove it. The Armor Aluminum frame and Armor FlexHinge work together to lend rigidity to the phone. The phone adds a new hue to the Z Flip palette, a navy blue dubbed 'Blue Shadow'. exclusively offers an additional color, Mint. The new cover display – or as Samsung terms it, the FlexWindow – is significantly larger than before, measuring 4.1' compared to 3.4'. The bezels have all but disappeared at just 1.25mm thick. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 also has a larger inner display than its predecessor, 6.9' vs. 6.7'. Both cover and inner displays can boost to 2,600 nits for outdoor visibility. On the Z Flip6, only the inner display can reach 2,600 nits, the outer one tops out at 1,600 nits. Back to the FlexWindow, it's a great tool for taking selfies. Quick tip: the area around the cameras lights up in certain colors depending on the mode: white is the standard mode, yellow is for photos and red is for videos. You can use the Zoom Slider to frame your shot or let Auto Zoom do it automatically – this is great for group shots where you can't hold the phone. New this generation is real-time preview of filters on the FlexWindow. The FlexWindow is also the home of the Google Gemini AI agent. You can long-press the Power button and start talking to it – it can even use the camera to see the world and answer questions like 'Can you recommend an outfit color that matches today's makeup?' Additionally, the Now Bar shows music and video controls and at-a-glance info from various apps with real-time updates. Now Brief focuses on personalized information based on your location, time and your usage patterns. Even better, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 is the first Z Flip to support DeX. Just plug in a display into the USB-C port (and you can add peripherals like a keyboard and mouse) and start using it as a desktop workstation. Check out our Galaxy Z Flip7 hands-on review for our thoughts on the new Z Flip flagship. Source Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Phone Arena
2 hours ago
- Phone Arena
FCC criticised for coddling T-Mobile and endangering rural dynamics
T-Mobilehas been cleared for the takeover of UScellular by both the Department of Justice (DoJ) and the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), despite opposition by various stakeholders. The FCC is now receiving criticism for not imposing stricter roaming terms on T-Mobile . Unlike AT&T, T-Mobile , and Verizon, which are national carriers with nationwide coverage, UScellular is a regional telecom company with a focus on rural areas. T-Mobile is buying most of its operations for $4.3 billion, and the deal will bring over four million new customers. UScellular decided to sell itself because it was ill-equipped to meet the evolving needs of its customers, who were increasingly ditching it. The company was still important for other reasons, including providing employment in the 21 states it served and keeping competition afloat. The Rural Wireless Association (RWA) had requested that the FCC ask T-Mobile to honor the roaming arrangements UScellular had with rural companies, as highlighted by Fierce Wireless . The RWA is a trade association that represents rural carriers who each serve fewer than two million customers. —FCC, July 2025 The RWA feared that the transaction would otherwise harm both rural customers and rural carriers if T-Mobile insisted on unfavorable roaming agreements with RWA's requests were denied, with the FCC reassuring the coalition that its dispute resolution framework would ensure that any roaming agreements were roaming services from another carrier allows mobile wireless providers to ensure their subscribers aren't left without connectivity in areas where they don't provide service. Roaming agreements let carriers use the facilities of other companies to provide service to their customers when they travel outside of their service area. The RWA has criticized the FCC for rubber-stamping the deal, claiming it gave in to the demands of T-Mobile and UScellular. The FCC was seemingly only interested in using the deal approval as a lever to get T-Mobile to scrap its diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) program, which it dutifully did. UScellular typically signed reciprocal roaming agreements with rural companies, meaning both sides paid each other when their respective customers roamed onto each other's networks. T-Mobile , on the other hand, usually inks unilateral roaming agreements. This means that while customers of a rural carrier can use T-Mobile 's network, T-Mobile prefers not to provide service in an area with no terrestrial presence, instead of letting its subscribers access rural networks. —Carri Bennet, RWA's outside general counsel, July 2025 This represents lost roaming revenue for rural companies, and it might be enough to threaten their survival. When it greenlit T-Mobile 's purchase of UScellular, the FCC had said that rural providers who find it difficult to reach reasonable roaming deals with T-Mobile could file a complaint. This is often futile and leads nowhere. Analyst Roger Entner of Recon Analytics has suggested that the issue might be getting blown out of proportion. He said that rural carriers usually have reciprocal roaming agreements with at least one of the three major carriers, and UScellular was never an important part of the equation. —Roger Entner, principal of Recon Analytics, July 2025 Moreover, rural carriers aren't necessarily here for the long haul, and most will be glad to cash out when convenient. Another threat looming over roaming agreements with rural carriers is satellite service. T-Mobile 's Starlink-powered T-Satellite program will officially launch on July 23 and leave even fewer reasons for T-Mobile to enter into deals with rural carriers. If T-Mobile completely ices out rural carriers, it will further harm competition and might wipe them out. This will pave the way for T-Mobile to get its hands on even more spectrum. The DoJ had expressed concerns about spectrum aggregation when it decided not to stop T-Mobile from scooping up UScellular. The FCC, on the other hand, doesn't seem to have an issue with this, so regardless of RWA's objections, T-Mobile is only going to continue becoming more powerful now. However, if it means better service for rural areas, that might not matter much, at least in the short run.
