
First the Soviets, then the Chinese, attempted to suppress the memory of Mongolia's founder
There was a music and folklore festival on Sukhbaatar Square outside the
Mongolian
government palace where weeks of
demonstrations toppled the prime minister last week
.
A few blocks away, a wedding party was posing for pictures outside the ornate, black and gold entrance to the
Genghis Khan
National Museum. The museum has been open for less than three years but it has already become one of the city's most popular landmarks and tourist attractions.
With eight floors of exhibition space beneath a gleaming domed room, the museum's 12,000 artefacts cover 2,000 years of history surrounding the Mongol Empire. Stretching from the Sea of Japan to Hungary, it was the largest contiguous empire in human history, established by Genghis Khan and expanded by his successors.
READ MORE
The museum illustrates some of the innovative methods Genghis Khan brought to warfare, including new weapons technology such as lightweight bows and arrows and the use of propaganda. He sent agents to cities he planned to attack, instructing them to frighten the populace with stories of the Mongols' savagery in the hope that they would surrender without a fight.
Many visitors to Ulaanbaatar take a day trip out of the city to view a 40 metre tall stainless steel statue of Genghis Khan, which is the claimed to be world's tallest equestrian statue. There is another statue of him outside the government palace on Sukhbaatar Square, where foreign dignitaries on official visits bow before it to show their respect.
When
Vyacheslav Volodin
, the speaker of Russia's State Duma, visited Ulaanbaatar two years ago, he caused public outrage by refusing to bow before the statue.
Pope Francis
had bowed before the statue only a couple of weeks earlier, and
Vladimir Putin
made the same gesture when he visited the city.
Volodin's offence struck a deep chord among Mongolians who recalled how the memory of Genghis Khan was suppressed when the country was a communist state under heavy Soviet influence.
In Ulaanbaatar this week, they were still talking about what happened during the 800th anniversary of Genghis Khan's birth in 1964.
[
Mongolian prime minister resigns after losing backing of parliament
Opens in new window
]
One of his descendants living in China was a leader of the Chinese autonomous region of Inner Mongolia and he persuaded the authorities to build a mausoleum of Genghis Khan.
Daramyn Timur-Ochir, a member of the politburo of Mongolia's communist party, heard about the Chinese plan to mark the anniversary and suggested that the warlord should be commemorated in his homeland too.
The politburo decided to build a monument, issue a postage stamp, commission a documentary film, organise a scientific conference and produce a Marxist appraisal of the role of Genghis Khan in Mongolian history.
The Soviet embassy then sent a report to Moscow about the conference, complaining that the Mongolian government 'declared that Mongolia's accession to the United Nations was to the credit of Genghis Khan when it was to the credit of the people'.
When Mongolia's communist leader Yumjaagiin Tsedenbal visited Moscow shortly afterwards,
Nikita Khrushchev
demanded to know what the Mongolians were thinking by issuing a postage stamp commemorating Genghis Khan. Tsedenbal returned to Ulaanbaatar and ordered that the monument that had been built for the anniversary should be destroyed, but local officials never carried out the order.
Within three months, Timur-Ochir was purged from the politburo and the Soviets later blamed the Chinese for encouraging the Mongolians to foster a cult of Genghis Khan.
[
Who gains from Mongolian prime minister's downfall?
Opens in new window
]
A few decades later, with Mongolia now well established as a liberal parliamentary democracy with much weaker ties to Moscow, it is China that is trying to suppress Genghis Khan's memory.
Five years ago, the Château des ducs de Bretagne history museum in Nantes said it was postponing an exhibition about him that was due to open in February 2021.
The exhibition was developed in collaboration with the Inner Mongolia Museum in the Chinese city of Hohhot, but the museum director in Nantes called the project off following a number of interventions by the Chinese government.
The Chinese Bureau of Heritage told the museum to remove the words Genghis Khan, Empire and Mongol from the exhibition's title and requested full control of the catalogue, explanatory texts and communications related to the exhibition. The Nantes museum claimed a proposed new synopsis included 'biased rewriting aimed at making Mongolian history and culture completely disappear for the benefit of a new national story'.
