logo
How a pendant could get Suresh Gopi into jaws of law

How a pendant could get Suresh Gopi into jaws of law

India Today24-07-2025
Union Minister and veteran actor Suresh Gopi is under legal scrutiny after he was seen wearing a necklace allegedly with a leopard-tooth pendant, a potential violation of the Wildlife Protection Act. The Kerala Forest Department launched a probe into the matter after a Youth Congress leader, AA Muhammad Hashim, lodged a complaint with it.Possession of a leopard tooth, a violation of the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972, can attract a jail term of three to seven years along with a fine.advertisementHashim, who filed the complaint with the Divisional Forest Officer (DFO) of Thrissur in June, which was forwarded to the Pattikkad Range Forest Officer, demanded the confiscation of the alleged pendant and a scientific analysis to verify whether the ornament indeed contained a real leopard tooth.
In his complaint, Hashim had stated that he had seen TV visuals of Gopi wearing the ornament at two functions, one in Thrissur and another in KannurThe Pattikkad Range Forest Officer had summoned Hashim to record his statements.The complainant, who is also an office-bearer of the Indian National Trade Union Congress (INTUC), sought the confiscation of the pendent as he recorded his statement with Kerala's forest officials on Monday, July 21, reported The Hindu newspaper.Hashim also urged authorities to verify when the ornament worn by the actor was created, apprehending that the ornament could be "manipulated", according to the report.To bolster the investigation, the complainant provided media footage from TV channels showing Gopi wearing the ornament alleged to be made of leopard tooth and requested access to original videos to verify the authenticity of the visuals.SERIOUS DERELICTION OF DUTY: HASIM IN COMPALINT AGAINST SURESH GOPIHashim contended that Gopi's actions were a clear violation of the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972. In the complaint, the Congress functionary argued that Gopi, the Minister of State Petroleum and Natural Gas in the Union Cabinet, must explain the origin of the alleged leopard tooth necklace, according to a report in a Kozhikode-based news outlet, Mathrubhumi.He argued that someone sworn to uphold the law cannot be seen flouting it, calling the act a serious breach of constitutional duty.The Pattikkad Range Forest Officer, after issuing a notice to the complainant to appear before him to record his statement, said that any further steps in connection with the complaint would be taken after verifying the complainant's statement and any documents or evidence he gives, reported news agency PTI.SURESH GOPI LIKELY TO BE SUMMONED: REPORTFollowing the registration of the complainant's statement, The Hindu report added, the Kerala Forest department will issue a notice to Gopi asking him to produce the pendant and appear before the Divisional Forest Officer, Thrissur, for an enquiry.advertisementThe Lok Sabha MP will be asked to explain the nature and source of the pendant.Forest authorities will also examine whether the pendant allegedly worn by the BJP MP is an actual wildlife trophy or a synthetic replica.The forest department considers Suresh Gopi's in-person appearance crucial, as only he can provide direct information about the pendant in question, according to the report.He will also have the option of filing a written statement to the questions raised by the enquiry officer.The future course of action will be decided after obtaining his statement, a highly-placed Forest Department source told The Hindu.PICTURE OF GOPI WEARING ALLEGED LEOPARD PENDENT WENT VIRALThe complaint was filed after the Kerala Forest Department in April arrested Malayalam rapper Vedan (Hirandas Murali) for allegedly wearing a leopard tooth pendant.The incident reignited attention to previous controversies involving celebrities and wildlife items — notably, actor Mohanlal's long-standing case involving elephant tusks, and the recent visuals of Gopi wearing a pendant resembling a leopard tooth.A picture of Gopi wearing the alleged pendant resembling a leopard tooth went viral on social media after the Malayalam singer's arrest.advertisementHashim told the Hyderabad-based news outlet South First that after Gopi was seen wearing the alleged pendant during his visit to a temple in Kannur in June, he later appeared at a public event in Thrissur wearing it again."Visual evidence has already been submitted to the state police chief," Hashim told the outlet.WHAT WILDLIFE PROTECTION ACT SAYS ABOUT ANIMAL TROPHIESThe Wildlife Protection Act of 1972 states that only individuals with a valid certificate of ownership are permitted, after the Act's commencement, to acquire, receive, or possess any captive animal, animal article, trophy, or uncured trophy listed under Schedule I or Part II of Schedule II, unless it is inherited.As per the Act, possessing a leopard tooth may attract a jail term of between three and seven years and a fine."The minister has not responded to the complaint. We have not received any request from the police or the Forest Department," Gopi's assistant told the South First in a report published on April 30.Personally, the minister is yet to respond to the allegations.- EndsMust Watch
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Second US appeals court open to blocking Trump's birthright citizenship order
Second US appeals court open to blocking Trump's birthright citizenship order

Time of India

time15 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Second US appeals court open to blocking Trump's birthright citizenship order

