logo
Federal funding uncertainty eliminates Indiana programs, threatens others

Federal funding uncertainty eliminates Indiana programs, threatens others

Yahoo2 days ago
Indiana Task Force One responded to devastating floods in Kentucky last February, but federal funding uncertainty threatens the program in the long run. (Courtesy photo)
Hurricanes Sandy, Helene and Milton. The Surfside condo collapse in Florida. Maui's wildfires. Floods in Kentucky.
All of these disasters had Hoosiers on the ground rescuing victims as part of Indiana Task Force One, a highly trained team of first responders and one of 28 federal squads across the country.
But President Donald Trump's proposal to close the Federal Emergency Management Agency and shift rescue and recovery responses to the states puts Task Force One in a precarious position.
The decision is just one of several that has fueled funding uncertainty for universities, state and local programs, watershed projects and environmental needs around the state.
'We're not even sure — will FEMA be dissolved? Will FEMA be reorganized where this program will stay under FEMA? Will we go to a different federal agency? There's a lot of questions that, quite frankly, we can't answer right now,' said Thomas Neal, Task Force One's division chief.
Generally speaking, the city of Indianapolis covers the expenses of Task Force One with the promise that FEMA will reimburse the entity for qualifying expenses, such as payroll, during search and rescue missions. Daily expenses are covered by a $1.3 million FEMA readiness grant and funding from the city.
But Indiana, as a state, doesn't spend any money on the program — and the General Assembly has rejected multiple attempts to add a budget line item. Indiana's sole contribution was the $150,000 it spent — with $150,000 from Indianapolis and $300,000 from FEMA — to start Task Force One in 1992.
Sen. J.D. Ford offered a budget amendment to allocate $1.5 million for Task Force One and won over six Republicans earlier this year, but failed to get enough support from the Republican supermajority. The Indianapolis Democrat said he was disappointed by the result.
'In my mind, these are first responders who are actually doing a service to our state and we're not giving them a nickel,' said Ford.
FEMA requires that Neal maintain at least 210 people on a rotating schedule who are ready to deploy at a moment's notice. Two-thirds of the unit is made up of firefighters with 380 hours of training in specialized rescue techniques for floods, structural collapses and more.
The other members are physicians, structural engineers, canine handlers, logistics operatives and even licensed CDL drivers who transport equipment like rescue boats, ready-to-eat meals, water tanks and dry suits.
Neal, the division chief, has been part of the team since 1994. The team has only three full-time members, including himself, and a few part-time employees. With the additional state funding, Neal said the team would have made its part-time logistics position into a full-time effort — an important role during the busiest part of the year: hurricane season, which started on June 1.
He estimated that Task Force One had maybe 70 total deployments in the history of the program, but 'since 2016, it's pretty much been nonstop.'
'We've had multiple deployments every single year. Sometimes we don't even hardly get back and get the equipment cleaned up and we're being pushed out the door again,' Neal said.
An analysis from the Indiana Fiscal Policy Institute found that total federal funding flowing into Indiana is $177 billion — equivalent to more than $25,000 for each Hoosier resident.
Indiana is the third most reliant state on federal cash – behind Louisiana and Mississippi according to the left-leaning Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
The federal agency that spends the most in Indiana is the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, totaling $126 billion. Next is Social Security with $32 billion.
In terms of where the money goes in Indiana the top two categories are Medicare and individuals — accounting for $160 billion. The state comes in third at $7.5 billion. Other categories include $1.2 billion for public higher education; $1.1 billion to nonprofits and $558 million for city governments.
Story continues after analysis.
IFPI FFY 2024 Indiana Federal Funding Analysis
This funding uncertainty complicated the state's efforts to draft a two-year budget for the 2025 legislative session, especially after a dismal revenue forecast predicted the state would take in $2 billion less than expected over the biennium.
The governor's office remains optimistic about Indiana's ability to weather any funding uncertainty, however.
'Because of Gov. (Mike) Braun's direction to do more with less, our state is in a great position to handle any reductions in federal spending. For years, the Biden administration grew our national debt and threw federal dollars around with few guardrails. States now need to demonstrate responsibility and manage their budgets well, and Indiana is leading the way,' said Press Secretary Griffin Reid.
Ford, on the other hand, tied the state's budget woes to the actions of Trump and Congress.
'We had to trim the state budget because of the instability that Washington (D.C.) was creating for states and for us,' said Ford. 'I think not only of first responders, but I think business owners, our farmers and everyday Americans and Hoosiers want stability and it's just not what we're getting.'
