Russian deputies back fines for clicking on 'extremist' content
Critics say the planned law, which has drawn rare criticism from across Russia's political spectrum, would stifle internet freedom.
Russian authorities already block access to thousands of websites accused of hosting "extremist" content.
The latest proposed legislation threatens fines of up to 5,000 rubles ($64) on anyone found to have deliberately searched for or gained access to material listed as extremist by the justice ministry.
More than 5,000 entries are on the list, including web pages, political slogans, books, artworks and music albums.
Among them are songs glorifying Ukraine, blog posts by feminist rock band Pussy Riot and information on the Wikipedia page for dynamite.
Deputies in the lower house State Duma backed the bill by 283 votes to 22 in its second reading.
It is not clear whether the bill has the support of the government.
The Kremlin said the proposal needed "more detailed explanations" to allay people's concerns.
"I am not familiar with the initiative by the deputies," Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said in response to a question from AFP.
- 'Attack on basic rights' -
The bill requires three readings and approval by Russia's upper house before President Vladimir Putin can sign it into law.
During Thursday's second reading, lawmaker Alexander Teterdinko of the governing United Russia party said the legislation would only affect those who "deliberately" search for extremist material.
"That is to say, if you Google something and material appears in the search results, but you do not click on it, do not read it, do not use it in any way... you will not fall under this article," he said.
Other lawmakers, however, expressed concern over the apparent lack of safeguards.
The bill was originally about tightening regulation over shipping clerks, but evolved as lawmakers inserted amendments.
Deputy State Duma Speaker Vladislav Davankov called components of the bill an "attack on the basic rights of citizens". Russia's internet safety tsar warned the legislation would stifle her department's work.
The bill would also ban advertising for virtual private networks (VPNs) and impose fines for transferring SIM cards to another person, both ways of browsing with more privacy.
Margarita Simonyan, the editor-in-chief of pro-Kremlin broadcaster Russia Today, said the legislation would make it impossible to investigate and expose extremist groups.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
29 minutes ago
- IOL News
Chelsea's Club World Cup win was a victory for PR, not football
Chelsea won the Fifa Club World Cup this past Sunday. Photo: AFP Image: AFP To be honest, few would have been surprised to learn that the real Fifa Club World Cup trophy — designed by Tiffany & Co — is destined to remain in the White House in perpetuity. It's the kind of garish Americana that fits neatly with the current president's brand: shiny, performative, and tailor-made for a press conference. Another glittering bauble to be paraded as proof of greatness — regardless of who actually earned it on the pitch. 'I said, 'When are you going to pick up the trophy?'' Trump remarked earlier this week, while showing it off at the White House. 'And (Fifa) said, 'We're never going to pick it up. You can have it forever in the Oval Office. We're making a new one.' Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading 'And they actually made a new one,' he added. 'So, that was quite exciting, but it is in the Oval right now.' So, after all that effort — seven matches, difficult conditions, the fatigue of a draining season — the eventual winners, Chelsea, didn't even get to take home the real McCoy. Instead, some replica will sit in the trophy cabinet at Cobham. Moreover, they didn't even get to enjoy their moment properly after beating PSG 3–0. Trump gate-crashed the celebration, too. These moments kind of encapsulate the problems with the Club World Cup for me. It's a political statement — not so much for the US (although they certainly profited from it), but for Fifa. It was created to satisfy the vanity of that organisation, to strong-arm the international association's members into participating. According to reports the official Fifa Club World Cup trophy will remain in the White House. Photo: AFP Image: AFP They dangled prestige, a shedload of money and the title of 'world champions', but much like the replica trophy, it still means very little. Chelsea will not — at least not in this generation — look back on winning the competition as a defining moment in their history. That's not to say that, in 100 years' time, it won't carry some aura, but right now it feels all very manufactured. From a purely commercial standpoint, you can't argue with it. Chelsea are R20 billion richer, their American owners have a new PR avenue to explore, complete with catchphrases to inspire the existing fanbase, while trying to court new supporters in the US and Asia. And a trophy is still a trophy. But, had they lost, the narrative would have been the usual fallback: 'It was a good experience for this young team. It'll help them grow and prepare for next season.' CHAMPIONS OF THE WORLD. — Chelsea FC (@ChelseaFC) July 13, 2025 I'm a Chelsea fan. On Monday, after winning the cup — if you can call the Voyager-inspired design a cup — I woke up and immediately started riling up my fellow football fans (especially the Liverpool ones). I did so with tongue firmly in cheek, poking and prodding for a reaction. 