‘The people's voice was heard': GOP lawmaker slams Gov. Newsom over Prop 36 funding
'I think the most essential role of government is public safety. Prop 36, passed by 70% of the vote in California, in all 58 counties, including the most liberal counties in California, San Francisco and Marin, voted in the affirmative on Prop 36 to make crime illegal again. But this governor hasn't put the money in the implement the will of the people,' Strickland told Nikki Laurenzo on this week's edition of Inside California Politics.
The Huntington Beach Republican has served in the state capitol since 2012. When asked about what has changed in his time as a lawmaker, Strickland noted there is not as much awareness in terms of subject matter on major issues.
'Its not easy, because we're dealing with 5,000 different bills, to be experts on all these different issues,' Strickland said. 'Elected leaders need to go out and in their community and hear from the citizens of their districts and people from around the state of California. And that's why I'm really in shock that this governor has not funded Prop 36. The people's voice was heard. They want to make crime illegal again in California, and now the governor is not funding that initiative. I am shocked.'
Strickland also pushed back against Gov. Newsom's claim that the state's $12 billion deficit is due to President Donald Trump's tariff policies. He did, however, praise Newsom for allocating more funds toward water management and resources for firefighters. Nikki Laurenzo also sat down with democratic strategist Kevin Liao to discuss the party's weaknesses going into the 2026 elections.
Inside California Politics airs this weekend during the following times:
KTLA: Sunday, May 18 at 5:30 a.m.
KRON: Saturday, May 17 at 6:30 p.m.
KSEE: Saturday, May 17 at 6:30 p.m. and Sunday, May 18 at 8:30 a.m.
KSWB: Sunday, May 18 at 5:30 a.m. and 11:00 p.m.
KGET: Sunday, May 18 at 11:30 p.m.
KTXL: Saturday, May 17 at 11:00 p.m. and Sunday, May 18 at 7:30 a.m.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
20 minutes ago
- The Hill
900 DOJ attorneys urge Senate to reject Bove nomination
More than 900 former Justice Department attorneys are urging the Senate Judiciary Committee to reject the nomination of Emil Bove for a lifetime judicial appointment. Bove, who previously served on President Trump's criminal defense team, is now in the No. 3 role at the Department of Justice (DOJ) and has been nominated for a judgeship on the Third Circuit Court of Appeals. The extraordinary outpouring came from attorneys from the Kennedy administration to the current Trump administration who pinpointed Bove as a key figure behind numerous firings and policy shifts, calling him a 'leader in this assault' on the Justice Department. 'Emil Bove has been an architect and enforcer of many of the attacks on DOJ and its employees,' said Stacey Young, executive director and founder of Justice Connection, which organized the letter. 'His nomination to the Third Circuit Court of Appeals sent shockwaves across DOJ's workforce, and should alarm all Americans concerned about the Department's future and the survival of the rule of law.' The Senate Judiciary Committee is set to consider Bove's nomination Thursday, as well as that of Fox News host Jeanine Pirro to serve as a U.S. Attorney. The letter runs through a string of recent controversies in which Bove has played a role. He was central in pushing the dismissal of the bribery charges brought against New York Mayor Eric Adams, prompting a wave of resignations from members of the department's Public Integrity Section. He was behind terminations of prosecutors who worked on Jan. 6 cases and a request to turn over a list of FBI agents who investigated riot cases. It also focuses on recent allegations from a DOJ whistleblower who said Bove told top department officials they may need to consider saying 'f— you' to judges who might block the administration's invocation of the Alien Enemies Act to send migrants to Salvadoran prison. Bove has said he couldn't recall whether he used the expletive, but told lawmakers during his confirmation hearing that he 'certainly conveyed the importance of the upcoming operation.' 'Each one of the undersigned would testify, under oath, that we have never — and would never — tell a Justice Department attorney to consider defying a court order. Moreover, the Justice Department's later defiance of judicial mandates in the cases where Mr. Bove previewed doing so further suggests that disregarding court orders was Mr. Bove's intent all along,' the letter states. Bove's nomination looks poised to proceed, as Sen. Thom Tillis (N.C.), the only Republican on the panel to previously oppose a Trump nominee, has said he would follow the staff recommendation. 'We ask that before the Judiciary Committee votes on this nomination, you rigorously examine the actions Mr. Bove has taken at DOJ and the effects they've had on the Department's integrity, employees, and mission-critical work,' the attorneys wrote. 'It is intolerable to us that anyone who disgraces the Justice Department would be promoted to one of the highest courts in the land, as it should be intolerable to anyone committed to maintaining our ordered system of justice.'
