
This ‘Bunker Buster' U.S. Bomb Could Cripple Iran's Nuclear Ambitions
The GBU-57—also called the Massive Ordnance Penetrator—is a 30,000-pound behemoth encased in a high-density steel alloy designed to plummet through 200 feet of mountain rock before exploding.
Military analysts said that large bunker buster has the best chance of getting through to such targets as the Fordow uranium-enrichment facility, which Iran buried under a mountain. Its existence has driven speculation that the U.S. could get involved in Israel's attack.
'This is really what it was designed for,' said Mark Cancian, who matched bombs to targets in the military and later worked at the Pentagon on procurement and budgeting, including for programs like the MOP.
Before bunker busters, the military figured it could turn to nuclear weapons to blast through mountains, but those were seen as unpalatable for political reasons, said Cancian, now a senior adviser at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.
Later, the U.S. worked on a new conventional alternative and spent about $400 million to develop and refine the MOP, he said. The U.S. now has around 20 of the giant explosives, he said, designed to be delivered by B-2 stealth bombers.
'It's a really specialized weapon for a very specialized set of targets that don't come up very often,' Cancian said.
Israel on Friday launched a campaign of intelligence operations and hundreds of airstrikes aimed at setting back Iran's nuclear program and hobbling its regime.
Israel notched direct hits on Iran's underground centrifuge halls at Natanz, some 140 miles south of Tehran, according to the International Atomic Energy Agency. But it has yet to attack Iran's other enrichment site, Fordow, in central Iran, near the holy city of Qom.
The U.S., which hasn't joined Israel in the attacks, began building up its military assets in the region in recent days, including bringing in a second aircraft-carrier group. President Trump, who has pushed for a diplomatic solution all year, has turned more bellicose, suggesting Tuesday on social media that Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei could be killed and calling for unconditional surrender.
If the U.S. were to get involved, it would make sense for it to take on hardened targets like Fordow and Natanz, said Mick Mulroy, former U.S. deputy assistant secretary of defense for the Middle East. Destroying them could take half a dozen MOPs apiece, he said.
The United Nations atomic-energy chief has warned of safety concerns from attacking nuclear sites, but other nuclear experts say the radiation risks of an attack on Fordow are low.
The International Atomic Energy Agency reported radiological and chemical contamination inside Natanz, which was bombed Friday, but normal radiation outside.
'If anything were to be dropped on Fordow, there is not a risk of radiation contamination from the attack outside of the site,' said Scott Roecker, vice president for nuclear materials security at the Nuclear Threat Initiative think tank.
Israel has a plan for Fordow and the ability to carry it out on its own, a senior Israeli military official said without elaborating. It is also taking a broader view of its mission by attacking Iran's military leadership and nuclear scientists as well as components of the nuclear program itself.
Ehud Eilam, a former researcher for Israel's Ministry of Defense, said Israel could send a large number of its own, smaller penetrator bombs to dig their way into Fordow, as Israel did when it killed the Hezbollah leader, Hassan Nasrallah, in a bunker under Beirut. It could also try a risky commando raid or more-covert means such as cyberattacks and targeted killings, he said.
An MOP dropped by a B-2 bomber could be simpler and better.
'The approach with the highest confidence of success would be a U.S. strike,' said William Wechsler, who was deputy assistant defense secretary for special operations under President Barack Obama.
Write to Benoit Faucon at benoit.faucon@wsj.com
Get 360° coverage—from daily headlines to 100 year archives.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Iranian Navy helicopter confronts U.S. destroyer in Gulf of Oman
An Iranian Navy helicopter confronted a U.S. warship attempting to approach Iranian territorial waters in the Gulf of Oman on Wednesday (July 23, 2025), Iranian state TV reported. The incident was the first direct encounter reported between Iranian and U.S. forces since the 12-day war between Iran and Israel, during which U.S. B-52 bombers targeted Iranian nuclear facilities. The report said Iranian forces dispatched the helicopter to confront a U.S. Navy destroyer identified as the USS Fitzgerald that approached the waters at around 10 a.m. local time. The report said the helicopter flew directly over the U.S. ship and issued a warning to maintain distance. In what the report described as a tense exchange, the U.S. warship reportedly responded by threatening to target the Iranian aircraft if it did not leave the area. The Navy referred requests for comment to the US Central Command, which said it would provide a response later Wednesday or early Thursday (July 24, 2025). The Iranian state TV report said that in response to the threats from the U.S. vessel, Iranian air defence forces announced that the helicopter was under the full protection of Iran's integrated air defence system. Eventually the USS Fitzgerald 'retreated southward,' the report said. It was not immediately clear how close the U.S. warship was to Iranian territorial waters.
