Federal judge blocks Trump administration's attempt to ban Harvard's international students: What it means for students
In a significant legal decision with national implications, US District Judge Allison D. Burroughs has extended an order that blocks the Trump administration from revoking Harvard University's certification to host international students.
This ruling preserves the university's ability to enrol foreign nationals and provides temporary relief to thousands of students whose academic futures were under threat.
Earlier this year, the Department of Homeland Security withdrew Harvard's authorisation under the Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVP), citing vague national security concerns and alleged procedural violations. This action effectively halted the university's ability to support the legal status of its international student population—affecting not only new applicants but also over 6,800 currently enrolled students.
Harvard responded with a legal challenge, asserting that the decision lacked factual justification and disproportionately harmed international students. The university also argued that the move undermined academic independence and was driven more by political motives than actual policy concerns.
The court's ruling offers a temporary relief
The federal court's ruling temporarily halts the implementation of the administration's order. Judge Burroughs determined that the potential damage to students and the institution outweighed the government's stated concerns.
She found that the administration failed to present a compelling justification for such a disruptive and sweeping policy action.
This judicial decision effectively restores Harvard's ability to issue the necessary documentation for student visas, ensuring that international students can continue their studies without the risk of legal status complications or forced departures.
Renewed uncertainty for students
The immediate impact of the ruling is the preservation of stability for thousands of students, many of whom had faced the prospect of losing their right to remain in the country.
Students from India, China, South Korea, and numerous other countries now have clarity regarding their enrolment, travel plans, and access to internships or research opportunities.
However, the injunction is temporary, and the case will continue to move through the courts. This leaves a lingering sense of uncertainty, particularly for students planning to apply for upcoming academic terms or those in the process of renewing their visa status.
The ruling serves as a reminder of the essential role that international students play in American academia—not only as contributors to campus diversity but also as researchers, innovators, and future leaders. Institutions like Harvard rely heavily on their global appeal and collaborative international networks, which are at risk when abrupt policy changes destabilise student participation.
The case also reinforces the legal principle that federal agencies must justify major policy shifts with evidence, especially when those decisions impact education, livelihoods, and long-term planning for students and families.
A moment of mobilisation
In response to the administration's initial action, student groups and faculty mobilised in protest and advocacy. While the court's decision provides a degree of reassurance, student organisations continue to offer legal assistance, counselling, and guidance to international students navigating complex immigration systems.
Universities across the country have also expressed solidarity, recognising that the outcome of this case could set a precedent affecting all U.S.
institutions that host foreign students.
While the court has provided a reprieve, the long-term legal resolution remains pending. The final outcome could redefine the extent of federal oversight in university operations, especially as it pertains to student visas and international academic exchange.
For now, students and universities alike are watching closely. The case represents not only a defense of legal rights and academic freedom but also a broader battle over the values of openness, diversity, and intellectual collaboration that have long defined American higher education.
Ready to empower your child for the AI era? Join our program now! Hurry, only a few seats left.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
27 minutes ago
- First Post
July 4: America at crossroads as it celebrates Independence Day amid Trump-induced global uncertainty
As the United States celebrates the 4th of July, commemorating the 249th year of independence, here's a look at how its hegemonic presence is fading away in a multipolar world. read more Advertisement U.S. President Donald Trump. Image- AFP On July 4, 2025, the United States of America will commemorate its 249th year of independence . In the span of over two centuries, the country's place in the world order has changed dramatically. From staying relatively isolated in the initial years of its independence, the US became a hegemonic power after the fall of the Soviet Union. However, this global dominance is currently on decline, with the rise of the multi-polar world order. The decline has become even more apparent with the comeback of US President Donald Trump in the White House. With Trump-induced global uncertainties, regional blocs and countries are looking for alternatives. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Meanwhile, Trump's policy has been more inward-looking over the years. This can be reflected by his brainchild, the ' Make America Great Again movement (MAGA). Right after he returned to the White House, he signed a plethora of executive orders, including cutting foreign aid and imposing high tariffs. He closed the American border and significantly reduced US military presence overseas, questioning alliances and exuding scepticism toward international institutions like the UN, WTO and NATO. This compelled the US's allies to look for alternatives, with multiple countries and regional blocs signing Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) with each other. Here's why under Trump, the US no longer enjoy the hegemony it once used to have. Trump and wars While campaigning to return to the White House, Trump made a highly ambitious proclamation of ending the Russia-Ukraine war in 24 hours . However, it has been over 100 days since he returned to the White House, and the war between the two nations is still raging. Trump's struggle to bring Russian President Vladimir Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to