Textile sector slams EFS, seeks relief
Listen to article
The All Pakistan Textile Mills Association (APTMA), Pakistan Cotton Ginners Association (PCGA), and Karachi Cotton Association have jointly demanded the removal of yarn and fabric from the Export Facilitation Scheme (EFS) and the abolition of the 18% sales tax on locally produced cotton and yarn.
Speaking at a press conference at APTMA House on Tuesday, APTMA Central Chairman Kamran Arshad, flanked by other industry leaders including Asif Inam, Naveed Ahmed, Khawaja Muhammad Zubair, Jesomal, and Sham Lal, called the policy of zero-rating imports while taxing local production "anti-national." Arshad stated that large-scale industries are deteriorating, and the withdrawal of the EFS for local industry has inflicted massive damage, leading to the shutdown of 120 spinning mills and over 800 ginning factories.
He said the textile sector had repeatedly raised concerns with policymakers, including during meetings with International Monetary Fund (IMF) officials, stressing that the industry could not sustain the burden of such heavy taxation. Arshad warned that the government must act before the industry is forced to shut down entirely or relocate abroad, noting that a looming US tariff war has added further pressure.
Arshad claimed that the EFS has brought the industry to the edge of collapse. During talks with the IMF, the delegation highlighted the financial losses the sector had faced under the EFS, but were told the matter lies within the jurisdiction of the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR). In response to these concerns, the prime minister has constituted a review committee headed by Federal Minister Ahsan Iqbal to assess the scheme.
Urging the government to curtail its own spending instead of overburdening industry, Arshad pointed to the iron and steel sector as another example of policy failure, claiming it suffered over Rs300 billion in losses under the EFS. "If the policy is not reversed, more textile mills will shut down," he warned. Karachi Cotton Association representative Sham Lal said cotton production has declined sharply — from 15 million bales to just 5 million — due to misguided government policies.
He criticised the dismantling of the state's traditional "roti, kapra, makaan" (food, clothing, shelter) slogan through flawed economic measures. With 120 spinning mills and over 800 ginning units closed, the industry is collapsing, he said, asking where imported American cotton would go if local factories continue to shut down.
Mahesh Kumar of the PCGA added that sugar mills have contributed significantly to the downfall of the cotton sector. He said the ginning industry currently holds 5.5 million bales of unsold cotton and that many ginners are now defaulting on bank loans due to the deteriorating situation.
However, not all stakeholders in the textile sector share the same view. The Pakistan Hosiery Manufacturers and Exporters Association (PHMA) criticised APTMA's stance and defended the EFS. PHMA Chairman Babar Khan called the imposition of sales tax under EFS an anti-export measure and said taxing imports within the scheme would damage the export sector. Khan stressed that value-added textile exporters rely on the EFS and are demanding its restoration to its original framework under SRO 957, as it existed before the 2024-25 federal budget. He argued this would enable the entire textile value chain to benefit from tax exemptions.
Questioning APTMA's change in position, Khan pointed out that the association had supported the scheme since 2021 but was now opposing it. He accused APTMA of misleading propaganda and of undermining the value-added sector, which, according to him, could have helped Pakistan's textile exports cross the $50 billion mark.
