Russia slams report it backed ‘zero enrichment' Iran nuclear deal
US news outlet Axios reported on Saturday, citing three anonymous sources familiar with the matter, that Putin had 'encouraged' Iran to accept a deal with the United States that would prevent the Islamic republic from enriching uranium.
The article 'appears to be a new political defamation campaign aimed at exacerbating tensions around Iran's nuclear program', the Russian ministry of foreign affairs said on Sunday.
'Invariably and repeatedly, we have emphasised the necessity of resolving the crisis concerning Iran's nuclear program exclusively through political and diplomatic means, and expressed our willingness to help find mutually acceptable solutions,' the statement read.
Tehran is suspected by Western countries and Israel of seeking to develop an atomic bomb, which it denies, defending its 'non-negotiable' right to develop a civilian nuclear program.
Moscow has a cordial relationship with Iran's clerical leadership and provides crucial backing for Tehran but did not swing forcefully behind its partner even after the United States joined Israel's bombing campaign in June.
Publicly, Moscow has defended Tehran's right to use nuclear technology for civilian purposes but in recent months, Putin has also drawn closer to US President Donald Trump.
On June 13, Israel launched an unprecedented attack on Iran, triggering a 12-day war.
The conflict halted negotiations initiated in April between Tehran and Washington to frame Iran's nuclear program in exchange for lifting economic sanctions against Iran.
On June 22, the United States bombed the underground uranium enrichment site at Fordo, south of Tehran, and nuclear facilities in Isfahan and Natanz.
The exact extent of the damage is not known. – AFP
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
7 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Patriots limit 'Trump doctrine'
AS some 20 Iranian ballistic missiles headed for the United States air base at Al Udeid in Qatar last month following US strikes against Iran, the only US personnel at the almost entirely evacuated base were some 40 air defence personnel manning a Patriot missile battery flown in a few weeks earlier. According to a press briefing by US chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Air Force General Daniel Caine, a few days later, together with another Patriot detachment from the Qatari military also present at the base, the US team fired more of the defence missiles than in any previous engagement since the system was first deployed in the first Gulf War in 1991. "They crushed it," he said, noting that damage to the base was minimal with no casualties. On the surface, officials from the Trump administration have painted last month's US strikes against Iran as an unusually decisive use of US power, talking of a new "Trump doctrine" in which military force is used with much clearer aims than under previous presidents. They argue it has "restored American deterrence", sending a clear signal to other potential foes, including Moscow and Beijing. The administration had also presented its 52-day bombing campaign against Houthi militants in Yemen as being similarly successful in restoring freedom of navigation there — only for the Houthis to restart attacks on shipping in recent days. All of that comes amid growing divisions within the administration over the future use of US military force. On that front, recent events in the Gulf have had consequences in Washington and beyond. According to reports last week, the US has barely 25 per cent of the Patriot missile stockpile the Pentagon believes it needs. Consumption of those missiles in the Middle East and Ukraine has made growing those stocks impossible despite heightened production. Last week, that prompted a Pentagon edict stopping shipment of several weapons types to Ukraine, including Patriot, long-range HIMARS strike rockets and artillery shells, described at the time as a deliberate decision to help rebuild US stocks. That decision, however, has since been reversed by President Donald Trump amid reports it had never received White House authorisation in the first place. "We have to," Trump told a press conference in Washington. "They have to be able to defend themselves." The US president has become increasingly critical of his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin in recent days, accusing him of being uninterested in Trump's efforts to mediate a peace deal as Russian forces have launched the largest drone strikes of the war against Ukraine. That will likely worry the powerful group within the current administration known as "the restrainers", keen to rein in the multi-decade US tendency to make open-ended defence commitments. On one side are several top US commanders who argue Ukraine should be supported as its defeat could embolden Moscow and Beijing to launch future attacks. On the other are individuals, including Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth and Pentagon No. 3 civilian official Elbridge Colby, who have argued publicly that too much support to Ukraine helps China by driving down already limited US weapons stocks. Ironically, the restrainers — including Vice-President JD Vance, among the most publicly committed US officials to reducing America's overseas military footprint — had been among the most supportive of Trump's actions on Iran. "Number one: you articulate a clear American interest ... in this case, that Iran can't have a nuclear weapon. "Number two, you try to aggressively diplomatically solve that problem. "Number three, when you can't solve it diplomatically, you use overwhelming military power to solve it and then you get the hell out of there before it becomes a protracted conflict," Vance told an Ohio fundraising dinner last month. Another even more significant challenge is that the threats the US now most needs to deter — a potential Chinese attack on Taiwan, or a Russian assault into Eastern Europe — are likely impossible to counter through a single US strike. Instead, Trump or his successors would likely face a choice between either unleashing a massive open-ended US conventional military campaign — at the very least an air, drone and missile offensive against advancing Russian or Chinese forces — or abandoning Taiwan and eastern European allies to their fate.
