‘Stitch-up' or scandal? What triggered the downfall of Britain's Sea Lord
This year, however, the august gathering – due to start on May 12 – was postponed at the last minute because of a keynote speaker dropping out. No, not a Ukrainian admiral sidetracked by urgent business in the Black Sea, or a tetchy Trump envoy throwing a hissy fit. Instead, it was the host himself, First Sea Lord Adml Sir Ben Key – whom, delegates were informed last week, had 'had to step back from all his duties for private reasons'.
The Ministry of Defence declined at first to elaborate, prompting speculation that Sir Ben was perhaps gravely ill. But on Friday, it confirmed he had stepped down while claims of an extramarital affair with a female subordinate are investigated.
It is the first time in the Navy's 500-year history that its First Sea Lord has faced a formal misconduct probe – which is perhaps surprising, given the reputation Royal Navy commanders had, in centuries past, for floggings, drunkenness and occasional acts of piracy.
Yet while it has been portrayed as a straightforward HR matter – the Navy forbids commanders having relationships with underlings – some suspect the reasons for his departure may have been rather murkier. A popular officer among the ranks, Sir Ben was said to be unhappy over planned cuts to the Navy, and was rumoured to have clashed with the Chief of the Defence Staff, Adml Sir Tony Radakin, over priorities. With Labour tipped to publish its long-awaited strategic defence review (SDR) in coming weeks – one that few expect to offer much new cash – there is speculation that the disciplinary proceedings might have been brought about, at least partly, to silence him.
'I think he has been stitched up to get him out of the picture,' one unnamed Naval source told the Mail on Sunday. 'He had constantly raised questions about the delays with new ships, funding for recruiting and the lack of frigates, and he was told to keep quiet. Now he can't say a thing.'
The MoD has declined to comment further, as has Sir Ben, 59, who has two sons and a daughter with his wife, Elly. But whether well-informed or not, the unproven speculation could barely have come at a worse time for the Government, as it tries to persuade both Britain and the world that the Navy will remain a serious global player.
Prime Minister Keir Starmer has promised to increase defence spending to 2.5 per cent of GDP, amid growing threats from Russia and China, but many experts believe that figure should be twice that. With Donald Trump refusing to act as a Nato backstop, British Navy chiefs feel their own role in Europe's security architecture is now even more important. Their thinking is that Continental powers, particularly Poland and Germany, should focus on land forces, while Britain, as a longstanding naval force, counters Russian threats in the waters off north-west Europe.
The possible future combat scenarios were laid bare in the topics for this year's Sea Lord's essay competition, which included: 'What if China, Russia, Iran or North Korea cut data cables to the UK?' and 'What if the UK has to defend the North Atlantic alone?' Yet, after decades of peace-time cuts, some commanders doubt the Navy even has the capacity to defend Britain's own waters, let alone project power across the Baltics or protect Taiwan.
Last November, Defence Secretary John Healey said he would scrap two amphibious assault ships and a frigate as part of £500 million in short-term savings, while there is also talk of mothballing aircraft carriers amid fears they are too vulnerable to underwater drones.
The downsizing of the Navy is something that Sir Ben has witnessed first hand, having joined the force as a cadet in 1984, at the height of the Cold War. He went on to command a mine hunter, two frigates and the aircraft carrier HMS Illustrious. In 2019, he became the UK's Commander of Joint Operations, supervising British evacuation efforts from Afghanistan after the Taliban took power in 2021, before taking over as First Sea Lord from Sir Tony later that year. Until recently, he was considered a frontrunner to succeed Sir Tony as Chief of the Defence Staff, the Armed Forces' top job.
Officers who have served with Sir Ben speak well of him, although there is by no means consensus over whether he was the victim of a 'stitch-up'. They point out that the Navy, as with the rest of the Armed Forces, has a zero-tolerance stance on officers having affairs with subordinates, given the close-knit working environment on ships and submarines. For low-ranking officers, an illicit liaison could lead to allegations of favouritism. For top-ranking commanders, there could be a risk of blackmail. They also point out that Sir Ben himself had been vocal on sexual propriety.
Last October, he publicly apologised for 'intolerable' misogyny in the Submarine Service, after investigations exposed sexual harassment within its ranks. He returned to the theme in March, telling a Parliamentary defence committee that 'unwelcome sexual behaviours' were being stamped out.
'I don't think there is any stitch-up here – he had a sexual liaison with a subordinate in his chain of command, having dismissed others who did the same,' one former rear admiral says. 'First Sea Lords have more important things to do with their lives than have clandestine affairs.'
Others, though, are sad to see the back of a popular commander-in-chief, and do not rule out the possibility that the affair allegations have been used as an excuse to sideline him.
'There is literally nothing left to cut in the Navy without taking an axe to the body itself, and he may have been resistant to that,' says one source. 'It might have been that a colleague dobbed him in to bring about his downfall.'