Phone Arena
5 hours ago
- Phone Arena
This phone could've been the bold new flagship we needed
Nothing's third-generation phone doubles down on its visual identity with even more customizable LEDs, a distinct UI design, and a refined aesthetic that's unlike anything else in the Android space. It's easy to admire the ambition, and as someone who's craving something different, a break from the mold, I respect it. The Nothing Phone (3) wants to feel special, expressive, and fun in a sea of polished rectangles. But once you get past the unique presentation, it becomes clear that being different doesn't always mean being better, even more so when you're charging $800. We've tested the Phone (3) in-depth, comparing it to the best alternatives at its price, and the results aren't flattering. Whether it's the performance, camera quality, video capabilities, or even display brightness, Nothing's latest effort consistently lands behind the competition, sometimes by a significant margin. That makes it hard to recommend, no matter how much I'd like to root for the underdog. The two color options of the Phone (3). | Image credit — Nothing Let's start with the good. The design of the Nothing Phone (3) is undeniably striking, particularly for tech enthusiasts like us. The transparent back, enhanced Glyph lighting, and symmetrical borders still turn heads, and build quality remains top-notch. I dig it, as it reminds me of something from Star Wars. This phone was made to be seen and felt, not just also commendable that Nothing doesn't overload the phone with bloatware or visual clutter — the clean software skin and thoughtful haptics help it feel more premium than most mid-rangers. However, this attention to design doesn't change the fact that it's entering a segment ($800 and above) full of excellent phones that don't compromise on essentials, such as the Pixel 9, Galaxy S25, OnePlus 13, and the iPhone 16. And that's where the Nothing Phone (3) stumbles, hard. The Phone (3)'s screen looks good indoors, but outdoor brightness is well behind the competition. | Image credit — PhoneArena Despite its sleek look, the Phone (3)'s display doesn't impress when it comes to real-world performance. It's a 6.7-inch OLED panel with good resolution and a 120Hz refresh rate — all specs that sound great on paper. But in our lab tests, it had the lowest brightness levels at 20% APL (just 1501 nits) among its peers, meaning visibility outdoors suffers compared to rivals like the Pixel 9 or Galaxy S25 , both of which push brightness well over 2000 nits. At the other end of the scale, its minimum brightness was the highest (2 nits), making it less comfortable to use in bed or dim lighting. A surprising saving grace was the color accuracy, which turned out to be the best compared to the competition. That said, this is something that can vary drastically between units, so it is definitely not a guarantee that all other Nothing Phone (3) devices will show such results. The chip performance presents a similar mixed-bag type of situation. With a Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 chip inside, the Phone (3) is finally using a flagship silicon — the first phone to use this chip. It easily beats the Pixel 9 's Tensor G4 and even Apple's A18 in some cases, but it is still nowhere close to the Snapdragon 8 Elite powering phones like the Galaxy S25 and OnePlus 13 . Our performance score confirmed the gap. The Phone (3) scored 7.6 in light tasks and 7.2 in heavy tasks. For comparison, the OnePlus 13 hits 9.0 in heavy workloads — a massive difference in responsiveness when gaming, multitasking, or using demanding apps. Despite stacked specs, the Phone (3) struggles with oversharpening, noise, and uneven image quality. | Image credit — PhoneArena On paper, the Nothing Phone (3) is stacked: it boasts a 50 MP main camera with a large 1/1.3" sensor and OIS, a 50 MP periscope telephoto lens with 3X optical zoom, and a 50 MP ultrawide shooter with a 114˚ field of view. Even the selfie camera is a high-res 50 MP sensor. It's one of the most spec-heavy camera arrays you'll find at this price — but unfortunately, the real-world results don't match the all cameras, we noticed aggressive oversharpening that made images look unnaturally crisp, especially in skin tones and textures. While the main camera is capable of sharp images thanks to its large sensor, the processing often strips them of depth and realism. The ultrawide shots showed decent consistency in color but lacked fine detail. The periscope zoom lens is a nice surprise in this segment, but results were hit-or-miss — with good sharpness at 3X, but poor dynamic range and visible noise in lower clear the hardware is there, but Nothing's tuning holds it back. In a side-by-side comparison, the Pixel 9a consistently produced more balanced, natural-looking photos with better dynamic range and color handling. The OnePlus 13R, despite fewer lenses, delivered more reliable results in both photo and video. And let's not even start comparing it to the Galaxy S25 or iPhone 16 . Big battery, underwhelming results. | Image credit — PhoneArena Battery life should have been one of the few areas where the Nothing Phone (3) holds its own, given it's massive 5150 mAh battery and tuned software. But in our Nothing Phone (3) review, it scored only 6.7. Our tests showed an estimated battery life of just 6h 45 min. That's only a tad better than the iPhone 16 's 6h 21 min and close to the Pixel 9 's 6h 48 min. This doesn't sound bad until you remember that the iPhone and the Pixel have much smaller batteries. Charging, on the other hand, is actually one of the Phone (3)'s bright spots. It supports 65W wired charging and 15W wireless, and in our test it delivered one of the fastest top-ups in its class (around 1 hour), beating out the Pixel 9 and iPhone 16 , and even outpacing the Galaxy S25 . That said, the OnePlus 13 still reigns supreme here with even faster speeds and better thermal control. It's clear that Nothing has a strong identity and a vision for what phones should be — playful, expressive, and thoughtful in their design. The Nothing phone (3) is the closest Nothing has ever come to a true flagship phone. But for most users, especially those spending $800 and more, the core experience is what truly matters, and it is not quite polished at the 'flagship level' in this case. The Nothing Phone (3) is — as I've put it several times now — a mixed bag. If you go and purchase it, there will undoubtedly be some things you love about it, but also an equal amount that you get annoyed by. I would have a much easier time recommending it if it cost $700, as that price difference would have made sense considering the lack of polish. As it stands right now, though, I feel this is a product that is not well-rounded enough to be in this category. One last thing worth noting — while I personally enjoy gadgets with a bold, industrial aesthetic, the Nothing Phone (3) 's design definitely won't appeal to everyone. This kind of look is a double-edged sword: distinctive and refreshing to some, off-putting to others. And as the price climbs, that edge only gets sharper — just like the pool of potential buyers, which inevitably gets smaller.
