
We swapped Wiltshire for New Zealand for the promise of a better life - but this is what they don't tell you about moving across the world
Now it's easier than ever after the Government relaxed rules to allow non-nationals to work remotely for a foreign employer whilst visiting for a period of up to 90 days - which can be extended to up to nine months.
It was all too tempting for Robert Eaton and his wife Sabrina who had been living in Chippenham, Wiltshire, for the past six years whilst he worked for Vodafone.
Robert hails from Essex but working in the telecommunications industry has seen him live in Taiwan, China, the Philippines and Europe.
He met Sabrina, 47, in Jakarta and the pair tried living in Singapore, Sydney and Auckland for six months in 2017 due to his job.
But the 46-year-old found his most recent role at Vodafone 'isolating' with his team stationed in Europe as he worked from home, so he 'halfheartedly' applied for a job in New Zealand.
'The offer was good. My UK gross salary was the same as my New Zealand net salary when we moved last year,' he told The Telegraph.
The couple had previously visited New Zealand on holiday and fell in love with 'the scenery, the culture and the people'.
After the landing the job, Robert and Sabrina packed all of their belongings into a 20ft container and had it sent to their new home in Whangaparāoa on the Hibiscus Coast, north of Auckland, for £10,000.
They paid an extra £1,000 to have it insured and another £2,000 to have their cat flown over.
New Zealand came out of a recession at the end of last year, but unemployment remains unchanged at 5.1 per cent - compared to Australia's 4.1 per cent and the UK's 4.4 per cent.
Many New Zealanders have jumped ship to Australia for more job opportunities with around 72,000 leaving in the year to December 2024, according to their government.
But New Zealand's skills shortage means it is easier to get a job in sectors such as education, healthcare, engineering and cyber security.
Even though he could earn more money in the same role in Australia, Robert and Sabrina were not as happy there and said 'it wasn't as welcoming'.
The only downside the pair discovered when they got to their new home is that the cost of living was not as cheap as they may have been led to believe.
'We loved the area - the Whangaparāoa Peninsula has beautiful beaches around it - but we were shocked at how high the house prices were,' he said.
Renting a four-bedroom house around 25 miles from Auckland is costing them £375 per week (NZ$850).
They could have chosen a smaller new-build in the area for £310 (NZ$700) but opted for a big garden and sea views in the pricier property worth around £554,000 (NZ$1.25m).
Robert now commutes by bus to Auckland every day whilst Sabrina looks for a job in recruitment.
Sabrina, who grew up in Malaysia, said: 'I'm hoping the market is going to pick up, but here in New Zealand it's all about who you know, so it takes time to get established But the sense of community is better.'
The cost of living is lower than in the UK with their food shop costing £243 ($550) per month and other costs including broadband at £22 to £44 ($50-$100), mains water at £44 ($100), electric at £75 ($170), gas at £35 ($80) and phone bills at £18 to £29 ($40-$65).
Petrol is cheaper in New Zealand and eating out is also more pocket friendly with a quick lunch in Auckland costing around £6 to £8 each and a coffee priced at £2.21 ($5).
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
New Zealand annual inflation quickens but below economists' forecast
WELLINGTON, July 21 (Reuters) - New Zealand's annual consumer inflation accelerated in the second quarter but was below economists' forecasts, leading markets to narrow the odds on a rate cut next month given weakness in the broader economy. Annual inflation came in at 2.7% in the second quarter, its highest level in a year, and speeding up from the 2.5% rate in the first quarter, Statistics New Zealand said in a statement on Monday. However, economists had forecast inflation at 2.8%. The statistics agency attributed the uptick to an increase in local government taxes and housing rental prices. On a quarter-on-quarter basis, the consumer price index rose 0.5%, compared with a 0.9% increase in the first quarter. Economists in a Reuters poll had forecast a 0.6% rise for the quarter. The New Zealand dollar dipped 0.3% to $0.5941 following the data release. Markets are now pricing in a 75% chance that the central bank will cut by 25 basis points in August, up from a 61% chance ahead of the data. The Reserve Bank of New Zealand, which in May forecast annual inflation for the quarter at 2.6%, held interest rates steady at this month's policy meeting partly due to near-term price risks. It was the first pause in the RBNZ's easing cycle that began in August 2024, a period in which it slashed rates by 225 basis points to 3.25%. The uncertainty around U.S. President Donald Trump's tariff policies and the impact on global growth and prices have kept most policymakers, including the RBNZ, on edge. New Zealand's annual inflation is nudging nearer to the upper end of the central bank's 1% to 3% target band. But economists say that with medium-term inflation expected to remain contained and considerable spare capacity in the economy, a rate cut in August remains likely. ASB Bank senior economist Mark Smith said ASB's core judgment is that the RBNZ will accommodate or look through the tick up in near-term inflation as the weakening global outlook and the large margin of spare capacity imply a lower medium-term inflation outlook. 'After earlier tapping the monetary policy brakes, the RBNZ is expected to press the accelerator and actively provide policy support," Smith said in a note. Annual non-tradeable inflation rose 3.7% in the second quarter, its lowest level since the second quarter of 2021, according to Statistics New Zealand.


Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
How Lord Hermer's staff racked up a £1.2MILLION work from home bill
More than £1million has been spent on work from home equipment by government departments that report to Attorney General Lord Hermer. The Government Legal Department, the Crown Prosecution Service and the Serious Fraud Office have spent more than £1.24million in the last three years on computers, desks and other equipment to enable remote work. Overall, agencies in eight departments have spent nearly £3million on similar equipment, despite ministers saying they want to see more people working in the office. The figures were revealed in response to parliamentary questions from a Tory MP. TaxPayers' Alliance spokesman Shimeon Lee urged ministers to 'get a grip and put the public back at the heart of public service'. He told The Sunday Telegraph: 'Taxpayers will be dismayed to know that we are still investing in a work from home culture. 'Remote working has become the norm in the public sector, with little regard for productivity, accountability or value for money.' Energy minister Miatta Fahnbulleh said the spending 'reflected an increased headcount to deliver additional remit for government priorities and steps to reduce its London office footprint to save money.' Other work-from-home highrollers included the Health and Safety Executive, a public body sponsored by the Department for Work and Pensions, which spent £955,099, and Ofgem, energy regulator in Labour's Net Zero department, at £396,486. Lord Hermer is a former barrister and a friend of Sir Keir Starmer. He was handed a peerage and was parachuted in to the high-profile role after the election. But some Downing Street aides are reported to be pressing for his removal as part of an autumn relaunch. He is said to be a key figure in the controversial deal to surrender the Chagos Islands, the decision to repeal laws protecting British veterans of the Northern Ireland Troubles from prosecution and the Government's refusal to help defend Israel during the conflict with Iran. Last month Lord Hermer rubbished claims of a 'two-tier' justice system in Britain as 'disgusting' and 'wrong'. Such accusations arose following last summer's riots after the Southport murders were policed more strongly and the early release of prisoners to tackle overcrowding. Lord Hermer said: 'What some people were seeking to do, bringing up 'two-tier', was to make a comparison with the way people were being treated for trying to kill police officers – and I want to reiterate that, kill police officers – with the response to protests on the streets of London. We don't have a two-tiered justice system.'


Telegraph
16 hours ago
- Telegraph
Everyone else is scaling back green targets – why can't we?
The Netherlands won't be building as many wind turbines in the North Sea as it had first planned. New Zealand has started issuing licences for developing new offshore gas fields again. Even Canada, under one of the champions of the green energy transition Mark Carney, has upped the production of fossil fuels. Right across the developed world, with the one significant exception of China, governments are scaling back their green targets, recognising that they are too expensive, too poorly planned and won't deliver the power needed at the right price to keep a modern economy functioning. But hold on. If the rest of the world is ripping up the plan, why can't Britain as well? Because we need cheaper, reliable energy more than any of our major industrial rivals. It has proved yet another week of setbacks for cheerleaders of the green energy transition. The Dutch government had set a target of 50 gigawatts (GW) of offshore wind energy – more than enough to supply the entire country's energy needs, currently around 24GW – by 2040, but has now lowered it. The reason? It is costing more than it expected – surprise, surprise – as well as generating more power than the country actually needs. Back in May, New Zealand, under a new Right-of-centre government, reversed the ban on new offshore oil and gas fields and is now actively encouraging fresh investment in fossil fuels. We might have expected Mark Carney to take office as the prime minister of Canada to accelerate the shift to renewable energy given his record at the Bank of England. But no. Instead, he is allowing the country's huge oil and gas industry to start expanding again.