The exhibition was finally staged last year without Chinese co-operation and instead of featuring objects from the museum in Hohhot, most of its exhibits came from collections in Mongolia, including the Genghis Khan National Museum in Ulaanbaatar.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Times
a day ago
- Irish Times
Myanmar forms interim government before election but top general still in charge
Myanmar 's military on Thursday nominally transferred power to a civilian-led interim government in advance of a planned election, with the junta chief remaining in charge of the war-torn country in his other role as acting president. An announcement in state media said a decree that granted power to the military after its 2021 coup had been cancelled and a caretaker administration had been formed alongside a special commission to oversee the election. The move signals no change to the status quo in Myanmar, with coup leader Min Aung Hlaing holding on to all major levers of power as acting president while retaining his position as chief of the armed forces. A nationwide state of emergency in place since the coup, which was due to expire on Thursday after seven extensions, has now been lifted, said Zaw Min Tun, a government spokesman. READ MORE 'The interim president and commander in chief said this upcoming six months are the time to prepare and host the election,' he told state media. Myanmar has been in chaos since the coup against Aung San Suu Kyi 's elected civilian government plunged the Southeast Asian nation into civil war, with the military fighting to contain a rebellion and accused of widespread atrocities, which it denies. The election has been dismissed by western governments as a sham to entrench the general's power and is expected to be dominated by proxies of the military, with opposition groups either barred from running or refusing to take part. David Mathieson, an independent Myanmar-focused analyst, said the change in power was cosmetic and those in charge would continue to be abusive and repressive. 'They are just rearranging the same pieces and calling the regime a new name,' he said. 'This is part of preparations for an election which we don't know much about.' The extent of the civil war's impact on the planned election remains unclear. In an effort to create voter rolls, the junta held a nationwide census last year but was only able to conduct it in 145 out of Myanmar's 330 townships – reflecting its lack of control over swathes of the country. At a meeting of defence officials on Thursday, Min Aung Hlaing said voting in the election would be held in different areas in December and January due to security concerns, state-run MRTV reported in its nightly news bulletin. Martial law and a state of emergency would be imposed in more than 60 townships across nine regions and states due to the threat of violence and insurgency, the report said, many in border areas where the military is facing unprecedented resistance from rebel groups. China's foreign ministry on Thursday said it 'supports Myanmar's development path in line with its national conditions and Myanmar's steady advancement of its domestic political agenda'. The military has killed more than 6,000 people and arbitrarily detained more than 20,000 since the coup, with more than 3.5 million people internally displaced, an Amnesty International report said in January. Myanmar's military has dismissed allegations of abuses as western disinformation. It justified its 2021 coup as a necessary intervention following what it said was widespread fraud in an election three months earlier that was won decisively by Ms Suu Kyi's now defunct ruling party. Election monitors found no evidence of fraud that would have changed the outcome. – Reuters


Irish Times
a day ago
- Irish Times
Odds and Ends - Frank McNally on the vagaries of Galway Race Week
For the second year running at the Galway Races, I found myself staying in a B&NB. That's to say, a place that does bed and no breakfast. Okay, last year's did have breakfast as an optional extra, but served in a different house nearby, so I didn't bother. This year, my gruffly cheerful – or cheerfully gruff – host responded to the query as to whether one was included or available with a laughing 'Not at all!'. It was as if I'd asked if his house had a late bar, or a chauffeured limousine service. In fairness, he was charging a mere €89 for the night, a bargain by Galway race week standards. My host in 2024 had been male too. Not only is the traditional B&B going the way of the dodo, so it seems is the traditional Bean an Tí. The last of those I saw in the wild was in north Donegal a couple of years ago while en route to Tory Island. Covid seems to have killed many of them off (not literally, I hope – just in precipitating early retirements). You'd miss their motherly presence and personal touch all the same. After taking payment up front, this year's host told me to let myself out in the morning and just leave the key. READ MORE Mind you, we chatted long enough for him to tell me that even breakfast-free accommodation is not without challenges. 'My biggest problem with the races is keeping clean sheets,' he said. I looked at him blankly, imagining various horror scenarios. 'The fake tan,' he explained. 'It's impossible to get out.' *** On the bus from Eyre Square to Ballybrit on Monday, the traffic was – as always in Galway – sclerotic. Our driver was no less frustrated than the rest of us as we oozed towards the racecourse at the speed of a leak in a molasses factory. Peering ahead over the steering wheel, he periodically shared the latest bad news: 'Nothing moving on the green light – there must be trouble somewhere.' Ominously, three fire brigades passed us at one point, lights flashing. The driver stared after them into the distance to see which direction they took. 'Did they turn or go straight on?' he asked a front-seat passenger. 'They went right, I think,' the passenger said. We had to go right too, so this was not good. 'Ah Jaysus, we're f**ked,' confirmed the driver. *** I always think the name Ballybrit sounds like it was invented for a TV sitcom, like Ballykissangel except that this series would set be in an Irish village full of posh English retirees. In fact, according to Logainm, the name is 500 years old, the earliest dated reference (to a 'Balebritt') being 1525. But speaking of coincidental anniversaries, while sitting on the bus I noticed via Twitter/X that Monday was the 266th birthday of one Hudson Lowe (1769 – 1844), who was born not only in Galway but on the Eyre Square we had just left. In other circumstances, Lowe might have left no impression on history. His fellow Anglo-Irishman the Duke of Wellington would later say of him: 'He was a man wanting in education and judgment. He was a stupid man. He knew nothing at all of the world, and like all men who know nothing of the world, he was suspicious and jealous.' So why was Wellington even talking about him? Because Lowe had been governor of Saint Helena in the years Napoleon (who was born two weeks after him) was prisoner there. And he imposed such a brutal regime that another Irishman, Napoleon's physician and friend Barry O'Meara, called him an 'executioner'. Although only acting on orders, he was later blamed for the embarrassment caused to Britain over the mistreatment of their celebrity prisoner. Wellington thought he had been 'a very bad choice' for the job. *** I could get through an entire Galway Festival, especially when working, without ever having a bet. On the other hand, like many occasional punters, I have a weakness for coincidental names. So scanning the racecard for Monday night, my eye was drawn to Theabsolutegov'nor, running in the last. If its jockey had been a Lowe or a Napoleon, I would definitely have backed it. Instead, rationality got the better of me and I didn't (wisely, it's still running). But passing through the betting ring before the Iggy Daly Easyfix Handicap Hurdle, I noticed there was a horse called 'Jerrari' entered in it. And it so happened that I have a French friend of that unusual surname. In my defence, this is as logical a reason as any to bet on a 20-horse handicap, with its countless permutations of form and weight, which you'd need to be a supercomputer to get a handle on. Jerrari was 12-1 at the time – far from favourite but not a no-hoper. So in my only bet of the meeting, I stuck a tenner each-way on him with the Tote. And sure enough, he romped to victory, earning me the price of two nights' bed without breakfast, or nearly.