The federal funding uncertainty may have only just begun. Here's three examples of cuts so far:
In May, the U.S. Department of Energy terminated 24 projects worth more than $3.7 billion with the Office of Clean Energy Demonstration. The initiative was designed to modernize U.S. industrial facilities and incentivize clean manufacturing. U.S. Secretary of Energy Chris Wright alleged the projects 'failed to advance energy needs of American people … and would not generate a positive return on investment of taxpayer dollars.'
This cut impacted two Indiana projects working to decarbonize their facilities.
In 2024, Heidelberg Materials North American was selected to receive $500 million in funding from the U.S. Department of Energy for a major carbon reduction project at a cement plant in Mitchell.
Former Gov. Eric Holcomb at the ribbon cutting ceremony for the plant called the award 'the most sustainable operation in the history of the world in terms of building cement.'
Ash Lauth, a senior campaign strategist with nonprofit advocacy group Industrious Labs, said the Mitchell Plant was a one-of-its-kind carbon cement facility and was expected to offer around 1,000 construction jobs.
'If I was living around that plant, I would be gutted right now,' Lauth said. 'This is real people, real money, I hope Indiana senators think about this and that Indiana voters care about it.'
Lauth said Heidelberg has already sunk a lot of money into the project and hopes that they go through the appeals process. She said that the cut is just another setback but not a 'nail in the coffin.'
'Killing these projects means more emission, more pollution, more people getting sick,' She said. 'Now we are handing over a competitive environment to countries around the world and leaving the U.S. behind. That is cause for sorrow.'
Kraft-Heinz facility in Kendallville also received a $170 million federal grant to install an industrial heat pump — which was part of a plan for up to 11 facilities across the country.
According to Lauth, the Kraft-Heinz grant would have created an estimated 500 construction jobs. By upgrading the plant with energy efficient manufacturing equipment, the facility sought to eliminate a major source of air pollution and provide cleaner air to nearby residents.
In February, the Allen County Soil and Water Conservation District was still waiting on $400,000 in federal reimbursements — funds that were supposed to arrive in January but weren't fully released until mid-April. During that time, the district had already spent nearly $300,000 on programs, salaries, education efforts and water quality monitoring, expecting federal reimbursement.
Instead, the funding freeze — and federal court holdup — left the district in turmoil. The delay not only hurt operations but forced Director Julie Davis Good to make difficult decisions, she said.
One Watershed Project Manager, who led much of the field and on-site conservation work, was terminated. Another was hired in December but could not begin until early June due to prolonged federal clearance. At one point, the nine-member team was down to just three full-time employees.
Where do federal funding cuts leave Indiana?
'Farmers are the ones hurt,' Good said. 'Obviously our office is in turmoil but farmers can't get anything that we promised them.'
The situation escalated in March, when the Indiana Association of Soil and Water Conservation Districts announced a pause in programs and staff due to a lack of previously promised federal funding. Like many districts, Allen County operates by spending grant money upfront and then billing the federal government for reimbursement.
Without staff and program funding, the district lost the ability to deliver soil testing, water quality monitoring and farm support.
Now, the organization hopes to mitigate funding uncertainty with support from local corporations, foundations and sponsors. Good said the grant is still tied up in the courts, jeopardizing new innovative conservation projects they had planned.
'Growing up I was told, 'who controls your food controls you,'' Good said. 'We are unable to produce our own food because now we are controlled by them … that is not the American way'
Universities and colleges have also taken a hit, particularly research grants from the National Institutes of Health. Trump has also targeted specific higher education institutions in blue states like California and Maine as well as elite universities like Harvard.
Indiana University didn't respond to a request for comment about funding uncertainty, but is one of 60 universities being investigated by the Trump administration for antisemitism. In 2024, it received just over 70% of its research funding from the federal government, or more than $552 million, mostly dedicated to its medical school.
Another cut impacts the Congressionally Directed Medical Research Program, which studies treatments for mild traumatic brain injuries. The IU School of Medicine received $715,000 from that fund in 2023.
Other grants, including those distributed by NIH, are currently being litigated. Indiana received $407 million from NIH in 2024.
Purdue University's LASER PULSE program — which helps the federal government research international development — has been frozen. The school had a dedicated page documenting such cuts and other funding uncertainty.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Americans' views on immigration take a massive positive swing amid Trump's crackdown
Americans' views on immigration take a massive positive swing amid Trump's crackdown

