Proposal outlines large-scale 'Humanitarian Transit Areas' for Palestinians in Gaza
Photo:
Eyad Baba / AFP
A proposal seen by Reuters and bearing the name of a controversial US-backed aid group described a plan to build large-scale camps called "Humanitarian Transit Areas" inside - and possibly outside - Gaza to house the Palestinian population, outlining a vision of "replacing Hamas' control over the population in Gaza."
The US$2 billion (NZ$3.3 billion) plan, created sometime after 11 February and carrying the name of the US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, or GHF, was submitted to the Trump administration, according to two sources, one of whom said it was recently discussed in the White House.
The plan, reviewed by Reuters, describes the camps as "large-scale" and "voluntary" places where the Gazan population could "temporarily reside, deradicalise, re-integrate and prepare to relocate if they wish to do so."
The Washington Post made a reference to GHF plans to build housing compounds, opens new tab for Palestinian non-combatants in May.
A slide deck seen by Reuters goes into granular detail on the "Humanitarian Transit Zones," including how they would be implemented and what they would cost.
It calls for using the sprawling facilities to "gain trust with the local population" and to facilitate US President Donald Trump's "vision for Gaza."
Reuters could not independently determine the status of the plan, who created and submitted it, or whether it is still under consideration.
The aid group, responding to questions from Reuters, denied that it had submitted a proposal and said the slides "are not a GHF document." GHF said it had studied "a range of theoretical options to safely deliver aid in Gaza," but that it "is not planning for or implementing Humanitarian Transit Areas (HTAs)."
Rather, the organisation said it is solely focused on food distribution in Gaza.
A spokesperson for SRS, a for-profit contracting company that works with GHF, told Reuters "we have had no discussions with GHF about HTAs, and our 'next phase' is feeding more people. Any suggestion otherwise is entirely false and misrepresents the scope of our operations."
On 4 February Trump first publicly said that the US should "take over" the war-battered enclave and rebuild it as "the Riviera of the Middle East" after resettling the population of 2.3 million Palestinians elsewhere.
Trump's comments angered many Palestinians and humanitarian groups about the possible forced relocation from Gaza. Even if the GHF proposal is no longer under consideration, the idea of moving a large portion of the population into camps will only deepen such worries, several humanitarian experts told Reuters.
The White House did not respond to a request for comment.
The proposal was laid out in a slide presentation that a source said was submitted to the US embassy in Jerusalem earlier this year.
The US State Department declined to comment. A senior administration official said, "nothing of the like is under consideration. Also, no resources are being directed to that end in any way."
The source working on the project said that it had not moved forward due to a lack of funds. Reuters previously reported that GHF had attempted to set up a Swiss bank account from which to solicit donations, but UBS and Goldman Sachs declined to work with the organization.
The Israeli Embassy in the US did not respond to a request for comment.
Ismail Al-Thawabta, director of the Hamas-run Gaza government media office, told Reuters it "categorically" rejects the GHF, calling it "not a relief organization but rather an intelligence and security tool affiliated with the Israeli occupation, operating under a false humanitarian guise."
The undated slide presentation, which includes photos dated 11 February, said that the GHF is "working to secure" over $2 billion for the project, to "build, secure and oversee large-scale Humanitarian Transit Areas (HTAs) inside and potentially outside Gaza strip for the population to reside while Gaza is demilitarized and rebuilt."
The Humanitarian Transit Areas described in the slides would be the next phase in an operation that began with GHF opening food distribution sites in the enclave in late May, according to two sources involved in the project.
GHF coordinates with the Israeli military and uses private US security and logistics companies to get food aid into Gaza. It is favoUred by the Trump administration and Israel to carry out humanitarian efforts in Gaza as opposed to the UN-led system which it says let militants divert aid.
Hamas denies this and says Israel is using hunger as a weapon.
In June the US State Department approved $30 million in funding for the GHF and called on other countries to also support the group.
The United Nations has called GHF's operation "inherently unsafe" and a violation of humanitarian impartiality rules. The UN human rights office says it has recorded at least 613 killings at GHF aid points and near humanitarian convoys run by other relief groups including the U.N.
One slide outlining a timeline said a camp would be operational within 90 days of the launch of the project and that it would house 2160 people, along with a laundry, restrooms, showers and a school.
