What did the review of the BBC Gaza documentary find?
Here are the findings of a report into the programme:
– Failure to disclose information
The BBC breached its editorial guidelines by not informing viewers that the narrator's father has worked as Hamas's deputy minister of agriculture.
This omission was considered misleading and a breach of accuracy standards.
– Members of the production company knew
The report found that nobody at the BBC knew of the father's position when the documentary first aired, but three people at Hoyo Films, the independent production company which produced the film, were aware.
The report does not find that the production company misled the BBC, but said that the firm bears most of the responsibility for the failure.
– The BBC was not proactive
The report said that the corporation does bear some responsibility for 'not being proactive in the early phase of the project to ensure that the relevant editorial risks were fully discussed and that the production company had the guidance, direction and support it needed'.
It said that the BBC also had a 'lack of critical oversight of unanswered or partially answered questions'.
– Narrator's role was problematic
The narration was 'highly scripted' and carried the right of reply of the Israel Defence Forces, so it was 'wrong' to use the narrator as the voice of the programme given his background, the report said.
There should have been more comprehensive scrutiny by the BBC about his role earlier in the production process, the report added.
– No influence on programme content
There was no evidence that the narrator's family or father influenced the content of the programme.
The narrator's scripted contribution did not breach impartiality standards, the report said.
– Payment and checks
The narrator received a fee, a phone and a video game gift card which all amounted to £1,817, while £795 was paid to his adult sister.
Sanctions checks on the narrator and family found no issues.
– No other editorial breaches found
There were no other breaches of the guidelines on issues of due impartiality, language and translation, continuity and editing, fairness to contributors and consent, privacy, harm and offence, and child safeguarding, the report found.
The programme contained a range of views and rights of reply and there was no evidence of any outside interests inappropriately affecting the programme.
– Recommendations
The report recommended stronger BBC oversight for 'higher risk' independent productions, including embedding executives, formal greenlight meetings, improved compliance tracking and enhanced scrutiny of narrators.
It added: 'It is clear that actioning these recommendations would require more senior executive oversight and scrutiny for the higher-risk projects. This requires consideration of resourcing by BBC News.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Rhyl Journal
22 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
MasterChef's Gregg Wallace 'deeply sorry' for behaviour
It comes as a report found 45 out of 83 allegations made against Wallace during his time on the show were substantiated. The report, led by law firm Lewis Silkin, found that the 'majority of the allegations against Mr Wallace (94%) related to behaviour which is said to have occurred between 2005 and 2018', with only one allegation substantiated after 2018. The report also concluded that the 'majority of the substantiated allegations against Mr Wallace related to inappropriate sexual language and humour'. Following the report's publication this morning (July 14), Wallace has released a statement. In a statement to the PA news agency, he said: 'For eight months, my family and I have lived under a cloud. "Trial by media, fuelled by rumour and clickbait. "None of the serious allegations against me were upheld. "I challenged the remaining issue of unwanted touching but have had to accept a difference in perception, and I am deeply sorry for any distress caused. "It was never intended. "I'm relieved that the Banijay report fully recognises that my behaviour changed profoundly in 2018. "Some of my humour and language missed the mark. "I never set out to harm or humiliate. A post shared by Gregg Wallace MBE (@greggawallace) "I always tried to bring warmth and support to MasterChef, on screen and off. 'After nearly 20 years on the show, I now see that certain patterns, shaped by traits I've only recently begun to understand, may have been misread. "I also accept that more could have been done, by others and by myself, to address concerns earlier. 'A late autism diagnosis has helped me understand how I communicate and how I'm perceived. "I'm still learning. "Banijay have given me great support, and I thank them. "But in the end, the BBC left me exposed to trial by media and the damage it leaves in its wake. 'To those who've shown kindness, thank you. Recommended reading: 45 allegations against MasterChef's Gregg Wallace substantiated as BBC cuts ties BBC tells Gregg Wallace 'you will not change' as star hires 'aggressive lawyer' Gregg Wallace 'breaks his silence' after being sacked by BBC "It mattered. "This has been brutal. "For a working-class man with a direct manner, modern broadcasting has become a dangerous place. "I was the headline this time. But I won't be the last. 'There will be more casualties if the BBC continues down this path, where protecting its legacy matters more than protecting people. "For my part, with full legal support, I will consider my next move."
