SC grants bail to Uttarakhand man accused of religious conversion for marrying inter-faith
A bench of Justices B V Navarathna and Satish Chandra Sharma granted the man relief by observing that the state government of Uttarakhand cannot object to the marriage when the same has taken place as per the wishes of the couple's parents.
'We observe that the respondent-State cannot have any objection to the appellant and his wife residing together inasmuch as they have been married as per the wishes of their respective parents and families. Thus, the top court found that this was an appropriate case where bail should be granted to the man.'
The man had been booked for having committed religious conversion under The Uttarakhand Freedom of Religion Act, 2018, for Cheating and Cheating by personation (pretending to be someone else) under the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita (BNS), 2023, following his marriage with a woman who belonged to another faith.
As per the man's counsel, the marriage was arranged by the families of the couple, who were aware of the inter-faith nature of the union. However, following the marriage, certain individuals and organisations raised objections. An FIR was lodged against the man, leading to his arrest and imprisonment.
After being in custody for six months, the Supreme Court, on May 19, directed that the man be immediately released on bail.
'We also make it clear that the pendency of the criminal proceeding against the appellant herein would not come in the way of the appellant and his wife residing together on their own volition', the Court stated, in its order.
The man had moved the Supreme Court against the Uttarakhand High Court's decision to reject his bail plea. The top court allowed his appeal and directed the concerned trial court to release him on bail. (ANI)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
16 minutes ago
- Time of India
Preamble Row Explained: Why 'Secular' And 'Socialist' Were Added & What The Supreme Court Says
A fresh debate has erupted after RSS called for removing the words "Socialist" and "Secular" from the Preamble of the Indian Constitution. These words were added during the Emergency in 1976 through the 42nd Amendment by Indira Gandhi, aiming to reaffirm state neutrality and pro-poor policies. Critics argue the move was political, while supporters say it gave clarity during a crisis. Though Parliament can amend the Preamble, the Supreme Court has ruled that its basic structure, including these terms, cannot be altered. Watch the video to understand the history, law and the latest debate around Preamble. #indianconstitutionpreamble #socialist #secular #rss #42ndamendment #emergency1976 #indiragandhi #supremecourtindia #constitutionaldebate #politicalcontroversy #fundamentalrights #constituentassembly #ambedkar #secularismindia #socialismindia #judicialreview #parliamentamendment #unityandintegrity #freedomofreligion #explained #toi #toibharat Read More
The Wire
16 minutes ago
- The Wire
A New Political Alliance Offers an Inkling into BJP's Plans on J&K's Statehood
Jehangir Ali a minute ago Some political analysts believe that international focus on the region as a result of the recent military conflict between India and Pakistan in May this year and the offer of mediation on Kashmir by the United States has changed the regional scenario. Jammu and Kashmir Peoples Conference (JKPC) President Sajad Lone addresses a press conference regarding the formation of 'People's Alliance for Change', a new political front comprising JKPC, People's Democratic Front and Jamaat-e-Islami-backed Justice and Development Front, in Srinagar, Monday, June 30, 2025. Photo: PTI Srinagar: Amid speculation on the restoration of Jammu and Kashmir's statehood, a new alliance has taken shape in the Union territory between the Peoples Conference led by Sajad Lone, the Justice and Development Front, a splinter group of the outlawed Jamaat-e-Islami and Hakim Yasin's People's Democratic Front (PDF). Some political analysts believe that international focus on the region as a result of the recent military conflict between India and Pakistan in May this year and the offer of mediation on Kashmir by the United States has changed the regional scenario in South Asia. It may also spark some political changes in Jammu and Kashmir. Srinagar-based political analyst and senior human rights activist, Sheikh Showkat Hussain, said that the changed scenario may make the Bhartiya Janta Party (BJP)-led Union government extend 'some concessions' to the political parties in J&K. 