The PHMA chief urged the government to ensure equal opportunities for all stakeholders and to reinstate the sales tax exemption on local purchases under the EFS. He said the practice of collecting and then refunding sales tax is inefficient, especially given frequent delays in refunds. Such delays, he added, would create serious liquidity issues for exporters.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
3 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Trump Doctrine 2.0
Starting from President James Monroe in December 1823 till Donald Trump in 2025, policy statements from different American presidents from time to time have been attributed as doctrines. According to AI, "Presidential doctrines in US foreign policy are major, overarching policy stances or strategies announced by a president, often shaping the nation's approach to international relations for a significant period. These doctrines are not legally binding but reflect a president's vision for the world and guide their actions on the global stage. They often emerge in response to specific geopolitical situations and can have lasting impacts on U.S. foreign policy." Major US doctrines proclaimed by various American Presidents like Monroe, Truman, Eisenhower, Carter, Bush, Clinton, Obama, Biden and Trump reflected major policy statements of US administration on foreign policy matters. How various American presidents after Second World War influenced the world through their doctrines indicated cold war and post-cold war realities. Trump Doctrine 2.0 is a recent phenomenon which was proclaimed in his second term following a set of events like the Russia-Ukraine War, the War in Gaza, and the Indo-Pak armed conflict of May 7-10 and the Israel-Iran war. Trump Doctrine, proclaimed in his first presidency, focused on accomplishing his objective enshrined in 'Make America Great Again', but the doctrine declared in his second term covered a wide range of international issues. After assuming power on January 20, 2025 Trump came up with strange type of ideas like getting hold of Greenland; making Canada the 51st province of America; getting control of Panama Canal; and renaming Gulf of Mexico as the Gulf of America. He also talked about ending wars starting with the ones in Ukraine and Gaza. But, most of his ideas, part of what is termed his makeshift doctrine, in his first 100 days in power were overshadowed with his tariff war and taking credit for the Indo-Pak ceasefire and ending the Israel-Iran. All that enabled him to claim that he deserves Nobel Peace Prize. What is Trump Doctrine 2.0? Is it like other doctrines of various American Presidents proclaimed since the Monroe doctrine? Is Trump Doctrine taken seriously by the world given his maverick and unpredictable personality? Is the US capable of proceeding with Trump Doctrine and what are the contradictions which are reflected in American president's policy statements? Some of the doctrines proclaimed by American presidents were announced during State of Union Address by US presidents and others were a reflection of their stance on various foreign policy matters. While the Monroe, Carter, Truman and Bush doctrines were pretty focused, the so-called Trump Doctrine is haphazard. According to a Reuters piece by Steve Holland and David Brunnstrom titled 'The latest US foray into military action has a name: The Trump Doctrine' dated June 26, 2025, "To some observers, however, the new doctrine sounds like an effort to offer a tidy framework to describe a foreign policy that often looks unpredictable and inconsistent I don't think Trump has a doctrine. I think Trump has only held instincts, [says Middle East analyst Aaron David Miller, a senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace]." A report in Politico magazine of June 24, 2025 titled "Vance outlines the 'Trump Doctrine' at political dinner in Ohio" quotes Vice President JD Vance as saying, "What I call the Trump Doctrine is quite simple: Number one, you articulate a clear American interest and that's, in this case, that Iran can't have a nuclear weapon. Number two, you try to aggressively diplomatically solve that problem. And number three, when you can't solve it diplomatically, you use overwhelming military power to solve it and then you get the hell out of there before it ever becomes a protracted conflict." Trump is known for making U-turns in his policy statements. On the eve of the Indo-Pak military confrontation on May 7, he and his vice president made it clear that the US had nothing to do with that conflict, only to take credit for the ceasefire later. When Israel attacked Iran on June 13 and Iran retaliated Trump made it clear that America was not behind Israel in its attack on Iran but within hours he began to actively support the Jewish state. Furthermore, he stated that in two weeks' time he would decide about whether or not to attack Iran, but within 24 hours his B-2 bombers attacked Iranian nuclear installations. Such U-turns reflect incoherence and inconsistency of Trump's mindset. He hailed the Iran-Israel ceasefire and used offensive words condemning violation of the ceasefire by both Israel and Iran. Trump Doctrine is a fallacy because of three main reasons. First, instead of acting like a statesman and a strategist, the US president is behaving like a person vying for gaining undue popularity without articulating his vision on foreign policy objectives. Once overshadowed with other foreign policy challenges like the Russia-Ukraine war, the conflict in Gaza and the Israel-Iran war, Trump's earlier pronouncements like annexing Greenland, taking control of Panama canal, making Canada America's 51st state and renaming Gulf of Mexico as Gulf of America slipped into background. It means a doctrine which is a set of brief policy statement is not reflected in Trump's speeches or in his State of Union address. In his address spanning one hour and forty minutes before the Joint Session of US Congress on March 4, 2025, Trump stated, "Six weeks ago I stood beneath the dome of this capitol and proclaimed the dawn of the golden age of America. From that moment on it has been nothing but swift and unrelenting action to usher in the greatest and most successful era in the history of our country. We have accomplished more in 43 days than most administrations accomplished in four years or eight years, and we are just getting started." Second, the so-called Trump Doctrine of 2025 will be followed by other doctrines in coming years which will contradict his earlier policy statements. One can expect chaos and dwindling of American power in view of inconsistent and incoherent position of Trump administration in the days to come. Finally, Trump's rash and maverick temperament will plunge the US in internal chaos and renewed conflict with China and NATO allies. It will also give an opportunity to other powers to effectively challenge American tutelage in global affairs.
