![[UPDATED] Immigration officer charged over nearly RM1mil in bribes](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fassets.nst.com.my%2Fimages%2Farticles%2Fcourt227_1753155397.jpg&w=3840&q=100)
[UPDATED] Immigration officer charged over nearly RM1mil in bribes
Nas Suffian Nasrun, 41, entered his plea after the charges were read out to him before judge Datuk Mohd Nasir Nordin.
Clad in a blue shirt, Nas Suffian listened to each charge attentively before pleading not guilty while his family members sat at the public gallery during the proceedings.
He looked calm throughout the proceedings, telling the court he understood each charge, the penalties and consequences of his plea.
His family members looked visibly sad and some had their heads bowed as the charges were being read out.
On the first count, was accused of being directly involved in transactions worth RM224,840 of proceeds from illegal activities from a special pass agent's bank account to his mother's bank account through 29 online transactions.
On the second count, he was alleged to have received RM297,600 of illegal proceeds in his bank account through 29 transactions from the same agent.
On the third to fifth count, he was accused of having transferred RM113,375, RM209,080 and RM88,400 from his own bank account to his accomplice, who is also an immigration officer, his mother and a company through 104 transactions.
He allegedly committed the offences at two banks in Kajang and Kota Damansara between July 29, 2022 and Sept 23, 2024.
The charges were framed under Section 4(1)(a) and Section 4(1)(b) of the Anti-Money Laundering, Anti-Terrorism Financing and Proceeds of Unlawful Activities Act.
Each charge carries a jail term not exceeding 15-years and a fine not less than five times the amount of bribe or RM5 million, whichever is higher, upon conviction.
Deputy public prosecutor Siti Amirah Muhammad Ali did not offer bail as the offences are non-bailable.
Howevever, she said the court should set RM800,000 with one surety if it wanted to use its discretion to grant bail.
She also urged the court to order the accused the surrender his passport to the court, report to the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) in Johor monthly and not harass prosecution witnesses if he was granted bail.
"Although he is a civil servant, he is a flight risk. He is an immigration officer and we believe he is well versed with the country's borders," she said.
Lawyer Muhammad Zaim Rosli pleaded for a bail of between RM10,000 and RM15,000 for each charge and said his client had been with the Immigration Department for 19 years.
"My client's wife is also a senior immigration officer and they have five children aged between 7 and 15.
"He has a clean work record and never had disciplinary action taken against him. But, he faces the risk of being suspended after being charged today.
"He cooperated during investigations. The issue of him absconding does not arise and he has pledged to attend all court proceedings," he said.
Zaim said his client will also be hauled to the Kuala Lumpur Court Complex to face similar charges on Thursday (July 24).
After hearing the submissions, Nasir set bail at RM100,000 with one surety.
He ordered Nas Suffian to surrender his passport to the court, report to the MACC office monthly and not harass prosecution witnesses.
The court set Sept 12 for mention.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Free Malaysia Today
an hour ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Lodge report against MACC officer who threatened you, Kula tells businessman
Deputy law and institutional reform minister M Kulasegaran speaking in Parliament during the winding-up of the Whistleblower Protection (Amendment) Bill 2025. (Bernama pic) KUALA LUMPUR : Deputy law and institutional reform minister M Kulasegaran has urged businessman Albert Tei to lodge a police report and name the anti-graft agency officer who allegedly threatened him not to go public with information about the Sabah mining scandal. 'This issue has also been raised by several MPs. It is a very serious allegation and one that cannot be accepted under any circumstances,' he said during his winding-up speech for the Whistleblower Protection (Amendment) Bill 2025 in the Dewan Rakyat today. 'I would like to advise the individual named Albert Tei to immediately file a report regarding this issue with the police and the MACC complaints committee under Section 15 of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission Act 2009 (Act 694), by naming the MACC officer involved in the allegation.' Kulasegaran said that the government will not compromise on issues involving threats or intimidation, and stern action will be taken if the allegations are found to be true. 'Any individual who comes forward with information about misconduct must not be blocked or threatened by any party, especially by authorities who are supposed to protect whistleblowers under Act 711,' he said. Tei is currently standing trial on two charges of giving a total of RM350,000 in bribes related to mineral prospecting licence applications in Sabah to two assemblymen. Earlier today, lawyer Mahajoth Singh was reported as saying that Tei had approached MACC but was warned against coming forward before he exposed the Sabah mining scandal to Malaysiakini. Malaysiakini reported Mahajoth as saying that his client had first approached MACC at the end of October 2024, but was told by the anti-graft agency that he 'would be in trouble' if he came forward. Tei was also not offered any protection, the lawyer claimed. Mahajoth said this in response to law and institutional reform minister Azalina Othman Said, who said whistleblowers who approached the media before enforcement agencies were not entitled to protection under the Whistleblower Protection Act 2010. He said Tei decided to go public after being dismissed by the MACC and receiving death threats. The Sabah mining scandal surfaced last year following the leak of several videos purportedly showing discussions involving bribery and misconduct related to mineral exploration projects in the state. Tei and two other Sabah assemblymen have since claimed trial to charges of giving and receiving a total of RM350,000 in bribes related to mineral prospecting licence applications in the state.