'One of them could be the restoration of J&K's statehood." Hussain, who retired as head and dean of the School of Legal Studies at the Central University of Kashmir, said, 'As a preemptive measure, they may go for fresh election and would like a fractured mandate in Kashmir so that they (BJP) can go an alliance of the type they had with PDP previously'. All eyes on parliament session Speculation is rife that the Union government could bring a bill restoring J&K's statehood in the parliament which will convene for the monsoon session from July 21. While the contours of the bill remain in the realm of speculations, The Wire has previously reported that it could pave the way for fresh assembly elections in Jammu and Kashmir. Although the three political parties have limited electoral influence with only one member (Lone) in the J&K assembly, some analysts believe that their coming together was part of a design to fracture the mandate in the Kashmir Valley. Rekha Chowdhary, senior academic and former professor of Political Science at the University of Jammu, said that the alliance indicates that the Peoples Conference led by Lone was playing on a weak wicket. The alliance's ability to stage electoral upsets in case of fresh election largely depends on its ability to convince the Jamaat sympathisers to cast their votes in their favour and embrace the mainstream. The Jamaat's advisory council including its chief Abdul Hameed Fayaz are languishing in jail along with several other Jamaat leaders and activists. Turbulence in Jamaat The Jamaat's splinter group, which has formed the alliance with Lone's PC, has only two well-known faces from the outfit in its ranks – former general secretary Ghulam Qadir Lone from north Kashmir, whose son, Kalimullah Lone, unsuccessfully contested from Langate constituency in 2024 assembly election, and Ghulam Qadir Wani, a basic member (rukun) from south Kashmir's Pulwama. Peoples Conference's Irfan Sultan Pandithpuri lost the Langate assembly seat by some 1,500 votes in a triangular contest with Sheikh Khursheed, the brother of Engineer Rashid who won the seat by polling 25,625 votes while Lone came in distant fifth place with just 3463 votes. A Srinagar-based political analyst, who has written extensively about the Jamaat said that Lone and Wani were not part of the outfit's Majlis-e-Shora or the advisory council when it was banned by the Union home ministry. 'The Jamaat has hundreds of basic members and its constitution doesn't allow the formation of a parallel party. Only the council can take a call on participating in elections,' he said, referring to the expulsion of late Hurriyat hawk Syed Ali Geelani, his political secretary Pir Hissamudin and others from the outfit in 2004. The expulsion of Geelani and others took place in the backdrop of allegations that the Jamaat had tacitly enabled the coming to power of the PDP led by late Mufti Mohammad Sayeed in the 2002 assembly election. Hissamudin was killed by unknown gunmen soon after the Tehreek-e-Hurriyat, a parallel political outfit, was floated and headed by Geelani against the Jamaat. Hussain said that following the ban in 2019, some former and present Jamaat members may have developed political ambitions. 'They used the name of the Jamaat in the 2024 assembly election. They have assumed a different name now because of resistance from the (Jamaat) cadre. One can only speculate at this point because the Jamaat leaders are in jail but the name change in itself is an indication of the differences within the group,' he said. Fracturing the mandate While the new alliance aligns with the BJP's broader strategy of having a third political force capable of competing with the two dominant parties in the Kashmir Valley – the ruling NC and the PDP, it is for some a stark reflection of Sajad Lone's dimming fortunes. 'Despite trying to strengthen his party, Lone lost one seat in the 2024 assembly election and won only one and that too with a narrow margin. He has not been successful in expanding his constituency and instead ended up on the losing side. This alliance reflects how badly the PC is requiring external support for expanding its ground base,' Chowdhary said. Hussain, however, said that the BJP would like to divide the voters in Kashmir 'so that there are so many parties that it becomes easy for them (BJP) to manage the outcome (in case of fresh assembly election)'. A leader of the new alliance, who spoke with The Wire on the condition of anonymity, rejected the speculation, saying that the three parties had reached an understanding that they could cash in on the 'widespread sentiment against the NC due to its refusal to take a tough stand against New Delhi while failing to fulfil its electoral promises'. 'The alliance's electoral ambitions also don't overlap. For instance, the PC is strong in Kupwara and Pattan while the JDF has presence in south Kashmir, parts of Budgam and Baramulla districts,' he added. Chowdhary also said that there was 'some volatility' in the political atmosphere in Kashmir with the narrative of Omar Abdullah versus Syed Aga Ruhullah gaining traction in recent months amid growing resentment against the party's performance after it came to power last year. 