The Hill
20 minutes ago
- The Hill
GOP split on whether Trump should fire Powell
Republican lawmakers are split over if President Trump should fire Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, with some pushing him to nix the central bank head and others encouraging him to be patient. Trump indicated to some lawmakers that he plans to fire Powell during an Oval Office meeting Tuesday evening, a White official and a second source told The Hill. But by Wednesday, the president was walking back some of his sentiments, telling reporters, 'I don't rule out anything but I think it's highly unlikely. Unless he has to leave, fraud.' The idea of Trump pursuing Powell's removal before his term is up next year rattled the markets, causing them to dip on Wednesday before finishing up. The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose half a percent on the day and the S&P 500 was up 0.3 percent. It was clear, as Trump has indicated before, his words have a real-time impact on stocks and bonds. But just who is advising Trump on the matter appears to be somewhat of a mystery. Sen. Mike Rounds (R-S.D.) was in the camp of believing that firing Powell was a bad idea, citing that markets are watching. 'No. Long term, the markets watch very carefully the independence of the Federal Reserve,' he told The Hill on Wednesday. 'I think when the time comes to reduce interest rates – and I think the time is coming – I think the fact that he has maintained his credibility with the markets will help and will send a really positive message to the markets.' 'By allowing the Fed chair a recognition and a stability in his tenure is going to work to the president's advantage long term,' Rounds added. When pressed on if the president is hearing that message enough, Rounds said he wasn't sure who has his ear. 'I don't know who that would be. I think [Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent] would clearly understand that and I'm hoping that his other advisers would be counseling him in the same way,' he said. Sen. John Hoeven (R-N.D.), meanwhile, said feelings about whether to nix Powell were mixed within the GOP conference. 'It depends who you ask,' he said. Some Republicans in the House were cheering for Powell to be out, including Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-Fla.) who shared reporting about Trump being likely to fire Powell soon and said 'told you.' 'Jerome Powell better lower those interest rates. You heard @POTUS 's statement just now. Plenty of smart people with common sense begging for the job. Ball is in his court. If he doesn't lower rates he will be FIRED. Bookmark this,' she said on X. But feelings in that chamber are mixed, too. Rep. Byron Donalds (R-Fla.), who is running for Florida governor, said he's not on board yet on supporting removing Powell. 'I'm not there yet, but I'll tell you that the president doesn't rule anything out,' Donalds said in an interview at the Hill Nation Summit. 'It's pretty clear the president is frustrated about where short-term interest rates are,' Donalds said. Trump went back and forth about removing Powell this week, reportedly drafting a letter to do so that he showed the lawmakers in the Oval Office meeting on Tuesday evening. But by the next day, he called such reporting 'not true' and said no letter had been drafted. Earlier this week, Bessent said there was a ' formal process ' underway to select Powell's successor. Powell's term as chair of the Fed's board of governors ends next year and his term as a governor goes until 2028. No president has ever fired a Fed chair before, and there are serious doubts that the presidential powers include the legal authority to do so. Trump's main quarrel with Powell is that the Federal Reserve's interest rate-setting committee hasn't dropped interest rates this year, a move that would make lending cheaper and likely please financial markets. Powell said earlier this month that the Fed has held rates aloft specifically because of the anticipated price effects of Trump's tariffs, which have likely just started to show up in the national price data. Asked if the Fed would have cut rates more if it weren't for the tariffs, Powell said, 'I think that's right.' That puts Fed policy squarely at odds with Trump's desires. Prices in the consumer price index rose to a 2.7-percent annual increase in June, up from 2.4 percent in May, likely due to the cost of tariffs being passed on to consumers. Prices rose in heavily imported goods such as apparel, appliances, and home furnishings, which was a smoking gun for tariff inflation for many economists. Republicans also just passed a law including large-scale tax cuts, which are traditionally thought to be economically stimulative, though projections show very little growth coming from the cuts. 'If President Trump's goal was to get interest rates down, doing nothing would've been a much better course of action than imposing sweeping tariffs and passing a huge, deficit-financed tax cut,' Kevin Rinz, a senior fellow at the Washington Center for Equitable Growth, wrote in a commentary. 'Antagonizing the Fed and actively threatening to fire Chairman Powell only makes it harder to get to the point where prices are stable and rates can come down,' he added.
Boston Globe
20 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Trump has wanted to fire Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell. A costly Fed renovation project could provide the reason.