Academy Empower your mind, elevate your skills U.S. President Donald Trump's order restricting birthright citizenship appeared on Friday to be headed toward being declared unconstitutional by a second federal appeals court , as judges expressed deep skepticism about a key piece of his hardline immigration agenda.A three-judge panel of the Boston-based 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals sharply questioned a lawyer with the U.S. Department of Justice as to why they should overturn two lower-court judges who blocked the order from taking lower-court judges include one in Boston who last week reaffirmed his prior decision to block the order's enforcement nationally, even after the U.S. Supreme Court in June curbed the power of judges to broadly enjoin that and other San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals last week became the first federal appeals court to hold Trump's order is unconstitutional. Its ultimate fate will likely be determined by the U.S. Supreme Department attorney Eric McArthur said on Friday that the citizenship clause of the U.S. Constitution's 14th Amendment, which was ratified in 1868 after the U.S. Civil War, rightly extended citizenship to the children of newly-freed enslaved Black people."It did not extend birthright citizenship as a matter of constitutional right to the children of aliens who are present in the country temporarily or unlawfully," he the judges questioned how that argument was consistent with the Supreme Court's 1898 ruling interpreting the clause in United States v. Wong Kim Ark, long understood as guaranteeing American citizenship to children born in the U.S. to non-citizen parents."We have an opinion by the Supreme Court that we aren't free to disregard," said Chief U.S. Circuit Judge David Barron, who like his two colleagues was appointed by a Democratic executive order, issued on his first day back in office on January 20, directs agencies to refuse to recognize the citizenship of U.S.-born children who do not have at least one parent who is an American citizen or lawful permanent resident, also known as a "green card" court to consider the order's merits has declared it unconstitutional, including the three judges who halted the order's enforcement nationally. Those judges included U.S. District Judge Leo Sorokin in Boston, who ruled in favor of 18 Democratic-led states and the District of Columbia, who had swiftly challenged Trump's policy in court."The Supreme Court has repeatedly recognized children born to individuals who are here unlawfully or who are here on a temporary basis are nonetheless birthright citizens," Shankar Duraiswamy, a lawyer for New Jersey, argued on 6-3 conservative majority U.S. Supreme Court on June 27 sided with the administration in the litigation by restricting the ability of judges to issue so-called universal injunctions and directing lower courts that had blocked Trump's policy nationally to reconsider the scope of their the ruling contained exceptions, allowing federal judges in Massachusetts and New Hampshire and the 9th Circuit to issue new decisions stopping Trump's order from taking effect rulings on appeal to the 1st Circuit were issued by Sorokin and the New Hampshire judge, who originally issued a narrow injunction but more recently issued a new decision in a recently-filed class action blocking Trump's order nationwide.

Arms smuggling modules busted in Amritsar: 13 pistols, ammo seized; juvenile among 11 held
Arms smuggling modules busted in Amritsar: 13 pistols, ammo seized; juvenile among 11 held

Hindustan Times

time15 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Arms smuggling modules busted in Amritsar: 13 pistols, ammo seized; juvenile among 11 held

At least 13 pistols and ammunition were recovered as Amritsar police busted three cross-border illegal arms smuggling modules with links to Pakistan on Friday, officials said. The weapons seized by counter- intelligence wing, Amritsar. (HT) Amritsar commissionerate police arrested four operatives of two modules, including a juvenile, and recovered seven sophisticated pistols from their possession, said Punjab director general of police Gaurav Yadav. Those arrested have been identified as Sikanderjeet Singh (19) of Bhagwanpura village in Tarn Taran; Pradeep Singh alias Babbal (43) of Antarjami Colony, Amritsar; Jarnail Singh (34) of New Shaheed Udham Singh Nagar, Amritsar; and a 17-year-old juvenile from Tarn Taran. 'The recovered weapons include two Glock pistols, four .30-bore Star pistols, and one .32-bore pistol, along with six live cartridges. Apart from recovering weapons, police teams have also recovered their motorcycle, which they were using to deliver consignment,' Yadav said, adding that preliminary investigation has revealed that the accused were in touch with Pakistan-based smugglers and retrieved weapon consignments near the international border. The weapons were meant to fuel gang rivalries and disrupt peace in the region, he said. The DGP said that further investigation is underway to trace forward and backwards linkages to unearth the entire smuggling network. Amritsar commissioner of police (CP) Gurpreet Singh Bhullar said that preliminary investigations revealed that the accused, Sikander, along with a juvenile, was in touch with Pak-based smugglers. 'Their home is close to the international border, and they retrieved the drone-dropped consignments from the locations provided to them,' he said. The other module was busted with the arrest of the accused, identified as Pardeep and Jarnail. 'The weapons were received from Pakistan smugglers and were meant for deceased gangster Ravneet Singh alias Sonu Mota, he said, adding that further investigation is ongoing, and more arrests are likely in the coming days. Two FIRs under relevant sections of the Arms Act have been registered at police station Gate Hakima in Amritsar and police station B-Division in Amritsar. Six pistols seized, 5 arrested In another case, counter-intelligence (CI), Amritsar busted a cross-border illegal arms smuggling module with links to Pakistan and arrested five of its operatives and recovered six sophisticated pistols from their possession, the DGP said. Those arrested have been identified as Jagroop Singh of Dhun in Tarn Taran, Navdeep Singh of Patti Lahian Di in Tarn Taran, Arshdeep Singh of Shaliwal in Amritsar, Gurlal Singh of Rajoke in Tarn Taran and Joban Singh of Patti Mana Ki in Tarn Taran. According to information, the arrested accused Jagroop and Navdeep have criminal backgrounds with several cases pertaining to the Arms Act and the NDPS Act registered against them. The recovered weapons include four 9MM Glock pistols and two .30-bore pistols, along with magazines and live cartridges. Yadav said that preliminary investigations have revealed that the arrested accused persons were acting upon the directions of a Pakistan-based smuggler identified as Rana, who has been sending consignments of illegal weapons from across the border, he said. The DGP said that teams of CI-Amritsar arrested five accused from a bus stop in Panjwar, situated on Amritsar-Bhikhiwind Road. A case under sections 25, 25(1)(A) and 25(1)(B) of the Arms Act and section 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) has been registered at the police station, state special operation cell, Amritsar. Man shot dead, 1 assailant killed, 2 hurt in encounter TARN TARAN: A man identified as Gurpreet Singh, a resident of Thathian Mahantan, who was shot at by the gangsters, and one of the assailants, who were injured in a subsequent shootout with police, succumbed to injuries on Friday, police said. On Thursday late evening, three unidentified bike-borne assailants opened fire on Gurpreet Singh, a resident of Thathian Mahantan falling under the jurisdiction of Sarhali police station of Tarn Taran. The victim sustained serious injuries and was admitted to a hospital. 'One ASI and one constable, who were deployed as security personnel with the family, due to a security threat from the Landa Harike and Satta Naushera gang, along with family members of the victim, chased the assailants. All three assailants were injured in the subsequent shootout near Mohanpur village. One of the assailants succumbed to injuries at the hospital today,' said Deepak Pareek, senior superintendent of police (SSP). Three pistols were recovered from the spot of the encounter.

