
Scolding does not amount to provoking someone to take own life: Supreme Court
The accused, in charge of a school and a hostel, had scolded the deceased following a complaint by another student. After the incident, the student killed himself.
A Bench of Justices Ahsanuddin Amanullah and Prashant Kumar Mishra stated that no ordinary person could have imagined that a scolding would result in such a tragedy.
The top court set aside an order of the Madras High Court, which had refused to discharge the teacher for the offence of abetment to suicide under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code.
"Having considered the matter in its entirety, we find it a fit case for interference. As has rightly been submitted by the appellant, no normal person could have imagined that a scolding, that too based on a complaint by a student, would result in such a tragedy due to the student so scolded taking his own life," the bench said.
The apex court said such scolding was the least to ensure that the complaint made against the deceased by another student was taken note of and remedial measures were effected.
"In the considered opinion of this court, under such admitted factual position, no mens rea (knowledge of wrongdoing) can be attributed to the appellant, much less, with regard to abatement of suicide committed by the deceased," the bench said.
The man, through his lawyer, had submitted that his response was justified and was merely a chiding as a guardian to ensure that the deceased did not repeat the offence, and to maintain peace and tranquillity in the hostel.
He had submitted that there was nothing personal between him and the deceased.
[Assistance for overcoming suicidal thoughts is available on the State's health helpline 104, Tele-MANAS 14416 and SNEHA's suicide prevention helpline - 044 24640050 or from any of the numbers in this link]
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Time of India
20 minutes ago
- Time of India
Syrian Govt Forces Enter Violence-Hit Sweida; Israel Sends Fighter Jets In Defence Of Druze
Kerala Nurse On Death Row in Yemen: Only Blood Money Can Save Nimisha Priya, Centre Tells SC The Indian government told the Supreme Court that it has limited options in the case of Nimisha Priya, a Kerala nurse on death row in Yemen. Scheduled to be executed on July 16, Nimisha is accused of murdering her abusive partner, a Yemeni national. Her family has offered ₹8.6 crore as blood money under Sharia law, but the government says it can only operate through private channels, as India has no diplomatic ties with Yemen, which is controlled by Houthi rebels. The Attorney General stated that going public could make matters worse. The Supreme Court has listed the next hearing for July 18, two days after the planned execution.#nimishapriya #yemenexecution #keralanurse #bloodmoney #indiayemencrisis #supremecourtindia #nimishapriyacase #toi #toibharat #bharat #trending #breakingnews #indianews 49.5K views | 23 hours ago


Time of India
34 minutes ago
- Time of India
Relief for Kerala nurse in Yemen: Nimisha Priya's execution postponed – what was the case
The execution of Nimisha Priya, an Indian nurse facing the death penalty in Yemen, has been postponed, sources told TOI on Tuesday. The 38-year-old from Kerala's Palakkad district remains imprisoned in Sanaa, Yemen's capital, which is controlled by the Iran-backed Houthi group. Last-minute efforts to save Priya's life were initiated by prominent Sunni cleric Kanthapuram A P Aboobacker Musliyar, who reached out to religious authorities in Yemen. Sufi scholar Sheikh Habib Umar bin Hafiz is now leading negotiations with the victim's family. Talks are taking place in Dhamar, the hometown of the deceased, Talal Abdo Mahdi. 'The agreement of the family to even speak with representatives of Sheikh Habib Umar gives us hope,' a source told PTI. A close relative of the deceased, who also holds senior positions in the Yemeni judiciary and Shura Council, has reportedly agreed to attend the talks at the advice of the Sufi scholar. Attorney General R Venkataramani told the Supreme Court on Monday that the government was doing its utmost under the circumstances. 'Yemen is not even diplomatically recognised. It's very complex,' he said, adding that India had written to the public prosecutor to request a deferral of the execution. What was the case? According to Yemeni court records, Nimisha Priya allegedly drugged and murdered Mahdi in July 2017, with the help of another nurse, before dismembering his body and disposing of the remains in an underground tank. She was convicted in 2020 and her final appeal was dismissed in 2023. The case revolves around a business dispute. Priya had partnered with Mahdi to open a clinic in Sanaa in 2015, as Yemeni law requires local sponsorship for foreigners to run businesses. Activists argue she was a victim of war and never received proper legal defence due to the ongoing civil conflict. Who is Nimisha Priya? Nimisha Priya is a nurse from Kollengode in Kerala. She moved to Yemen in search of better work opportunities and later tried to establish her own clinic. Her supporters say she endured severe abuse and exploitation, and that the murder was the result of prolonged trauma. An international campaign group, Save Nimisha Priya, continues to work to raise the required 'blood money' under Sharia law to secure her release. The Supreme Court is expected to hear further updates on July 18.


News18
36 minutes ago
- News18
Mere Act Of Sending Messages With Profanity Is Not Stalking, Says Karnataka High Court
The court made the observation while dismissing a petition filed by a UPSC aspirant from UP, who had sought to quash criminal proceedings initiated against him by a co-aspirant The Karnataka High Court has clarified that the mere act of sending abusive or foul messages to a woman does not, by itself, amount to the offence of stalking under Section 354D of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). The bench of Justice M Nagaprasanna made the observation while dismissing a petition filed by a 30-year-old UPSC aspirant from Uttar Pradesh, who had sought to quash criminal proceedings initiated against him by a co-aspirant he had met during coaching classes in Delhi. The man and the woman first came in contact in January 2022. Their initial academic interaction eventually developed into a personal relationship, with the man claiming that the two got married on November 10, 2023. The woman, however, later alleged that she was coerced into the marriage and filed a separate FIR in Prayagraj, accusing the man and his family of forcing her to consent at the registrar's office. The Allahabad High Court has stayed the proceedings in that case. Meanwhile, the relationship between the two deteriorated, leading to the current case registered in Bengaluru, where the woman accused the man of recording intimate videos on the false promise of marriage and using them to harass and threaten her. She filed a complaint at Chandra Layout Police Station in Bengaluru, and the case was registered under various sections of the IPC, the Information Technology Act, and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. Among the offences included in the chargesheet was Section 354D (stalking), which the man sought to contest. Therefore, the court held that in the present case, isolated acts of abuse or sending offensive messages could not alone sustain a stalking charge. Further, it noted that a few of the offences were loosely laid against the man and a few were appropriately. Therefore, while the court refused to quash the entire proceedings, citing sufficient prima facie material to proceed with the trial on other charges, including voyeurism (Section 354C), criminal intimidation (Section 506), insult to modesty (Section 509), and violation of privacy under Section 66E of the IT Act and also allowed the charge under Section 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST Act to remain, it quashed the case only in respect of offence alleged under Section 354D of the IPC. view comments Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.