Electricity demand growth is resilient to tariffs, Engie CEO says
Uncertainty around tariffs imposed by U.S. President Donald Trump has hit stock markets hard over the last month, and the International Energy Agency has said that the trade wars could provide challenges for the emerging data-centre sector and cause slower growth.
Make sense of the latest ESG trends affecting companies and governments with the Reuters Sustainable Switch newsletter. Sign up here.
"To meet our net zero objectives at the European level, even if you don't have much economic growth you are going to need to electrify and this ... drives electricity demand growth," MacGregor told Reuters at the company's annual general assembly.
Electrification refers to the process of developing batteries for electric vehicles and other processes necessary to meet climate goals.
"Then the other aspect is AI and data centres. As hyperscalers invest in training capability ... it's fairly immune to economic (impacts) because it is a bit like (research and development) investment," she said.
Engie is involved in various data centre development and cooling projects, and is also working on developing ways to cover a majority of data centre power needs from renewable or sustainable energy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
US won't send some weapons pledged to Ukraine following a Pentagon review of military assistance
The U.S. is halting some shipments of air defense missiles and other munitions to Ukraine amid concerns that its own stockpiles of such supplies have declined too much, officials said Tuesday. The munitions were previously promised to Ukraine for use during its ongoing war with Russia under the Biden administration. But the pause reflects a new set of priorities under President Donald Trump. 'This decision was made to put America's interests first following a DOD review of our nation's military support and assistance to other countries across the globe,' White House spokesperson Anna Kelly said in a statement. 'The strength of the United States Armed Forces remains unquestioned — just ask Iran.' The Pentagon review determined that stocks were too low on some items previously pledged, so pending shipments of some items won't be sent, according to a U.S. official, who spoke on condition of anonymity to provide information that has not yet been made public. To date, the U.S. has provided Ukraine more than $66 billion worth of weapons and military assistance since Russia invaded in February 2022.
Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
VIEW Investors react as US Senate passes Trump's big tax bill
July 1 (Reuters) - The Republican-controlled U.S. Senate passed President Donald Trump's sweeping tax-cut and spending bill termed the "big, beautiful bill" on Tuesday. The measure, Trump's top legislative goal, passed in a 51-50 vote, after Vice President JD Vance cast the tiebreaking vote. The megabill would extend the 2017 tax cuts that were Trump's main legislative achievement during his first term as president, cut other taxes and boost spending on the military and border security. The Congressional Budget Office estimates it will add about $800 billion more to the national debt than the House of Representatives version. The bill now returns to the House for approval. The reaction of U.S. stocks, treasuries and the dollar has been fairly muted. QUOTES: SCOTT WREN, SENIOR GLOBAL MARKET STRATEGIST, WELLS FARGO INVESTMENT INSTITUTE, ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI: "The bond market is focused on growth right now, I think, and slowing growth. It's way more focused on that than some temporary inflationary bump, relative to what's probably going to happen over the longer term, which is lower inflation. Then also it's not really thinking much about how much debt we have to sell relative to what the demand, particularly foreign demand, is going to be." "Stocks aren't cheap and they're extended in some of these sectors and that's not to say they can't go higher, but for us, we're not jumping in here with a bunch of new money." CAMPE GOODMAN, FIXED INCOME PORTFOLIO MANAGER, WELLINGTON MANAGEMENT COMPANY, BOSTON: 'I feel caught between my shorter-term sense that hiring is slowing and my longer-term concerns that the deficits we are creating over the next five, 10 years are really large … Is the market still too complacent about what these deficits mean long-term? Yes, and longer term we ought to expect more premium in the long end.' 