Yahoo

time41 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Americans' views on immigration take a massive positive swing amid Trump's crackdown

Americans' views on immigration took a massive positive swing this year amid President Donald Trump's ongoing crackdown, according to new Gallup polling. The share of Americans who thought immigration should decrease – 55% – reached a 5-year high point in 2024. This year, it has dropped to 30%, and positive views of immigration have hit a record high of 79%, according to poll results released July 11. The poll surveyed 1,402 Americans between June 2 and 26. The Trump administration ramped up its promise to carry out widespread deportations in June, sending out masked immigration agents to raid restaurants, farms and hardware stores and touching off widespread protests. He has unveiled a new "Alligator Alcatraz" detention facility for migrants in the Florida Everglades. The administration has faced legal challenges at every turn, bringing it several times to the brink of clashes with judges who have imposed barriers on the scale and tactics of the crackdown. During former President Joe Biden's administration, Americans' views on immigration took a dip amid a surge of migration and reports of disarray on the southern border. But this year, even among Republicans, views on immigration have grown significantly rosier – 64% of Republicans now believe immigration is a good thing, a 25-point jump from June of 2024. The fraction of Republicans who think immigration should decrease has fallen from 88% to 48% in that time span. Trump's immigration policies are broadly unpopular, with just 35% disapproving of his handling of the issue, according to the poll. The Trump administration faced heavy pushback over its immigration policies in March when it deported hundreds of men to a brutal prison in El Salvador – even though most were Venezuelan. It was forced to return Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Maryland man from El Salvador who a judge ordered could remain in the U.S., amid an ongoing legal battle. The Supreme Court has since given the Trump administration the green light to deport people to countries from which they do not originate. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Americans' views on immigration hit a high point amid Trump crackdown

Trump administration's Texas flood disaster response 'fundamentally different' from Biden's approach: Noem
Trump administration's Texas flood disaster response 'fundamentally different' from Biden's approach: Noem

Fox News

time2 hours ago

  • Fox News

Trump administration's Texas flood disaster response 'fundamentally different' from Biden's approach: Noem