Sinar Daily
an hour ago
- Sinar Daily
Zayn Rayyan's mum suspected he was abducted
22 Jul 2025 08:43pm According to Ismanira, Zayn Rayyan also never left the house without her and was always under her supervision. Photo by Bernama Ismanira suspected her son was abducted by someone while they were climbing the stairs to her residence on the day the autistic child went missing. Photo by Bernama PETALING JAYA - The mother of the late Zayn Rayyan Abdul Matin today told the Sessions Court here that she suspected her son was abducted by someone while they were climbing the stairs to her residence on the day the autistic child went missing. Ismanira Abdul Manaf, 30, said this because she did not hear the sound of her son's footsteps and people running as they climbed the stairs from the first to the second floor of Block R, Idaman Apartments, Damansara Damai on Dec 5, 2023. However, the first defence witness did not agree with the suggestion of Deputy Public Prosecutor Raja Zaizul Faridah Raja Zaharudin that in fact no one took or abducted her six-year-old son on the day of the incident. "I suspected my child was kidnapped and taken away because I didn't hear the sound of his footsteps," she said on the second day of the defence proceedings in the neglect case involving the child. According to Ismanira, on the day of the incident (Dec 5), she walked in front of Zayn Rayyan, but she did not look back at all because she only used her sense of hearing to monitor the whereabouts of Zayn Rayyan who was behind her at the time. However, Ismanira agreed with the prosecution's suggestion that visual monitoring is clearer and quicker to respond to than using the sense of hearing. According to Ismanira, Zayn Rayyan also never left the house without her and was always under her supervision. The accused also disagreed with the prosecution's suggestion that on the day of the incident (Dec 5, 2023), she left Zayn Rayyan to play on a swing in the playground alone while she went up to her house on the second floor of the apartment. "While walking, sometimes Zayn will run in front of me or behind me under my supervision. Zayn knows the stairs up to the house and he also knows our house. "Besides the house, Zayn also remembers the way to places he usually goes to such as the way to his grandparents' house, the way to school and the shop. I know how my son is... Zayn is a smart person even though he has a disability (autism), he knows his home," she said. Yesterday, Judge Dr Syahliza Warnoh ordered Ismanira to enter her defence after finding that the prosecution had successfully proven a prima facie case against the woman while her husband, Zaim Ikhwan Zahari, 30, was discharged and acquitted of the same charge. Zaim Ikhwan and Ismanira were charged with neglecting Zayn Rayyan in a manner likely to cause physical harm to the victim in the area of Block R, Idaman Apartments, Damansara Damai up to the nearby river area between noon on Dec 5 and 9.55 pm on Dec 6, 2023. They were charged under Section 31(1)(a) of the Children Act 2001 read with Section 34 of the Penal Code which carries a maximum sentence of 20 years imprisonment or a fine of RM50,000 or both, if convicted. The trial continues tomorrow. - BERNAMA

The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
Someone must have grabbed him, Zayn Rayyan's mother tells court
PETALING JAYA: The mother of Zayn Rayyan Abdul Matin told the Sessions Court here on Tuesday (July 22) that she suspected the autistic child had been grabbed or abducted by someone on Dec 5, 2023. Ismanira Abdul Manaf made the statement while testifying on the second day of her defence trial for a charge of neglecting Zayn Rayyan in a manner likely to cause physical injury. She gave evidence before Judge Dr Syahliza Warnoh, according to a report by Sinar Harian. During cross-examination by Deputy Public Prosecutor Raja Zaizul Faridah Raja Zaharudin, the 30-year-old said she believed this to be the case because she did not hear the footsteps of the late Zayn while he was supposedly walking up to the second floor of Block R, Pangsapuri Idaman, in Damansara Damai. The first defence witness agreed with the prosecution's suggestion that, logically, one would have heard running footsteps if the special needs child had been grabbed or taken. Prosecutor: I put it to you that during the incident, in fact, no one was grabbed or abducted. Agree? Ismanira: Disagree. Prosecutor: Logically, you would have seen Zayn Rayyan behind you or seen him being grabbed – but you told the court you kept looking back at him. Ismanira: I did look back at Zayn Rayyan, but not at all times, as I was using my senses to monitor him. Prosecutor: Wouldn't it be clearer if you had used your sight rather than hearing? Ismanira: Agree. Prosecutor: Do you agree that relying on hearing is not an accurate method of supervision, especially when monitoring a special needs child like Zayn Rayyan? The mother of two responded that she did not agree. Ismanira, who works as an accounts clerk, also denied a prosecution suggestion that she had left Zayn alone at the playground and returned home by herself. Her lawyer Haresh Mahadevan objected to the line of questioning, arguing that the narrative of Zayn being left alone at the playground had never been raised by prosecution witnesses. Raja Zaizul Faridah responded that the fourth prosecution witness, former investigating officer Inspector Nina Syamimi Syamsuddin from Petaling Jaya District Police Headquarters, had stated this in a previous hearing. 'She was their witness, so the defence may re-examine her. At this point, I am fulfilling my duty as the prosecution during cross-examination,' she said. After hearing submissions from both sides, Judge Syahliza recorded all objections but allowed the prosecution to proceed with the question. The trial will continue on Wednesday. According to the amended charge, Ismanira is accused of having custody of six-year-old Zayn Rayyan and neglecting him in a manner likely to cause physical injury. The offence was allegedly committed in the area of Block R, Pangsapuri Idaman, Damansara Damai, up to a nearby river, between noon on Dec 5, 2023 and 9.55pm the following day. She is charged under Section 31(1)(a) of the Child Act 2001 and faces a penalty under Section 31(1) of the same Act, which provides for a fine of up to RM50,000, imprisonment of up to 20 years, or both, upon conviction. On Dec 6, 2023, Zayn Rayyan was found dead in a stream near Pangsapuri Idaman at around 10pm. He had earlier been reported missing and was discovered lying approximately 200 metres from his residential block.