With estimates of the ongoing project reaching $2.5 billion or higher, Trump and other White House officials have accused Powell of mismanagement and wasting money on what critics have compared to the Palace of Versailles and the Taj Mahal. 'It's possible there's fraud involved with the $2.5, $2.7 billion renovation,' Trump told reporters Wednesday after a Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Trump said it was 'highly unlikely' he would fire Powell, whose term as chair doesn't expire until May 2026, 'unless he has to leave for fraud.' But the president said he polled a dozen House Republicans meeting with him Tuesday and said they all told him they wanted Powell fired. Advertisement 'Fortunately we get to make a change in the next eight months or so, and we'll pick somebody that's good,' Trump said. He declared surprise that Powell was appointed as chair in the first place. But it was Trump who first appointed him to the position in 2018. President Joe Biden re-upped Powell to another four-year term in 2022. Advertisement The battle over interest rates is a continuation from his first term, when Trump quickly soured on Powell, a Republican, over the same issue, said Stephen Moore, an informal Trump economic adviser. 'He'd say, 'Steve, one of my worst mistakes was Jerome Powell,' ' recalled Moore, a senior visiting fellow in economics at the conservative Heritage Foundation think tank. With interest rates much higher this year, 'Trump wants Powell out of there as soon as possible,' Moore said. 'The White House is looking for any possible way to discredit Jerome Powell right now.' Senator Elizabeth Warren, a Massachusetts Democrat 'When he said he was going to do it back in March, it tanked the bond market, so he backed off. But he hasn't given up on the effort,' Warren told the Globe. 'Now he's suddenly interested in how much the Fed has spent on plumbing and painting to repair a 90-year-old building. That smells a lot like pretext.' Powell has been adamant publicly that he will not step down before his term ends and that Trump can not legally fire him over policy disputes. Powell would be expected to sue if he's fired and would win because the renovation project isn't a valid cause, predicted Jaret Seiberg, a Washington financial policy analyst at investment bank TD Cowen. Advertisement The Fed adjusts its benchmark interest rate in response to economic conditions. Like central banks in other advanced nations, the To battle high inflation, the Fed raised its interest rate sharply to more than 5 percent starting in 2022. Powell and Fed officials were criticized for waiting too long to try to rein in rising inflation, arguing it would be temporary as the economy reopened after the pandemic. The higher interest rates, along with easing supply chains, helped push inflation down. Fed officials began slowly lowering interest rates in 2024 and forecast that it would continue that effort this year. But after taking office in January, Trump hiked tariffs and has threatened even higher ones in a chaotic trade war. Adding tariffs to the prices of goods risks reigniting high inflation—recent data has showed That has infuriated Trump. Higher interest rates slow economic growth and also affect the rates business owners pay to borrow money. Trump has tried publicly and privately bullying Powell to lower interest rates, falsely asserting there's no inflation, but that effort hasn't worked. So the White House and its allies recently launched a different strategy focused on the Fed's renovation and expansion project, which began in 2018. Advertisement Powell was grilled about the costs when he appeared before the Senate banking committee on June 25. 'We can all agree that updating aging infrastructure is a legitimate need,' the panel's chairman, Republican Tim Scott of South Carolina, said in noting the estimated cost of the project had increased by about a third from it's original $1.9 billion price tag. 'But when senior citizens can barely afford Formica countertops, it sends the wrong message to spend public money on luxury upgrades that feel more like they belong in the Palace of Versailles than a public institution.' Scott said the 'lavish renovations' included 'rooftop terraces, custom elevators that open into VIP dining rooms, white marble finishes, and even a private art collection.' Powell said 'There's no new marble. We took down the old marble. We're putting it back up. We'll have to use new marble where some of the old marble broke,' he said. 'There are no special elevators. They're old elevators that have been there. There are no new water features. There's ... no roof terrace gardens.' But his testimony didn't squelch the controversy. Last week, Vought suggested that changes the Fed made to the renovation plans would put it out of compliance with the approval it received in 2021 from the National Capital Planning Commission. That night, three Trump White House officials appointed to the commission, including the new chair, attending their Advertisement 'Some have started to refer to this as the Taj Mahal near the National Mall,' James Blair, White House deputy chief of staff, said at the meeting. He said he would request 'a full review of plans of the Federal Reserve project' and a site visit. To try to mitigate the controversy, the Federal Reserve has posted Senator Cynthia Lummis, a Wyoming Republican on the banking committee, said the cost overruns are 'spectacularly large' and just one of several problems she has with Powell's leadership, including his handling of interest rates. But she doesn't think he can be fired. 'That's why I think he should resign instead,' Lummis said. But another Republican on the committee, Senator Thom Tillis of North Carolina, said the whole controversy is 'silly,' noting other Washington renovation projects, like $257 million in the recently enacted 'beautiful' tax bill for work at the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts. Advertisement Tillis said the White House is just trying to look for a reason to fire Powell. 'I just can't imagine that they're building a Taj Mahal there,' Tillis said. 'It just doesn't work with what I know about Jay Powell.' Jim Puzzanghera can be reached at