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said Saturday that the federal response to the deadly floods in Texas Hill Country last weekend was a good indication of the improved disaster response the Trump administration is committed to providing. Devastating floods on the Fourth of July claimed at least 119 lives, and more than 150 others are missing. Among those killed were 27 girls attending Camp Mystic along the Guadalupe River in Hunt, Texas. "What you saw from our response in Texas is going to be a lot of how President [Donald] Trump envisions what [the Federal Emergency Management Agency] (FEMA) would look like in the future," Noem said during a news conference Saturday. "We did things in Texas, in response, very different than Joe Biden." In response to the 2023 Ohio train derailment in East Palestine, the Biden administration said the chemical disaster did not meet legal requirements for a FEMA disaster declaration, waiting two weeks to deploy a team to assist. In the 2023 Maui fires, more than 100 people were killed, and historic Lahaina was reduced to rubble. Survivors were left without food, water and shelter. At the time, FEMA Administrator Michael Brown called President Joe Biden's response to the deadly fires "an abject failure." Slow responses and inadequate aid were also widely reported after Hurricane Helene struck North Carolina, Georgia and South Carolina in late 2024. "I'll also be signing an executive order to begin the process of fundamentally reforming and overhauling FEMA or maybe getting rid of FEMA," Trump said in January while visiting North Carolina. "I think, frankly, FEMA is not good." Noem noted that, during the most recent disaster, federal assistance was on the ground in Texas as soon as the flooding hit. "We deployed our Coast Guard, helicopters, [aircraft] and swift water rescue teams out of Customs and Border Protection," she said. "Our [Border Patrol Tactical Unit] (BORTAC) teams, which I like to call the Department of Homeland Security's ninjas, are specifically trained for situations like that, where the unprecedented is happening." After the floods, Noem said she immediately met with Texas Gov. Greg Abbott and spoke with him about getting a major disaster declaration signed. Within an hour or two of the request, she said, it was approved by the White House. "We pre-deployed dollars right to Texas so that they can make the best decisions responding to their people," Noem said. "FEMA has never done that before — pre-deployed dollars to a state so that they could use that to save their people, so they could use that to go out and save lives." Noem said the president wants the states to be empowered during emergencies. "Emergencies are locally executed," she said. "They are state-managed and then the federal government comes in and supports you. [No one] ever wants to sit back and wait for someone from the federal government to show up and rescue you out of your house because that, in the past, has not served people well under the Biden administration. Under President Trump, Noem said, federal officials were there immediately to help local and state officials manage the response. She added her belief that FEMA "will cease to exist the way that it is today." "We are fundamentally reforming that agency," Noem said. "President Trump may want to, in his prerogative, as he likes to do, rename things. He may come up with a new name for this agency that reflects the fundamental change that's going to happen there. But this agency will no longer be the bureaucratic agency where people have to wait 20 years for their claim to be paid. "It will be an agency that immediately says to that state, and to that local emergency management director, 'What do you need? How can we support you?' And then trains them to have the skill set that they need to be serving their people immediately, because they're always there faster. They're right there on the streets." It is unclear what the new agency name might be. When asked about reports of calls to FEMA from Texas residents going unanswered, Noem said she was "throwing the bull---- flag," claiming she did not think that was true. "I will get rid of any contract that doesn't respond to people because they know they are empowered to do it," she said. FEMA did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital's request for comment.

Democrat Lawmaker Blasts 'Alligator Alcatraz' as 'Internment Camp'
Democrat Lawmaker Blasts 'Alligator Alcatraz' as 'Internment Camp'

Newsweek

time3 hours ago

  • Newsweek

Democrat Lawmaker Blasts 'Alligator Alcatraz' as 'Internment Camp'