'Longer-term this is a bad backdrop and it's something any bond investor has to feel nervous about.' MAX GOKHMAN, DEPUTY CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER, FRANKLIN TEMPLETON INVESTMENT SOLUTIONS, SAN MATEO, CALIFORNIA: "The impact of this bill on the real economy is going to fall far short of the negative impact of debt issuance that it comes with." MICHAEL ARONE, CHIEF INVESTMENT STRATEGIST, STATE STREET INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, BOSTON: 'Investors will keep a careful eye on the negotiations from the beach this holiday shortened week. But they know the real deadline for passing the bill isn't until the U.S. Treasury exhausts its ability to meet all of the government's financial obligations, the so-called X date, later this summer. Until then investors will largely shrug off the messy legislative process. Not surprisingly, 10-year Treasury yields, and gold are higher today while the U.S. dollar is lower.' RICK MECKLER, PARTNER, CHERRY LANE INVESTMENTS, NEW VERNON, NEW JERSEY: "I think it's going to create some problems for the fixed income market as we continue to spend no matter which party is in power, and, ultimately, that's a negative for the stock market. But the reaction from investors in the short term is just that it's pro economic development, and they're not as worried about inflation, and they continue to buy stocks. "It seems like investors have been very accepting of that risk. Clearly we keep increasing the deficit and longer-term investors have to be concerned about that." ROBERT PHIPPS, DIRECTOR, PER STIRLING, AUSTIN, TEXAS: "The market assumed it was ultimately going to happen. It's got to go to reconciliation now and there are very large differences between the Senate and the House version. The House tends to have the Freedom Caucus, which is the deficit Hawks. The Senate version actually adds a lot to the deficit, and they're using an accounting trick to make it look like it doesn't." "The House will ultimately pass a bill because they'll have to because we have the debt ceiling we're going to bump up against ... I'm hoping that more reasonable heads will prevail and that they come up with something that's not so onerous to the outlook for the deficit and the U.S. debt load ... this is a very potentially damaging bill because of what it does to the deficit and the debt."
Daily Mirror
2 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Donald Trump's 'devastating' bill passed by Senate GOP as warning issued
The Republican-controlled Senate narrowly passed the centerpiece of President Donald Trump's legislative agenda, a move that has been called "devastating" by the Democrats The Republican-dominated Senate has narrowly passed the centrepiece of President Donald Trump's legislative agenda, a bill that Democrats have labelled as "devastating". The legislation, referred to by Trump as the "one big, beautiful bill," was approved with a 51-50 vote. Vice President JD Vance broke the tie after three Republicans, including Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky, Susan Collins of Maine and Thom Tillis of North Carolina, opposed the bill. Democratic National Committee Chair Ken Martin expressed his condemnation of the budget being passed by the Senate in a statement. " Donald Trump and Senate Republicans have sent a clear message to the American people: Your kids, your job, and your elderly relatives don't matter. This is one of the worst bills in the history of Congress," Martin said. He described it as a "massive scheme to steal from working folks, struggling families, and hell, even from nursing homes - all to enrich the already rich with a tax giveaway.", reports the Mirror US. His statement highlighted that nearly 17 million Americans, including Republican constituents, will lose their healthcare while 5 million Americans will lose their food assistance as the bill threatens sweeping cuts to SNAP benefits. " I know firsthand how devastating this will be, because I grew up in a family that only made it because of these lifelines," Martin added. "Billionaires don't need more help, working families do. Democrats will stand shoulder to shoulder with working families to kick these Republicans out of their seats in 2026," Martin concluded. The bill is now set to return to the House where Speaker Mike Johnson is tasked with passing it before Trump's Fourth of July ultimatum. On Monday, Johnson gave reporters a firm assurance, declaring they will pass the bill "one way or another." Embodying an expansion of Trump's tax cut vision from his first term, the bill not only carries forward these reductions but also provisions for military funding and pursues his momentous deportation ambitions through cuts to Medicaid, energy finding, and various food aid initiatives. Prior to its passage in the Senate, the Congressional Budget Office had projected a worrying $3.3 trillion surge in the national debt over ten years. The CBO further cautioned that should the law come into effect, healthcare coverage could be stripped from nearly 12 million people by 2034. Senator Collins, breaking ranks with her Republican colleagues, voiced her opposition based on the "harmful impact it will have on Medicaid." She highlighted that close to 400,000 Maine residents, roughly a third of the state's population, depend on Medicaid services. "I strongly support extending the tax relief for families and small businesses. My vote against this bill stems primarily from the harmful impact it will have on Medicaid, affecting low-income families and rural health care providers like our hospitals and nursing homes," Collins explained in her public statement.