'Whether this is only a narrative remains to be seen but the situation is more unsettled now rather than being settled and it seems anything is possible. In case of fresh elections, there could be defections within the parties and who knows which parties are going to be hit,' she said. BJP's road to power? Chowdhary said that the BJP would aim for a repeat of its 2014 performance if a fresh assembly election was held in Jammu and Kashmir. The saffron party swept the Jammu region after riding the Modi wave and formed a coalition government with the PDP which emerged as the single largest party. In Kashmir, the party would ideally seek support this time from smaller parties other than NC and PDP. Hussain said that the BJP's policies have pushed the whole country on the 'wrong side of history' including in the Middle East, recent developments vis-a-vis the India-Pakistan conflict and US president Donald Trump's claims of having brokered a ceasefire might force a change. 'These experiments (new alliances) are aimed to create electoral divisions in Kashmir so that people vote for local parties. Their basic purpose is to create a situation in which the mandate in Kashmir remains tied to the party which comes to power in Jammu, be it the BJP or the Congress'. Chowdhary said that the Jamaat has been an ideological rival of the NC but in terms of electoral politics, it hasn't been able to put up a good show in its history. 'The alliance feels more like a pressure tactic and the coming together of odds rather than a factor that could change the situation on the ground. In its history, the Jamaat has performed well only with the blessings of the Union government. It was a proxy for the Congress in 1972 when it put up its best performance by winning five seats. Whose proxy it was in the 2024 election and whether it will continue to remain a proxy, given the prevailing ban, remains to be seen.' The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.
Time of India
18 minutes ago
- Time of India
Wisconsin Supreme Court's liberal majority strikes down 176-year-old abortion ban
The Wisconsin Supreme Court 's liberal majority struck down the state's 176-year-old abortion ban on Wednesday, ruling 4-3 that it was superseded by a newer state law that criminalizes abortions only after a fetus can survive outside the womb. State lawmakers adopted the ban in 1849, making it a felony when anyone other than the mother "intentionally destroys the life of an unborn child." It was in effect until 1973, when the U.S. Supreme Court's landmark Roe v. Wade decision legalizing abortion nationwide nullified it. Legislators never officially repealed the ban, however, and conservatives argued that the U.S. Supreme Court's 2022 decision to overturn Roe reactivated it. Wisconsin Attorney General Josh Kaul , a Democrat, filed a lawsuit that year arguing that the ban was trumped by abortion restrictions legislators enacted during the nearly half-century that Roe was in effect. Kaul specifically cited a 1985 law that essentially permits abortions until viability. Some babies can survive with medical help after 21 weeks of gestation. Sheboygan County District Attorney Joel Urmanski, a Republican, defended the ban in court, arguing that the 1849 ban could coexist with the newer abortion restrictions, just as different penalties for the same crime coexist. Live Events Dane County Circuit Judge Diane Schlipper ruled in 2023 that the 1849 ban outlaws feticide - which she defined as the killing of a fetus without the mother's consent - but not consensual abortions. Abortions have been available in the state since that ruling but the state Supreme Court decision gives providers and patients more certainty that abortions will remain legal in Wisconsin. Urmanski asked the state Supreme Court to overturn Schlipper's ruling without waiting for a decision from a lower appellate court. It was expected as soon as the justices took the case that they would overturn the ban. Liberals hold a 4-3 majority on the court and one of them, Janet Protasiewicz, openly stated on the campaign trail that she supports abortion rights . Democratic-backed Susan Crawford defeated conservative Brad Schimel for an open seat on the court in April, ensuring liberals will maintain their 4-3 edge until at least 2028. Crawford has not been sworn in yet and was not part of Wednesday's ruling. She'll play pivotal role, though, in a separate Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin lawsuit challenging the 1849 ban's constitutionality. The high court decided last year to take that case. It's still pending.