The Guardian
44 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Tim Davie admits ‘significant failing' by BBC over Gaza documentary
Tim Davie, the BBC's director general, has admitted the broadcaster made 'a significant failing' over a documentary about children in Gaza, after an internal investigation found that the programme breached editorial guidelines for accuracy. Senior BBC figures have acknowledged that programme-makers failed to ask the right questions about the making of Gaza: How to Survive a Warzone. An internal investigation found viewers should have been made aware of the 'critical information' that the 13-year-old narrator was the son of a Hamas official. However, the inquiry found no other breaches of guidelines in its production, including impartiality. It concluded no outside interests 'inappropriately impacted on the programme' and that no payments were made to people under financial sanctions. Davie and the BBC are under serious pressure after a series of incidents and have face repeated condemnation from the culture secretary, Lisa Nandy, whose relationship with Davie appears to have reached its lowest ebb. In her latest broadside at Davie, Nandy said there had been a 'series of catastrophic failures' by the BBC in recent weeks. Responding to the Gaza documentary findings, she said the BBC 'must ensure that such errors are never repeated'. She said: 'The public rightly expect the highest standards from the BBC and the corporation must learn and take swift action from the report's findings. Accurate and impartial reporting on the conflict in Gaza and events in the Middle East is absolutely essential. This must be done with the utmost care and sensitivity to ensure public trust.' Nandy had already demanded to know why no one had lost their job over the documentary error. Davie said there would be 'fair, clear and appropriate actions to ensure proper accountability'. No one has so far been dismissed. The long-awaited report was published on the same day as an investigation into the behaviour of Gregg Wallace, which substantiated 45 allegations made against the former BBC presenter, including claims of inappropriate sexual language and one incident of unwelcome physical contact. The BBC admitted opportunities were missed to deal with his behaviour. The review of Gaza: How to Survive a Warzone, which aired on BBC Two in February and was later removed from iPlayer, was carried out by Peter Johnston, the BBC's director of editorial complaints and reviews. He found that three members of the programme's independent production company, Hoyo Films, knew of the father's position but the BBC was not informed. The review concluded Hoyo Films had not intentionally misled the BBC but bore most responsibility for the failure. However, the BBC was accused of failing to be 'sufficiently proactive' with initial editorial checks and of a 'lack of critical oversight of unanswered or partially answered questions'. BBC figures had asked about the connections of the narrator's father but those queries went unanswered. It also found no 'reasonable basis' to conclude that anyone engaged or paid in connection with the programme was subject to financial sanctions. A fee of £795 was paid to the narrator's adult sister. The narrator was given a secondhand mobile phone and a gift card for a computer game. The narrator, his father, mother and sister were all checked for financial sanctions against them. Davie said the report 'identifies a significant failing in relation to accuracy in this documentary. I am sorry for this failing. We will now take action on two fronts – fair, clear and appropriate actions to ensure proper accountability and the immediate implementation of steps to prevent such errors being repeated.' He announced a series of changes, including new 'enhanced editorial controls'. No 'high-risk' long-form programmes will be formally commissioned until all compliance issues have been considered, including 'rigorous social media and background checks'. While the BBC has not announced anyone is leaving as a result of the incident, it is creating a board-level role overseeing news documentaries and current affairs. It raises questions over the future of Joanna Carr, the head of current affairs. Deborah Turness, the chief executive of BBC News, told staff that the programme had made a 'significant mistake'. Danny Cohen, the former director of BBC television who has repeatedly accused the BBC of anti-Israel bias, said: 'This looks like a classic case of 'deputy heads must roll' and that is nowhere near good enough. As head of news, Deborah Turness has questions to answer.' The Gaza report and the Wallace findings mean Davie is now facing the most challenging week of his five-year leadership of the BBC. Nandy has also criticised the director general over the failure to cut the live feed of Bob Vylan's Glastonbury performance. During the live stream, Bobby Vylan, whose real name is Pascal Robinson-Foster, led chants of 'death, death to the IDF', referring to the Israel Defense Forces. In a pointed attack on Davie in the House of Commons, Nandy said one editorial error was 'something that must be gripped. When you have several, it becomes a problem of leadership'. This is rejected by senior BBC figures. Meanwhile, the corporation has been criticised internally for failing to broadcast a second documentary over the plight of medics in Gaza. The programme, Gaza: Doctors Under Attack, was eventually shown by Channel 4.
Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
Carlos Alcaraz made his feelings very clear in response to Emma Raducanu rumours
Carlos Alcaraz has been romantically linked with British tennis star Emma Raducnau for some time but the two-time Wimbledon champion once moved to address the rumours Carlos Alcaraz will be licking his wounds after his dreams of clinching a third straight Wimbledon title were dashed on Sunday. The Spanish tennis star was beaten by his rival Jannik Sinner, who triumphed 4-6, 6-4, 6-4, 6-4 to claim his maiden SW19 crown. Alcaraz is no doubt now experiencing a different vibe from the aftermath of last year's event. After winning the competition in 2024, he was spotted dancing the night away with women's champion Barbora Krejcikova at the annual Wimbledon Champions' Dinner, as is tradition. Yet, it wasn't their dance moves that sparked a media frenzy but rather Emma Raducanu's presence in the Centre Court stands as he dispatched Novak Djokovic for his second Wimbledon title. Alcaraz later found himself batting away whispers of a romance with the British star, who exited this year's tournament in the fourth round after a thrilling clash with Aryna Sabalenka. Despite the relentless rumour mill, Alcaraz brushed off any notion of love with a chuckle. When quizzed last summer about Raducanu attending the 2024 final, he played down its significance, saying: "I don't know, I don't know. I think a lot of people came to see the final. "I think Novak and I always put on a good game, a show on the court. I think it is a beautiful game to watch. And she is from here, so I imagine that she wanted to come and see it. If there was a Grand Slam in Murcia I would 100 percent go to the final, even if I wasn't playing." But the Spaniard couldn't resist teasing, adding: "I don't know if she came to the finals or if she came to see me. Who knows? You have to ask her, but I hope she enjoyed the final." Despite Alcaraz maintaining they're merely friends, speculation continues to swirl around their blockbuster pairing ahead of the US Open. Tournament bosses have unveiled a glittering lineup for their two-day mixed doubles spectacle during 'Fan Week', with all focus now on the dream team featuring both former US Open winners. Alcaraz recently set tongues wagging when he confessed Raducanu "will be the boss" during their partnership. In a BBC chat at Wimbledon, the duo fielded questions about what they'd quiz each other on before heading to New York, reports the Express. "Ooh, good question," Raducanu said. "I would like to know how much of the court he can cover in New York." When posed the same query, Alcaraz burst into laughter before declaring: "I'm just going to serve and I'm gonna pull myself away and I let her play. She will cover a lot of the court. She will be the boss. I will do whatever she wants me to do." The tennis world was also sent into a top spin when Alcaraz let slip that he had made a "special request" to partner with Raducanu for the upcoming mixed event in August. "Yeah. I mean, the tournament told us about the tournament, the mixed tournament," Alcaraz told the media. "I was thinking that I couldn't play better if it wasn't with Emma. I just asked Emma if she wants to play doubles with me. Yeah, I made that special request." However, Raducanu didn't jump at the chance straight away, as Alcaraz, who has five Grand Slam titles under his belt, confessed she took her time before deciding to join forces. Raducanu later said: "Got to keep them on their toes! I mean, of course, I had to ask my team if they wanted me to play. But for me, when he asked me, I was going to say yes, I just had to kind of go through the formality of asking my coach, so I didn't just make the decision." During her pre-tournament press conference for this year's Wimbledon, Raducanu again faced questions about a potential romantic connection with Alcaraz after they were spotted filming a promo together at the All England Club. She concluded by stating she had a "good time" with him, adding: "We're just good friends."