the negotiation table can be seen in the fact that he often jumped in and out of peace talks. During the 12-day confrontation between Israel and Iran , Trump once again attempted to bring peace in the region. He called for a ceasefire after bombing three of Iran's nuclear facilities. However, neither Iran nor Israel stopped fighting, reflecting the diminishing influence of the US. An angry Trump eventually told reporters that Israel and Iran have been 'fighting so long and so hard that they don't know what the f**k they are doing '. In a similar brazen manner, Trump went on to claim that he stopped the India-Pakistan conflict. While Pakistan supported the President's narratives to gain brownie points, even to this day, India rejects Trump's claim, reflecting that the US no longer has the power to change the direction of the conflict. Apart from this, Trump often tends to diminish the importance of international groups like NATO , the European Union and the United Nations. In March, he casts doubt on the US's willingness to defend Nato allies. 'It's common sense, right?' Trump told reporters in the Oval Office. 'If they don't pay, I'm not going to defend them. No, I'm not going to defend them.' He often called out the UN for its inability to preserve international peace. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Trump tariffs are pushing countries away from the US In April this year, Trump commemorated ' Liberation Day ' by announcing reciprocal tariffs on goods the US imports from different countries. He announced a blanket tariff of 10 per cent on all nations and introduced additional tariffs on countries like Japan, South Korea, Vietnam, and India. China, however, faced the major brunt of it with tariffs ranging as high as 125 per cent. While these tariffs are yet to come into force, in the words of Trump, countries rushed to sign bilateral trade deals with the US, with the UK already having one in place and India finalising its trade deal. Amid the tariff saga, several countries and regional groups joined hands and signed FTAs with each other, providing a new alternative to the US hegemony. India has signed FTAs with the UK and Australia , with a deal with the EU on the cards by the end of this year. Similarly, South America's largest trading bloc, Mercosur, signed a trade deal with the four-nation European Free Trade Association (EFTA) on Wednesday. Over the years, China have also been enhancing its influence around the world with its Belt and Road Initiative. When asked if Trump tariffs would eventually push US allies towards China, renowned American economist Jeffrey D. Sachs emphasised that there is more to the story. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'Trump is alienating the rest of the world over many issues, including tariffs, but also sanctions, threats to sovereignty (e.g. vis-à-vis Canada, Panama, and Greenland), and reckless disregard for climate change,' he told Firstpost in an interview on April 11 . Chaos at home Chaos ensued across the United States ever since Trump came back to power. Domestic political polarisation and economic challenges complicate US governance and its ability to project global leadership. For instance, when the US was intervening in the Iran-Israel war, the United States' Los Angeles was witnessing protests over the ICE raids on immigrants. The demonstrations were so severe that the Trump administration went on to threaten the arrest of LA Mayor Karen Bass and California Governor Gavin Newsom . Trump eventually compared the protests in LA with an 'invasion of third-world lawlessness'. In terms of the economy, Wall Street witnessed a decline the moment Trump announced sweeping reciprocal tariffs. This eventually prompted Trump to pause the tariffs to prevent a crash of the American markets. Hence, political and economic volatilities induced by Trump's policies are taking the US's attention away from what is happening in the world and giving space to other powers to fill the vacuum, transforming the world into a multipolar world order.
Time of India
36 minutes ago
- Time of India
Zuckerberg's AI dream team is all built by immigrants: Will visa walls break Silicon Valley's AI backbone?
The United States of America, sobriqueted as the "land of opportunities," now stands at the precipice reeking of irony. What if we told you that America's tech supremacy, the very capability it is globally championed for, rests not on homegrown talent, but on the passports of the immigrants? Historical facts have added their weight to it, and now present affirms it further. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Mark Zuckerberg's newly announced AI Superintelligence Lab tells the story emphatically: Eleven scientists, eleven immigrants, not a single US-born engineer in sight. What is striking is not that America depends on immigrants: It is how profoundly that dependency is knitted into the architecture of its future. Their names are not etched on billboards. Their accents may differ. But from Princeton to Peking University, from IIT Kanpur to Carnegie Mellon, these minds are carrying the bastion of artificial intelligence for the Silicon Valley. The global minds behind American machines Meta's all-immigrant dream team reads like a map of intellectual migration. Trapit Bansal, an alumnus from IIT Kanpur, honed his brilliance at UMass Amherst and OpenAI. Shuchao Bi, born in China, gave GPT-4o its voice. Huiwen Chang invented architectures that made machines 'see.' Ji Lin made AI cheaper and faster. The journeys trace their roots back to overcrowded classrooms in Beijing, Delhi, or Pretoria, survived the crucible of elite admissions, and culminated in a foreign land where visa renewals were as stressful as debugging code. They trained in the US, built foundational models, and are now constructing the scaffolding of AI's future. This isn't an exception. It is the rule. From Google's Bard to OpenAI's GPT-4, from Microsoft's Azure to Amazon's Alexa, the architects of American AI are more likely to have roots in Chennai than Chicago, in Wuhan than Washington. Silicon Valley's immigrant skeleton America's tech economy has always run on imported intellect. Over 70% of H-1B visas are granted to Indian nationals alone, according to data shared by USCIS. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Some years, the number has crossed 75%. And it's not just engineering cubicles. Sundar Pichai (Google), Satya Nadella (Microsoft), and Arvind Krishna (IBM), the corner office is increasingly accentuated. The journey started in the 1990s when coders flocked the Silicon Valley, which has now translated into an artery system of AI architects, cloud infrastructure pioneers, and cybersecurity leaders. They do not just solve technical problems; they set the global agenda for what AI is and what it has become. And yet, these very professionals are being subjected to a political climate that casts suspicion on foreign workers, tightening visa controls, and erecting bureaucratic minefields that threaten to break the very backbone of American tech. Visa battles and broken promises The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) received over 780,000 applications for just 85,000 H-1B slots in FY 2024, according to USCIS data. The odds are absurd, the process increasingly punitive. A proposed beneficiary-based lottery model aims to curb mass applications, but it also risks shutting out legitimate talent. Add to that the rising wage thresholds, compliance red tape, and anti-immigrant rhetoric that predictably peaks during election years, and you begin to see why America's AI future is hanging by a bureaucratic thread. The tightening immigration policies might cast a shadow on the tech progress that America is witnessing right now. The Indian engine of the AI age The effect of this reliance is more pronounced in India. Post-liberalisation, our country developed an obsession with engineering, catalysed by the IITs and fuelled by social aspiration, creating a goldmine of global tech workers. Over the years down the line, India has lost its talent to offshore and, in a way, contributed enormously to building the American tech empire. The irony deepens: Indian engineering graduates built apps for the world, but couldn't find jobs at home. Their futures, and sometimes their families' fortunes, hinged not on innovation but immigration. A tectonic shift or a temporary snag? Today, that engine is sputtering. Visa regimes are unstable. The H-1B system is outdated. International students, once America's intellectual capital in waiting, now live under a cloud of uncertainty. And as Meta's immigrant-only team shines bright, the tech juggernaut is exposed well enough. If tomorrow, the gates narrow further, or worse, if talent stops navigating to the country, the US will not only lose developers, but with them the crucial direction as well. Already, there are numerous murmurs among graduates about staying back. Startup India, AI missions, and semiconductor initiatives, the incentives are growing. With the right policy push, India could convert its brain drain into a brain return. Maybe, the global tech power can be rescripted, this time from Bengaluru and not Boston. Innovation is not a nationality The American edge in AI owes a lot to the passports that have flown from distant countries with a utopian vision of building a future. They showed up with foreign degrees, accents that were often mocked, and dreams that carried enough weight. However, dreams need visas. And revolutions, especially technological ones, need the freedom to cross borders. The question before America now is simple: Will it remain the world's most powerful magnet for minds? Or will it build walls so high that even superintelligence can't climb over? If it picks the latter, it may soon find that the AI of tomorrow and the accompanied power may find an abode somewhere else and might not be in America.
India.com
41 minutes ago
- India.com
Putins Mystery Call: Drops Everything And Rushes Off Stage At Event, Video Goes Viral
Russian President Vladimir Putin suddenly stopped short of a public speech at the "Strong Ideas for a New Time" forum in Moscow on Thursday to answer the phone from US President Donald Trump. Putin excused himself to the audience, explaining it would be "awkward" and his American counterpart "might get offended" if delayed. The meeting was the sixth encounter between the two leaders since President Trump's return to the White House and the fourth within six weeks. Although the dialogue had an apparently cordial tone, the talks were unable to bring any significant breakthroughs, more so when it came to the ongoing war in Ukraine, where Moscow restated its determination not to stray from its initial goals. In the phone call, President Putin told Trump that although Russia wants a negotiated solution to the Ukraine war for peace, it "will not retreat from these goals," Kremlin aide Yuri Ushakov stated. Ushakov expounded that Russia seeks "the removal of the well-known root causes which resulted in the existing situation, to the existing sharp confrontation." Russia identifies such "root causes" as barring Ukraine from membership in NATO and preventing any threat close to its borders, an explanation roundly rejected by Ukraine and Western countries, who consider the war as an act of Russian domination. The leaders also touched upon other pressing global issues, including tensions in the Middle East, the situation in Iran, and the broader state of US-Russia relations. Putin informed Trump about recent agreements on prisoner exchanges and the return of fallen soldiers between Russia and Ukraine, expressing Moscow's openness to further discussions with Kyiv. WOW. Russian President Vladimir Putin abruptly leaves the stage to hop on the phone with President Trump, saying he didn't want to offend Trump by keeping him waiting. This is what happens when we have a real President. The world respects — Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) July 3, 2025 Friendly Tone, Limited Progress Ushakov summed up the leaders as being "on the same page" in the call. President Putin also offered congratulations to Trump before the US Independence Day on July 4. The call apparently started with the US President speaking about his new economic bill, and leaders also discussed ways of boosting trade and even introducing a cultural exchange program based on traditional values through films. But some of the most critical issues were noticeably missing from discussion. The recent US move to temporarily suspend some military assistance to Ukraine was not mentioned, a development closely watched by Ukraine's allies. A possible in-person meeting between the two presidents was also not mentioned, although Ushakov said the possibility is still "up in the air." The Iranian situation was another topic that came up. Ushakov stated that "The Russian side stressed the significance of settlement of all conflicts, disputes and contentious situations solely by political and diplomatic means." This was mentioned barely a week after the US was said to have conducted airstrikes on three of Iran's nuclear sites, something Russia had vehemently condemned.
