Is the leader of the GNU lost at sea? : Ramaphosa's leadership style questioned
President Cyril Ramaphosa is losing the country.
His hold on it is unravelling like a ball of frayed string rolling downhill.
The government of national unity, which had vowed to rescue South Africa, is dysfunctional, largely because of the president's appalling lack of leadership.
Unprecedented depths of economic and social distress have heightened public discontent and one senses that it needs just a spark to erupt.
The ever-faster cascade of events has punctuated the president's customary sang-froid. He has made foolish decisions and he has been caught in fabrications that he should have realised were bound to be exposed.
Lieutenant-General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi's explosive allegations about political meddling, cadre deployment and institutional capture in law enforcement and the justice system left Ramaphosa flat-footed.
It says much about how out of touch Ramaphosa has become that, despite the gravity of Mkhwanazi's allegations, he genuinely seemed to think he could shield his close ally, police minister Senzo Mchunu and deputy national commissioner Shadrack Sibiya.
Public outrage swiftly made his stance untenable. As Mchunu's stand-in, Ramaphosa chose Prof Firoz Cachalia.
A respected academic who, on paper, looked like a safe choice, Cachalia arrives with baggage of his own.
When Mkhwanazi earlier this year went public for the first time with claims of political meddling, Cacha lia accused him of 'public grandstanding' and urged him to stick to the internal police channels that he had accused of corruption.
But the comedy continues. Farcically, the portfolio in the meantime has been handed to Gwede Mantashe, the most compromised but longest-serving minister Ramaphosa has had.
It's during all this slapstick that Minister in the Presidency Khumbudzo Ntshavheni deemed it to be an opportune to release the 2024-2028 National Security Strategy assessment, which confusingly concludes that, despite political assassinations, incipient terrorism, violent extremism, economic sabotage and ram pant corruption, South Africa is a stable and secure nation.
She then went on to make some extraordinary remarks at the press conference about a potential coup d'état.
'There is,' Ntshavheni told the increasingly bewildered journalists, 'a potential risk of a coup d'état. We have identified it and put measures in place to mitigate against it.
So, that's why we say to South Africans that there will not be anyone attempting to do a coup in South Africa.'
ALSO READ:'Cyril must fall': Organisations march against Ramaphosa to Union Buildings on Mandela Day
In the past few days or in the past few weeks, there has not been anyone attempting to do a coup in South Africa.
That does not mean people are not planning one. Or, as Lewis Carroll put it with greater elegance and far less chance of rocking national confidence: 'If it was so, it might be. And if it were so, it would be. But as it isn't, it ain't.'
Unfortunately for Ramaphosa, his other pet project, the National Dialogue, is not going to save the day for him.
To many, it's just the latest manifestation of Ramaphosa's preference for symbolism over action. Even ANC legacy foundations, long accustomed to wielding quiet influence behind the scenes, are now publicly voicing their frustration.
This week, the Walter and Albertina Sisulu Foundation issued a blistering statement, warning that Ramaphosa's habit of 'preaching dialogue while insulating political elites from accountability' amounts to little more than political theatre.
The foundation charged that his leadership – tarnished by the still unresolved Phala Phala scandal – 'contradicts the very principles his administration claims to uphold'. The foundation's conclusion was stark: it's time for Ramaphosa to resign.