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
3 hours ago
- First Post
Iran agrees to let technical team from IAEA visit country after US 'Op Midnight Hammer' strikes
'The delegation will come to Iran to discuss the modality, not to go to the (nuclear) sites,' Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi said. He was in New York for meetings at the UN. read more Iran on Wednesday (July 23) confirmed that it had agreed to allow a team from the International Atomic Energy Agency to visit the country in the coming weeks. Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi said the team from the United Nations nuclear watchdog would discuss relations between IAEA and Tehran. 'The delegation will come to Iran to discuss the modality, not to go to the (nuclear) sites,' Gharibabadi said. He was in New York for meetings at the UN. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD IAEA has said that its chief Rafael Grossi is actively engaging with all the parties involved in the 'Iran nuclear issue." Concerns after Israel, US' strikes IAEA officials have stressed the urgency of restoring access to Iranian nuclear facilities after last month's air strikes by Israel and the United States, which targeted key components of Iran's nuclear infrastructure. Those attacks, aimed at impeding Tehran's ability to develop a nuclear weapon, have severely disrupted the IAEA's ability to verify the status of enriched uranium stocks and other critical components of Iran's nuclear programme. Tehran maintains that its nuclear activities remain peaceful and that no effort is underway to develop atomic weapons. Gharibabadi said Iran's Atomic Energy Organization is still assessing damage from the attacks. 'We do not know what has happened there … because of the risks of the radiation,' he said. 'Our Atomic Energy Organization is assessing, actually, the damages to the nuclear installations, and we are waiting to receive their report.' Diplomatic concerns have mounted over the fate of some 400 kg of highly enriched uranium, with the IAEA yet to receive an update from Iran regarding the material's status. The watchdog has deemed full resumption of inspections essential to rebuilding international confidence. Iran reluctant to share data with IAEA Gharibabadi claimed the IAEA has not formally inquired about the uranium and added, 'we cannot say anything now because we do not have any valid and credible report from (Iran's) Atomic Energy Organization.' The comment shows Tehran's continued reluctance to share data in the absence of what it deems a secure inspection environment. In June, the IAEA sparked Iranian ire by stating on the eve of the Israeli strikes that Tehran was in violation of non-proliferation treaty commitments, complicating the possibility of progress in any renewed talks over Iran's nuclear programme. Looking ahead, Gharibabadi said he would meet counterparts from Britain, France and Germany in Istanbul on Friday. These countries, along with China and Russia, remain signatories to the 2015 nuclear deal from which the United States withdrew in 2018. The agreement traded sanctions relief for restrictions on Iran's atomic activities. Alongside this track, Iran and the US have engaged in five rounds of indirect negotiations mediated by Oman since the beginning of the year. With inputs from agencies


NDTV
3 hours ago
- NDTV
Israel, Ukraine To Hold Talks On Countering "Threats" Posed By Iran
Israel and Ukraine said Wednesday they had agreed to start talks on countering the "threat" posed by Iran, in a sign of deepening ties between the two countries. Both see Iran, a close ally of Russia, as a malign actor on the world stage. Israel has long accused Iran of developing nuclear weapons, an allegation it denies, while Ukraine is regularly attacked from Russia by Iranian-designed drones. Ukrainian Foreign Minister Andriy Sybiga described Iran as an "existential threat" to global security during a joint press conference in Kyiv with Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar -- the most senior Israeli official to visit Ukraine since 2023. "Our countries face common security challenges. Today we have decided to launch a separate dialogue on the Iranian threat," Sybiga said. Saar said any effort to curb Tehran's access to weapons and technology contributed to the security of Europe and Ukraine. "I thank President (Volodymyr) Zelensky and the Ukrainian government for its position that Iran must not have nuclear weapons," he said. Ukraine has expressed frustration at Israel's neutral stance on the Russian invasion, but the two share common interests. Kyiv has long accused Tehran of supplying military hardware to Moscow. Last month, Israel launched a surprise bombing campaign against Iran with the stated aim of destroying military and nuclear sites, an action that Kyiv supported.