In fact, uncertainty had been surrounding Sir Ben's future since well before last week. In January, The Times reported that he intended to retire this summer rather than apply to succeed Sir Tony, citing sources who said he no longer believed he could 'fix the Navy'. His office then contradicted this, briefing journalists that he was committed to managing whatever changes lay ahead.
There is, however, potential for disagreement over how those changes are implemented, particularly when tight budgets force a focus on certain priorities at the expense of others. Among the big expenditure programmes are the new Dreadnought submarines, which will replace the ageing Vanguard fleet as carriers of Britain's Trident nuclear deterrent, and Type 83 destroyers, which will have enhanced air defence capabilities, including against hypersonic missiles. But Sir Tony and Sir Ben may have differed over how much to invest in 'next generation' weapons, especially unmanned air and sea drones.
'Radakin had quite a radical agenda for rapid modernisation, pushing AI and unmanned systems, but you still need ocean-going ships, as drones can't just fly for thousands of miles, especially in extreme weather,' says one source. 'There is a balancing act between retaining the older systems and bringing in new tech – plus ships can take 10 years to build, so you have to plan ahead.'
'Sadly, successive governments have failed to invest properly in defence, and believed naively that the US was going to protect everyone for ever, ' adds ex-Royal Naval commander Ryan Ramsey, a former captain of the submarine HMS Turbulent. 'Radakin and Key are both good guys – maybe there is some politics at play here, but frankly, even if that turns out not to be true, the damage has already been done.'
The mood in the top ranks is unlikely to be improved by reports that the soon-to-be-published SDR contains no specific costings, potentially delaying key spending decisions in the autumn. Critics say Starmer's Government is needlessly prolonging the process, mindful that hiking defence spending is unpopular with Labour's Left.
'Ben Key probably wanted to retire because he was just tired,' added another former comrade. 'Running the Navy is OK when there's money around, but when you're firefighting against cuts all the time, it's just exhausting.'
Meanwhile, the search is now on for a replacement for Sir Ben, who may end up finishing an otherwise distinguished career in disgrace if this is indeed the end of his association with the Navy, as appears to be the case.
The current Second Sea Lord, Vice-Admiral Sir Martin Connell, has taken his place as Acting First Sea Lord, although there is as yet no new date for the Sea Power Conference at Lancaster House. It remains to be seen whether the essay contest will be revised to include the topic: 'What does a Navy do if it loses its top commander overnight?'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Miami Herald
20 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
The RNC chairman is stepping down. Trump wants a Florida Republican to step in
Amid news that the chairman of the Republican National Committee is stepping down, President Donald Trump on Thursday encouraged Republicans around the country to rally behind a Florida lawmaker as his replacement. Posting on his social media site, Truth Social, Trump said Florida Sen. Joe Gruters, from Sarasota, 'will do a wonderful job' as the chairman of the Republican Party. Gruters, 48, confirmed in a text message that he wants the job. 'I'm looking forward to advancing President Trump's America First agenda as the next Chair of the RNC,' Gruters wrote in a text message to the Miami Herald. 'He is the greatest President in our nation's history, and I'm ready to serve, fight, and win for our party and our country.' Trump endorsed Gruters at the end of a post about current RNC Chairman Michael Whatley, who is expected to step down from his position to seek a soon-to-be-open seat in the U.S. Senate representing North Carolina. Trump said Whatley has his endorsement for the Senate seat should he run. Gruters, a former Florida GOP chairman, has been a longtime supporter and friend of Trump's. He was co-chair of the president's 2016 campaign in Florida, and got a look from the president last year when then-RNC Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel was on her way out. Gruters has been campaigning for the post of Florida chief financial officer, and only recently announced that two of Trump's top political advisors would work for his campaign. He faces a competitive primary, with Gov. Ron DeSantis this month appointing former state Sen. Blaise Ingoglia to the post. Gruters did not say whether his interest in the RNC job would affect his campaign.