NOW READ: What now for Senzo Mchunu? Police minister's political career on the ropes
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
5 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
South Africans are sick to death of persistent corruption by politicians
Greg Mills, in his book Why States Recover, illustrates that the key reason behind economic failure is politics: 'Today, the bulk of the world's poor – totalling 1.1 billion of the planet's seven billion people – live in failed or failing state,' he states. The continued failure of South Africa's political leadership to deal decisively with corruption by holding the perpetrators accountable is turning this country into a failing or failed state. South Africans are sick to death of persistent corruption by political leaders. It seems we are headed for a possibly violent revolution if impunity is not stopped urgently. If you don't believe me, just look at the agitation of ordinary people who loudly express their support for Lieutenant General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi. On social media, some have even threatened widespread looting if something bad were to happen to him. Against the backdrop of July 2021's devastating riots, we are treading on dangerous ground. Mkhwanazi represents an idea of the people's hatred of the impunity of the corrupt elite. People are infuriated by the repetition of hollow anti-corruption rhetoric by those in power, yet they know that behind the scenes they are colluding with criminals to milk Treasury dry. Writing in Good Governance Africa's flagship publication, Africa in Fact (special edition on the proposed International Anti-Corruption Court), researcher Nnaemeka Ohamadike states that 'the gap between anti-corruption rhetoric and real law enforcement remains a breeding ground for impunity, weakening governance and leaving citizens to bear the cost, especially in Africa'. He further refers to the World Bank's definition of corruption as the extent to which power is 'misused for private gain, encompassing both petty and grand corruption, as well as the influence of elites and private interests in capturing state institutions'. This continues in South Africa year after year, but nothing is done to combat it. South Africa has been cursed by bad political leadership and policies, from colonial times through to the apartheid period and now the so-called democratic dispensation. Colonial political leaders committed the original sin of dispossessing the indigenous people of their land and resources. The architects of apartheid curated an effective racist system that balkanised the people of this country and continued to dispossess the people of their land, minerals and other resources and entrenched grand corruption. Not to be outdone, the post-democracy kleptocratic elites continue their systematic industrial-scale corruption enterprise, siphoning public resources for the benefit of the few. Mkhwanazi's revelations are the latest in a string of corruption scandals that have blighted this country since the dawn of democracy. A quick scan of post-1994 South Africa shows a series of major corruption scandals from 1999 to 2021, exposing systemic misuse of public funds and abuse of power by high-ranking officials and political elites. Starting with the Arms Deal in 1999, it details successive scandals including Travelgate, Oilgate, the Selebi bribery case, Limpopo tender fraud and high-profile cases such as Nkandla and State Capture involving former president Jacob Zuma and the Gupta family. Despite various investigations and some convictions, many cases ended with limited accountability. Recent scandals like the Bosasa revelations, PPE corruption during Covid-19, Tembisa Hospital, Life Esidimeni and the Digital Vibes contract highlight ongoing issues with political patronage, weak enforcement and slow or stalled prosecutions. The pattern points to a deeply entrenched culture of corruption within state institutions. The boldness and audacity of the corrupt criminal elite is increasing while the decisiveness of our political leaders to deal with them is sadly decreasing. It seems that criminal elements are firmly embedded into our political systems in a way that compromises and disempowers our leaders from acting. It is a total failure to deal with corruption, year after year. Even if Mkhwanazi himself were to be found wanting in some respect, the idea will persist because people are sick of being taken for a ride by the so-called leaders. In 2011, the South African Constitutional Court judgment in the Glenister case stated that 'corruption is… an antithesis to democracy and the rule of law. Corruption diverts resources that are needed to improve the lives of citizens to enrich a few, at great cost to many. Corruption prevents the state from fulfilling its constitutional obligations, erodes the legitimacy of our democratic government and subverts the rule of law.' As this continues unabated, we must brace ourselves for a very bad retaliation, the likes of which this country has never seen. The only thing that will prevent this is strong action against the powerful political elites who enable and reward corruption in our society. On 11 July 2025, Karam Singh of Integrity Initiatives International, and Ruth Kolevsohn wrote in the Mail & Guardian that 'frustration remains that the criminal justice system in many countries is unable to deal with the weight and magnitude of high volume, multi-actor, multiple jurisdiction transactions… In global systems, where no single jurisdiction can be relied upon to have the political will and modalities to go after kleptocrats and their stolen assets, we need alternative solutions. 'Presently, there is no international institution to hold kleptocrats accountable when the countries they rule are unwilling or unable to do so. The case for establishing an international anti-corruption court (IACC) has been mooted as a feasible solution to address the constraints of domestic systems.' It is for this reason that Good Governance Africa is partnering with Integrity Initiatives International to promote the establishment of the IACC, and the drafting and ratification of the International Anti-Corruption Court Treaty.
