Budget 2025 Must Deliver Consumer Confidence
Strong signals on economic recovery are on Retail NZ's wish list for the Budget announcements.
The Electronic Card Transactions data for April 2025, released today by Stats NZ, shows a tiny increase in sales compared with April 2024, it is not enough to improve the outlook for retail, Retail NZ Advocacy Manager Ann-Marie Johnson says.
The 0.8% lift reflects the Easter public holidays, which fell fully within April this year, and also within the April school holiday period. Easter spanned March and April in 2024.
The figures also show that the value of the average transaction has not changed since April last year, with consumers spending $55 per transaction.
'There's still a long way to go before we see any light at the end of the tunnel. Retail NZ members are anticipating slow sales and uncertainty through this winter. Although there may be some relief from lower interest rates putting more money in consumers' pockets, low consumer confidence will continue to rein in spending. We are hoping the upcoming Budget will help restore confidence to the marketplace.'
Retail NZ's latest quarterly Retail Radar survey, covering January-March 2025, found that 57% of retailers did not meet sales targets for the quarter and had mixed expectations for quarter two sales.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsroom
18 minutes ago
- Newsroom
Govt KiwiSaver cut ‘final nail in the coffin' for self-employed
Self-employed New Zealanders are re-thinking their retirement savings schemes after the Government slashed its KiwiSaver co-contribution in the Budget. Data compiled from accounting fintech Hnry's latest sole trader pulse check highlights negativity following the change, with 52 percent of the 502 self-employed workers polled, actively opposing the cut. Forty-three percent say it will alter their saving behaviour and 24 percent plan to reduce their contribution as a result of the change.
1News
2 days ago
- 1News
Is there anything we can actually do to bring down butter prices?
The alarming rise of butter prices has become a real source of frustration for New Zealand consumers, as well as a topic of political recrimination, writes Lincoln University professor of agricultural economics Alan Renwick. The issue has become so serious that Miles Hurrell, chief executive of dairy co-operative Fonterra, was summoned to meetings with the government and opposition parties this week. After meeting Hurrell, Finance Minister Nicola Willis appeared to place some of the blame for the high price of butter on supermarkets rather than on the dairy giant. According to Stats NZ, butter prices rose by 46.5% in the year to June and are now 120% higher than a decade ago. The average price for a 500g block is NZ$8.60, with some local brands costing over $10. But solving the problem is not a matter of waving a magic economic wand. Several factors influence butter prices, few of which can be altered directly by government policy. ADVERTISEMENT And the question remains – would we want to? Proposals such as reducing exports to boost domestic supply, or cutting goods and services tax (GST) on dairy products, all carry consequences. A key factor driving butter prices in New Zealand is that 95% of the country's dairy production is exported. Limited domestic supply and strong global demand have pushed up prices for a range of commodities – not just milk, but beef as well. These increases are reflected in local retail prices. Another contributing factor is rising costs along the supply chain. At the farm level, producers are receiving record prices for dairy. But this comes at a time when input costs have also increased significantly. It is not all profit. Weighing the options Finance Minister Nicola Willis. (Source: Getty) Before changing rules around dairy exports, the government must weigh the broader consequences. ADVERTISEMENT On the one hand, high milk prices benefit 'NZ Inc'. The dairy sector accounts for 25% of exports and employs 55,000 New Zealanders. When farmers do well, the wider rural economy benefits – with flow-on effects for the country as a whole. On the other hand, there is the ongoing challenge of domestic food security. Many people cannot afford basic groceries and foodbank use is rising. So how can New Zealand maintain a food system that benefits from exports while also supporting struggling domestic consumers? One option is to remove GST from food. Other countries exempt dairy products from such taxes in an effort to make staples more affordable. This idea has been repeatedly reviewed and rejected – including by the 2018 Tax Working Group. In 2024, it was estimated that removing GST could cost the government between $3.3bn and $3.9bn, with only modest benefits for the average household. Fonterra or supermarkets? File photo. (Source: ADVERTISEMENT Another route would be to examine Fonterra's dominance in the supply chain. There are advantages to having a strong global player. And it is not in the national interest for the company to incur losses on domestic sales. Still, the structure of the market may warrant scrutiny. For a long time there were just two main suppliers of processed dairy products – Fonterra and Goodman Fielder – and two main retailers – Foodstuffs and Woolworths. This set up reduced the need to compete on prices. While there is arguably more competition in manufacturing sector now, supermarkets are still under scrutiny and have long faced criticism for a lack of competition. The opaque nature of the profit margins across the supply chain also fuels suspicion. Consumers know what they pay at the checkout and what farmers receive. But the rest is less clear. This lack of transparency invites speculation about who benefits from soaring prices. In the end, though, the government may not need to act at all. As economists like to say: 'Nothing cures high prices like high prices.' While demand for butter is relatively inelastic, there comes a point at which consumers reduce their purchases or seek alternatives. International buyers will also push back – and falling global demand may redirect more supply to domestic markets. High prices also act as a signal to producers across the globe to increase production, which could happen relatively quickly if there are favourable climatic and other conditions. ADVERTISEMENT We only need to look back to 2014, when the price of dairy dropped by 48% over the course of 12 months due to reduced demand and increased supply, to see how quickly the situation can change. Alan Renwick is a professor of agricultural economics at New Zealand's Lincoln University. This article was republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons Licence.