Express Tribune
3 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Gold up Rs108,500 in FY25
Gold prices in Pakistan registered a sharp rise over the past year, mirroring gains in the international market and fueled by a combination of currency depreciation, inflationary pressures and strong investor demand. According to the All Pakistan Sarafa Gems and Jewellers Association (APSGJA), the price of 24-karat gold surged Rs108,500 per tola since June 29, 2024, reaching Rs350,200. The 10-gram rate similarly jumped over Rs93,000 to Rs300,240. This substantial appreciation comes as global gold prices continue to climb, moving up from $2,326 to above $3,280 per ounce over the same period. On June 29, 2024, the international gold price stood at $2,326 per ounce, with the local rate for 24-karat gold at Rs241,700 per tola and Rs207,219 per 10 grams. The price for 22-karat gold was Rs189,950 per 10 grams. In contrast, according to the latest update from APSGJA, the price of 24-karat gold has risen sharply to Rs350,200 per tola – a jump of Rs108,500 over the 12-month period. Similarly, the 10-gram gold rate has increased to Rs300,240, reflecting a substantial rise of over Rs93,000 compared to last year's levels. Gold prices in Pakistan posted a modest increase on Monday, following a similar trend in the international market where the precious metal inched higher amid a weaker US dollar. Investors are now awaiting key US economic data due later this week for cues on Fed's future policy direction. The price of gold rose Rs800 per tola, reaching Rs350,200. Similarly, the price of 10-gram gold climbed Rs686 to Rs300,240. Interactive Commodities Director Adnan Agar noted that gold touched intra-day high of $3,296 and low of $3,259 in the international market. He described the overall market trend as downward, with potential support zones at $3,220 and $3,200. Spot gold rose 0.5% to $3,287.64 per ounce as of 1447 GMT after reaching its lowest point since May 29 earlier in the session, according to Reuters. The yellow metal was up for the second straight quarter, rising 5.2%. Meanwhile, the Pakistani rupee registered a slight decline against the US dollar on Monday, slipping 0.01% in the inter-bank market. It concluded fiscal year 2024-25 with a year-on-year depreciation of 1.95%. At the close of trading, the rupee settled at 283.76, down four paisa from the previous session. On a yearly basis, the rupee depreciated Rs5.42 compared to the closing rate of 278.34 recorded at the end of the previous fiscal year. Analysts attribute the currency's subdued performance to persistent pressure from rising import demand.
Business Recorder
5 hours ago
- Business Recorder
France's Macron calls tariffs imposed by powerful countries a form of ‘blackmail'
French President Emmanuel Macron said on Monday that tariffs levied by powerful countries were often a form of 'blackmail' rather than instruments to rebalance trade. His comments during a speech at the International Conference on Financing for Development in Seville, Spain, came with the European Union negotiating a trade deal with the United States ahead of a July 9 deadline, though he did not specifically refer to the United States or U.S. President Donald Trump. 'We need to restore freedom and equity to international trade, much more than barriers and tariffs, which are devised by the strongest, and which are often used as instruments of blackmail, not at all as instruments of rebalancing,' Macron said. He also urged support - and a rethinking - of the World Trade Organization to bring it in line with goals to fight inequality and climate change. 'Bringing back a trade war and tariffs at this moment in the life of the planet is an aberration, especially when I see the tariffs that are being imposed on countries that are just beginning their economic takeoff,' Macron said. EU seeks unity in first strike back at Trump tariffs Trump unveiled sweeping global tariffs in April in which he said countries would face taxes on imports into the United States ranging from 10% to 50%, though he later reversed course and mostly lowered them for 90 days. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt on Monday rejected Macron's characterization, insisting that tariffs were an effective tool to rebuild U.S. manufacturing. She said Trump remained in discussions on trade to aid American workers. 'Europe and the rest of the world might not be used to that, but President Trump is back in town and he's going to do what's right for our people and our country,' she said. The United Nations trade agency had said the tariffs could have a catastrophic impact on developing countries, with some of the world's least developed, such as Lesotho, Cambodia, Laos, Madagascar and Myanmar, facing some of the highest levies. Macron, a vocal critic of Washington's tariff campaign, has also said it is an aberration to ask Europeans to spend more on defence while launching a trade war.