A source working on the project said that the slide deck is part of a planning process that began last year and envisions a total of eight camps, each one capable of sheltering hundreds of thousands of Palestinians.
The proposal did not specify how the Palestinians would be relocated into the camps, or where the camps could be built outside Gaza, but a map shows arrows pointing to Egypt and Cyprus as well as other points labelled "Additional Destination?"
GHF would "oversee and regulate all civil activities required for construction, deradicalisation and temporary voluntary relocation," the proposal said.
Responding to questions from Reuters, three humanitarian experts expressed alarm over details of the plan to build camps.
"There is no such thing as voluntary displacement amongst a population that has been under constant bombardment for nearly two years and has been cut off from essential aid," said Jeremy Konyndyk, president of the Refugees International advocacy group and a former senior US Agency for International Development official who reviewed the plan.
The source who worked on planning for the camps told Reuters that the intent "is to take the fear factor away," enabling Palestinians to "escape control of Hamas" and providing them "a safe area to house their families."
The latest bloodshed in the decades-old Israeli-Palestinian conflict was triggered on 7 October 2023, when Hamas attacked southern Israel, killing around 1200 people and taking 251 hostages, according to Israeli tallies.
Gaza's health ministry says Israel's retaliatory military assault on the enclave has killed over 57,000 Palestinians, caused a hunger crisis, and displaced nearly Gaza's entire population internally.
-Reuters
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
1News
12 hours ago
- 1News
UK bans pro-Palestinian groups under anti-terrorism laws
The pro-Palestinian activist group Palestine Action lost a bid to block the British government's decision to ban it under anti-terrorism laws after activists broke into a military base last month and vandalised two planes. At a hearing at the High Court in London, the group had sought to temporarily block what it considered to be an "authoritarian" ban, which will go into effect at midnight. The ban will make membership of the group and support of its actions a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison. But Justice Martin Chamberlain, who spent all day listening to lawyers representing the group and the government, declined to give the organisation interim relief from the ban, which was first proposed by Home Secretary Yvette Cooper and approved by lawmakers earlier this week. While conceding that the order to proscribe Palestine Action a terrorist organisation may have "wider consequences for the way the public understands the concept of 'terrorism'," he said it is not "the court's function to comment on the wisdom of the use of the power in the case". ADVERTISEMENT Huda Ammori, the co-founder of Palestine Action, was hoping the court would temporarily block the government from banning the group as a terrorist organisation under the Terrorism Act of 2000 before a potential legal challenge. Some 81 organisations are already proscribed under the 2000 Act, including Hamas and al-Qaida. Demonstrators during a protest by Palestine Action group in London. (Source: Associated Press) Ammori's lawyer Raza Husain had asked the court to suspend the "ill-considered" and "authoritarian abuse of statutory power" until a hearing, which is due around July 21. "This is the first time in our history that a direct action civil disobedience group, which does not advocate for violence, has been sought to be proscribed as terrorists," he said. He added that his client had been "inspired" by a long history of direct action in the UK, "from the suffragettes, to anti-apartheid activists, to Iraq War activists". The ban was triggered after pro-Palestinian activists broke into a Royal Air Force base in Brize Norton, damaging two planes using red paint and crowbars in protest at the British government's ongoing military support for Israel in its war in Gaza. Police said that the incident caused around 7 million pounds (NZ$15.7 million) worth of damage, with four people charged in connection with the incident. The four, aged between 22 and 35, were charged Thursday (local time) with conspiracy to commit criminal damage and conspiracy to enter a prohibited place for purposes prejudicial to the interests of the UK. No pleas were entered at Westminster Magistrates' Court in central London and the four are scheduled to appear on July 18 at the Central Criminal Court. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper announced plans to proscribe Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation a few days after the break-in. She said the vandalism to the two planes was "disgraceful," adding that the group had a "long history of unacceptable criminal damage".
The Spinoff
a day ago
- The Spinoff
What is Rocket Lab launching into space and why are people angry about it?