The Star
6 hours ago
- The Star
South Africa's human rights crisis: Calls for action ahead of National Dialogue
Manyane Manyane | Updated 5 hours ago Civil rights organisation, Amnesty International South Africa, has urged President Cyril Ramaphosa to redirect the R700 million allocated for the National Dialogue. The organisation advocates for this budget to be invested instead in safeguarding and fulfilling the basic human rights of South African citizens. Ramaphosa formally announced the National Dialogue last month. It is intended to be a platform for reflection on the nation's current state, envisioning its future, and establishing the foundation for the upcoming National Development Plan. The process, scheduled for August 15, 2025, will unfold in phases, including local consultations and sectoral engagements, to provincial and national gatherings, over the period of a year. Ramaphosa also pointed out that this is a chance for South Africans to shape the next chapter of democracy, adding that it is an opportunity to forge a new social compact for the development of the country. While South Africa's transition to democracy years ago was a landmark event, the country continues to grapple with significant challenges stemming from its past and present realities. Despite progress in some areas, deep-seated issues such as poverty, inequality and unemployment persist, often linked to the legacy of apartheid and the slow pace of land reform. Furthermore, corruption and state capture have undermined public institutions and service delivery, impacting basic services like water, electricity, and healthcare. Amnesty International South Africa's executive director, Shenilla Mohamed, said that while nation-building and social cohesion are important, the government should ensure that the budget allocated does not come at the expense of addressing the country's most pressing challenges. 'Most of the country's population lives in dire conditions and does not have access to basic essential services such as water and sanitation,' said Mohamed. 'Repeatedly, we hear people complaining of raw sewerage flowing through townships, inadequate housing, poor medical services, lack of quality education, high rates of gender-based violence, crime, and the list goes on. To address these violations and ensure the fulfilment of basic human rights, we need more government action and increased investment,' she said. Asked to comment on the statement, Ramaphosa's spokesperson Vincent Mangwenya did not respond. Amnesty stated that, despite a progressive legal landscape, rates of sexual and gender-based violence remain staggeringly high, with the number of reported offences in 2023/2024 sitting at 53,285, adding that the South African Police Service continues to fail in ensuring quality investigations. The organisation said that when it comes to basic services, over 3 million people have no access to basic water supply service, while 5.3 million households do not have access to safe and reliable drinking water. 'Decades of corruption and the mismanagement of public funds have weakened the government's ability to safeguard the country's water security, especially in the face of climate change and extreme weather events. Climate change is another threat to a wide range of human rights and will continue to impact the rights to life, health, housing, water, and sanitation. Without proper investment in climate-resilient infrastructure, we will continue to see destruction and loss of life during floods and other extreme weather events. 'There are a number of ways to spend R700 million. We urge the South African government to invest in the protection and fulfilment of people's human rights,' said Mohamed. Meanwhile, political analyst Professor Sipho Seepe said the National Dialogue is a costly distraction meant to give the impression that Ramaphosa's administration is doing something. He said this is all about smoke and mirrors, something that Ramaphosa has mastered and perfected. 'The National Dialogue has no legal and constitutional standing. Its recommendations are not legally binding. To that extent, it is just another talkshop that is meant to cover up Ramaphosa's glaring failures,' he said. Another political analyst, Ntsikelelo Breakfast, said there is no need for the National Dialogue to uncover challenges facing the country, adding that they are well-known. [email protected]
Eyewitness News
7 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
Ramaphosa fires Nkabane as minister of higher education over SETA boards debacle
Nkabane's axing follows months of controversy over the Sector Education and Training Authorities (SETA) board appointments that saw several African National Congress (ANC)-aligned individuals appointed. Her sacking also comes a day before she was set to appear before Parliament's higher education committee to explain the SETA board appointment process after failing to appear in the last two committee meetings. Minister Nobuhle Nkabane on Monday evening issued a statement confirming her removal as higher education minister. In the statement, she thanked the president for entrusting her with the responsibility to serve as minister of higher education. She said that it was a privilege to lead such a crucial portfolio and she remained committed to the service of South Africans in the country's development. The Democratic Alliance (DA)'s Karabo Khakhau had earlier on Monday called for her removal. "If she says that the ANC did not work with her, she must be willing to take the blame alone having master engineered this alone, which is highly unlikely. But the bottom line is that President Ramaphosa must fire her." It is not clear whether the committee will move forward with its meeting on Tuesday where Nkabane was set to appear, alongside other members of the panel who were involved in the initial evaluation and nomination of candidates to be SETA chairpersons.