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Representative Debbie Wasserman Schultz, a Florida Democrat, on Saturday toured the Everglades migrant detention site, known as "Alligator Alcatraz," and denounced the facility as an "internment camp." "The conditions that we saw inside this internment camp—which it is nothing less than that description—were really appalling," Wasserman Schultz told reporters. Newsweek has reached out to Wasserman Schultz's office by email outside of normal business hours on Saturday afternoon for comment. Why It Matters Florida's Democratic representatives have tried for weeks to gain access to the Everglades facility, which was hastily established at the site of the Dade-Collier Training and Transition Airport and rapidly filled with detainees. National scrutiny over the conditions of the facility have remained a significant focus amid ongoing controversies about the treatment of detainees, particularly migrants and non-citizen residents, at U.S. immigration facilities. The center is part of the Trump administration's effort to crackdown on illegal immigration. President Donald Trump has vowed to carry out the largest mass deportation in U.S. history, an initiative that has seen an intensification of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids across the country. Florida Governor Ron DeSantis and other Republicans have touted the detention center as efficient despite concerns about the makeshift nature of the establishment, largely constructed of tents, trailers, and temporary buildings that flooded the day after Trump toured the facility. The Everglades facility now holds an estimated 400 people, has drawn backlash from immigration, environmental and Indigenous groups and is facing a lawsuit from the group Friends of the Everglades and the Center for Biological Diversity. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Kristi Noem said during a press conference on Saturday that it is "held to the same standard that all federal facilities are." Beds are seen inside a migrant detention center, dubbed "Alligator Alcatraz," located at the site of the Dade-Collier Training and Transition Airport, as President Donald Trump tours the facility in Ochopee, Florida, on July 1.... Beds are seen inside a migrant detention center, dubbed "Alligator Alcatraz," located at the site of the Dade-Collier Training and Transition Airport, as President Donald Trump tours the facility in Ochopee, Florida, on July 1. Inset: Representative Debbie Wasserman Schultz, a Florida Democrat, is seen during a press conference after visiting "Alligator Alcatraz" on July 12 in Ochopee, Florida. More Andrew Caballero-Reynolds/AFP via Getty Images //What To Know Florida lawmakers on Saturday took a state-arranged tour of the facility after some were blocked earlier from viewing it due to the large number of Democrats and Republicans who turned up on Saturday morning. The lawmakers were divided into multiple groups that toured the facility, and Wasserman Schultz told reporters ahead of her visit that lawmakers had arrived because they wanted to ask questions and get a sense of conditions even if they were not going to be allowed into the facility. The congresswoman has remained a vocal opponent of the state's detention facilities, previously railing against the Glades County Detention Center in Moore Haven, Florida, telling Newsweek at that time that "there's just too many credible reports that people are not properly cared for there, and that's an understatement" and that it was "time to close this facility." After her tour of the Everglades facility on Saturday, Wasserman Schultz called the facility an internment camp and described the conditions. "Throughout this entire tour, it was repeated over and over that the state is working hand in glove with ICE," Wasserman Schultz said. "This facility was inspected by ICE. They review their detention standards. They are using cages. These detainees are living in cages. The pictures that you've seen don't do it justice." She described the detention areas as "cages, wall-to-wall," that held 32 people per "cage," which contained only bunk beds and "three tiny toilets" that are a toilet and sink combined into a single unit. "They get their drinking water, and they brush their teeth, where they poop, in the same unit," the congresswoman said, adding that officials "bragged that they went above standards, supposedly." She described the shower facility as having "no privacy at all," with 900 men sharing the space and having only "small walls in each shower." However, her greatest shock was reserved for the food provided to the detainees: The congresswoman said that when shown the "meal prep area," she saw that employees at the facility were fed "large pieces of roast chicken, large sausages," while detainees ate "small, gray turkey and cheese sandwiches and apple and chips, and that's it." "We're talking about fully grown men being fed very small portions," she said. What People Are Saying Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin in an emailed statement to Newsweek regarding Wasserman Schultz's comments: "Beyond disgusting. The vilification of ICE must stop. This type of rhetoric directly contributes to ICE law enforcement facing a nearly 700% increase in assaults against them. Our brave law enforcement should be thanked for risking their lives every day to arrest violent criminal illegal aliens including gang members, murderers, and pedophiles." Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem previously wrote on X, formerly Twitter: "Alligator Alcatraz can be a blueprint for detention facilities across the country. It will provide DHS with the beds and space needed to safely detain the worst of the worst." Bacardi Jackson, executive director of the ACLU of Florida, wrote in a statement: "As President Trump doubled down on his agenda of fear and division, we're reminded that this cruel and inhumane stunt is part of a broader strategy to expand the abusive mass detention machine, and in turn, criminalize and disappear members of our communities. Building a prison-like facility on sacred indigenous land in the middle of the Everglades is a direct assault on humanity, dignity, indigenous sovereignty, and the constitutional protections we all share." Representative Maxwell Frost, a Florida Democrat, wrote in a statement: "I've toured these facilities myself – real ones, not the makeshift tents they plan to put up – and even those detention centers contain conditions that are nothing short of human rights abuses. Places where people are forced to eat, sleep, shower, and defecate all in the same room. Places where medical attention is virtually non-existent. Anyone who supports this is a disgusting excuse for a human being, let alone a public servant." What Happens Next? While the Everglades facility is ostensibly established as a temporary response to the needs of the Trump administration's deportation effort, it remains unclear how long officials plan to continue using the facility, especially as national scrutiny continues to grow. This article includes reporting by The Associated Press.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store