On Friday, picket signs bearing Palestine flags and banners about genocide gathered around three Rocket Lab locations in New Zealand. Why? Rocket Lab, founded in 2006 by Sir Peter Beck, is often lauded in New Zealand for catalysing our space industry. Today it still leads the sector, one with a quickly growing revenue – it was $2.68b in 2024. It's not just glowey-eyed nationalism that paints Rocket Lab favourably. Outside of New Zealand, it's seen as an ' innovative, exciting young space tech company,' and in the first quarter of 2025, Rocket Lab recorded $123 million in revenue, 32% up year-on-year. Rocket Lab is now an American corporation with headquarters in California. It offers launches from Māhia Peninsula and Virginia USA as well as aerospace manufacturing and design. While in 2008 Beck stated, ' if it's involved in the military we don't want anything to do with it,' the company won contracts from at least three US defence agencies in 2009, and seemingly never looked back. In May, Rocket Lab announced a $460 million deal with a US missile tracking tech company, positioning itself as a major contractor to US national security. In the US, Rocket Lab's rockets are the second most launched (after SpaceX). Here in New Zealand, concerns have been raised, and largely ignored by politicians, that Rocket Lab's ability to replace satellites makes the country a military target. Over the years, groups like Auckland Peace Action and Rocket Lab Monitor have accused Rocket Lab of being part of the militarisation of space and breaching New Zealand's Nuclear Free status. Many of the complaints have centered around its US military contracts. These groups have pointed out that Lockheed Martin, the world's largest weapons manufacturer, has invested in Rocket Lab and that the aerospace intelligence and communications technology that Rocket Lab develops, manufactures and launches could be used in weapon systems and other military operations. The most recent protests, from Friday, were led by Palestine Solidarity Network Aotearoa (PSNA). Beyond the pickets, the group, along with a lawyer, have referred Rocket Lab CEO Peter Beck, minister for space and for defence Judith Collins and others to the office of the prosecutor of the International Criminal Court. Why? Because PSNA believes that Rocket Lab activities may have intentionally contributed to war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide committed by Israel. In a statement provided to The Spinoff, a Rocket Lab spokesperson said the company 'strongly refutes PSNA's false and irresponsible claims' and that it is considering its legal options. They followed with a bullet-pointed summary of New Zealand's legal requirements for launching rockets. So what does Rocket Lab launch into space from Māhia? Rocket Lab's website says that its launches, numbering over 200 since 2018, have enabled ' operations in national security, scientific research, space debris mitigation, Earth observation, climate monitoring, and communications '. In the past the company has said it does not and will not launch weapons as this is against its commitment and New Zealand law. New Zealand's space activities are regulated by the Outer Space and High-altitude Activities Act 2017. Apart from safety considerations, the act takes into account New Zealand's international obligations and national interests like economic benefits, risks to national security and international relations. Anything launched into space must have a license granted by discretion of the government on a case-by-case basis. Cabinet has outlined some payloads not to be permitted – payloads that contribute to nuclear weapons programmes or capabilities; payloads with the intended end use of harming, interfering with, or destroying other spacecraft, or space systems; payloads with the intended end use of supporting or enabling specific defence, security or intelligence operations that are contrary to government policy; payloads where the intended end use is likely to cause serious or irreversible harm to the environment. Rocket Lab's website includes a log of launched missions. Among the clients listed are Hawkeye360, BlackSky, Capella Space, NASA, the US National Reconnaissance Office, the United States Space Force, Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency and RideShare. A few are labelled 'confidential commercial customer' or simply 'undisclosed'. Some media coverage states that Hawkeye360, BlackSky, Capella Space, all space-based intelligence firms, have links to the Israeli Ministry of Defense, though unsurprisingly it's hard to track down evidence and details. In its ICC referral, PSNA has taken issue with Rocket Lab's BlackSky launches in particular, claiming that ' these satellites provide high resolution images to Israel which are very likely used to assist with striking civilians in Gaza '. BlackSky has a network of satellites and sensors that capture high-frequency imagery of Earth. They monitor places and activities for clients, providing high-resolution photographs and AI-enabled analytics every hour under subscription models. This year, Rocket Lab is launching a series of BlackSky's Gen-3 satellites from Māhia Peninsula which are faster, can automatically identify smaller objects and can capture imagery through clouds, smoke or haze. In 2024, Intelligence Online, an intelligence trade publication, reported that 'BlackSky has a secret $150m contract to supply high temporal frequency images and analysis to the Israeli defence ministry'. This claim has not been reported elsewhere, but BlackSky has recently announced a new, $100+ million contract from a 'strategic international defense sector customer' for its Gen-3 monitoring capabilities. When Rocket Lab was asked by Newsroom in November last year whether payloads it had launched had been used to inform Israeli air strikes, a spokesperson pointed to other uses of commercial satellite imagery and data like disaster and humanitarian response, emergency management, national security, commerce, and environmental monitoring. A recent mission launched satellites for wildfire detection and monitoring. What don't we know? There is much we don't know and may never know about what Rocket Lab and its clients do. Some payloads have been kept confidential, yet all launches from New Zealand have to disclose information to the government in order to get the needed licenses. It's not cut and dry when the government might have obligations to release that information – under the Official Information Act information can be withheld on grounds of commercial or national security. The Spinoff contacted the office of Judith Collins for comment on Rocket Lab and the ICC referral. We were referred to the office of the prime minister who provided the following comment from a spokesperson: 'People are free to express their views but New Zealand has consistently made clear the situation in Gaza is deeply distressing, and the crisis must end. Our response to the Israel-Hamas conflict has been consistently grounded in the importance of upholding international law.'