San Francisco Chronicle
20 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Planned Parenthood closes 5 Northern California clinics, citing Trump budget bill
President Donald Trump's budget cuts to Medicaid have forced Planned Parenthood Mar Monte to shutter five clinics across Northern California and the Central Coast, including one in South San Francisco, the group said Thursday. The GOP-led federal spending bill that Trump signed into law earlier this month eliminated federal Medicaid funding for any type of medical care to organizations that perform abortions. Mar Monte is the largest Planned Parenthood affiliate in the country, with health care centers from Bakersfield, the Bay Area, Stockton and Sacramento. The now-shuttered facilities also include San Mateo, Santa Cruz, Gilroy and Madera. The closures represent the first wave of how the recent federal budget cuts will have real-life consequences for health clinics across the country — particularly for low-income Americans. They are also a crushing blow to a state that set it up to be an abortion haven after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022. In the year after the decision, political leaders in California — led by Gov. Gavin Newsom and the Democratic-controlled Legislature — passed more than a dozen new laws and invested more than $200 million to increase access across the state. Thursday's announcement drives home the extent of the federal government's tremendous power to impact abortion access. Roughly 80% of Mar Monte's patients received Medi-Cal, California's version of Medicaid. Ten million people are expected to lose their health insurance because of nearly $1 trillion in Medicaid cuts over the next decade in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. Meanwhile, the wealthiest Americans will receive a disproportionate share of the tax cuts funded by those cuts, according to the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities. In just one week since Mar Monte stopped billing Medicaid, the Planned Parenthood affiliate with 35 locations said it saw 5,000 patients — amounting to about $1.7 million in care costs it covered without reimbursement — Mar Monte Chief of Staff Andrew Adams told the Chronicle Thursday. 'It's just not sustainable,' said Adams. 'We can't keep our doors open if we continue doing that.' Mar Monte said the funding law also forced it to end services in family medicine, behavioral health and prenatal care. The Planned Parenthood affiliate estimates it will lose $100 million in annual revenue from care that can no longer be reimbursed under the law because they provide abortion care. Americans tend to support abortion rights, according to public polling. A May 2025 Gallup Poll found that 51% of respondents described themselves as 'pro choice' while 43% described themselves as 'pro life.'Of those respondents who said they were 'dissatisfied' with the nation's abortion polices, 42% said they would like to see them made 'less strict' while 14% wanted them to be 'stricter.'


USA Today
20 minutes ago
- USA Today
The White House is feuding with ‘The View.' Here's why.
From late-night show hosts to the animated sitcom South Park, the feud between President Donald Trump and the entertainment industry shows no signs of slowing down. Now the administration finds itself in a dispute with ABC's 'The View' after a White House spokesperson suggested the long-time talk show could be coming to an end. The comment comes after CBS canceled late-night comedy 'The Late Show with Stephen Colbert' after 33 years, a decision Trump celebrated on social media. During a July 23 episode, co-host Joy Behar said Trump is jealous of former President Barack Obama because 'Obama is everything that he is not.' She added that, unlike Trump, Obama is 'trim, smart, handsome, happily married, and can sing Al Green's song 'Let's Stay Together' better than Al Green. And Trump cannot stand it. It's driving him crazy.' Following the dig, White House Assistant Press Secretary Taylor Rogers referred to Behar as 'an irrelevant loser suffering from a severe case of Trump Derangement Syndrome.' 'It's no surprise that The View's ratings hit an all-time low last year. She should self-reflect on her own jealousy of President Trump's historic popularity before her show is the next to be pulled off air,' Rogers said in a statement. USA TODAY has reached out to representatives of 'The View' for comment on Rogers' statement. When asked for a comment on behalf of Behar, her manager Bill Stankey told USA TODAY, 'On behalf of me……..Release the Epstein files.' In May, Attorney General Pam Bondi had reportedly told Trump that his name appears several times throughout the criminal case files on the late financier and convicted sex offender Epstein, according to CNN and the Wall Street Journal. How did this start? The latest tension between the White House and 'The View' started after an Oval Office meeting with Philippines President Ferdinand Marcos on July 22, when Trump accused Obama of treason. The president called the Democrat a 'ringleader,' adding that his actions were 'seditious.' Later that day, Obama addressed a July 18 report from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence that claimed the former president 'manufactured and politicized intelligence to lay the groundwork for what was essentially a years-long coup' against Trump's presidential victory against former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in 2016. Obama also said he supported the U.S. intelligence community's conclusion that Russia tried to influence the 2016 election. He dismissed the allegations against him, calling them the typical 'nonsense and misinformation' emerging from the Trump White House. On the next morning's episode of 'The View,' Behar defended Obama with a sly remark against Trump regarding the Capitol insurrection on Jan. 6, 2021. 'First of all, who tried to overthrow the government on Jan. 6? Who was that again? That was not Obama,' she quipped. Late-night talk show hosts also make jabs at Trump Before the beef with Behar, Trump was at odds with his usual late-night foes, starting with Colbert, who during a July 17 episode announced that 'The Late Show' would be ending in May 2026. 'I absolutely love that Colbert' got fired. His talent was even less than his ratings,' Trump wrote on Truth Social July 18. He later made a jab at ABC's Jimmy Kimmel, insinuating that his show would be the next to end and that he 'has even less talent than Colbert.' Kicking off his July 21 episode monologue, Colbert asked, 'How dare you, sir?' 'Would an untalented man be able to compose the following satirical witticism? Go (expletive) yourself,' Colbert said. Trump fired back on a July 22 Truth Social post, writing: 'The word is, and it's a strong word at that, Jimmy Kimmel is NEXT to go in the untalented Late Night Sweepstakes and, shortly thereafter, (Jimmy) Fallon will be gone.' 'These are people with absolutely NO TALENT, who were paid Millions of Dollars for, in all cases, destroying what used to be GREAT Television. It's really good to see them go, and I hope I played a major part in it!' the president wrote. Fallon's show is slated to continue until at least the end of 2028 when his contract with NBCUniversal ends. In 2022, Kimmel extended his contract through his show's current 23rd season. Contributing: KiMi Robinson, USA TODAY