Mithi River fraud: EOW submits charge-sheet against two middlemen
Mithi River fraud: EOW submits charge-sheet against two middlemen

Hindustan Times

time15 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Mithi River fraud: EOW submits charge-sheet against two middlemen

MUMBAI: A 7,000-page charge-sheet has been submitted against two alleged middlemen involved in the Mithi River desilting fraud. Police said the charge-sheet also names deputy chief engineers Prashant Ramgude and Ganesh Bendre of the storm water drains department of the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC), and civic official Prashant Tayshete. Mumbai, India - May 7, 2025:EOW Dept of Mumbai Police arrested 2 accused Ketan Kadam and Jay Joshi Mithi River Desilting case and produced at Esplanade Court, in Mumbai, India, on Wednesday, May 7, 2025. (Photo by Anshuman Poyrekar/ Hindustan Times) (Hindustan Times) 'We have submitted a charge-sheet of more than 7,000 pages before the EOW (Economic Offences Wing) court. The court is yet to take cognisance of the chargesheet,' said a police officer, adding that around 15 people have been cited as witnesses. The charge-sheet was submitted by the Economic Offences Wing (EOW) of the Mumbai Police in the Esplanade metropolitan magistrate court on Friday. The case relates to a ₹65.54-crore fraud that involves the manipulation of tenders to favour certain middlemen, in the desilting of the Mithi River. 'Our evidence in the charge-sheet is primarily receipts, statements, air-ticket copies of foreign trips of BMC officers, which show how the two arrested accused middlemen, who acted as middlemen, sponsored foreign trips for BMC officials. These middlemen are Ketan Kadam, director of Woder India LLP, a Mumbai-based company that provides desilting services, and Jayesh Joshi, who is associated with Virgo Specialties Pvt Ltd, a Mumbai-based industrial products manufacturer. The middlemen then got contracts to supply equipment to the contractors at inflated rates. The equipment was then supplied to the BMC,' said a police officer. Police have charged the accused under sections 406 (criminal breach of trust), 420 (cheating), 465 (forgery) and 120B (criminal conspiracy) and 474 (possessing a forged document or electronic record with the intention of using it as genuine) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). Police said that prima facie investigations show that Kadam and Joshi, who acted as middleman in the desilting scam, had together received ₹9 crore. Kadam and Joshi are among 13 people named in the First Information Report (FIR). Investigators have questioned all 13 accused including actor Dino Morea and his brother, but have made only two arrests so far. These are Ketan Kadam and Jayesh Joshi, both of whom are out on bail. 'We have kept the option of further investigations open under section 193 (3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), for further investigations in the charge-sheet,' said the police officer. The FIR was registered in May, against 13 people, including three civic officials, for allegedly causing a loss of ₹65.54 crore to the BMC through irregularities in the execution of contracts for desilting the Mithi River. The FIR also names senior executives of the contractors involved in the desilting project, such as Matprop Technical Services, Virgo Specialties, Woder India, Acute Designs, Kailash Construction Company, NA Constructions, Nikhil Constructions and JRS Infrastructure. The alleged scam took place between 2013 and 2023, officials said. A special investigation team (SIT) was constituted in August 2024 after questions were raised in the state legislative council about alleged irregularities in the desilting of the 17.84-km-long river.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store