National Business Review
a day ago
- National Business Review
Trump proposes 50% copper tariff, threatens 200% drug levy
Happy Wednesday and welcome to your morning wrap of the key business and political headlines. We begin in the United States, where President Donald Trump said he would impose a 50% tariff on copper imports, CNBC reported. The announcement at a cabinet meeting caused copper prices to jump to a record high. The US imports nearly half of the copper it uses. Trump ordered a probe in February into potential tariffs on copper on national security grounds. Meanwhile, Trump also threatened to impose a 200% tariff on pharmaceutical imports. He said the levy on pharmaceuticals would be introduced 'very soon' but would not go into effect immediately. 'We'll give them a certain period of time to get their act together,' Trump said, apparently referring to drugmakers. Pharmaceutical stocks appeared to shrug off the statement, as their prices remained relatively unchanged. The comments come as Trump wants to incentivise drug companies to move manufacturing to the US. Staying in the United States, Trump has lashed out at his Russian counterpart and has resumed sending weapons to Ukraine, ABC reported. During the same cabinet meeting, the President said he was 'very unhappy' that Vladimir Putin had made no progress on peace talks with Ukraine since the pair had a phone call last week. 'We get a lot of bulls**t thrown at us by Putin, if you want to know the truth," Trump told reporters. "He's very nice all the time, but it turns out to be meaningless." Trump hinted that he was considering further sanctions on Russia and confirmed the US would resume weapons shipments to Ukraine. Donald Trump. To the Middle East, where five Israeli soldiers were killed in an attack in northern Gaza, and 51 Palestinians were killed by Israeli strikes, the Associated Press reported. The soldiers were killed by an explosive device detonated in Beit Hanoun, according to an Israeli security official. Militants also opened fire on the soldiers, injuring 14 in the attack. Hamas officials at Nasser Hospital said 41 Palestinians were killed on Tuesday, and another 10 were killed in central Gaza. The rising death toll comes as Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu visits the US for talks about a ceasefire plan. A new round of indirect peace talks between Israel and Hamas began on Sunday. A Hamas supporter. In market news, it was a mixed day on Wall Street, as anxiety over Trump's tariff comments overshadowed earlier hopes for clarity on US trade policy, Reuters reported. The S&P 500 was flat, the Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 0.26%, and the tech-heavy Nasdaq rose 0.21%. Wall Street equities sold off on Monday after Trump warned of new tariffs on goods from key trading partners but steadied overnight. There was no rebound, however, as investors remained concerned about the President's new sector-specific tariff threats. "There's still a lot of uncertainty about how the tariff story is going to play out. There are too many moving parts here," Paleo Leo managing director John Praveen said. Finally this morning, former UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak has joined investment bank Goldman Sachs as an adviser. The BBC reported that he would work part-time, advising the bank's clients on global politics and the economy. Sunak resigned as Prime Minister in July 2024 but remains the Conservative MP for Richmond and Northallerton in Yorkshire. He previously worked for the bank in the early 2000s. A condition of his employment prevents him from advising other governments or their sovereign wealth funds for the bank, or advising clients he had direct dealings with while Prime Minister. His salary will be donated to The Richmond Project, a charity he founded alongside his wife to improve numeracy across the UK.