Techday NZ
2 days ago
- Techday NZ
Global ransomware attacks drop 43% but threats evolve quickly
Ransomware attacks worldwide declined by 43% in the second quarter, yet threats continue to adapt and evolve according to a new report from NCC Group. The report found a notable decrease in global ransomware activity, with incidents dropping by six percent month-on-month in June, amounting to 371 cases. Over the quarter, attacks fell by 1180 cases compared with the previous quarter. Experts attribute the reduction to seasonal slowdowns, including holiday observances such as Easter and Ramadan, as well as increased law enforcement interventions disrupting key ransomware operators. Analysis suggested the downturn may be temporary, with warnings that cybercriminals are likely to use this time to regroup and adopt more sophisticated social engineering strategies. Key disruptions in the ransomware ecosystem have opened opportunities for emerging groups to exploit gaps and continue targeting organisations. Sectors under attack The industrial sector remained the most targeted, experiencing 27% of all recorded attacks in June. Across the entire quarter, industrials represented nearly 30% of ransomware incidents, reaffirming the sector's prominence as a target for cybercriminals. Attacks on the consumer discretionary sector, which includes retail, dropped notably from 102 incidents in May to 76 in June, coinciding with reduced activity from the Scattered Spider group. Previously, Scattered Spider had claimed responsibility for prominent attacks on major retailers such as Marks & Spencer and the Co-op in May. Healthcare was the third most targeted sector, recording 42 attacks in June, almost double the figures reported in May. The information technology sector followed, with 33 attacks during June. Threat groups' activities In June, the ransomware group Qilin was named the most active, responsible for 16% of all attacks - rising from third place in May - and increasing its activity from 95 incidents in the first quarter to 151 in the second quarter. Qilin has increasingly targeted both industrial and IT sectors and now offers legal assistance to its affiliates, helping them navigate law enforcement risks and improve their ability to pressure victims into paying ransoms. This is seen as indicative of the more structured, business-oriented approach developing within ransomware-as-a-service models. Akira was the second most active group in June with 31 recorded attacks, rising from its fourth-place ranking in May, while the Play group fell to third with 29 incidents. The SafePay group followed, dropping to fourth place with 27 attacks after suspicions of a recent rebranding. Geographical impact North America experienced the highest proportion of ransomware attacks, accounting for 58% of incidents in June and 52% across the entire second quarter. Europe saw a decrease in attacks by 8% to make up 21% of global cases, fewer than half the number reported in North America. Asia was the origin of 12% of attacks, with South America recording the smallest regional share at four percent. Cyber warfare and political motives The report observed that ransomware is increasingly being used as part of political and cyber warfare tactics. In June, the Handala group - a pro-Palestine entity - claimed responsibility for targeting 17 Israeli organisations in the aftermath of significant regional conflict between Iran and Israel. The timing of the attacks, which began immediately following Israeli strikes on Iran, indicated a likely retaliatory motivation and suggested that ransomware could become further entrenched as a political tool. The UK Government's recent Industrial Strategy has highlighted the importance of cybersecurity in protecting vital national interests. Increased cyber warfare activity is leading to more robust state-level responses and driving the adoption of cybersecurity-focused policies globally. "The volume of victims being exposed on Ransomware leak sites might be declining but this doesn't mean threats are reduced. Law enforcement crackdowns and leaked ransomware source code is possibly a contributing factor as to a drop in activity, but ransomware groups are using this opportunity to evolve through rebranding and the use of advanced social engineering tactics. We've already tracked 86 new and existing active attack groups this year, and we're on course to surpass 2024's record. The increased number of attackers means a broader range of attack methods that businesses need to be prepared for. Both organisations and nations should take this as a sign to remain vigilant. Investing in cyber security and intelligence-led defences is the key to staying ahead of increasingly agile threat actors." These comments from Matt Hull, Global Head of Threat Intelligence at NCC Group, reflect ongoing concerns that while raw attack numbers may have declined, the risk from ransomware remains significant due to the continued evolution of both criminal tactics and the number of threat actors.