'Good morning, champs,' I wrote to my fellow Blues supporters, with a knowing smile. I didn't do it because I care deeply about the win (although I am proud of the performance) but rather because of the absurdity of it all. When it comes down to it — was it the tournament a success? It certainly was, in its own peculiar way. Just not in on-field terms. It felt like winning an elongated Community Shield — and I remain far more concerned about the upcoming Premier League and Uefa Champions League. I believe most, if not all, of the clubs that participated — regardless of where they come from — harbour a similar sentiment. Maybe one day the Club World Cup will carry the weight its organisers desperately want it to. But until then, it remains a curious experiment: part sporting contest, part PR stunt — with just enough gloss to convince us it matters, even if we know deep down it doesn't. After all, football has a funny way of turning sideshows into centrepieces.
The Star
7 hours ago
- The Star
Does the BRICS currency threaten the dollar?
Some people may be wondering why the US President has been acting out in recent months, threatening to impose tariffs, at times in a seemingly excessive manner. Economists and political analysts suggest that one of the main reasons for Trump's economic rhetoric is the United States' concern that BRICS countries are initiating a strategic plan to undermine the dollar, a process some observers refer to as "de-dollarisation''. The BRICS grouping includes Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa and a few other countries that joined in the past couple of years. It all started in Kazan, Russia, during the 16th BRICS summit last year when these countries unveiled a symbolic BRICS banknote, unleashing hot debate regarding the US dollar's dominance. At the time, Russian President Vladimir Putin emphasised that the dollar is being used as a ''weapon.'' A year before, meanwhile, Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva proposed creating a new, common currency in South America to reduce its reliance on the dollar in international trade. India has also been advocating for local currency settlements among BRICS nations. The unveiling of the BRICS currency bill, featuring the Taj Mahal, added controversy, as the bloc explores challenging the US dollar's global financial power. Despite research showing that the US dollar remains the primary reserve currency, Trump would take none of that as he continued his criticism of BRICS. "We are going to require a commitment from these seemingly hostile countries that they will neither create a new BRICS currency, nor back any other currency to replace the mighty US dollar or, they will face 100% Tariffs,'' he wrote in his Social Truth platform in January. The statement was similar to the one he posted last November. According to Bloomberg, Brazil and South Africa have criticised Trump separately for his anti-BRICS comments, while India has refrained from responding publicly, signalling that it is walking a fine line in maintaining its relationship with Washington. Would a BRICS currency threaten the dollar? Political analyst Anda Mbikwana offers his insights on the issue. 'The unveiling of a symbolic BRICS banknote at the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum represents far more than ceremonial posturing — it signals a deliberate escalation in the bloc's strategy to construct alternative financial architectures that could fundamentally reshape global monetary dynamics. ''While critics may dismiss this $200 denomination note as mere symbolism, the careful design choices reveal sophisticated strategic thinking. The front's display of founding member flags alongside the reverse featuring partner nations creates a visual narrative of expanding multipolarity that directly challenges the hierarchical nature of the dollar-dominated system. ''This imagery reinforces BRICS' positioning as what President Putin has characterised as 'non-western' rather than 'anti-western' — a crucial distinction that broadens its appeal across the Global South.'' The Technological Infrastructure Behind De-dollarisation ''The symbolic banknote masks more substantive developments in BRICS' financial infrastructure. Russia's emphasis on blockchain-based payment systems and central bank digital currencies represents a technologically sophisticated approach to circumventing traditional dollar-denominated channels. ''These systems offer practical alternatives to SWIFT and correspondent banking relationships that have become increasingly weaponised through