Irish Times
2 days ago
- Irish Times
Why isn't the message on climate change getting through?
Almost every time I catch a news bulletin on radio or TV this summer, it strikes me that the conversation on climate change is in drastic need of a reset. Time and again, reports are broadcast concerning extreme weather events, from unprecedented rainfall in Asia to searing heatwaves in southern Europe , from record temperatures in the Arctic to devastating flooding in the US. One particularly tragic event this month was the loss of many young lives at a much-loved summer camp for girls in Texas. Time and again, these events are described as once-in-a-lifetime occurrences, rare events that are hugely regrettable but unavoidable. Indeed, I was struck by the number of times the expression 'acts of God' was used on US news channels – or 'acts of satan' as conservative American journalist Cal Thomas put it on the Last Word on Today FM Although understandable, this reaction is wide of the mark. This is because it has been known for many years now that the probability of such events occurring is greatly enhanced in a warming climate. Indeed, it is a matter of basic physics that, as our atmosphere warms, extreme weather events such as violent storms will undoubtedly become more frequent and more severe. READ MORE Why isn't this message getting through? I lost count of the number of media reports I saw that failed to mention the issue of climate change altogether,or referred to it in passing as a side issue. One reason may be a genuine misunderstanding of the science. It is true that there have been plenty of extreme weather events in the past and it is also true that one cannot usually draw a direct link between a particular weather event and climate change. However, innumerable studies have shown such events are becoming much more common and are rendered much more likely by a warming atmosphere. A second reason is politics. For some reason, a great many of those on the conservative side of the political spectrum seem unable to accept the findings of climate scientists, dismissing them as exaggerated or 'woke'. Thus an entire field of science has been dragged into the culture wars. Some argue that this rejection is not surprising as conservative parties tend to maintain close links with corporate interests. Given that a central finding of climate science is that global warming is closely linked with the emission of greenhouse gases from industrial activity – in particular with the burning of fossil fuels – it was entirely predictable that these industries would use their considerable wealth and power to convince their friends in politics to ignore the science. [ Forty degree heatwaves are the 'new norm'. Now we see what's coming for Ireland Opens in new window ] An extreme example of this behaviour can be found in the US . A striking characteristic of US president Donald Trump's 'big beautiful bill' is a systematic attempt to hamper developments in renewable energy at every turn, whilst removing almost all constraints on the mining of fossil fuels. There is little question that Trump's second term will be a major blow to attempts to wean the world's largest economy off fossil fuels, a regression that is already causing several other countries to review their own commitments in reducing emissions. One answer to this dangerous situation is communication. After all, not many people – whatever their politics – would genuinely wish an unstable climate on their children. What is needed is a sea-change in attitude, similar to what occurred in the case of the tobacco industry. As historians such as Naomi Oreskes have pointed out, the tobacco lobby used its power and influence to block action on smoking for many years. Yet the truth eventually prevailed and smoking is no longer the menace it once was. [ Let's inconvenience some oligarchs before we come for exhausted mothers Opens in new window ] Thus, it is incumbent on scientists and science communicators to redouble efforts to convey the threat posed by climate change. It seems to me the best way to do this is to explain both the basics of climate science and aspects of the practice of science such as convergence (how different lines of evidence can point to a single explanation) and consensus (how scientists come to agree, often after great initial scepticism and much debate, on that explanation). The alternative is that the painstaking findings of climate scientists are perceived as inflexible dogma, a not uncommon view that is as dangerous as it is mistaken. Dr Cormac O'Raifeartaigh is a senior lecturer in physics at the South East Technological University (Waterford) and a fellow of the Institute of Physics