The Star
8 hours ago
- The Star
India rebel group says army killed leaders in Myanmar strikes
MYANMAR-INDIA BORDER (AFP): Separatist militants in northeastern India said the Indian army carried out cross-border drone strikes on the group's camps in neighbouring Myanmar on Sunday, killing three of its leaders. Some rebel groups in northeastern India have ethnic, linguistic and cultural ties with minorities across the border in Myanmar and maintain a presence there. A top commander of the United Liberation Front of Asom (ULFA) was killed and 19 others wounded in a drone attack in Myanmar near the border, the separatist group said in a series of statements. "Two more senior commanders were killed" in subsequent strikes, the ULFA said, adding: "Several other members and civilians were also wounded." Indian authorities have yet to confirm the strikes. Camps belonging to another rebel group, the People's Liberation Army, were also targeted, the ULFA added. The ULFA is one of several insurgent groups in India, and wants independence for the northeastern state of Assam, while the PLA advocates for the secession of Manipur state. One faction of the ULFA laid down arms and signed a peace deal with the Indian government in 2023. Rebel attacks have drastically reduced in recent years but the insurgent violence has killed thousands of people, mostly civilians, over the last three decades. - AFP
The Star
8 hours ago
- The Star
Gaza civil defence says Israeli strikes kill 43 as truce talks deadlocked
GAZA, Palestinian Territories (AFP): Gaza's civil defence agency said Israeli air strikes on Sunday killed more than 40 Palestinians, including at a market and a water distribution point, as talks for a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas stalled. Delegations from Israel and the Palestinian militant group have now spent a week trying to agree on a temporary truce to halt 21 months of devastating fighting in the Gaza Strip. But on Saturday, each side accused the other of blocking attempts to secure an agreement at the indirect talks in the Qatari capital, Doha. On the ground, civil defence agency spokesman Mahmud Bassal said at least 43 people were killed in the latest Israeli strikes, including 11 when a market in Gaza City was hit. Elsewhere, eight children were among the 10 victims of a drone strike at a water point in the Nuseirat refugee camp, in central Gaza, Bassal said. Israel's military blamed a technical problem for that strike, saying it had been targeting a member of Hamas ally Islamic Jihad. "As a result of a technical error with the munition, the munition fell dozens of meters from the target," a statement read. "The incident is under review." Reports of casualties were being examined, it added. Khaled Rayyan told AFP he was woken by the sound of two large explosions after a house was hit in Nuseirat. "Our neighbour and his children were under the rubble," he said. Another resident, Mahmud al-Shami, called on the negotiators to secure an end to the war. "What happened to us has never happened in the entire history of humanity," he said. "Enough." - 150 targets in 24 hours - The Israeli military, which has recently intensified operations across Gaza, said in a statement that in the past 24 hours the air force "struck more than 150 terror targets throughout the Gaza Strip". It released aerial footage of what it said were fighter jet strikes attacking Hamas targets around Beit Hanoun, in northern Gaza, showing explosions on the ground and thick smoke in the sky. Media restrictions in Gaza and difficulties accessing many areas mean AFP is unable to independently verify tolls and details provided by the civil defence agency and other parties. The war was sparked by Hamas's October 7, 2023 attack on Israel, which led to 1,219 deaths, most of them civilians, according to an AFP tally based on official figures. Of the 251 people taken hostage by militants that day, 49 are still held in Gaza, including 27 the Israeli military says are dead. Hamas-run Gaza's health ministry says that at least 58,026 Palestinians, most of them civilians, have been killed in Israel's retaliatory campaign. The UN considers those figures reliable. UN agencies on Saturday warned that fuel shortages had reached "critical levels", threatening to worsen conditions for Gaza's more than two million people. On Sunday, the Handala -- a former Norwegian trawler loaded with medical supplies, food and children's equipment -- set off from Sicily. The pro-Palestinian activists on board hope to reach Gaza, despite Israel having recently detained and deported people aboard a previous vessel, the Madleen, including Swedish climate activist Greta Thunberg. - Forced displacement fears - Talks to seal a 60-day ceasefire and hostage release were in the balance on Saturday after Israel and Hamas accused each other of trying to block a deal. Hamas wants the complete withdrawal of Israeli forces from Gaza, but a Palestinian source with knowledge of the talks said Israel had presented plans to maintain troops in more than 40 percent of the territory. The source said Israel wanted to force hundreds of thousands of Palestinians into the south of Gaza "in preparation for forcibly displacing them to Egypt or other countries". A senior Israeli official said Israel had demonstrated an openness "to flexibility in the negotiations, while Hamas remains intransigent, clinging to positions that prevent the mediators from advancing an agreement". Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has said he is prepared to enter talks for a more lasting end to hostilities once a temporary truce is agreed, but only if Hamas disarms. Thousands of people gathered in Israel's coastal hub of Tel Aviv on Saturday to call for the release of the hostages. "The window of opportunity... is open now and it won't be for long," said former captive Eli Sharabi. - AFP