sanctions regimes.'' And how does this directly affect South Africa, one might ask. Said Mbikwana: ''For South Africa, this development presents both opportunities and challenges. Greater financial integration within BRICS could reduce transaction costs and currency exposure risks in trade with major partners. ''However, it also requires careful navigation of relationships with Western economies that remain crucial for South African exports and investment. The Reserve Bank's approach to central bank digital currency development will become increasingly strategic as these alternative payment systems mature.'' According to Mbikwana, despite BRICS' banknote symbolic significance, fundamental economic realities limit BRICS' ability to quickly displace dollar dominance. ''The United States retains unparalleled capital market depth, institutional credibility, and network effects that have historically proven resilient to challengers. Moreover, internal coordination challenges within BRICS — particularly between China and India — limit the bloc's ability to present a unified monetary alternative.'' The BRICS symbolic banknote, added Mbikwana, should be understood not as an immediate threat to dollar hegemony, but as a manifestation of longer-term structural shifts in global economic governance. ''Its significance lies not in its current form, but in its representation of institutional momentum toward financial multipolarity. ''American opposition to these developments may paradoxically accelerate their adoption by reinforcing perceptions of dollar weaponisation among emerging economies. ''The ultimate question is not whether BRICS can immediately supplant the dollar, but whether it can create sufficient institutional alternatives to reduce the international community's dependence on dollar-denominated systems. In this context, symbolic gestures serve as important markers of political will and institutional capacity — prerequisites for any serious challenge to existing monetary hierarchies.'' The purpose of the banknote will serve as a payment system designed to facilitate transactions within the BRICS bloc using local currencies and potentially central bank digital currencies. While a BRICS currency could potentially challenge the US dollar's dominance, it's unlikely to replace it entirely soon . There is ongoing development and testing, with a pilot programme potentially appearing before the end of 2026. Some economists are criticising Trump for threatening the BRICS, according to a CBS News report, saying it makes the US look weak. "It isn't a good look, as it indirectly elevates the stature of a non-threat and suggests a lack of confidence in the dollar," Brad Setser, a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations and former Treasury Department economist, wrote on X.
eNCA
8 hours ago
- eNCA
Afghan data breach unmasked UK spies, special forces: reports
The details of more than 100 Britons, including spies and special forces personnel, were included in a massive data breach involving thousands of Afghans, UK media reported Thursday. The information was included in the mistakenly released spreadsheet, British newspapers reported, citing unnamed defence sources. The leak was only revealed to the public earlier this week after news blackout imposed by the previous Conservative government was finally lifted. The ministry of defence did not immediately respond to a request for comment from AFP. But reports in the British media, including the Guardian newspaper and BBC, said members of Britain's intelligence service and special forces were among those listed on the spreadsheet. Britain's government disclosed on Tuesday that a UK official had accidentally leaked a document containing the names and details of almost 19,000 Afghans who had asked to be relocated to the UK. It happened in February 2022, just six months after Taliban fighters seized Kabul, Labour's Defence Secretary John Healey told parliament. The breach and the resettlement plan to protect those involved from potential repercussions only came to light after a court-issued super-gag was lifted. The nearly two-year-long court ban secured by the previous Conservative government prevented any media reporting of the leak. In addition, parliament was not briefed and there was no public knowledge of the resettlement plan and the costs involved. Prime Minister Keir Starmer has said that Tory ministers have "serious questions to answer" over the secret resettlement plan while parliamentary Speaker Lindsay Hoyle said the affair raised significant constitutional issues". Some 900 Afghans and 3,600 family members have since been brought to Britain or are in transit under the programme known as the Afghan Response Route, at a cost of around £400 million ($535 million), Healey said. Applications from 600 more people have also been accepted, bringing the estimated total cost of the scheme to £850 million. They are among some 36,000 Afghans who have been accepted by Britain under different schemes since the August 2021 fall of Kabul.
